Logo

Cool News

Art yesterday, film images today... PAN'S LABYRINTH. Damn this looks cool!

Published at:  Feb 22, 2006 5:46:03 AM CST

SPOILER ALERT !!

Hey folks, Harry here... our foreign friend, MathesonLegends sent a second set of pics from that European Magazine involving PAN'S LABYRINTH... only while that first set was some of the legendary stunning artwork of William Stout... Here we have images from the actual film. And damn if this doesn't look amazing. The story is essentially that of... no, you shouldn't know the story. Just know that it set in the Spanish Civil War period again and involves the phantasmagorical and a little girl. And this isn't just one of those sweet fairy tales... this is one of those other fairy tales - and it's sweet in its way... like the way blood tastes from an accidental cut. You'll see. Let's get to the pics...
















































    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 5:48:54 AM CST

    First...

    by foxman

    Come on!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 5:50:33 AM CST

    Pan looks coool...

    by det. john kimble

    The others look like leftovers from a Hellraiser sequel. Is the fleshy dude supposed to be the Nerve Ghost?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 6:02:42 AM CST

    What exactly does this have to do with Peter?

    by moondoggy2u

    I am really getting tired of these sequels.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 6:04:21 AM CST

    AHHH THE SUFFERING!!

    by moondoggy2u

  • Feb 22, 2006 6:15:40 AM CST

    Angry goat!

    by mallestarion

    Ohh that goat sure looks angry!

    What whas the news about again??

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 7:03:57 AM CST

    no, this looks terrible

    by normal-guy

    It's a complete shame how you promote crap for your "friends" while slamming other things. I don't see how you can say that these pictures look cool and build up any type of excitement for this crappy looking flick.

    This is going to be worse than that crap Blade 2 movie that is completely unwatchable!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 7:04:23 AM CST

    no, this looks terrible

    by normal-guy

    It's a complete shame how you promote crap for your "friends" while slamming other things. I don't see how you can say that these pictures look cool and build up any type of excitement for this crappy looking flick.

    This is going to be worse than that crap Blade 2 movie that is completely unwatchable!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 7:17:45 AM CST

    nice pics

    by kizeesh

    Looks good. I particularly like the look of the eye-less demon.
    This is the sort of nightmarish quality that hollywood horror usually lacks, favouring flashy effects and thing being black and poorly lit.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 7:19:00 AM CST

    it looks good.

    by superb0nb0n

    I have to say, this looks better than Blade 2 and Hellboy!. looking forward to it!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 7:29:51 AM CST

    Is this subtitled and spoken in spanish??

    by nomad202

    I dont think I could handle another movie with badly-acted voice overs *having flash backs of "High Tension"...* This looks good but the voice-overs are gonna pull me out of the "illusion".

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 7:35:20 AM CST

    Subtitles

    by c4andmore

    I agree, dubbing sure ruins a movie, however, the dubbing for "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon" actually explained more of the story than the subtitles, but I blame that more on the subs than vice-versa. The only films that should be allowed to be dubbed are bad bad bad kung fu movies, because that just makes them funnier.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 7:41:01 AM CST

    I still say the film's costumes look like something

    by moondoggy2u

  • Feb 22, 2006 7:41:38 AM CST

    I still say the film's costumes look like something

    by moondoggy2u

    out of labrynth.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 7:42:26 AM CST

    oops, i meant to say Legend. oh well

    by moondoggy2u

  • Feb 22, 2006 7:48:18 AM CST

    I hate the way AICN writers are impressed sometimes...

    by orionsangels

    Because they're not gamers and don't realize alot of this stuff is taken from video games. Harry's like, wow that's original. No it's not. That looks like the game, the suffering.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 7:56:31 AM CST

