Logo

Cool News

AICN-D: Serial killer flick TENDERNESS, Ang Lee's BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN and more!!!

Published at:  Nov 21, 2005 4:39:04 PM CST

Ahoy, squirts! Quint here to introduce our man from the land downunder, Latauro. He's go the skinny for you folks on the goings on in his neck of the woods. Enjoy!



You don't go up there to fish.



AICN-DOWNUNDER



A few weeks ago, there was a report about the failed proposal by local distributors to get a giant ad for KING KONG placed upon St Paul's cathedral in Melbourne.



The church, which sits on the corner of Flinders and Swanston in the very heart of the city, has been under renovations for some time, and is still yet to raise the remaining funds needed to complete the work. Alas, the ad -- which would have seen a picture of the giant monkey sitting upon the spire -- was rejected.



Now, as much as I like impressive advertising, I wanted this to go through for other reasons. Can you imagine how amusingly this would have symbolised the whole Intelligent Design vs Evolution argument? Sure, it wouldn't have solved anything, but it would have brought a smile to my face.



And that's really all that's important.



NEWS



John Polson (SWIMF@N, HIDE AND SEEK -- also, played the "Australian" in M:I-2; never forget that) will return to Australia to direct an adaptation of Robert Cormier's teenage serial killer novel. The film, TENDERNESS, will begin shooting in early 2006.



Um, that's all.



AWARDS AND FESTIVALS



EUROPEAN FILM AWARDS



Critically-acclaimed Australian film LOOK BOTH WAYS is up for the Best Non-European Film at this year's ceremony. It's competing against GOOD NIGHT AND GOOD LUCK, THE CONSTANT GARDENER, BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN, and CRASH.



2005 FILM CRITICS CIRCLE OF AUSTRALIA



The stuffy, latte-drinking, black skivvy-wearing, hygiene-free, unattractive, couldn't-get-a-job-making-so-they-got-a-job-criticising film snobs of Australia (who, on a completely unrelated note, haven't invited me to join), voted Sarah Watt's LOOK BOTH WAYS Best Film. Watts also picked up Best Director and Best Original Screenplay, with Best Actor in a Lead Role going to William McInnes and Best Editor to Denise Haratzis for their work on the same film. LITTLE FISH got the other acting awards, with Best Actress in a Leading Role going to Cate Blanchett, Best Supporting Actor to Hugo Weaving, and Best Supporting Actress to Noni Hazlehurst. THE PROPOSITION collected Best Score for Nick Cave and Warren Ellis, and Best Cinematography for Benoit Delhomme. Best Adapted Screenplay went to Robert Connolly and Elliot Perlman for THREE DOLLARS.



BOX OFFICE



Gotta say, the box office is not looking nearly as bad as it usually does. Sure, there's a derivative Hollywood thriller and an unnecessary Jane Austin adaptation, but WOLF CREEK is still number two, KISS KISS is on the list (even if it deserves to be higher), and ELIZABETHTOWN -- which, despite the occasional misstep, is really good -- sits pretty in the middle.



1. FLIGHTPLAN

2. WOLF CREEK

3. ELIZABETHTOWN

4. PRIDE AND PREJUDICE

5. KISS KISS BANG BANG



RELEASED THIS WEEK



"Gerbil" -- G-E-R-B-I-L -- "Gerbil", Ralph Fiennes finds some work for his younger brother, Helena Bonham-Carter is subject to the most elaborate spousal practical joke ever ("Helena Bonham-Carter IS Tim Burton's Corpse Bride!"), the mathematical sequel to Aronofski's PI goes colour, and Leigh Whannell disposes of the subtitle "HACKSAW" just to avoid paying me royalties.



BEE SEASON

THE CONSTANT GARDENER

THE CORPSE BRIDE

PRIME

SAW II



REVIEWS



BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN



Mr Eric Cartmen of South Park, Colorado, you were so close. When you said that independent movies were boring because they just featured gay cowboys eating pudding, you only got it a little wrong. If this movie had featured scenes where pudding was eaten, I might have been able to sit through it a little more comfortably.



This is going to be a tough review to write. I was furious during the movie for reasons I'll go into soon, but I've softened somewhat in the days since the screening. Tell you what: I'll first review the film as I saw it last Wednesday.



Last week I accused Francois Ozon's 5X2 of being the most sinfully boring film of the year. Sitting through BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN made me feel like Ozon was McG. At first I loved the slow pace. I like a film that makes the audience work a little bit. I also love Ang Lee films; THE ICE STORM is a work of art, and I'm even one of the few who adored HULK. He's a brilliant director who paints portraits of his characters with the smallest brush strokes, chipping away at their facades, and blowing away online film critics to such an extent that they're quite happy to mix metaphors.



