|
Published on Wednesday, October 12, 2005 - 1:46pm |
|
Our First Review of THE FOG rolls in...
Hey folks, Harry here with a review from "Ben" of the remake of THE FOG. I've been anxiously awaiting word on this film. It's interesting that this reviewer wanted to hate this film, but in the end couldn't... and actually came away saying that it was pretty good. That's a good sign. Right now, I'm watching Carpenter's original - which is a film I love even though probably more than any other film of his, it shows it's age and budget. But damn it. Barbeau, Jamie, Janet and Houseman just flat out rule. And Carpenter's score and the sound design is spine-tingly. A little film that did quite a good job. I'm hoping this is a film that does quite a bit more. Been awfully quiet on this new version so far.
Hi Harry. I love you man.
Saw a screening of the Fog tonight. Here’s a shocker…
Didn’t hate it.
Actually, I should give more credit. I expected to hate this movie. I wanted to hate this movie. It was pretty good. Better-if you give hottie cred for blonde from Lost and SELMA.
While I’m at it, Let’s be honest. SELMA is too good for this stuff, but once you make out with Buffy you’ve got to prove yourself worthy. How long does that take? I’ll let you know. But SELMA was really great, a welcome distraction from the “acting” of blond from Lost and Supermodel.
Okay, legit review time. The Fog was pretty good. A 6, maybe 7 out of 10, which is worthy of acknowledgment given the crap we’ve been choked with for the last year. It makes House of Wax look like another Paris home vid, and it doesn’t take itself too seriously like, oh, every damn Japanese remake. Why does the vulnerable but very hot girl hang out with the dead bodies? Cause it’s a movie, and it’s creepy. Why does same girl do every stupid thing she does? Cause it’s a movie, and it’s funny to watch her be stupid. We all like to talk at the screen when we see these kinda movies, and happily we’re given lots of chances here. In this instance we also get a good scare or 15, and most impressively the scares don’t come when you expect them to. Whoever shot the movie (yes I’m too lazy to look up names) did a fucking bang up job, and he made SELMA look sooo hot. Blondie looked blonde, and damn she’s hot too when she’s not speaking. Overall the acting was missing something, namely acting, but if you forgive the performances, which were not good, you’re gonna get scared. Nuff said. The movie has lots of off-frame movement/hand-on-the-shoulder/silence-then-loud-noise/violin scares. There’s also ample story, which only occasionally gets in the way.
The story, in case you’re too cheap to rent the vid, goes like thus. A 100 years ago these guys on Antonio Island, Ore. (people actually live in Oregon?) killed a bunch of lepers and stole all their cash. The lepers burned to death. Horrible. Antonio Island meanwhile, CACHING. Built them a town. But the ghosts of the lepers ain’t happy, and yes, they’re back to kill the descendants of those who killed them. How radically convenient, then, that our core of main characters (Supermodel, blonde from Lost, People Over 30 that I don’t care about, and SELMA) are-if you can believe it-descended from the guys who betrayed the lepers. Yawn. But if you forgive the very recycled plot, which was flawed the first time when it was called THE FOG, this movie actually improves upon its template. That’s rare. The scares are more numerous and scattered evenly throughout a movie that (for once) doesn’t run too long. Theres also a connection that was missing in the original film. SELMA gets to leave the lighthouse. And gets wet. She’s actually active, and wearing black leather. She and Tom Welling have “a past” which doesn’t pay off as suggested but makes for a nice we’re-all-in-this-together hatch-battening climax.
Like most horror movies pretending to have a plot, The Fog gets really lost in the first 15 minutes. Lots of people are talking. Oh, and there’s a lighthouse. We get back story, character, and timelines ga-fucken-lore, and a few funny spoken lines that aren’t given the time they deserve. The screenplay is typical but organizes well the massive and oft-unnecessary back story throughout the movie. It’s also smartly written most of the time and doesn’t dumb down the scenes. The movie doesn’t waste your time. It doesn’t linger like the original. It sets up, cashes in, moves on.
Surprisingly it was more “The Blonde From Lost Show” than anything else, with Tom Welling and SELMA book ending her and providing a welcome break from glassy-eyed taught-jawed stares. Blond from Lost was hot, IS hot, and gets wet (twice!), but this will be her only feature. Guaranteed. She’s distracting not just as eye candy but in her blatant inability to be in the moment. She’s like Mischa Barton. Soo pretty, except when she talks or moves in any way. SELMA was fantastic, maybe just a smidge wooden in her last scene. No jest, friends. She was damn good, and one fiiiine looken mama. Tom Welling was just-fine. I mean, he was okay. Supersized Smallvillian but okay. He may actually find a niche out there. (I hear Freddie P. is doing TV now, so there must be 8 Julia Stiles movies on the shelf just waiting for a forgettable hunk like him.) He’s got more chemistry with SELMA than Blonde, but you believe that he and Maggie (huh, she DOES have a name) have “a past,” if for no other reason than -we are told they have a past. And before we ask too many questions they get naked and showery. It’s PG-13 but still hot.
Now for my sour grapes. Er, grape. The ending kinda sucked. If you’re the kind to roll your eyes and move on you probably won’t mind, but I wasn’t a fan. It just didn’t fit. But, again, to be fair, as I strive to be, if you can get over this, you’ll be happy with your ten bucks spent.
So here’s my summation. The Fog is, believe it or not, a scary movie with hot women and a nice look to it. I was pleasantly surprised, which is quite rare. But the flick does hold up, and in so doing not only does the original justice but makes a weak soup better. This Fog has more fright, more cool scenes, passable special effects, and breasts that weren’t store bought. If you love Selma Blair this is the best movie of 2005. If you like her as a friend it’s just a good movie. If your indifferent it’s still worth your time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reader Talkback
Been waiting for this one. by seppukudkurosawa | Oct 12th, 2005 01:49:50 PM | Did this movie really need a
remake? by fiester | Oct 12th, 2005 01:49:57 PM | Though I have to say, I really
don't think The Fog holds
up by seppukudkurosawa | Oct 12th, 2005 01:50:47 PM | This reviewer... by DocPazuzu | Oct 12th, 2005 01:54:49 PM | Another Redux? Jesus Christ. by Bor | Oct 12th, 2005 01:58:35 PM | that being said... by Bor | Oct 12th, 2005 02:00:06 PM | Why do reviewers act as if
they've got a brain
aneurysm so a by seppukudkurosawa | Oct 12th, 2005 02:00:46 PM | I never really though much of
Maggie Grace by zer0cool2k2 | Oct 12th, 2005 02:02:59 PM | Okay... Now it's official,
every Carpenter movie will be
rem by moviemaniac-7 | Oct 12th, 2005 02:04:10 PM | meh by Zoviet Squid | Oct 12th, 2005 02:06:28 PM | But did he think Selma Blair
was hot? by splbrg75 | Oct 12th, 2005 02:15:42 PM | Haven't you heard? True
geeks think Selma Blair's
hot-- by Lance Rock | Oct 12th, 2005 02:20:05 PM | "We all like to talk at the
screen when we see these kinda
movie by Charlie & Tex | Oct 12th, 2005 02:20:15 PM | I'm holding out for Snakes
on a Plane to get my horror
fix by amano | Oct 12th, 2005 02:30:04 PM | Funny that people are ranting
about remakes of Carpenter
films.. by Osmosis Jones | Oct 12th, 2005 02:45:48 PM | They just announced today they
are remaking Carpenter's
VILL by Vern | Oct 12th, 2005 02:51:08 PM | I've Just Signed On To Do
A Remake Of The Remake Of
Carpente by ZombieSolutions | Oct 12th, 2005 03:09:27 PM | *walks into talk back with
head down and a letter in his
hand* by trevorfactor | Oct 12th, 2005 03:27:56 PM | Can't believe Vern
actually posted... by Childe Roland | Oct 12th, 2005 03:30:43 PM | Why remake this? The original
FOG is still scary, at least
to me by Orionsangels | Oct 12th, 2005 03:49:11 PM | Cliches as usual by optimus122 | Oct 12th, 2005 04:22:59 PM | I concur optimus by trevorfactor | Oct 12th, 2005 04:38:10 PM | PLANT by joshua | Oct 12th, 2005 04:43:25 PM | "Hi Harry. I love you man." by DrManhattansUnit | Oct 12th, 2005 04:44:07 PM | do any of you people even know
who Harry is? by trevorfactor | Oct 12th, 2005 04:56:51 PM | who the fuck are these people? by JimmyJAMF | Oct 12th, 2005 05:06:13 PM | The original was terrible by Doc_McCoy | Oct 12th, 2005 05:06:18 PM | The original was AMAZING! by Doom II | Oct 12th, 2005 05:11:00 PM | I have come here to chew
bubblegum and call this
reviewer a twel by seppukudkurosawa | Oct 12th, 2005 05:17:29 PM | "Surprisingly it was more by StovetopStuffin' | Oct 12th, 2005 05:21:49 PM | seppuk, if your post is not
the pot calling the kettle
black, I by trevorfactor | Oct 12th, 2005 05:24:26 PM | Great review! Told me
absolutely NOTHING about what
really matte by Doom II | Oct 12th, 2005 05:24:34 PM | The difference, Trevor Factor,
is that we're in a John
Carpe by seppukudkurosawa | Oct 12th, 2005 05:32:41 PM | no actually I only half read
his review, and yes it sucked
or at by trevorfactor | Oct 12th, 2005 05:42:44 PM | Since when is Selma Blair too
good for this kind of movie? by chickychow | Oct 12th, 2005 05:59:00 PM | Yes, Selma Blair is hot by MilesGloriosus | Oct 12th, 2005 06:01:06 PM | Oh yeah, and a horrible
review... by chickychow | Oct 12th, 2005 06:05:13 PM | What a fucking awful review. by team america | Oct 12th, 2005 06:11:56 PM | TOM ATKINS by la_sith | Oct 12th, 2005 06:17:21 PM | Attention Hollywood! by DuncanDisorderly | Oct 12th, 2005 07:15:27 PM | My fellow SELMA fans: if
"Pretty Persuasion" is still
playing ne by FrankDrebin | Oct 12th, 2005 07:19:57 PM | No John Houseman. Pass. by Det. John Kimble | Oct 12th, 2005 07:23:22 PM | I saw Selma Blair in the
parking lot of Tower Records by Film Whisperer | Oct 12th, 2005 07:39:15 PM | Was this "review" typed by a
rhesus? by SalvatoreGravano | Oct 12th, 2005 09:01:43 PM | if I ever get a chance to
write a review for AICN.... by Orange Crush | Oct 12th, 2005 09:39:10 PM | In what way is The Thing a
remake? by Shan | Oct 12th, 2005 10:09:50 PM | Exactly 100 years later?
Ghosts must like round
numbers. by FrankDrebin | Oct 12th, 2005 11:14:44 PM | Escape From New York remake by Uncapie | Oct 12th, 2005 11:17:11 PM | moviemack by PVIII | Oct 12th, 2005 11:44:58 PM | i will watch any film that has
selma blair "bookending" the
girl by slappy jones | Oct 12th, 2005 11:57:10 PM | RE: Tom Welling chose this
over Superman by Shermdawg | Oct 13th, 2005 01:20:21 AM | A big trouble in little china
sequel???? by Andsoitis | Oct 13th, 2005 07:52:21 AM | Ben and SELMA? We gotta get
these two to meet somewhere... by Moonwatcher | Oct 13th, 2005 08:01:44 AM | Any person with an IQ bigger
than their age would be
running lik by Monkey Butler | Oct 13th, 2005 08:21:04 AM | This review... by Yeti | Oct 13th, 2005 09:19:14 AM | Selma Blair has a very pretty
face by Immortal_Fish | Oct 13th, 2005 11:45:41 AM | Remake Ghosts of Mars! by chickychow | Oct 13th, 2005 12:23:50 PM | DuncanDisorderly... hush your
mouth! by Uncooked_Meat | Oct 13th, 2005 02:20:28 PM | I would like to
participate.... by savage_henry | Oct 13th, 2005 03:21:08 PM | OK savage, you can be NY
Kid's warm-up face. by seppukudkurosawa | Oct 13th, 2005 08:45:56 PM | Wait...I don't remember
writing that. by seppukudkurosawa | Oct 13th, 2005 11:43:02 PM | I wouldn't classify
Carpenter's The Thing... by Childe Roland | Oct 14th, 2005 10:42:29 AM |
|
|