    It looks like it will be another memorable Fantasy film

    by the 12th monkey

    Movie looks like it will be awesome, and knowing Guillermo it will be something special. His movies always improve from one to the other, and it looks like this time he just uped the ante. Those pics are fantastic!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 7:58:40 AM CST

    orionsangels

    by occams_razor

    So where in the suffering do you fight a centaur/dryad looking guy?
    The eyeless dude kinda looks like those blade demons from the suffering but loosely at best. Yeah, I don't think they pulled this stuff from the suffering.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 8:06:40 AM CST

    occams_razor

    by moondoggy2u

    Actually, when i said ahhh, the suffering, i was referring to hellraiser. You gotta admit, there is a certain hellraiser feel to it, isnt there? Still, I say it looks pretty cool. Teenage cool, but nifty nonetheless

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 8:27:51 AM CST

    Chick is hot

    by uncle_les

    I mean, uh... looks cool, yeah!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 8:38:13 AM CST

    whoa

    by rabban

    lopoks like a great flick to me!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 8:43:26 AM CST

    no subject

    by rabban

    damn typos...i can't wait to see a new dark fantasy film...first flick i remember seeing like this was legend...and i liked it..and then nightbreed which hurts cause it got a lot right and a lot wrong...anyways...and while the setup sounds like labyrinth i can't wait to see the details that make it different!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 8:56:01 AM CST

    normal-guy

    by killah_mate

    "This is going to be worse than that crap Blade 2 movie that is completely unwatchable!!" -- Dude, you really crapped on your credibility with that one. I suppose you also think Underworld is hot shit or something.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 9:55:40 AM CST

    moondoggy2u

    by occams_razor

    I was refering to orionsangels post about the movie looking like something from the suffering. Yeah, I can see the hellraiser vibe going on there with the guy with the eyes in the palms of his hands. I just don't see the suffering reference but none the less, I hope this is a good as it looks.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 9:56:25 AM CST

    Re: no, this looks terrible

    by machinaman

    I don't know what version of Blade 2 you saw (perhaps the David Goyer edited version) because that movie not only rocked, but was the best of the trilogy.

    And I have gotta agree with Killah_Mate on this one, normal-guy. To attack a film with serious balls like Blade 2(without any real justification) shows how little your view is worth.

    You may not be a fan of Guillermo del Toro's work, but it's undeniable that he is a man of vision, and that his films tend to bring fresh ideas to traditional subject like vampires (Chronos) and the ghost story (The Devil's Backbone).

    I also expect that Pan's Labyrinth will take us to places that Jim Henson's Labyrith only hinted at, despite posts that dwell on the relatively minor things, like the resemblance of character(s) in one film with characters in the other.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 10:07:49 AM CST

    If you're a Del Toro hater...

    by 3 bag enema

    ...you have absolutely no taste whatsoever. I can hardly wait to see this at the Drafthouse. Heaven.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 10:22:36 AM CST

    I like the look of the girl character

    by mutant leader



    She looks to me like a
    literate, *substantive* character
    . . .and those are always my
    favorites. Looking forward to this. :)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 10:40:11 AM CST

    Uh, If The Tree Was A You-Know-What

    by captdanielroe

    Then that old looking dude is a you-know-what-else. Grody to the max, but artful.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 10:55:43 AM CST

    don't defend them occams_razor

    by orionsangels

    You're not on their payroll. bottom line is we've all seen too much at this point to be impressed by this.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 10:59:54 AM CST

    looks weird

    by acroyear77

    What is this, a Hellraiser movie?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 11:01:56 AM CST

    It's not identical, but it has that vibe from suffering

    by orionsangels

    http://www.playstationpro2.com/images/2003/5/the_suffering1.jpg --- also borrowing from silent hill --- http://www.itsonlyamovie.co.uk/NEW%20WALLPAPER%203/SILENT%20HILL%20WALLPAPER%202.jpg

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 11:31:59 AM CST

    I don't think that thing is eyeless.......

    by dallas1701d

    Just look at the palm of it's hand ..................