I thought BROKEBACK was going to be like this; a slow burn film that reached a climax that Eastwood could only dream of. The thing is, to have a slow burn you need some substance TO burn. You can't have an entire film built on subtext. SUBtext lives underneath the story; if there's no story, then all you have is a series of ponderous scenes and some closing titles.



I may have trashed 5X2, but at least it was ninety minutes long. In BROKEBACK, I started looking at my watch at the seventy minute mark. At ninety minutes, I couldn't believe we were still in there. At two hours, I was ready to walk out. If it hadn't been for the fact that I was up the front and was afraid of being judged by the theatre full of critics behind me, I'd have been out of there, no question. No, I stayed for the entire two hours and ten minutes, praying that we'd eventually reach a point. I rarely get furious in movies. If something's really that bad, I usually just get bored. It takes a lot for a film to make me angry, and this one did. I was seething at how unnecessarily ponderous the film was, and aghast at how Ang Lee -- a master filmmaker -- could not have realised this.



After BROTHERS GRIMM last week, I have to ask: is Heath Ledger a bad luck charm? I hope not. The best thing about BROKEBACK is his performance. He finally shows the talent I'd suspected he'd always had, and, like compatriot Hugh Jackman, gives a great performance in an unworthy film.



Jake Gyllenhaal makes an effort, but is fairly miscast. He doesn't quite sell himself as the outdoors bloke who grew up around rodeos. There's something so fragile and delicate about him, and I don't mean the fragility and delicateness in the scenes where he's supposed to display these characteristics. He maintains these traits throughout scenes he clearly wasn't supposed to. You can see him acting.



The big central issues -- the attraction these two have for one another -- seems a little thrown away. Perhaps this film needed to be directed by a woman... or a gay man, for that matter. At no point did I believe the mutual attraction. I certainly bought Gyllenhaal's attraction to Ledger, but it's a one way street. Ledger's transformation seems to be as simple as flicking a switch, and just didn't fit in with the character at all. I don't buy the argument that as a straight male, I wouldn't "get" the attraction either. I can see a romantic comedy and completely understand why the girl is attracted to the guy. I get why David and Keith are attracted to each other in SIX FEET UNDER. It's all in the chemistry and the direction. If you're going to hire someone to sell that attraction, you get Ang Lee. So why did he drop the ball?



I don't know. And, after an hour, I didn't care.



In the closing credits, we discover this was adapted from a "Short story" by Annie Proulx. I think "short" is the important word here. I haven't read her story, but it's clear that Proulx didn't feel the need to ramble on for an infinite number of pages. Why stretch the film out so long? Why have so many unnecessary characters and subplots? Why do we need to see one of the most phenomenally cliched scenes in history (Gyllenhaal teaches his father in law a "lesson", while the audience is expected to cheer) inserted randomly into the film?



As I said, I've softened on the film somewhat. Hearing others talk it up has certainly made me feel like I've missed something, but my instincts tell me otherwise. I do feel like I should go with my initial feelings on the film. It's a rambling, plotless film that believes itself to be a solemn treatise on the pitfalls of forbidden love. Even the brief-but-worth-the-wait nudity of Anne Hathaway and Michelle Williams can't sway me from my recommendations: avoid this film.



NEXT WEEK



- James Cameron once again combines his love of big action spectaculars with soppy romances, with BRIEF ENCOUNTERS OF THE THIRD KIND



- Ben Affleck kicks off his comeback by signing on to Robert Ludlum's THE CHARACTER NAME ABSTRACT NOUN



- Never ones to miss a bandwagon, Fox signs DJ Qualls to play a strange young boy living in small town America in Peter Segal's GENGHIS GUNPOWDER



Go the Socceroos!



Latauro





    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Nov 21, 2005 4:44:34 PM CST

    first

    by chief redcock

  • Nov 21, 2005 4:47:35 PM CST

    brokeback mountain looks intriguing...

    by chief redcock

    really want to see that one. i'm glad a movie about a gay relationship with high profile actors and mainstream production values is being made... so rare that that happens. and to those waiting to make homophobic comments about this thread.... i'd like to say in advance, FUCK YOU ALL. homophobes are just geeks who are unable to score with women and are overcompensating. GEEKS. on a completely unrelated note, i'm totally jazzed about being first... only in america.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 21, 2005 4:55:01 PM CST

    Ben Afflecks career has been 1 big joke.

    by josh town

    His last 5 films: Surviving Christmas, Jersey Girl, Paycheck, Gigli, and Daredevil. Is this guy serious. I just looked at his resume at imdb.com. What a shame. So I ask, You proclaim his next film is his comeback, his comeback from what? He never was anything to begin with.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 21, 2005 5:04:50 PM CST

    I thought Larry McMurtry

    by quin the eskimo

    wrote brokeback mountain

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 21, 2005 5:24:38 PM CST

    Weird....

    by vinceklortho

    I've heard nothing but good things about Brokeback Mountain. This guy tells us to avoid it? Hmmm.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 21, 2005 5:52:59 PM CST

    ummm..isnt ang lee gay?

    by sosguy74

    i thought he was.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 21, 2005 6:10:39 PM CST

    Anne Hathaway SHOWS?!

    by artsnob

    I'm there! Boy, I can't wait to do a "Tyler Durden" with this scene, splicing it into a copies of THE PRINCESS DIARIES and ELLA ENCHANTED!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 21, 2005 6:37:54 PM CST

    Josh Town, you ignorant slut.

    by roook

    The Afflec bit is a joke, as is that whole segment. Brokeback looked boring but with this Anne revelation, I'm in. And yes, that can make an entire movie...c.f. Katie Holmes and The Gift.
    --GeeseAplenty.com

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 21, 2005 7:10:50 PM CST

    THE CHARACTER NAME ABSTRACT NOUN owns

    by frietag

    I can't wait till it comes out at Soulless Megaplex 20 down on Jampacked Fourlane Road.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 21, 2005 8:37:22 PM CST

    sosguy74

    by aikimoe

    Ang Lee has a wife and a few kids. That doesn't mean he's not gay, but I've no reason to think he is.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 21, 2005 8:37:37 PM CST

    not that there's anything wrong with that!

    by aikimoe

  • Nov 21, 2005 10:00:16 PM CST

    George Takei will own your ass !!!

    by jesuschrist

    Your brokeback ass! Yeehah!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 21, 2005 10:44:33 PM CST

    Quin: McMurtry co-wrote the script.

    by barry egan

    The movie based on a short story, so McMurtry may have invented a lot of the plot points. Lonesome Dove rules.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2005 12:59:02 AM CST

    I read Tenderness 3 years ago

    by giftedinthepants

    Simplistic yet a sad book.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2005 1:08:37 AM CST

    Was "Brokeback Mountain" a porn movie script that landed on an i

    by burnhollywood

    First there's that name...then there's the two guys conveniently alone in the mountains (about as subtle as a pizza delivery in a hetero porn flick). When do the rest of the Village People get a shot? What about "Leather Man"...what's his story? Get the Weinsteins on the phone!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2005 6:59:37 AM CST

    I actually...

    by halloween68

    Quite liked BROTHERS GRIMM. Granted it is the lesser of the works which make up Terry Gilliam's film career. But in its on right, I thought it was a pretty entertaining flick. And as opposed to what you proclaimed last week -- you must not be much of a Terry Gilliam fan if you didn't see any Gilliam in that film. The look, the humor, the dialog, as well as the presense of Jonathon Price, made this very much a Terry Gilliam film. Again, it's no BRAZIL or FEAR AND LOATHING. But it is close to being up there with BARON VON MUNCHAUSEN and JABBERWOCKY. Sure, you can see the interference of the studios. You can tell the film uncharacteristically (of Gilliam) sells out in certain instances. But on the whole, it's still a Gilliam film.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2005 7:58:58 AM CST

    So Does Anyone Actually Break Their Back On The Mountain?

    by iammrmonkey

    I was just wondering.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2005 9:02:33 AM CST

    just saw Kiss Kiss Bang Bang

    by cherub rock

    it's pretty good. Black humour is usually my cup of tea and this movie had an extra-strong streak of it

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2005 2:17:43 PM CST

    Actually, I'm a pretty big Gilliam fan...

    by latauro

    ...and that film looked like someone trying to emulate Gilliam. Badly. It had all the superficial stuff you think of when you picture a Gilliam film (fantastical images, short people, Jonathan Pryce), but without the depth that Gilliam always infuses.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2005 3:57:20 PM CST

    To avoid...

    by gluecifer

    Brokeback mountain?

    Well, fuck you, man, but I'll avoid your reviews in the future!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2005 5:37:22 PM CST

    You know what I love about loser like you, Gluecifer?

    by latauro

    I went to an advance screening of a film that turned out to be one of the dullest 2+ hours of my life. I then spend hours writing my column -- which I do out of love, it's not a paid position -- to warn other moviegoers of a potentially bad experience. Those who read my reviews regularly will know if they generally agree with me or not. If you find your opinion typically matches my own, you may want to avoid any film I negatively review. If, however, you never agree with me, any negative review I give a film should be a strong endorsement for you to see it. When pathetic morons like yourself log on to respond with a "fuck you", it doesn't hurt my feelings in the slightest. I just roll my eyes at the time I've wasted reading your worthless comments. Like my review, this post can be taken as a suggestion of what to do or what not to do in the future. Do with it what you will. But for the love of God, grow up and try to contribute something meaningful to society.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 26, 2005 7:19:36 PM CST

    Kiss Kiss Bang Bang might be one of the most entertaining movies

    by moviemaniac-7

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback