Ain't It Cool News (www.aintitcool.com)
Movie News

Behold - The Eighth Wonder of the World! Teaser Image for KONG has Arrived!!!

Hey folks, Harry here... Oddly fitting that on the eve of FANTASTIC FEST - that this teaser image for KING KONG has finally arrived - and it is absolutely gorgeous. Still prefer my original 1933 KING KONG one-sheet... but that's just cuz I love Stone Lithography and stylized art over photo-realism... but OH MY GOD - I WANT THIS POSTER NOW! Imagery from this first arrived on an EMPIRE Magazine cover - but here we see that that special cover was a tease to this reveal. Awesome work! Here you go...







Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • Oct. 5, 2005, 1:47 p.m. CST

    Awesome

    by team america

    Doesn't really look like 30s New York to me, but... awesome.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 1:48 p.m. CST

    titties

    by madoo14

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 1:49 p.m. CST

    Definitely Kong

    by Mantenna

    Still, I don't know what to think about it.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 1:49 p.m. CST

    "Come here often?"

    by I Hate Movies

    "I know, I know, it's a little chilly, but the view can't be beat. Have you tried the Cessna?"

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 1:51 p.m. CST

    Looks good

    by Doc_Strange

    Hopefully the FX in the movie will follow suit cause they really needed some work.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 1:51 p.m. CST

    He wasn't that big in the trailer

    by zacdilone

    Should've been, though

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 1:53 p.m. CST

    um...

    by chimpandy

    wasnt this the cover of last months Empire magazine? The answer to that is "yes"!

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 1:57 p.m. CST

    THAT'S NOT THE REAL POSTER!! IT'S JUST A PICTURE!!

    by jig98

    joblo.com has updated their article saying it's not the real poster, it's only a picture on the cover of empire mag. bitchin' pic though

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 1:58 p.m. CST

    Ilac5 - from Harry

    by HEADGEEK

    Technically you were the 5th person to send me a link to the poster - the 1st was a gal named Theresa - but before her a fella named Sennheiser sent me a 5.5 meg file of the image - that I was resizing. Just to be totally upfront about it all.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 1:59 p.m. CST

    Bow Before The Worlds First REMAKE OF A REMAKE!

    by ZombieSolutions

    how to know the world is about to end 1) Dubya; 2) Christina Ricci and Lindsey Lohan losing their beautiful boobies; 3) Remaking remakes. thee end is near.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2 p.m. CST

    But is it the teaser?

    by dr_buggerlugs

    I too have just seen that joblo have an update regarding this...oh and the new Darkness single is ace...

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2 p.m. CST

    BTW, It Is A Nice Poster

    by ZombieSolutions

    too bad it's for a remake of a remake, though.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:01 p.m. CST

    "i wonder if i could throw her to new jersey from here".

    by ZombieSolutions

    IPAMPILASH!

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:02 p.m. CST

    HI Harry

    by LOST_Grendel

    Since I knew you were in this TB at the moment, thought I would say hi! --- Could you please memorize my name now, and then recall it when you're choosing the next lucky bastards for BNAT???? =)

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:02 p.m. CST

    Aw, that's heartbreaking...

    by viola123

    Gosh, that is a nice poster. I'm not too psyched for this movie, but I must say that that poster is beautiful. Sad, you know. He's so sweet and gentle. Poor thing.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:04 p.m. CST

    Hey Harry ... maybe you should visit joblo.com more often

    by Windfola

    "According to the studio, this is definitely not the film's teaser poster, but it was a picture from the movie that was featured on the cover of "Empire" magazine last month." Great pic though... I'm excited about the film..

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:05 p.m. CST

    Yeah....

    by vinceklortho

    I've seen this one before awhile ago; still pretty cool nonetheless. However, at imdb.com, they have a better one sheet teaser poster there. Don't know if that is real, but it looks cool. As for the movie...my nerd excitement level is reserved for Harry Potter 4, which is at a maximum level of a 9 nerd wattage out of 10. My KONG nerd levels are a basic 7, so after Harry Potter it could go off the charts given a longer trailer with more emotional resonance involving Kong climbing the Empire State building while planes circle him firing off bullets...Nerd levels rising...must control myself.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:06 p.m. CST

    The Eighth Wonder of the World!

    by RickSlamu2

    Andre the Giant is in this Film! Best news i have heard in awhile!!!

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:06 p.m. CST

    Not the poster!

    by plissken77

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:11 p.m. CST

    hahahah..I fucking knew Empire Magazine was full of shit..

    by The True Priapic

    ..they used this as a cover and promoted it as "we asked weta to knock something up"!!!Fucking rotten magazine with no opinion other than "we love the taste of Lucas' and Spielbergs cock",fuck me this is really old news.C'mon Harry this is 2 months old..........

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:16 p.m. CST

    king kong....

    by blackthought

    looks nothing like samuel l. jackson....what a jip.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:25 p.m. CST

    Where does Harry say this is a teaser poster?

    by Ribbons

    Was something updated? All he says is that it's a teaster image. Anyways, I like it. Don't really know how much it'll have to do with the movie, but it's purdy to look at; makes you feel for the big lug and all. I wouldn't mind having a poster of this one meself.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:28 p.m. CST

    NICE POSTER

    by bubcus

    I like the image. I do agree that it looks like a modern New York and isn't too believable as a 30's era. (For some stupid reason, I seem to think sunsets should look different a hundred years ago than they do today... ARGH). Anyhow, nice to see Harry in the forum. Hi, Harry! I'm looking forward to this movie.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:31 p.m. CST

    That looks ghey as hell

    by LordMadhammer

    sorry but it does.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:35 p.m. CST

    "Come heeeere, ya big ape!"

    by Anna Valerious

    I have a question...I've noticed on the toys, they're calling it "Kong: The Eighth Wonder of the World"...did they change the movie title to that as well?

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:36 p.m. CST

    bleh

    by Magnethead

    Yeah, I dont like it either. not for a poster.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:38 p.m. CST

    Actually, I think it is supposed to be romantic

    by bubcus

    This is a tender moment. A romantic touch in a scene of imminent tragedy. I've loving the look of the big lug.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:40 p.m. CST

    "Look, Naomi, you're nice and all...

    by Childe Roland

    ...but it just won't work. I mean, my Kongkey Dong is twice as big as you limp. Imagine if you actually could get me excited." Poor guy. Someone needs to hook him up with the 50-Foot Woman.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:42 p.m. CST

    Windfola - No shit? EMPIRE Magazine you say?

    by HEADGEEK

    I didn't need to Call Universal to know that, nor did I need to click on the JoBlo link in my bookmarks - cuz before he updated his story - I ALREADY HAD WRITTEN THAT THIS WAS THE IMAGE FROM EMPIRE MAGAZINE. Perhaps actually "Reading" the story will help you.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:42 p.m. CST

    Hang on a minute... this was the cover for the last issue of Emp

    by alucardvsdracula

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:45 p.m. CST

    Actually folks this isn't really even the "real" teaser post

    by Thirteen 13

    The real teaser poster has yet to arrive. Still a very cool image though, but its NOT anything offically released from Peter Jackson and crew. Oh I can't wait for this movie's release. :-)

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:52 p.m. CST

    Don't think it's the 1-sheet, could be wrong!

    by Sinisterjim

    Aside from everyone pointing out this is the Empire mag. cover, which Harry CLEARLY stated in the piece, the ratio for the movie poster (1 sheet) is incorrect. If you shrink a 27"x40" (1-sheet), the image should be taller, it seems a bit more square. Great image, but it seems framed for a magazine cover, or something with a lot of text, as not to cover the focus of the image. Of course, since Harry knows Mr. Jackson, I'm probably going to get my ass handed to me...but dammit, the ratio still looks wrong! Great image though! Harry, how about your Oct. DVD picks? C'mon man, I'm dyin' here! The Lewton colletion is fantastic, can't believe I wasn't familiar with him.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:52 p.m. CST

    THIS SO ROCKS, HARRY IS INTERACTING WITH US...

    by bubcus

    Way cool!

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:54 p.m. CST

    Nice poster

    by I Dunno

    Not sure how necessary this film is in general but since they're making it, it looks like they're doing a good job.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 2:58 p.m. CST

    I love it!!!

    by Sinisterjim

    I love that Harry is getting vocally agressive at the handful of shithead talkbackers that have all but ruined the talkback section!!!

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 3:02 p.m. CST

    "Hi pretty lady. Ever heard of the Stockholme Syndrome?"

    by modlight

    This is the first time I'm interested in seeing this movie.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 3:02 p.m. CST

    "Hi pretty lady. Ever heard of the Stockholme Syndrome?"

    by modlight

    This is the first time I'm interested in seeing this movie.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 3:13 p.m. CST

    This image is great.

    by Manmole

    I really, really hope the film stands up. I'm hopeful...but scared.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 3:14 p.m. CST

    Yeah, he is way too big

    by Rupee88

    compared to the trailer. I hope they are consistent in the actual movie.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 3:23 p.m. CST

    Size matters

    by Sinisterjim

    I don't know, it would be kinda cool if he decided to increase Kong's size just for the Empire State building sequence...plus, it would tweak the detail-nazis that bitch about every litle, insignificant effect that looks off!

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 3:23 p.m. CST

    He's too gorilla-like.

    by FluffyUnbound

    Yes, that sounds like a typical Fluffy asshole thing to say, but this is how I see it: it is possible to make Kong too "perfect" and realistic a giant gorilla. The story arc of Kong is supposed to make you fear him in the beginning, and pity him in the end. If it's too realistic a gorilla, I for one will see him and immediately think "Koko wants to do sign language" and will always root for him and against the humans, even on the island where he's supposed to be a fearsome threat. Basically this is the problem I had the Godzilla remake - they accentuated the fact that he's basically just a big animal too much. Show me a perfect CGI gorilla and I'll just want to go kill poachers or something. Show me KONG, and that's entirely different.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 3:28 p.m. CST

    Should I...? Shouldn't I...?

    by Ribbons

    Okay. This is kind of a lame debate anyway, but is he really any bigger there than he is in the trailer? Think about it. He seems really big because he takes up the whole poster, but I think the proportion between him and Ann is about the same.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 3:28 p.m. CST

    Harry Knowles,an apology...

    by The True Priapic

    ..oops,you did INDEED state it was on Empire.My stupid mistake,I'm afraid its the eagerness to see the pic that lead to my demise.Duh,what a dick I am.Then again in 2001 I posted "I still don't think Jackson will give us a classic!" in regards to LOTR.Happy to be wrong.Apology if it means anything.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 3:41 p.m. CST

    No need to get upset Harry

    by Windfola

    I assumed you were writing about *the poster* because of the 'I WANT THIS POSTER NOW' sort of thing.. and stuff like "Still prefer my original 1933 KING KONG one-sheet" ... It's just a freakin magazine cover

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 3:42 p.m. CST

    I'm just here to say my peace...

    by clone-o-mat

    ...then I'll be on my merry way. Old Kong (Kong Classic) was proportioned like a man. Maybe it sucked, maybe not, but it came first, so it is Kong. New Kong is proportioned like an ape. It's more realistic, but unfortunately, it is therefore not Kong. Same applies to the more realistic version of Godzilla in the American version. More realistic, but not right. And that is my peace.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 3:46 p.m. CST

    Potbelly King-Kong

    by NZGUY

    Has he been drinking (or eating...) too much??

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 3:52 p.m. CST

    clone-o-matic

    by Windfola

    I belive you are writing about the shitty Kong 1976, that one even walked like a man, because it was a man in suit... like godzilla Kong 1933 proportioned like a man? I suppose YOU have hands that reach you knees.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 3:54 p.m. CST

    "but it came first, so it is Kong"

    by I Dunno

    Don't take this the wrong way but that's pretty stupid. The first version of Kong is just that, the first interpretation of the character. If the goal was to simply copy the original because it's the "real" version then this remake would be even more useless than I already think it is. As for his size, he damned well better stay the same size throughout the film. I don't consider that nitpicky. With all that technology they'd better get that little detail right.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 3:55 p.m. CST

    Guys, this ain't a remake of a remake. Jackson is completely

    by Lenny Nero

    This is a remake of the 1930s film.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 3:56 p.m. CST

    Size

    by Thorfin

    Wouldn't it be cool if Kong's size changed when he got angry... and the more rage he felt the bigger he grew?

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 4:01 p.m. CST

    Who cares if it's the actual teaser poster or not?

    by odysseus

    What matters is the image itself, and that it has quite an emotional impact for something that could easily come off as ridiculous. Beautifully done -- whatever its purpose.

  • That would kick all the ass. And he should also hop around to the point of flying and have zero weight, like a proper CGI creature.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 4:06 p.m. CST

    I'll amend my earlier remarks to say that

    by FluffyUnbound

    ...this version of Kong, who looks like he's getting ready to have a series of pictures taken while he's cuddling a kitten so that his keepers can make a fundraising calendar, could work if Kong is never violent. You could make a movie where the filmmakers deliberately go to his island to find something savage and bloodthirsty to film to entertain jaded Americans with no true sense of or perspective for the wild left. The filmmakers could then find Kong, living in the jungle, eating plants, and could then spend the movie trying to provoke him into violence. ["Ok, ACTION! Now stab him in the ass with a spear! Come on, you stupid fucking gorilla! Growl or something! Damn it, get the cattle prods up here!"] You have the filmmakers kill the dinosaurs and not Kong, because that's what asshole Hemingwayesque filmmakers in the 30's would have done - the dinosaurs would have run away, and they would have chased them and killed them. They then pose Kong with the dead dinosaurs the better to service the American fetish for jungle gladiatorianism. Eventually they drag Kong back to New York, where they put him in an all-concrete enclosure that's too small for him and charge people 10 cents each to look at him and throw things at him. Kong eventually dies because they don't know his dietary requirements and are too stupid or lazy to learn them. After he dies, to squeeze a last few bucks out of selling pieces of his carcass, they drag him up to the top of the Empire State Building and drop him [careful to do it on a Sunday where no one below can get hurt and sue] so they can spread the false tale of Kong's bloodthirsty attack on the city. The End. That's the movie that a realistic looking gorilla should mean you have.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 4:07 p.m. CST

    wow ... something that looks interesting ...

    by welther47

    but still very fake. What happened to Jackson & WETA's ability to make things look real? Kong is looking more and more like just another ILM cartoon.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 4:26 p.m. CST

    But will we see Kong's balls?

    by fiester

    I mean, he's a big ape...and he's nude. How big are those things?

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 4:28 p.m. CST

    This CAN'T be real...

    by TheBigLebowsky

    Jackson said his Kong would only be 25 foot high. The gorilla on this image is at least 45 foot...

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 4:31 p.m. CST

    "Maybe something causes him to grow"

    by I Hate Movies

    Yes, the assorted bananas scattered throughout a series of climbing obstacles that he collects as he chases two Italian plumbers ... oh, wait, wrong Kong.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 4:55 p.m. CST

    I really look forward to coming to this site.

    by Azlam Orlandu

    Then I read the forums and... -Az

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 5:03 p.m. CST

    Somebody Photoshop Harry into this picture! ......In place of t

    by JDanielP

    Awesome picture, with or without Harry. Beautiful. I can't wait!

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 5:05 p.m. CST

    The art is in making it look BETTER than real, which this does!

    by JDanielP

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 5:20 p.m. CST

    Giant Monkey!! Giant MOnkey!!!!!

    by Hate_Speech

    eep eep!!! KONG.. Throw CGI truck Kong, Klimb Building Kong!! Big Banana fo Kong!!! Eeep Eep... TRULY A STUPID DUMB FILM.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 5:33 p.m. CST

    Is "Ed"

    by Jon E Cin

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 5:35 p.m. CST

    Argh...I really hope Ed and Matt Leblanc make a cameo

    by Jon E Cin

    I also hope they writing is up to par..."I am going to spank that monkey!" I love a good monkey movie.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 5:37 p.m. CST

    Ping Pong balls? I thought you said King Kong's balls!

    by jesuschrist

    Barry Sobel in "Punchline" - 1988

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 5:45 p.m. CST

    "Am I the only one who sees the giant monkey!?"

    by DerLanghaarige

    Save K.P.

  • I guess the point they're trying to get across is that this has been around for over a month, and that it isn't exactly news worthy.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 6:12 p.m. CST

    Oh, my - it's an ape.

    by SalvatoreGravano

    How exciting. By the way, it looks virtually identical to that image from de Laurentiiiiiiiiiiiiiis's remake, only with the matte painting replaced by a bad, oversaturated CGI landscape (which only lacks a deer to be 100% tacky). Did he lose that idiotic tooth yet?

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 6:21 p.m. CST

    What's Kong gonna do with that white girl?

    by Batutta

    Seriously. I don't think he ever thought it through.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 6:24 p.m. CST

    Looks fucking great!

    by Samuel Steamer

    I can already see that I am going to feel for that ape. As far as people saying that you thingk the city looks too modern...they rebuilt in in CG according to actual (tha's right, authentic) records from the time of the film. Sooooo, stop being ignorant and do your homework if you are going to comment on a movie site. His size is perfect as it is in the trailer when he is taking on a dinosaur. They were big creatures you know. There are alot of cool people in this talkback but I guess you are all entitled to an opinion. I myself am starting to get excited about this. And retards...and you know who you are...go to the www.kongisking.com website and watch the videos that tell you a few things about filmmaking. Nice scoop, even though its kinda old. Hamilton Hog out.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 6:37 p.m. CST

    Nobody will ever be...

    by dewijnboer

    ... fully satisfied with whatever movie anyone is ever going to make. Stop moaning, you lowlifes, PJ rules supreme and will deliver a nice little moster movie. King Kong will rule yo' ass!

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 7:11 p.m. CST

    WHAT DOES KING KONG'S BALLS HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING?

    by jig98

    we are discussing this awesome pic NOT KING KONG'S SCHLONG NEIGHBORS! get with the program.ok?

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 7:18 p.m. CST

    big ape

    by jrbarker

    looks cool I guess

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 7:19 p.m. CST

    I hate every APE I see...

    by Gilkuliehe

    From CHIMPAN A to CHIMPAN ZEE... NO you'll never make a monkey out of meee!!!!

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 7:39 p.m. CST

    KONG'S DONG PRONGS WATTS!

    by ZombieSolutions

    thats a big ouchy in the hoo hoo diddle!

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 7:58 p.m. CST

    I think the official name of the movie is now KING KONG, even th

    by FrankDrebin

    For future reference, official posters have 'indicia' (copyright info, "Printed In Canada", "Not For Reproduction", "All Rights Reserved", that sort of stuff).

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 8:13 p.m. CST

    For those who think the landscape looks too modern

    by Riff Randall

    What did you expect, black and white??? Does that make it somehow more "authentic"? Pfft. As someone already pointed out, the cityscape design was based on actual photos of 1933 Manhattan and will therefore be chillingly realistic.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 8:15 p.m. CST

    Well. at least that image is better than that giant green Mr. Mi

    by seppukudkurosawa

    And t'is official, this big sexy beast (with the pert nipples) has gotten me excited. Wouldn't you have pert nipples too if you had Naomi Watts in the palm of your hand?

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 8:31 p.m. CST

    fuck you harry! im soooo jealous!

    by s0nicdeathmonkey

    ive been wanting an original kong poster since before i had anyway to comprehend how much that shit would cost me.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 8:38 p.m. CST

    "Doesn't really look like 30s New York to me"

    by performingmonkey

    Maybe that's because a) you've never been to 1930s New York, b) Jackson and crew have spent a lot longer than you researching how it looked, c) you probably just picture it in black and white. As for Kong's size, I have a feeling they might make him look bigger at the top of the ESB add to the coolness. They did this on the original Kong. They made it so he was double his original size for the climax. (that last sentence is so wrong). This was the Empire cover, so what's the real story? It would be cool if it was a real teaser poster. Also, they should do a Rex/Kong fight poster or an Ann tied up poster.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 8:43 p.m. CST

    I have a feeling...

    by jpdill

    ... this film will do well critically and with the audience, but poorly (well, not amazing) at box-office. Shame, if true.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 9 p.m. CST

    Uh, hate to break it to ya jpdill

    by Riff Randall

    but you just contradicted yourself, unless no one told me "audience" isn't the same as box office.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 9:37 p.m. CST

    C'mon Harry...

    by Grammaton Cleric

    I always thought you and the AICN gang were above the fray. Devolving to the lowest common talkback denominator via limp insults is kind of abhorrent.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 9:40 p.m. CST

    whats Kong's OTHER HAND holding!!!

    by KongMonkey

    So thats why he hasn't eaten her yet. His imagination is flying, and soon so will a big glob of giant gorilla sperm to shoot down the byplanes moving in for the kill.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 9:49 p.m. CST

    "Behold, the world's first REMAKE OF A REMAKE!!!"

    by Osmosis Jones

    Uh, there were three versions of Invasion Of The Body Snatchers, and about three versions of Ben Hur, before the Kong trifecta.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 9:57 p.m. CST

    Remake of a remake, of a remake...

    by Kjotvi

    As far as I'm concerned, this is the only remake of willis O'Brian's classic. If you're going to consider De Laurentis' attemp as anything but a spoof, then you have to include King Kong vs Godzilla, as well as that gawdawful 1970s cartoon series and the Classics Illustrated comic book. None of them count (nor did they in their day).

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 10:08 p.m. CST

    KONGS SIZE in the TRAILOR....

    by uberman

    I beleive he looked smaller when flipping the car because the car is flying TOWARDS the audience P.O.V., while kong is in the background. This is a phenom called 'Perspective'. Did you ever notice how a airplane looks smaller than your hand when its flying off in the horizon? But when you try ad grab it, you catch nothing but air? That is because it is 'Farther Away' than it appears and is, in reality, actually much, much bigger that your enitire room located in your moms basement. Remember, its called, 'Perspective.'

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 10:27 p.m. CST

    "you just wont leave me alone, hey" "Rrrrroooow Grunt" "Can you

    by TheGinger Twit

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 11:09 p.m. CST

    So how exactly is this a spoiler?

    by pizzatheface

    Somebody not know that King Kong involves a large ape holding a girl on a building? The only spoiler here is Harry spoilin' his trousers with excitement.

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 11:30 p.m. CST

    "Me Kong...."

    by CerebralAssassin

    "Ooga booga! Me Kong! Me king! Blond girl hot piece ass! Me cock too big for blond girl. Poor Kong! Ooga! Maybe blond girl like Kong betterer if me do crunches. Fat belly make Kong fat and ugly and undesirable for hot small blond girl! Ooga Booga!!"

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 11:31 p.m. CST

    If you love blondes, then you will love this. BRITNEY SPEARS SE

    by islander

    http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2004580002-2005460337,00.html

  • Oct. 5, 2005, 11:33 p.m. CST

    by passing time

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 12:17 a.m. CST

    What is it about seeing the King's 'Donkey Kong'?

    by Doc_Strange

    Obviously this is a PG-13 rated movie so I think Universal had to castrate Kong in order for it not to rate as a pseudo-beastiality x-rated movie.

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 12:18 a.m. CST

    NOTE THE SUBLIMINAL FACE IN THE ORANGE CLOUD

    by Regis Travolta

    WHO IS THAT THE FACE OF? FRAN?

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 1:03 a.m. CST

    Nice one

    by moviemaniac-7

    But if the movie opens in two months, isn't it about time for the REAL THEATRICAL poster? Hopefully they don't do character posters. Ugh. But I loved this image ever since it was announced on the Empire site.

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 1:35 a.m. CST

    Rouge Et Noir

    by OldEnoughForMe

    was a terrible song by Modern Talking. This poster is cool. Blade Runner! It has that look going for it. Beauty and the Beast at its finest. What an odd tension between those two. Must suck to be in love with someone in a different size. Serkis and mo-cap team is the only thing I'm going to see this for.

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 2:37 a.m. CST

    1976 King Kong poster is awesome!

    by one9deuce

    The artwork with Kong standing on the Twin Towers is outstanding even if the movie is only decent. As cool as the artwork for the Jaws poster. Why don't they make great posters anymore? Seriously, when was the last time a movie had an iconic poster that everyone recognizes? Also, the 1976 King Kong poster said "The most exciting original motion picture event of all time" for those that were paraphrasing in above posts. I think the size of King Kong in this new picture is just right, but the one thing that just keeps bugging me about him is that he does look just like an gorilla. Not unique or anything, just a giant gorilla. The 1933 (and 1976 for that matter) King Kong looked only like King Kong. As much monster as a gorilla, and totally original looking.

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 3:29 a.m. CST

    If that aint a monkey then...

    by Der-Rabe

    I've been skeptical about King Kong after I saw the trailer but man if this poster is anything the movie gonna be...I'm one geek ready for the monkey business.. Bring it on! Hua!

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 4:41 a.m. CST

    erm, so does kong want to fuck her or what?

    by William Cutting

    never understood that bit

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 4:55 a.m. CST

    Which one is kong?

    by Colonel_Blimp

    And where's zira and cornelius? Hardyharrharr. This picture is too kitsch for my taste. sorry. that look was ok for the spiderman 2 poster, but kong should be more adventurelike, or more romantic. this just reminds me of something you get when you buy a pictureframe at IKEA. i hope the film will be great though. If PJ manages to invest this with as much awesomeness and emotional wallop as he did lotr i'll be one happy camper. my fingers (and opposable ape-toes) are crossed.

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 5:45 a.m. CST

    A Classic Kong Poster

    by 0074Ever

    They don't make 'em like they used to! ... http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v298/EdFlood/kong.jpg

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 11:33 a.m. CST

    "Aww, Harry -- Ain't It Old News?!"

    by Immortal_Fish

    All you folks moaning about this being old news, knowing this was not the actual poster, knowing this was just an Empire Rag picture, etc... here's an idea. START your OWN SITE and SCOOP HARRY.

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 11:36 a.m. CST

    And for you Re-Post of a Re-Post people

    by Immortal_Fish

    Can't you at least attempt to put a different spin on that tired comment? I bet you folks are the same ones complaining about Hollowood running out of ideas.

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 11:45 a.m. CST

    A Gorilla??

    by DiernaSoul

    So he's a Mountain Greyback Gorilla now? Interesting... hopefully they'll also do a remake of the sequel "Son of Kong". The ending to that movie always makes me cry. Too bad none of the hobbits from LOTR were able to find time in their schedule to be in this movie. I still think it would be funny to have King Kong stomp on some hobbits.

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 11:45 a.m. CST

    Kong's Got Man-Boobs!

    by Graphix67

    Hmmmmm.... In the movie-trailer, Kong looked more like a glorified Mighty Joe Young but on the poster, he obviously looks considerably larger and more monsterous. Just another example of no truth in advertising I suppose.

  • Oct. 6, 2005, noon CST

    No interest to see this new Kong...

    by MechaTruffautMk2

    ...but I'm very excited to see the original which will thankfully finally be put out on DVD thanks to this movie.

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 12:21 p.m. CST

    DiernaSoul

    by seppukudkurosawa

    If you count Andy Serkis' Gollum as a hobbit, then don't despair for he can be found in this film as both Kong himself (not as the Man In Suit...unless you count a white onesie with balls attached to it as a suit. Yes I said balls attached to it you immature talkbackers), and also a highly-scurvy looking Cockney galley cook.

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 12:47 p.m. CST

    Don't Like It

    by cabsau

    I look forward to emotional depth from this adventure film, but this image says chick flick Kong. Also, while teaser and poster images of the films past exaggerated Kong's size, the depth of this image confuses me. Unless he is going to be bigger than the teaser shows; which could be waaaaay cool, I just scratch my head at the scale, the exaggerated color palate and the message of the image. A soft moment for Kong and Anne in the sunset...PLEASE. So, the new film end

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 1:01 p.m. CST

    Kong then and now

    by mrbuckles

    I'm interested to see this primarily to see if the interesting interpretation of the film I read -- Kong as the monster of Denham's Id -- is retained. Not saying that it has to be, I'm just curious if it will be.

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 1:26 p.m. CST

    NES

    by seppukudkurosawa

    the poll's for Best politically incorrect quote, not Most politically incorrect quote...if that were the case, then take five random words from your spiel and Bingo, you win.

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 1:39 p.m. CST

    But you're right about Sexy Beast

    by seppukudkurosawa

    I'm not sure how many votes any quotes from that film would get, but I'd vote for: "I fucked Jackie. Dirty cow. During what we were doing, she tried to stick her finger up my bum. I nearly hit the roof, you can imagine. I mean, what have you got to think of a woman who'd want to do that?"

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 1:59 p.m. CST

    by dommy-gnome

    Hey everyone whos knocking on Harry for this not being "news": I HADN'T SEEN IT YET SO SHUT THE FUCK UP! SO FUCKING WHAT IF YOU'VE ALLREADY SEEN IT GET THE FUCK OF THIS FUCKING SITE!

  • Yeah, what he said.

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 3:24 p.m. CST

    Kong's balls...

    by MaguaSynfield

    ...now I'm concerned - he is, after all, a boy monkey ( unless Jackson is really taking this thing another way)...and if Anne Darrow gets him excited...well, there goes the PG rating. The pic looks amazing - I will trust Peter Jackson until (unless) he porks the pooch. I'm hoping he won't.

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 3:37 p.m. CST

    Shaping up to be the movie of the year!

    by GravyAkira

    I should let you know that I am a LOTR fanatic who is waiting for this more than any other film this year. I am expecting this to be the best blockbuster since FOTR Peter! Any word on the new trailer?

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 3:41 p.m. CST

    Alright Nintendo! Tell it man!

    by cabsau

    Hell yeah! Exercise your freedom of speech and all man. Way to go! You rock! Fuck those politically correct cunts, queers and coons! It's there for burnt out, intellectually stunted, little dicked, greasy pock skinned, pot bellied, inbred, uneducated, emotional weaklings who cower behind film forum BBS' to speak out about their truths. Among the human garbage that usually mills about these talk backs, you're definitely a leader man. A credit to your sex and race. Makes me want to blow you! God-damn Harry. You must be proud of your site.

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 5:52 p.m. CST

    SPOILER!!! King Kong is...

    by BannedOnTheRun

    A GIANT APE!!! And the chick in The Crying Game is, a, er, a man!

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 7:49 p.m. CST

    and Bruce Willis' character in The Sixth Sense

    by ATARI

    is actually dead!

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 8:17 p.m. CST

    and Norman Bates' Mom is actually...

    by seppukudkurosawa

    Alfred Hitchcock's token cameo.

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 8:45 p.m. CST

    And Rosebud? Ha, I tell ya!

    by Judge Doom

    Just a snowboard, or something.

  • And no fair saying the FX. John Barry's soundtrack is awesome, Charles Grodin is funny, Jessica Lang is teh hawt and it's got The Dude! And it's MAN IN SUIT! all the way. Of course it's cheesy but guess what, the fucking story is cheesy. I think it had more personality than this one probably would.

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 9:41 p.m. CST

    "I think it had more personality than this one probably would."

    by slappy jones

    that sentence only is a perfect example of why i still come here everyday.....beautiful.

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 10:19 p.m. CST

    I like the new black obligatory posts....

    by HavokJD

    It's like a new lure to the site I guess. Come argue and be childish with Harry himself!! This site seems to be getting worse and worse.

  • Oct. 6, 2005, 10:32 p.m. CST

    Looks good

    by Mafu

    I've tried to avoid watching the video diaries on Kongisking.com, keeping my mind's eye clear of Kong information, though I did watch a couple of them. But as a first impression the screenshot of Kong looks good to me. I even suffer mild vertigo seeing Kong elevated so high above the city. I have a fear of heights anyway, so I'm sure this film rub it in my face. Cool.

  • Oct. 7, 2005, 2:29 a.m. CST

    wtf time period is this set in anyway?

    by captain_sulu

    the trailer makes it look like it's set ages ago, this poster looks like it's set in the future - what gives?

  • Oct. 7, 2005, 3:25 a.m. CST

    Whats so horrible about it??

    by TheGinger Twit

    everything!

  • Oct. 7, 2005, 3:31 a.m. CST

    So do you all you guys just bitch and moan about a film that you

    by passing time

    I've seen some pretty shitty media releases and trailers only to find fabulous films. How can one reach a guilty verdict without a trial?

  • Oct. 7, 2005, 9:18 a.m. CST

    Fucking beautiful.

    by minderbinder

    If the whole movie looks more like a painting than real life, fine by me. If I want to see real life I'll go watch the monkeys fling poop at the zoo.

  • Oct. 7, 2005, 4:20 p.m. CST

    Eat a mango and relax

    by MrCere

    This is nothing but a hi-res image WETA cooked up for a magazine to sell magazines. That is it. Kong is a movie MONSTER, not a nice ape in love with a 5'5'' blonde. This is no movie poster. And Harry "knows" Jackson in that they have talked and emailed but they aren't regular phone buddies and Harry doesn't just call him up and ask, "Hey Pete, is this the poster?" Making Kong keeps him occupied. Beautiful image, crappy King Kong movie poaster and definitely NOT NOT NOT a genuine poster. People get sooooo worked up!

  • Oct. 7, 2005, 6:17 p.m. CST

    You know what they say about monkeys' "size"

    by deadguy76

    Once you go Kong, you'll never go wrong. Maybe Naomi Watts is used to dating Black guys and it wasn't enough.

  • Oct. 7, 2005, 8:17 p.m. CST

    awh, let'em bitch. They're still gonna fork over what d

    by KongMonkey

    Kong is King. Period. Who cares if his tale is told more than once. Didn't stop Godzilla. Infact that big muthafucka is still crushing Tokyo after all these years, via Special FX designer Mannen Rubbursoot. BTW: THAT WAS THE FLAW OF KONG 76'. Instead of the kickass FX that were promised, WE GOT RICK BAKER IN A MONKEY SUIT! Thats not kong, man. Thats not kong. Along with the fact that 76 lacked some prehistoric punching bags for the big guy, and instead we get a giant snake via Special FX guru Icann C. Thawyrre.

  • Oct. 7, 2005, 9:15 p.m. CST

    KongMonkey

    by seppukudkurosawa

    with a name like that you think anyone's gonna take what you say on a King Kong talkback seriously? It's like going on a Lord of the Rings talkback with the name GandalftheGrey (something I've admittedly done before).