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 11:43:30 AM CST

    A movie ripped off a video game?

    by frankenbastard

    Actually, I am a

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 12:26:21 PM CST

    No, really, Blade 2 sucked

    by potvsktl

    All of them did.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 1:14:54 PM CST

    Truly can't wait to see this!

    by immortal_fish

    Trying to keep myself blissfully ignorant, but can't help peeking at the pics. Looks like Del Toro is taking cues from Clive Barker.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 1:20:17 PM CST

    Brodester, "throw away fantasy"

    by immortal_fish

    If you consider those flicks dreck, then what do you consider good fantasy? Not a flame and I agree with you about RETURN TO OZ, but the other three you mentioned were fantastic in my opinion.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 1:42:59 PM CST

    Orionsangels

    by occams_razor

    And suffering has the hellraiser vibe and hellraiser has something else's vibe. I'm sure the focal point of creativity all started when a cave man farted and we are all just copying off of that. Regardless, it looks good and I'll try to see it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 2:29:55 PM CST

    Actually, that cave man coppied that routine

    by moondoggy2u

    from a sabertooth cat next cave over. I read it in wikipedia

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 3:28:35 PM CST

    seriously??

    by normal-guy

    I don't know, maybe the Blade 2 I saw about the reapers with the piss-poor, absolutely terrible cgi was different than the one you people are spewing over. It was just on again the other day and I really had to laugh at how terrible the special effects are.

    Oh wait, why am I responding! That's probably just Harry signing on with a different name to back up his love-buddies movies again.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 4:22:51 PM CST

    No occams_razor

    by orionsangels

    hellraiser had it's own thing going. I'd say the movie seven or nine inch nails video has more in common. it's those filthy rooms, that house a big tub sink and the walls and ground seem to be stained in blood. the film has scratches and jumps a bit. that disturbing look. that started in the 90s

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 4:34:43 PM CST

    pretty nifty trailor. Congrats to Olorin.ofthewest

    by moondoggy2u

    You just did more snoop work than the bozos in charge of this site. That thing had been out the whole time and said morons were busy giving us pencil sketches. I swear to G-d I'm gonna give up this site if it keeps up like this! Oh, and the trailer was cool. The Grudge sound effects were a bit much, but otherwise interesting.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 4:39:19 PM CST

    Course, I also got a hunch that it was deliberate

    by moondoggy2u

    I'll betcha that dollars to donuts that harry intentionally did it. First, the sketches to get us interested. Then *surprise* stills that magically appear the next day (today). Tommorrow, the trailor will be presented. Its a way to pique interest in a film like this. I wouldnt put it past Harry with his history of pimping for del Torro. either that, or they were just dicking around and mismanaging this site for a the past few days. Take your pick.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 5:38:32 PM CST

    trailer

    by whatyoufear

    it's not this one is it?
    http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=22115

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 5:44:15 PM CST

    moondoggy2u

    by whatyoufear

    is now deemed the official unscoopable asshat of the talkbacks.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 5:52:40 PM CST

    whatyoufear

    by moondoggy2u

    Well, can you blame me for thinking that, whatyoufear? For crying out loud, if the trailor is out, than why the hooplah over stills that are directly from the fucking trailor??? I can't help it this site is displaying things in a bass ackwards manner. What do you expect me or others who have never even heard of this flick to think? jerk

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 5:54:07 PM CST

    oops

    by moondoggy2u

    I meant to say what do you expect me, or others, to think when we have never heard of this movie? jerk comment still stands, though

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 6:02:17 PM CST

    idiot

    by whatyoufear

    if you had taken the time to read the actual article, it is clearly stated that these new stills were taken from a magazine- NOT the trailer that was mentioned on JANUARY 3RD. and it is TRAILER with a fucking E.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 6:05:09 PM CST

    looks cool

    by frank cotton

    to me- i'm betting the goat creature is an update of the drawing, judging by its wooden arms, and the other thing looks to have one eye in the center of its head, altho i guess it could be a mouth. and seriously, some of you assholes are just never going to be happy with anything.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 6:35:18 PM CST

    thank you, whatyoufear, for proving my jerk comment.

    by moondoggy2u

    I swear, nothing more rude than an anal retentive webster wannabe. And if you check out those stills from the magazine, they are directly lifted from the trailer. Or did you watch it?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 8:05:48 PM CST

    moondoggy jones and the 4th grade reading level

    by whatyoufear

    at least now you can tell everyone you were taught the correct spelling of the word "trailer" by an anal retentive webster wannabe jerk. unscoopable asshat comment still stands, though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 8:21:23 PM CST

    what you fear

    by moondoggy2u

    glad to see satisfaction is always one of perspective. I wish you look in your quest to prove yourself correct through catching the spelling errors made from people who could honestly care less. But hey, son, whatever floats your boat.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 8:27:29 PM CST

    Oh no, I wrote look instead of "luck."

    by moondoggy2u

    Quick, call captain anal, err..whatyoufear. Feel free to critique my post for all spelling and grammatical errors. Be sure to check out those split- infinitives, too. They can be tricky;) Oh, and when you have found sufficient time to create and properly edit a comeback, try to be original and not simply rework my own post. Thorst sort of I toddler style imitation only goes so far. But hey, what do I know? I spell words wrong, right?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 8:29:40 PM CST

    hmmm, thorst intead of those. I guess I failed in my

    by moondoggy2u

    argument. *sigh* I'm hopeless.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 8:50:06 PM CST

    PS

    by whatyoufear

    those stills are nowhere to be seen in the trailer we have been discussing. fancy that! i wish i could quit you.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 22, 2006 10:00:12 PM CST

    Eye-palmed fleshy guy

    by old gregg

    Is that jelly made out of blood on his table? Cos it sure looks like it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 23, 2006 12:32:52 AM CST

    hmm

    by rabban

    it just seems to me that there is a mixed bag of people out there that don't like films that are fancifull and fun. i actually bumped into somebody in the real world who can not stand legend. the movie won an academy award and though that means little now it's movies like legend and labyrinth that allowed lord of the rings to be made...it's like the homophobic guys that are tested for positive sexual reactions to gay porn and they liked it lol...only worse...these guys think fantasy films = children movies which = immature children's cartoons...and i say that's bullshidt posturing. if you can't enjoy movies like that then chances are you got some serious emotional problems...mythology is supposed to help send messages that are serious but covered with the trappings of surreal images...most crap out there.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2006 7:55:52 AM CST

    normal-guy

    by killah_mate

    I agree that about two or three scenes in the movies had bad CGI (the digital doubles), but the rest was, in fact, I'm sorry to say, awesome. Especially considering the budget they had to work with. The CGI doesn't have to be perfect to be cool - that's why I'll enjoy the Blade II effects many more times, while I have no intention of seeing Revenge of the Sith more than the once. In any case, the quality of the CGI does not determine the quality of the movie - that's why they're called "movies" and not "FX reels". (Case in point - Revenge of the Sith)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2006 9:55:07 AM CST

    Movies like this must get made...

    by hellhouse

    otherwise all we'll have is a lot of crap like When A Stranger Calls and Freedomland clogging up the theaters. And freinds, there is no plunger big enough.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 26, 2006 2:40:40 AM CST

    I can't wait

    by cerebulon

    This movie looks awesome so far and weird as all get out. I hope Del Toro doesn't hold back and we get the weirdest sickest fantasy movie ever. I'm glad they are getting away from excessive CGI. It's not needed as much as a good story line is. I personally think these critters look like some of Wayne D. Barlowe's art myself... but then, who really cares. Everything is a mimicry of something else.. you might as well blame the concept artist for ripping off goats! "Yuck, goats that's like so done! I remember goats at old McDonald's farm - he totally ripped that off! Gee Whiz!" Go Toro!!!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback