Ain't It Cool News (www.aintitcool.com)
Movie News

One reviewer says you're doomed if you see DOOM!

Ahoy, squirts! Quint here. I really want DOOM to be a fun, kick-ass mostersploitation flick. I think it's really fuckin' funny how the studio took the one well received bit from their Comic-Con presentation (the much touted First-Person-Shooter sequence) and designed their WHOLE marketing campaign around it. Looking at the trailers and posters for DOOM, you'd never know The Rock or Karl Urban starred in the movie. The star is that FPS sequence, apparently. I'm still eagerly awaiting to see this flick. I understand it might blow donkeys for quarters, but it also just might make me smile. But it sure as shit didn't make this below reviewer smile. Enjoy the dissection below!

Hey Harry,

I managed to see a preview screening of Doom yesterday (Wednesday, October 12th) here in Miami, Florida at the AMC Sunset Theatres. Here's the review if you care, it is rather different from the one you ran yesterday, so I hope that makes it more interesting:

I saw a sneak preview screening of “Doom” last night and even though I held out hope that it might be a fun ride, it turned out to be just as miserable as most of the other video game adaptations that have come out over the past few years. Cheap, ugly, and painfully boring are the best words to describe this film, and to make things worse no cheap horror cliché is left unturned in its, overly long, running time. I guess I shouldn’t have expected more, what with Andrzej Bartkowiak at the helm. I mean, this is the same guy that directed the American, Jet Li treasures, “Romeo Must Die” and “Cradle 2 the Grave” (yeah, it’s with a “2”), so he hasn’t really proven himself to be a master of cinema. But still, a man can hope can’t he?

Well, no, I guess he can’t, because “Doom” is just plain awful all around, even though it is definitely “R” rated with a good amount of swear words and gore thrown in for good measure. The problem, though, is that the gore is never particularly inspired and is usually hidden by bad lighting and bad camerawork that plague the whole movie overall. But we’ll get back to that later, for now, if you want to know how bad the movie gets, let’s just say that by the time “The Rock” stands up and yells “Semper Fi Motherf***er”, I think we all knew we were in a lot of trouble.

Set in the near future (is there any other in movies these days?) “Doom’s” plot begins with a monster rampaging through a research facility on Mars. Soon after, Earth receives a distress call from the terrified scientists holed up with the unknown. In response, a team of Marines is sent to Mars to investigate the situation. The team is led by the aforementioned Rock and a mixed bag of screenwriting manual stereotypes that always tend to make up these kinds of teams in movies. Once on Mars, the team begins to get picked off one by one by whatever it is that is lurking in the research facilities’ dark and dank corridors. The rest of the movie is about the survivors trying to figure out where these monsters come from and how to stop them, while, of course, staying alive themselves.

Well, it’s not exactly a bad set-up, right? At least, it’s not a bad set up for a straightforward action/horror hybrid type of film like this. The problem with this movie is just about everything else. The production design, first of all, is hideous. The movie pretty much takes place in a couple of gray corridors that the actors run through over and over again. There’s no atmosphere, mood, or creepiness in these hallways, and no sense of dread is felt as these marines traverse them; the sets are just grey and dark, and that’s about it. It’s an awfully boring place to spend an hour and a half.

Speaking of boring, the first half of the film consists mostly of characters coming up on the monsters and shooting at them as they run away. In between the excitement generated by shooting and missing the bad guys that are running away, the film is punctuated by “shocking” reveals of who the monsters are and what exactly is going down at the research facility. The problem though, is that none of these revelations are in the least bit shocking. Who the monsters are is painfully obvious to everybody but the characters in the movie and what is going on in the facility, though not revealed until the end of the second act, is given away at the very beginning of the films trailer!

The movie also comes off as being seriously cheap. The Monsters that appear in “Doom” are poorly presented extras in rubber suits that, as usual, depend on the fact that they are always shown in the dark, or shot in extreme close-up, so that we can barely see them. When you do see them, you wish you hadn’t, because they are just your typical off the shelf monsters with big teeth and a bunch of eyes. Also, speaking of cheapness, just wait until you see the way in which the characters travel from Earth to Mars in a matter of seconds. It is supposed to be this amazing teleportation device and just about the time you think you’re going to see this massive setup like the Stargate or something, all you get is this cheap CGI blob that spurts out of the ground and sucks up the character.

The scares, as mentioned before, are your standard cheap horror scares that are all the rage these days. A character goes down a hallway, hears a noise, stops, the audio is dropped out, and exactly when you expect it, the silence is broken by something that makes a loud noise, either a monster attacking or just a monkey (!) or a dog that decided to sneak up on the heroes and scare them. There is this hilarious part though, that tries to be scary, but instead shows off just how stupid the movie is. While exploring the sewers one of the Marines hears a noise, when he goes to take a closer look into the darkness from which the noise emanated from, he sees a pair of eyes looking back at him. They’re human looking enough, except for the fact that he can see them in the dark! Which really should clue him in that something is wrong. Instead of shooting, the idiot asks, “Dr. Willis, is that you?” Now, if you saw a pair of eyes glowing in the dark like in a cartoon, you would run away as fast as you could, right? Not these guys, they wait until a few more eyes open up to reveal that, yes, indeed, that is a monster standing in front of them and then they resign themselves to their fate. Not the sharpest tools in the shed, really.

Oh, and that first person sequence that has been so highly touted. While it is the best thing in the movie, it is still rather disappointing. I counted at least two obvious cuts, and the parts where Karl Urban walks up to a mirror or sees his reflection in a wall seem oddly out of step with the camera movements. Such sloppiness, frankly, is unacceptable when you consider how well Kathryn Bigelow did the same thing ten years ago in “Strange Days”.

And that’s all I have to say really. “Doom” is a pretty darn poor movie. I hope I covered all the bases and was able to give a decent impression of what the movie was like so that you all don’t have to spend your hard earned money on poo like this and see it for yourselves. If you use this just call me PK Money.



Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • Oct. 13, 2005, 10:49 p.m. CST

    FPS?

    by bralli

    Like in the game? That sounds unbelievably lame.

  • Oct. 13, 2005, 10:52 p.m. CST

    I ain't DOOMED!

    by Terminator

    Cause I ain't seein it!

  • Oct. 13, 2005, 11 p.m. CST

    You're doomed if you do and you're doomed if you don&#39

    by seppukudkurosawa

    I don't see how you can be so invested in the doom franchise that you can get all that righteous about this film. I used to love doom too (and I remember that day well when I accidentally stumbled across God Mode and thought I'd cracked the game or something), but it's a pretty broad concept, you're on mars fighting bad troll looking dudes. What does it matter if the film fucks it up, it's not like you have any memories of the original other than "Hey, remember that time when I was sitting down and playing the game, you know October 14th '93, that was one hell of a day". So this game's been fucked up, what did you expect. Now for my gratuitous Uwe "AICN Pi

  • Oct. 13, 2005, 11:04 p.m. CST

    " Also, speaking of cheapness, just wait until you see the way i

    by DOGSOUP

    What makes you think I'm going to see this shit to get that far?

  • Oct. 13, 2005, 11:04 p.m. CST

    Yeah this one seems like a real review.

    by Thirteen 13

    The previous plant review of this movie was beyond pathetic and gave me more than enough reasons to save my money and skip Doom.

  • Oct. 13, 2005, 11:06 p.m. CST

    Oh well

    by Darth Thoth

    I gotta admit I was pretty hurt you guys didn't run my Q&A transcript of Park Chan-wook and Sympathy 4 Lady Vengeance review. Oh well. Still love the site and check it out multiple times daily. I don't expect much from Doom. Really. I hope it meets people's expectations but I'm not expecting much. I'm anticipating Domino much more. And seeing Paradise Now (top 3 flick this year) again upon its release Oct. 28th. Peace.

  • Oct. 13, 2005, 11:09 p.m. CST

    Might be ok to watch

    by Ridge

    If you go in comparing it to a Uwe Bolle movie... then again anything compared to Alone in the Dark or House of the Dead seems to be a damn masterpiece.

  • Oct. 13, 2005, 11:11 p.m. CST

    The Rock

    by bryce

    I have to admit that I am a fan of the Rock, but I hope that he gets the "tough-as-nails" character out of his system and at least tries to get his hands on some better material. They should have made a movie based on KillZone instead of Doom anyway. Hey, Maybe Peter Jackson will get KAOS to direct Halo!!

  • Oct. 13, 2005, 11:23 p.m. CST

    You mean Doom might Suck? Wow I'm in utter shock.

    by Meremoth

    After that last review -cough 'plant' cough- I thought this movie would win a n Oscar or something. Oh Hell (or as they say in the Doom movie), Oh Genome Experiment.

  • Oct. 13, 2005, 11:25 p.m. CST

    Fake review, nothing here that wasn't in the trailers

    by CrispyOne

  • Oct. 13, 2005, 11:31 p.m. CST

    DOOMED! the Movie

    by Hate_Speech

    no kidding! http://www.doomedthemovie.com

  • Oct. 13, 2005, 11:45 p.m. CST

    You have to see this new Doom image!

    by I Dunno

    Now that I have you here, see the movie. And buy the games.

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 12:15 a.m. CST

    Maybe they could have had a Heads Up Display that showed how man

    by skoobyx

    That might have helped.

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 12:16 a.m. CST

    Maybe they could have had a Heads Up Display that showed how man

    by skoobyx

    That might have helped.

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 12:27 a.m. CST

    Or a little cartoon Rock in the corner that gets progressively m

    by seppukudkurosawa

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 1:10 a.m. CST

    I still hope that Dwayne makes better choices in film roles.

    by Bargin Hunter in 3D

    I'm not a WWF fan at all, but Dwayne does have screen presents, and good comic timing, why in the hell is he picking such poor roles? Is it just the $$$ or what? I'm a bit dissapointed, but then again I'm not his manager/agent, he is a working actor and that is the important thing I suppose. Damn I wish he would be in better films that this...junk.

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 1:12 a.m. CST

    Plant?

    by Knightmare187

    This review says nothing original. He/she probably read the last review and just put a negative spin to it. Most of what he says comes from the trailer. And just because this review goes along with the rest of the snap judgements of this film doesn't make it anymore or less of a plant then the last review. just my 2 cents

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 1:22 a.m. CST

    Re: Rock's choices...

    by SmarkJobber

    Yeah, that's the thing with Rock -- he needs a director who can get the most out of him while obscuring his weaknesses. Picking good scripts would be a good start as well. I had hope for "Be Cool" -- seemed like a good choice, a supporting role among a great cast -- then I learned F. Gary Gray was directing, and wrote it off. Even though I think "Spy Hunter" is going to be another mis-step, at least the dude is balancing that with something interesting like "Southland Tales" (which I will probably see even though I don't belong to the Cult of Darko). I still feel that Rock could have a career that surpasses Arnold's, as long as he aligns himself with the right people/material.

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 4:16 a.m. CST

    Lazy Hollywood production package:

    by Sithlord_999

    Popular video game + "The Rock" = "The kids will go nuts with this."(Translation: "Screenwriter? Who the hell needs a Screenwriter. We begin shooting in two weeks!")

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 6:07 a.m. CST

    Isn't The Rock..

    by SamFisher

    Attached to FarCry movie with Uwe Boll fucki...i mean...directing?

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 7:08 a.m. CST

    Chain Gun... The Movie

    by zekmoe

    This movie should be about grisly dealths opn both sides, with popcorn type scares and humor. Just like the game. I'll see it on DVD, since I rarely go to theaters to experience the home-boys speaking ebonics, and the cell phone challenged Yolandas. I'll watch it in a real theater. My own.

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 7:42 a.m. CST

    The FPS sequence CANNOT, repeat CANNOT!!! be better than the one

    by Tubbs Tattsyrup

    That not only had a FPS point of view, but the whole sound design and visual design makes you feel as if you are actually inside the dude's head. On a good sound system it's a fucking trip, I tell you. Disappointing about this film though. I really wanted it to be good, at least on a "monsters being exploded gorily" scale. Looks like it's shit that way too. Well...I'll probably see it anyway, then return to Braindead for some decent gore. Ain't THAT movie cool? Let's all hold hands and pray for HALO...

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 9:37 a.m. CST

    seppukudkurosawa

    by raw_bean

    The point is not remembering the (at the time brilliant but yes, not very cinematic) original 1993 game, but the seminal (if primitive in some ways and far too repetetive) remake, Doom 3. If they'd just stuck to the premise, it could have been so much better. Zombies, phsychologically terrifying whispers and visions and weird occult shit going on, and hell breaking through into reality. Not this 'final ten percent of the human genome' rubbish. Such a waste.

