Ain't It Cool News (www.aintitcool.com)
Movie News

Charles McGuire knocks MIAMI VICE around like a heroin stuffed pinata!

Hey folks, Harry here... this is the first time that I'm not really looking forward to a Michael Mann film. Of all the subject matters that I've craved his attention to be focused upon... Miami Vice - revisited wasn't one of them. I'd love to see Mann attack another period film, a fantasy, a sci fi flick, horror, suspense... maybe even a frickin' musical... but not his desperately eighties tv show.... which I loved back then... but has aged as badly as Don Johnson's sockless shoes he wore. I hope it's great - but I'm really kinda tired of these. To me - I'd rather Mann have made anything but this. Here ya go...

Last Thursday I managed to catch a free prescreening at Arizona Mills for an “upcoming R-rated summer blockbuster.” While in line, I was approached by a representative and was chosen to afterwards sit in on a panel to later discuss the movie. So, like any red-blooded American I excitedly entered the theater and quietly said a prayer for Snakes on a Plane. Just before the movie started they let us know we were watching Miami Vice (which for me was a double sting-you’re not watching Snakes on a Plane and you are Miami Vice). So, for the people out there looking forward to this movie, I thought I’d let you all know how it was.

When the movie started I decided to enjoy this for what it was, after all, I had the panel afterwards, and I would have to say something. Plus, there was always the hope that the movie I was about to see may honestly be good. That hope faded rather fast.

If I were to summarize the movie in a TV ad, I would probably use: Not as funny as Beverly Hills Cop, not as well done as Traffic, trying hard to be both: it’s Miami Vice.

The movie starts with lots of shots of fast boats, one of which is being driven by James “Sonny” Crockett (Colin Ferrell) and Ricardo Tubbs (Jamie Foxx) (one of my friends pointed out this is probably where the credits will be eventually be, so I forgive how long and how many of these boat shots there were…in this part of the movie, there were lots all over). Our heroes hop out of their boat and join their female fellow vice cops, who are trying to make a prostitution ring bust. They follow some evil pimps to a night club and after much squeezing through dancing people and hitting on bar maids we see one of the evil pimps slap a prostitute. This upsets Jamie (sorry, I know who Jamie Foxx is, I only know Ricardo Tubbs’ name because I just looked it up…I never watched the show) who is approaching the pimp to make a bust…but misses the elevator. A cell phone rings, someone is in trouble, this is very important, and the entire movie up to this point is dropped and never returned to. For someone who has just invested 20 to 30 minutes of my life in a movie that has not been that great thus far-this was a bit of a kick to the crotch.

Okay, here’s the real plot of the movie: In either the CIA, FBI, DEA, etc…someone has tipped off a drug lord about undercover agents (the caller from the opening was a tad upset about this as he was connected to this case and closely linked to a lot of now, or soon to be, dead people). To properly enforce drugs pushers, they need new undercover agents, but since they don’t know where the leak is, they needed to use an outside organization. They choose who else but a pair of cops from the vice squad of the Miami police department. So off to South America our heroes fly and already I’m thinking to myself, ‘I could sure go for some snakes in that plane.’

So here are my thoughts:

First and foremost, I need to point out that it started at 7:00 and ended at 10:00. Many of my overarching complaints about this movie revolve around that fact. I personally feel if I sit in a theater for 3 hours, I want to either see Scotland liberated, Frodo get 1/3 of the way to Mordor, or Leonardo DiCaprio die (nothing against him, I just feel one less attractive man in this world betters my chances). At this drawn out pace we are able to see such things as every gyration of three separate love scenes, people gazing at sunsets and one another, motorboats cruising (lots of cruising), plane flying (lots of flying) and gun battles in which you want to scream, please someone, anyone, get shot. I understand that this being a prescreening they have yet to cut it down to its final length, but there was so much fat that begged to be cut out, it really completely killed the movie as a whole.

Assuming that’s fixed I shall start with the good. There was some good action, speckled with outbursts of sudden, unexpected Saving Private Ryan-like violence. While I am not one who greatly enjoys horrific act of bloodshed, the occasional loss of Marvin in a back seat is kind of fun, and I must admit, here, it was a nice touch. There were some good points of humor, but I won’t delve into that too much as nothing sucks more than someone explaining a funny joke and then you having to watch what could have been a great unexpected scene. I thought Jamie Foxx did a fine job, and I especially respect that having last seen him in Collateral where he played such a loser. I wasn’t as much a fan of Colin Farrell, but that might simply because he makes some seriously retarded decisions.

Things that bugged me: Before you read this, you should know that I tend to overanalyze things, so if that’s not you, forgive me. One glaring thing I found humorously strange was at one point Jamie and Colin are undercover as drug trafficers and using fake identities. While talking to the drug lord, the drug lord mentions to Jaime, “that’s a beautiful wife you have” and Jamie later learns the drug lord has sent her flowers. Jamie talks to his wife and they decide this is no big deal as all the information the drug lord has, is all apart of their fake identities. Okay, Either A: The drug lord discovered your true identities and then found your wife in which it’s time to make peace with God, or B: You created a fake identity with a fake wife, who is played by your real wife that lives in your real home. I can’t help but think this might be a bad idea that could possibly come back to haunt you.

Other things include when you first meet the attractive female drug lord, they zoom in on her watch, later you meet the head of the drug organization, who is sitting next to above attractive drug lord, and the camera zooms in on their matching watches. That’s about it for the watches, leaving me not quite certain of the watches importance. Later Colin hits on and then sleeps with the attractive drug lord. To me would be like a runner getting a calf tattoo just before a race, not a good idea, and again, something that just might come back to haunt you.

Also, I must say the ending bothered me greatly, but out of respect for the film makers, I won’t go into it. I will say it left me desperately wanting some snakes on that boat.

Afterwards the panel was cancelled (thank you, as it is no fun to tell someone their child has cancer) so the only feedback they got from me was on a yellow double-sided piece of paper.

All the best,

Charles McGuire

Transient

Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • April 12, 2006, 5:52 p.m. CST

    by georges garvaren

  • April 12, 2006, 5:53 p.m. CST

    WOO!

    by LordOfTheThings

    Was this movie really necessary? I mean, talk about beating a dead horse. Oh, and... first?

  • April 12, 2006, 5:53 p.m. CST

    Ok, can we declare an amnesty on "snake on a ..."

    by chrth

    comments? I mean, seriously?

  • April 12, 2006, 5:53 p.m. CST

    where ever michael mann goes, i will follow

    by georges garvaren

    serious. i would.

  • April 12, 2006, 6:03 p.m. CST

    Probably not first because I actually read it..

    by Cotton McKnight

    but the only thing I have to say is this- I don't want to see this movie and Jamie Foxx didn't play a loser in collateral.

  • April 12, 2006, 6:06 p.m. CST

    is there really a movie called snakes on a plane?

    by slappy jones

  • April 12, 2006, 6:08 p.m. CST

    It's no LA Takedown

    by Mgmax

    Apparently Mann, though a brilliant director, has a finite number of ideas. A TV movie he did called LA Takedown was successfully expanded into Heat. Unfortunately people actually remember Miami Vice so he can't totally revamp it. Hopefully soon he will remake Band of the Hand and it will be an awesome 5-1/2 hours of cinema.

  • April 12, 2006, 6:12 p.m. CST

    I

    by Batutta

  • April 12, 2006, 6:16 p.m. CST

    Cotton McKnight is right.

    by mocky_puppet

    Jaime Foxx did not play a loser in collateral.

  • April 12, 2006, 6:20 p.m. CST

    Nosferatu Jones: GREAT IDEA!

    by Cray-1

    Please someone make a Max Headroom movie, I'm sure Matt Frewer could do with the cash these days. I see Tony Scott directing and Rob Lowe as the evil TV exec. With Seth Green in the role of Bryce, and Emmanuelle B

  • April 12, 2006, 6:24 p.m. CST

    "I never watched the show"

    by utz_world

    Credibility pass instantly revoked!

  • April 12, 2006, 6:27 p.m. CST

    Why Colin Ferrell?

    by Oceanlizard

    He keeps poping up in action films. Some people say he's talented and a lot of women say he's sexy. He looks like a wino and acts like a wino in every film I have seen him in. This film doesn't have a chance.

  • April 12, 2006, 6:27 p.m. CST

    MAX HEADROOM movie

    by Neo Zeed

    I'd pay serious dough to watch that flick!

  • April 12, 2006, 6:29 p.m. CST

    next up...Martin Scorsese tackles KNIGHT RIDER!

    by eppdude

  • April 12, 2006, 6:37 p.m. CST

    Ferrell=professional Irishman

    by John Dalmas

    Lookitmedrink! Lookitmesmoke! What a rogueish mess! Still, even with Finn McCool there, I look forward to anything Mann does, and I love him in the crime genre, and I'm gonna see this on opening day no matter what kind of reviews it gets. Also, I second the proposed Band-of-the-Hand remake.

  • April 12, 2006, 6:39 p.m. CST

    Umm... there already was a Max Headroom movie

    by Drunken Rage

  • April 12, 2006, 6:40 p.m. CST

    This would have been better with Scolari and Hanks

    by ChileanSeaBass

    I eman honestly they totally could pull this off, doesn't anyone else have my wisdom..I freakin love those guys!!

  • April 12, 2006, 6:53 p.m. CST

    if i sit in the theater for three hours

    by dr.bulber

    i xpect to see naomi watts naked. dammit.

  • April 12, 2006, 6:57 p.m. CST

    Thanks, Mocky_puppet.

    by Cotton McKnight

    It's just a passing comment in the review but I really think the guy misses the point if he calls Jamie Foxx a "loser" in Collateral. It was a fine character study and yeah, Max was an underachiever (Vincent's speech about how he could have rented a limo gets to me to this day), but he isn't a loser. He's actually pretty heroic. Some people achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon them. Max is in the latter category.

  • April 12, 2006, 7:27 p.m. CST

    Beverly Hills Cop?

    by REDD

    Why is this clown comparing a Michael Mann crime film to BHC? Refering to Traffic, I get that.

  • April 12, 2006, 7:44 p.m. CST

    And after Scorsese tackles Knight Rider...

    by DarthFloyd

    Frances Ford Coppola will direct The A-Team! Finally, not to be outdone, Jonathan Demme will take on Space: 1999!

  • April 12, 2006, 7:51 p.m. CST

    Phill Collins or bust!

    by seniormoogle

    There better be some delicious pastels, and scrumptuosly crappy 80's music, or I will be a little dissapointed. Plus, Don Johnson cannot be replaced.

  • April 12, 2006, 8 p.m. CST

    Actually Michael Bay doing Airwolf might work...

    by Cray-1

  • April 12, 2006, 8:19 p.m. CST

    Snakes On.....

    by onefalsemove

    I am so looking forward to Snakes On Serenity? Why isn't AICN covering that?

  • April 12, 2006, 8:33 p.m. CST

    Not to be too negative but

    by Evil Chicken

    This looks horrible. I might rent it for the Mystery Science Theater 3000 treatment, but other than that? Blah. Jamie Foxx is awesome but he needs more

  • April 12, 2006, 8:58 p.m. CST

    Perfect casting would've been...

    by blotter

    Matt Damon and Terrence Howard!!!

  • April 12, 2006, 9:04 p.m. CST

    There won't be snakes on a plane. . . .

    by Nice Marmot

    . . . but anybody who watched the show knows there should be an alligator on the boat. I think his name was Elvis. And I honestly hope none of you people prematurely ripping on this flick are Michael Mann fans. If you are one, you know that it will kick ass & the only similarity w/ the show will be the title & a few of the character's names. Even though its titled Miami Vice, its still a Michael Mann flick with cops & bad guys & no Muhammed Ali. It'll be great.

  • April 12, 2006, 9:12 p.m. CST

    "Maybe Even A Freakin Musical..."

    by GopherTrace

    Let's just everybody calm down.

  • April 12, 2006, 9:33 p.m. CST

    Mann still excites more than "Cars", "Nacho Libre",

    by indiephantom

    "Superman Returns" or any other film that's been pimped to death here lately. I'll take a visionary filmmaker every time. And BRYAN SINGER doesn't count. How many years ago was "The Usual Suspects"? The statute of limitations has expired. Mucho kudos to Mann for revisiting the material that made him famous and not making it all goofy...a la "Starsky & Hutch". This is "Vice" in name and attitude only. It looks better and smarter. Can't FUCKING WAIT. Haters go back to S'mores bars and "Prison Break" reruns. I want my Vice...mann.

  • April 12, 2006, 10:25 p.m. CST

    Ugh...

    by Kuj

    Are we so starved for stars that Colin Farrel is still being forcefed to us? So many men in movies these days are so soft and pretty that a guy like Farrel is sold as some rough and tumble mans man and people buy it. AND this is the guy who ruined BullsEye for me!

  • April 12, 2006, 10:35 p.m. CST

    Fake ID with real address? Real wife part of deception?

    by George Newman

    McGuire, you are not over-analyzing, that is just absolutely retarded. RE.TAR.DED.

  • April 12, 2006, 10:50 p.m. CST

    That being said, Mann's still in my top 3

    by George Newman

  • April 12, 2006, 11:48 p.m. CST

    People need to see Farrell's GOOD performances...

    by DirkVega

    before flatly dismissing him. Tigerland, A Home at the End of the World, Intermission, and The New World show his talent. I'm not saying he's a Redford, but it would be a little lame to only watch Legal Eagles, Indecent Proposal, and Up Close and Personal and then say, "Eh, that Redford is overrated.."

  • April 13, 2006, 2:19 a.m. CST

    MIAMI VICE

    by Batman_9

    actually, the t.v. show was serious. i enjoy it more now than i did when it was originally on because i'm old enough to pay attention to the dialouge and not just the boat chases. go back and watch a few episodes. it was always meant to be a serious portrayal of undercover narcotics cops in Miami. yes Crockett was arrogant and flambouyant but that was his character. just Tubbs was a more serious, laid back kinda guy. sure Crockett had a pet alligator named "Elvis" but thats because that paticular character wanted a pet alligator and he chose to name him Elvis. the style of the show was very flashy because the perception of the drug scene in Miami is flashy. it was 80's style flashy because, well it was set in the 80's. sure it seems cheesey now but that was not the case then. Mann created that show. he odviously has a personal love for the characters. if he wants to revisit that and update it into a modern set feature length film, its his perogative. personally i like it. just like i liked THE DUKES OF HAZZARD because it updated the premise into modern time while respecting the spirit of the show. i suspect MIAMI VICE will be a damn good cop drama with some action in it. now, seriously, bring on a damn KNIGHT RIDER film! we're all geeks here damnit, so why does a movie based on a show about a state of the art artificial intelligent suped up car driven by a loner who was left for dead but has returned to seek out justice sound like such a bad idea? "Knight Rider. A shadowy flight into the dangerous world of a man...who does not exist. Micheal Knight. A lone crusader on a quest to champion the cause of the innocent, the helpless, the powerless, in a world of criminals who operate above the law." sounds like fun to me.

  • April 13, 2006, 2:59 a.m. CST

    Nosferatu, ALL those sound like great ideas.

    by Lenny Nero

    MAX HEADROOM, SLEDGE HAMMER: THE MOTION PICTURE, HILL STREET BLUES '06. I'm there, motherfucker.

  • April 13, 2006, 5:54 a.m. CST

    K.I.T.T.

    by The Selecter

    Knight Industries THREE-thousand!!! I could get on board with that.

  • April 13, 2006, 6:08 a.m. CST

    Who really cares what Harry thinks. Honestly.

    by doobieflixx

    Great site but harry's reviews bite. He isn't very good. just like the Entourage guy who called Vince Aqua-fag.

  • April 13, 2006, 6:21 a.m. CST

    "this is the first time that I'm not really looking for

    by Trazadone

    Well it's a good thing that Mann doesn't care what you think, huh? I for one can't wait for this. I loved the show in the 80s and it holds up to this day. The style and action of Collateral was obviously influenced by Vice. Can't wait!

  • April 13, 2006, 6:24 a.m. CST

    "I never watched the show"

    by Trazadone

    Then you have no goddamn business offering any opinion on this.

  • April 13, 2006, 6:36 a.m. CST

    How Dare...

    by ZooTrain

    Michael Mann revisit his OWN property. The nerve! If it was another one of Hollywood's whipping boys, I'd be concerned. Here, I think it might be good because it's Mann's baby and he cares. I don't see it as a cynical cash-in, because from the looks of things, it doesn't look like a cash-in type of movie. And this is coming from the guy who really didn't care for the TV show. And to the Superman cynics...you're the same asshats who were bashing Batman this time last year. Either shut your yaps or go make your own movie.

  • April 13, 2006, 6:40 a.m. CST

    And another thing...

    by ZooTrain

    If they're going to update an 80's adventure show, I wish they'd pull "The Greatest American Hero" out of hiatus hell. I love the original show, but the effects are pretty hokey (but that was just the time). But I can't forgive the stunt doubles running around with blonde wigs. I just can't think of a good enough schlub to play Ralph Hinkley. I'd offer my suggestion for Bill Maxwell...but the people who are cooler than me will hurt my feelings.

  • April 13, 2006, 8:57 a.m. CST

    What BS...

    by brycemonkey

    I think it is wrong to say 'Unless you saw the original you can't comment on this'. That is bullshit. If it isn't a feature length episode, then it is a stand alone movie and needs to be judged accordingly. Also I was about 10 when Miami Vice was out, even younger for Starsky and Hutch and any other number of movies 'inspired' or otherwise form TV shows. So no-one who saw the original series is allowed to watch the movie? Get real.

  • April 13, 2006, 8:59 a.m. CST

    Michael Bay doing an Airwolf...Brillant!!!

    by Lost Skeleton

    Have the Airwolf crew fight Blue Thunder over the streets of L.A. and I am there.

  • April 13, 2006, 9:02 a.m. CST

    Also...

    by brycemonkey

    not so many Mann lovers now with a less than glowing review. I'll wait and see how this trurns out, hopefully it will continue Mann's improving trend of films. However, a voice in the back of my mind has a 24 year old studio exec green-lighting this because he was playing Grand Theft Auto: Vice City and thought it would be 'cool'. Hope I'm proved wrong. Peace.

  • April 13, 2006, 10:11 a.m. CST

    Colin Farrell

    by NeoCon

    How many more absolute duds does Colin Farrell have to make before he's taken off tha A-list? I think the guy is a pretty good actor and he seems like a nice enough guy, but enough is enough. Every movie he's been in since he became a "movie star" is absolute shit. Actors like Ben Affleck and John Travolta had about 10 year grace period of crappy movies before everyone collectively said "Enough!". I can't take another 8 or so years of shitty Colin Farrell movies being pudhed down my throat 2-3 times a year.

  • April 13, 2006, 10:39 a.m. CST

    The New World

    by CaptDanielRoe

    I dunno but I heard that one was kinda quality. I am not in league with Colin Farrel, but I wouldn't say all of his recent movies have quite matched your characterization. I'm still hoping for great things from Vice here.

  • April 13, 2006, 10:55 a.m. CST

    Re: The New World

    by NeoCon

    That movie was pretty much panned by the critics for having no substanance. Farrel's performance was beaten up because his character was under written (not his fault)and his accent was once again hurting. He does a flawless american accent but ironically, he seems to have trouble with the european ones. He's tried to make a couple of "important" movies (The New World, Alexander) that blew up in his face. Overall I feel he's become a "cash & dash" kind of actor since he became a star. The easiest shoots for the most amount of money.

  • April 13, 2006, 11:20 a.m. CST

    The Farrell...

    by brycemonkey

    I agree he has put in some really good work in Tigerland and Phone Booth. So much so that I changed my opinion of him from 'punk twat' to 'actually has some talent'. However, with shit like SWAT and Alexander I am starting to become a doubter. I haven't seen New World yet so can't say if the downward slide has stopped. You might be a bit harsh on the 'cash & dash' front there NeoCon. His last two finished movies Alexander and New World don't look like they were picnics to film. He still has a way to go yet before becoming the new Sean 'where's my money' Connery...

  • April 13, 2006, 11:26 a.m. CST

    CAMERON DOES AIRWOLF

    by kwisatzhaderach

    James Cameron to make Airwolf movie :) Existential character issues and raging action = cameron classic!!

  • April 13, 2006, 12:27 p.m. CST

    anchorite

    by brycemonkey

    So can you only watch Battle Star Galactica, Starsky & Hutch, Dukes of Hazzard, Mission Imposible, Scooby Doo, Serenity, Brady Bunch, Willy Wonka, (and many others) and now Miami Vice if you saw the original? That is nonsense, especially when the movie has been updated and only bears a passing resemblance to the original. Also if you see the list there are a lot of poor/average end products there. Makes me worried about Miami Vice...

  • April 13, 2006, 12:40 p.m. CST

    And yes...

    by brycemonkey

    it would be helpful to have someone who saw the original so they could mention it in their review. You also have to remember Miami Vice was '84-'89 so I was 7-12 years old when it came out and a lot of the posters/fanboys on this site are a lot younger than me...

  • April 13, 2006, 12:52 p.m. CST

    IT'S MICHAEL MANN PEOPLE!

    by Akira'sCrow

    If anyone thinks this is going to be some crappy action movie than you have zero concept of who Mann actually is. It's not an 80's period cop flick, it doesn't use the series as canon, the only similarities are the names and the job.

  • April 13, 2006, 1:22 p.m. CST

    whatever happened to Mann's planned adaptation...

    by beamish13

    of William Gibson's second novel COUNT ZERO? I bet it would be amazing.

  • April 13, 2006, 1:27 p.m. CST

    re: indiephantom

    by beamish13

    I couldn't agree more. I will probably never even see CARS or SUPERMAN, but I'll definitely see this. Okay, Farrell has made some poor films, but his work in NEW WORLD and THE WAR ZONE (probably the most terrifying film of the 1990's, IMO) are ace.

  • April 13, 2006, 2:17 p.m. CST

    You dontt have to have seen the original at the time!

    by Cray-1

    I actually did watch a fair few of the originals at the time even though I was about 10 or something. I can remember thinking how cool the testarossa was. But I've since watched it again on DVD, and it's fantastic. I think on AICN you're reviewing to fanboys, so you could do with having seen the originals. However it should stand up on its own obviously.

  • April 13, 2006, 2:18 p.m. CST

    They'd better have white jackets with the sleves rolled

    by Cray-1

  • April 13, 2006, 6:47 p.m. CST

    re: beamish13

    by indiephantom

    Brilliant! I saw the premiere of THE WAR ZONE at the Toronto film fest. What a screening that was! I haven't seen it in a long time and I had no idea until your post that Colin was in that one. The film is so disturbing and so damn well-made! Kudos to you for having great taste and a bit of useful trivia that makes me want to revisit that movie--soon.

  • April 14, 2006, 7:48 a.m. CST

    Since Miami Vice helped to define the 80's...

    by alucardvsdracula

    ...therein lies the problem. Regardless of how good this movie really is, anyone 'old enough' will have preconceptions about the movie based on their memories of growing up in the day-glow 80's. Starsky and Hutch for example was a key show of the 70's, but the (lame) movie version kept it within that camp time period. Since the Miami Vice movie isn't going for the kitch piss-take route, it's gonna be hard to convince the more cynical among us to take it seriously (in fact the show took itself too seriously sometimes to the point of pretention). Anyways, I am looking forward to this movie AND COULDN'T GIVE TWO FUCKS ABOUT THOSE SNAKES!!!!