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 10:04 a.m. CST

    BLASPHEMY!!

    by DarthMango

    WE MUST KILL THE INFIDEL!!

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 10:41 a.m. CST

    "that sites like this don't make a difference at all on Box

    by Neosamurai85

    How many hits does this site get a day? I seem to recall reading that back in its prime that it was getting over a million. Now, I

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 11:13 a.m. CST

    With no offense to Bargin Hunter...

    by Childe Roland

    ..."screen presents" may be one of the funniest malaprops I've ever read on this site. It could be applied so artfully to any number of Harry criticisms as well as make a handy euphemism to describe gratuitous boob shots in movies (i.e. "That blond chick from Lost can't act, but at least she gives lots of screen presents."). Thanks for that. Consider it coined and corrupted.

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 11:26 a.m. CST

    As a fan of everything "Doom", I am obligated to see this, but g

    by Doom II

    Unlike a lot of reviews here lately, he didn't just explain the scenes or actors we know about, but brought up legitimate scenes from the film that bothered him. He obviously saw the movie he was bashing, which is nice for a change. Some of these reviews lately just talk about who's in the fucking film and bring up plotlines. I can do that with with ANY movie. Shit, give me 10 minutes and I will write a King Kong 2005 review as well as a Spider-Man 3 review.

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 11:53 a.m. CST

    Did you seriously think there was a story here?

    by Harker-Writes

    Doom's a computer game, not a movie. The Yanks are seriously trashing the business of movie making with this kind of nonsense. How about making a movie based on a well written script and then using real actors to portray the characters?

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 12:01 p.m. CST

    Firstly, I DUNNO - That was hysterical. Secondly, "The Monsters

    by www.valiens.com

    Because of that cheesetastic element, gentlemen, I will see this film. That sounds too bad to miss on the big screen.

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 12:03 p.m. CST

    Sounds good...

    by Hail

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 1:11 p.m. CST

    He can't complain about the teleporting.

    by zerogundamx

    That's how it is in the game, you step on the cheap looking platform and ZIP! Green blob takes you to the other platform.

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 1:19 p.m. CST

    the most depressing thing about this review is the reminder that

    by chickychow

    Fuck, I was 15 when I saw that thing. He's right tho, pretty great POV work in that flick. The rape scene disturbed the shit out of me, still does.

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 3:40 p.m. CST

    How long was this in production?

    by zer0cool2k2

    doesn't seem like that long ago that i was reading they were going to make this movie with The Rock. Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems like it went from casting/preproduction to release fairly quickly, which seemed like a bad omen to me. ........... And the best thing about House of the Dead? They showed Lois Lane's* Boobies fairly early on, so I could then change the channel. *(Erica Durance, that is).

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 4:11 p.m. CST

    If you couldn't tell it was crap by the trailer...

    by xenaman

    then you must be blind. I was offended that I had to sit through it before Serenity. Looks like the biggest turd since "Wing Commander". Why is it so hard to get a good movie made today?

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 6:46 p.m. CST

    The mention of Strange Days just reminds me...

    by ComputerGuy68

    that Angela Bassett SHOULD have been the next female action star in roles like Riply and Sarah Connor! Storm WAS MADE FOR HER

  • Oct. 14, 2005, 9:09 p.m. CST

    Strange Days was kickass.

    by I Dunno

    I'm surprised anyone even remembers that. James Cameron wrote that I think. That was the first time I ever heard the term "Y2K". The man's an innovator. And I always had a thing for Juliet Lewis. Sigh. As for the movies based on video games, there are actually quite a few video games that have better stories than a lot of action films. Unfortunatly, Doom is not one of them.

  • Oct. 15, 2005, 12:12 p.m. CST

    Cameron did write Strange Days

    by chickychow

    It came out in 95 and took place in a 99 that seemed to be in some alternate universe. Did they really think in 4 years LA would turn into such an ugly, dirty scumhole? Oh yeah, guess they got it right...

  • Oct. 17, 2005, 4:56 a.m. CST

    Strange Days!!

    by skoobyx

    Oh man I need to watch that again. Chicky is right but not only is the story well written but the POV shot was expertly directed. I can't exactly explain what it is but it works extremely well and even if you know what the movie is about you are still wondering what the hell is going on. Another genius POV is the opening scene from Halloween. Guy like Cameron and Carpenter make it look so easy. No wonder the Doom guys messed it up.