  • April 14, 2006, 7:52 a.m. CST

    Oh, and another thing...

    by alucardvsdracula

    FUCKING CRAP REVIEW.

  • April 14, 2006, 11:13 p.m. CST

    I also saw this movie at Arizona Mills, Tempe

    by azsulsa

    Spoilers. You like to ruin BSG, so don't cry to me for ruining this crappy movie. The review sucked. The guy was an idiot for not knowing what movie it was. There were signs with the Universal logo right next to the Miami Vice movie poster. So, the movie was HORRIBLE. I loved the TV show. This movie would have made a great two hour episode somewhere in the 5th season of the show. You know, after they get a new car, start dressing differently, have the 8th episode with Valerie or Ricco's kid or Calderone's daughter that gave birth to Ricco's kid. You know, right when the show started to suck. The lead actress, Gong Li, was horrible! You couldn't understand a word she said. Also, how did a Chinese girl from Cuba (her aunt lived in Cuba, her mom was a surgeon in Cuba) become involved in this drug cartel? I doubt that the script was written for a Chinese actress, they must have just hired her for the heck of it. The story makes no sense, unless they have a sequel to it. The reviewer was right about how the firt 30 minutes of the movie end up meaning absolutely nothing. The final gun battle sucked! It reminded me of the Police Academy movies where people were five feet away from each other and couldn't shoot each other. The ending sucked. I guess it sets up a sequel. However, I don't care to see Gong Li in another movie for the rest of my life, and the person that played her boss/lover wasn't that great of an actor. Speaking of crappy actors, which except for Jamie Fox, the actress who plays his wife (he's married to Trudy in this movie), and the actress that portrays Gina (I can't remember if she is even called Gina in the movie), the rest of the cast SUCKS. Colin Farell sucks in the movie. Why? How many different accents do you need? No, they were used for different undercover roles, they were used for his main character. As I stated above, Gong Li was horrible. You can't understand a single word that she said. I didn't need to see her and Sonny having sex three times. It just slowed the plot. Did I mention how I can't figure out how she is from Cuba? Again, the script probably called for a cuban actress, they decided to get Gong Li instead. I know I'm all over the place. But hey, at least I'm not one of those fake reviewers that are used here at ainitcool to bolster a movie before it comes out. You guys know what I'm talking about. At least I'm not trying to review a movie based on the poster! Just like what happened to the last Cameron Crowe film, you know, The rip off of the Zach Braff film. Ok, sorry.... Miami Vice sucked. First 1/3 of the movie- useless because they never came back to it. Action at the end sucked. There is even a scene where a guy blows up a house in Florida, even though he is somewhere in South America. He can do this because of all of the surveillance that he has on this house. However, he doesn't start using the surveillance until after the cops have rescued the girl. Why the hell isn't he paying attention to the house when he knows that there are important things going on in the house? If he had, he would have known that Sonny and Tubbs were cops. I still don't know why he didn't figure out that they were cops after that though, since the police showed up rather quickly. Ok, Ok... I'm just trying to save you a lot of money on this movie. Just wait until you can get it from piratebay or some other torrent system. Peace Out, F-Jackie, WHRDA sucks, Yankees Suck, but Red Sox suck more. I was at games 1, 2, and 7, of the 2001 World Series, awesome games!

  • April 17, 2006, 2:48 p.m. CST

    Worst review ever...

    by Winkleboy

    This bellend was obviously looking forward to snakes biting people and Sam Jackson shouting "motherfucking snakes"...The new Michael Mann movie all be it a tv adaptation is not something i wouldve expected someone in that position to have enjoyed....Harry you should have more respect for Mann, whilst i realise your just voicing your opinion you just brushed this off...A FUCKING MICHAEL MANN MOVIE!!! The guys one of the finest directors working today.... snakes on a fuckin plane. Jesus fuckin christ some of you people are idiots.