Logo

Cool News

Massawyrm will suck out the VENOM, but I don't think he's swallowing this load!

Published at:  Sep 11, 2005 3:53:17 PM CDT

Hey folks, Harry here with that Massawyrm fella. He's got the unenviable task of suffering through current releases while Quint, Mori and I are on QT vacation. Poor guy. VENOM sounds like the bomb, yo! Here ya go...





Hola all. Massawyrm here. You know, somewhere in the world there is a room - a room where evil drips off the very walls and a vile, creeping wickedness hangs in the air. A place where souls are sucked free of their hosts and gnawed upon - cannibalized until they are virtually unrecognizable. It is a place, buried within the murky depths of Dimension studios, where producers and writers ingest sacred herbs and discuss how they could possibly make another horror film despite the fact that almost all of the good ideas have been done. It is a place that no good ever comes out of and real ideas never escape. It was in this very room, on a dark and languid night, that Venom was given birth and set in motion to do it’s worst to the world.




There are times when you watch a film, scratch your head and wonder – ‘what the hell were they thinking?’ But then, once in a blue moon, there comes that rare, special occasion when you can peer through the ether into the minds of the creators and see exactly what they were thinking. Venom is just such a film. I envision the scene something like this –




“Dude, you know the briefcase from Pulp Fiction?” “Yeah.” “Well, you know how the combination was 666 and it was all glowy and shit inside and Ving Rhames had a band-aid on the back of his neck?” “Yeah.” “So, what those guys were carrying around was the soul of this really evil, hardcore mother fucker.” “Dude, Quentin said that was made up fanboy bullshit.” “I know. I know. So it wouldn’t actually be stealing if we made a movie about that, now would it? Hey, pass that thing man, don’t bogart it.” “Okay, I’m with you. Evil Breifcase.” “No way, we’d have to be a little more clever than that – don’t want to catch any fanboy shit. We’ll make it a suitcase.” “Okay, so how did the soul get into the suitcase?” “I don’t know, some voodoo shit or something.” “It’d have to be a creepy fucking suitcase – but if it’s voodoo, we’ll have to have some snakes or something.” “Yeah! Snakes in a suitcase with the souls of really evil guys! Hell if snakes on a plane is some scary shit, snakes in a suitcase has to be like twice as scary. Nobodies afraid of suitcases!” “So like the snakes bite you and you get possessed by the souls in the snakes?” “Yeah!” “So who do the snakes bite?” “An escaped convict.” “Naw, been done.” “An escaped mental patient?” “Passé.” “Fisherman?” “Nope.” “I don’t know…um…a creepy tow truck driver.” “Now we’re talking.” “Yeah, and he can kill people with tire chains and a crowbar.” “Sweet! I’ll bet that’s never been done.” “Dude, lets take it to Harvey and Bob.” “Definitely. Hey, I wonder if we could Get Kevin Williamson on this – he loves this sort of shit.”




Venom is the perfect example of how modern horror is done wrong. Not bad – but wrong. It’s not a terrible movie, really it’s not. It’s certainly total crap – but far from being absolutely terrible. It’s just done wrong. The movie kicks off with this total 80’s movie vibe, like you’re watching some lost Friday the 13th movie. This is exactly the type of movie Quint and I used to stay up till all hours of the night devouring, drinking in both the ingenuity and the terribleness inherent in many of the films. But what is forgivable in the films of twenty to thirty years ago is far from forgivable now. Back then the sub-genre of the slasher film was just cutting its teeth, and many of the things we were seeing were being done for the first time. But here, now, everything is simply being borrowed – Nay – stolen outright.




Venom’s worst crime is that it borrows incessantly from the genre but gives nothing back. Not a damned thing. It offers nothing inventive, nothing ingenious, nothing remotely worthy of even mentioning to your buddies once the final credits begin to roll. Even though the Friday the 13th movies were telling the same story over and over and over again, the filmmakers knew what audiences wanted and gave it to them. Jason Voorhees didn’t kill people in the same manner every time – he shook it up. Sometimes it was hedge clippers through the eyes (which he then closed shut) and sometimes it was a pitchfork through the chest. It wasn’t always original but it was always bloody and each film offered at least one new demented kill for us gore hounds to savor and argue over as we discussed which was our favorite. Even many of the modern, highly derivative films like Wrong Turn and House of Wax put this to good use. The idea of sadistic, even mutant, rednecks killing in the woods has been around in fiction for over 70 years - back when H.P. Lovecraft first gave us the classic “The Picture in the House.’ – but each of these films puts their focus not on the fact that the death was scary, but rather, how terrifying that manner of death is. Neither of these films will live on as classics, but each entertained, giving us film buffs plenty of material for our late night, caffeine induced rants on the genre. They entertained, gave us new manners of death to fear and made us giggle at their inventiveness. Venom does not.




Its one moderately original idea is a possessed fucking Samsonite with snakes. That’s it. And it’s not like they couldn’t have done anything original with the idea – it just got bungled by bad writing, mediocre directing and a knowledge of the genre that belies no understanding of it. I mean, here we have a killer, the afore mentioned tow truck driver, possessed by the evil souls ‘milked’ out of dozens of sick, sadistic, evil bastards. There’s a lot you could do with that – really there is. First of all, you could have at least made the tow truck driver likable, endearing. He’s already set up in the script as one of the main character’s estranged father. Would it have been too much to make him tragic – maybe adding a bit of pathos to the film? Nope. He’s gotta be a piece of shit to begin with – it’s not enough that he gets possessed by truckloads of evil – we gotta hate and ‘fear’ him from the start. With the tow truck driver’s son running around, playing with the idea of him wanting to save his father rather than destroy him could have created an interesting conflict between the characters. Has it been done? Sure. But it would have been more interesting than what we’re given here.




But more importantly, we’re told that this guy is possessed by the evil of ‘Countless evil souls.’ You with me? The idea is that some twisted, sick bastards had their sins and wicked thoughts ‘milked’ out with a voodoo ritual and all that fucked up shit is coalesced into these snakes kept in a suitcase. One could imagine the idea that all this ‘evil’ might manifest itself into some pretty disturbed manners of death. One would assume from the way it’s presented that these are not just guys who like killing, but rather are also rapists, pedophiles, sadists, and masochists – deranged mother fuckers of all shape and kind. And these souls might be in conflict with one another, each vying for control to live out their maddened fantasies that have been lying in wait for decades for their chance once again share their pain with the world. But nope – they just want Ray, our tow truck driver, to keep impaling people with a crowbar and choke them with tire chains. Oh, and then dump the bodies in a pile.




This was a real chance to get creative, to unleash some seriously sick shit on the audience – to let our minds try to wrap around just how evil this monstrosity could be. It was a chance to give us scant pieces of the souls histories to make us fear just who might take control next. It was a chance to give us a villain that didn’t just kill, but really, honestly got off to it – to not just scare us with how he was going to kill, but to scare us even more with the idea of what happened after that. True horror is psychological, not physical. What scares us most is what might happen, not what actually happens – and the great films of the genre execute that idea with extreme prejudice. Great films of this genre get under our skin and keep us from sleeping at night.




And Venom is not even a passable film in this genre.




First of all, despite being set in the town of Backwater, Louisiana (I shit you not), the entire cast looks and sounds like they just walked off the set of Mtv’s ‘Laguna Beach’ – there’s nary a southern accent nor an authentic character to be found. It’s the usual assemblage of up and coming pretty faces given their readily identifiable personality traits that clearly denote them as victim #1 and Victim #2, ect. Now, with a movie like the classic ‘Pumpkinhead’ this works because they’re all visiting backwoods, bumfuck nowhere – here they’re all supposed to be locals. Locals who don’t know anything about where they live like, with nuggets of knowledge like oh say, don’t go running into the swamp. And while they do give us the granddaughter of a voodoo priestess, better known as Little Miss Exposition, they can’t even give us something remotely interesting like maybe the redneck son of a local trapper who knows the bayou like the back of his hand and can fashion rudimentary traps from stuff he finds lying around? I mean if you’re going to do things that have been done before, go whole hog and redo some of the interesting stuff (One 80’s style weapon making montage would have killed them?) Instead these are more like the kids who broke down in the swamp – not the kind who live there.




And while they set the film in the swamp, they never do anything interesting with the setting either. This could just have easily been set in the woods anywhere. Only the Voodoo of the deep south warrants it being set there. It’s all for look – not effect. If you’re going to have teens running through a swamp, how about making the swamp just as scary as the deranged psycho killer? Force the characters to really have to make a tough decision about what’s scarier – a crowbar wielding zombie or potentially getting snapped in half by an alligator. Speaking of which, you’ve got a rotting madman running through the swamp and you can’t give us a single psycho killer/gator fight? I mean come on – zombie vs. shark was a classic kind of awesome and if you’re going to steal, steal from the best. Think about it, this movie was one gator fight away from being memorable.




But no – despite the genre, despite the lack of ingenuity in the deaths, despite the utter lack of detail to the area in question, this movie wants to take itself seriously every single moment. Which is another of Venom’s many problems. Some of you may be rolling your eyes and thinking “Gator fights and montages? That’s retarded.” It sure is – but it’s fun. Venom never wants to be fun – and these days, derivative Slasher films HAVE to be. Slasher films just aren’t scary anymore. Mindless killers have been run into the ground and if you’re not playing around with genuinely scary ideas, when you’re not presenting a film that just drips with mood and nuance, you have to at least make it fun. Not necessarily with satire or cornball jokes, but let us know we don’t have to take it seriously. Let us laugh and enjoy the deaths for what they are – mindless entertainment. Because mindless is all Venom really is.




Which I have a strong feeling stems from the third and most vital problem with Venom – the ‘talent’ behind it (and I use that word in the loosest of all possible terms.) First off, it’s produced by Kevin Williamson, a man who’s never met an idea of someone else’s that he didn’t like - for his own films. While many will defend Williamson for his one decent film, Scream (which merely riffed on the rules of horror films and began the self-referential freight train of wink-at-the-camera-and-reference-other-better-horror-films films we’ve been enduring on and off for the last 9 years), they often neglect that the man hasn’t touched another single movie that didn’t rip off from everything else in the genre and simply make it slicker and post-modern. But if his hand in this film isn’t enough, Venom reunites Williamson with director Jim Gillespie, best known for directing Williamson’s ‘I Know What You Did Last Summer.’ For those of you who’ve watched Venom’s trailer and noticed the killer wielding something hook-like and oddly familiar, know now that this is no accident. Gillespie not only rips off from the genre, but cannibalizes his only other theatrically distributed, and also highly derivative, film. Switching from a fisherman to a tow truck driver, the only thing he does different here is presenting the villain as edgier by shooting him with a 45 degree shutter (making the camera seem shaky and sporadic) while inserting over exposed pieces of film, ultimately giving it that Se7en/Nine Inch Nails music video effect. Unfortunately, it doesn’t help.




And if the idea of a suitcase full of souls possessing someone and turning him into an unstoppable killer that chases kids through the swamp feels more like something out of the current crop of video games then anything that should be shot as a film, it should. The two guys behind it (credited with the story and no doubt the first draft of the script) are two seasoned video game writers, who while having written for some cool freaking video games (like Dead to Rights and Chronicles of Riddick: Escape from Butcher Bay) don’t make the transition to film that one could hope for. But swooping in to save the day to get the coveted screenplay credit is none other than the writer of Wicker Park. Yeah, not exactly the guy I’d go to for an inning of relief pitching from a fresh arm.




But the final nail in the coffin lies in the production values. While certainly this movie looks like some money went into it (complete with CG snakes) – it completely fails to go into the places it should go for an 80’s slasher film knock-off. While we’re given alluring girls to look at, there’s zero T&A. Fine by me, but a staple of the genre demanded by many who love it. And the gore? The most vitally important part of a slasher film? Fairly minimal. There is one decent shot of the tattered flesh of an arm torn out of it’s socket (done off camera), but the bulk of the kills are all prosthetic neck and chest wounds – almost all done with a crowbar. The films one moderately inventive death is completely wasted – and a sheer sign of where the money went – as a girl pinned under a car is about to be hit with a sandblaster (which Ray shows off by removing the paint of a car door.) As he brings the sandblaster down, rather than showing us a scant second of the effect or ever really showing us the aftermath of the flesh having been peeled off the bone, we’re treated to the sandblaster being turned on the camera and digital sand flying at the screen before we cut away. Ooooh! Scary! The idea was kinda neat, but the execution is amazingly lame. The only thing that doesn’t entirely disappoint in this film is the look of Ray, who seems to decay more and more as the film goes on, and does look kind of cool. However, while his body becomes more and more rotten, the make up effects people seem to forget to tear off chunks of flesh or add gaping holes from the couple of times he gets hit from a shotgun at close range. I mean, if they’d done something like that, maybe this film would get a cool point or two. Alas, he suffers from Voorhees/Myers syndrome – the inability to show serious structural damage despite the tremendous amount of damage he takes.




Not to mention that Ray not only borrows, but steals every convention laid down by the Voorhees/Myers model. With such hits including ‘Slow, stumbling, methodical walk’, ‘The ability to catch up to you no matter how fast you go or how far ahead you are’, ‘The inability to speak’, ‘The Brooding stare’ and who could forget the classic ‘The necessity to strike a menacing pose after each kill or every time those pesky kids get away.’ The only thing missing is the mask.




Ultimately, this film is everything you’d expect from the talent involved. Tired, repetitive, and lacking a single scrap of imagination. Neither goofy, campy fun, nor remotely frightening, Venom proves only to exist for that special breed of movie-goer who rents everything and anything horror related – from scythe wielding scarecrow movies to anything with ‘zombie’ in the title, no matter what the budget – in hopes of finding a single scrap of cool and enjoying it no matter how bad it is. For the rest of us, it’s laughably bad only in whole, not in parts. Like I said, it’s not terrible – just entirely uninspired. Although knowing Dimension’s love of sequels, those two guys are probably back in that dank, cyclopean tomb of evil, musing to themselves: “Dude, what if that suitcase were part of a whole matched set of luggage?” “Dude, that’s genius. Call Harvey and Bob.”




Until next time, friends, Smoke ‘em if ya got ‘em. I know I will.



Massawyrm



Do you have Venom I can Suck out? Contact me here for proper suckage!









    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 3:59:31 PM CDT

    What the fuck are you talking about RJ....

    by axelfoley


    I mean Harry. I mean RJ, I mean, oh well, way to waste a minute of my life I'll never have back. This article made no FUCKING sense. What the fuck is with you lately anyway?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 4:00:05 PM CDT

    This week on ACCORDING TO JIM...

    by uncle stan

    "Wedding Bell Blues"
    Jim scrambles to find a replacement minister when he accidentally knocks the reverend unconscious with the car door on Dana's wedding day.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 4:10:16 PM CDT

    I think that review is longer than the movie...

    by lance rock

  • Sep 11, 2005 4:11:38 PM CDT

    yeeaash ... i'll pass

    by todayzspecial

    where is darkhorizons.com? Its been down almost a month now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 4:17:31 PM CDT

    Where is Baron Samedi when you need him?

    by the awful goggle

    He should have been a no-brainer in a Voodoo horor flick.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 4:21:41 PM CDT

    i gave up after one paragraph

    by bitterman23

    christ, if it sucks, say so and move on. and really, what do you expect from dimension anyway??? decency?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 4:24:34 PM CDT

    What are "real ideas"

    by jorson2

    I know there are good ideas, bad ideas, original ideas and unoriginal ideas, but what are "real ideas?" I mean, isn't that like asking what are real numbers? ALL numbers are real numbers, right? Why are not all ideas "real ideas?"

    Also, why does everyone love "Pulp Fiction" but hate unoriginal horror movies? I mean, I hate unoriginal movies, too, but I also dislike "Pulp Fiction" for some of the same reasons. "Pulp Fiction" is so derivative of everything 70's and exploitative that it's practiclly DEFINED -- even entitled -- by its derivative nature. What did Tarantino do that makes him above everyone else whose work is derivative -- make fun of what he was imitating? SO WHAT? IT'S STILL IMITATION!

    Oh, and by the way, that logo for the reviewer sucks. Some Kevin Smith look-alike smoking while riding an upside-down cross like a pogo stick? Please, as if Christianity isn't made fun of and lampooned enough on this site. Talk about UNORIGINAL. Make fun of some double-talking eastern religion for a change, will 'ya? (Fat chance...)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 4:38:04 PM CDT

    Thought this referred to Spiderman...

    by performingmonkey

    Thought Venom was confirmed for a second, and I swear that a little bit of poo came out, just a little. Fuck Venom. Bring on Sandman. Power to the people. End this destructive conflict. Fuck you.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 4:42:24 PM CDT

    So Did I....Here's some VENOM news from SPIDERMAN 3

    by dark_silence

    The folks over at freezedriedmovies seem pretty convinced that Topher Grace is to play Venom.
    Follow the link for more:

    http://www.fi-sci.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=230&Itemid=44

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 4:54:42 PM CDT

    Man, this is longer than John Holmes's equipment!

    by lord_soth

    Even with the smallest font size.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 5:03:41 PM CDT

    damn

    by blackthought

    an editor please, when did reviews turn into thesis papers?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 5:17:44 PM CDT

    Love it or leave it

    by mcvamp

    Either people complain AICN reviewers are too vague or they get all ass-itched because a little prose is involved. Jeepers H. Crackers, if you want a short synopsis and a general yea/nay, go read Yahoo's Movie Mom. The regular AICN reviewers are ALWAYS adding personal opinions, pointing out notable scenes, or writing six paragraphs about their pre-movie breakfast. Whether it ends up being an entertaining read or rambles pointlessly for minutes and minutes, your average AICN review--by Harry, Quint, Massawyrm, Moriarty, A. DuPont, Vern, so on and so on, etc.--has been like that for YEARS. It's not going to change. Are we over it?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 5:18:18 PM CDT

    It's worse, this sounds like a Star Trek episode.

    by i dunno

    And early episode of the Next Generation, a society too all their evil out of themselves and left it behind in the form of this black tar creature. It's how that dyke looking Lt Yar got killed. You know your horror movie is lame when it rips off an old Trek.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 5:47:01 PM CDT

    That was so fucking long

    by youinrawbins?

    that I stopped about 1 1/2 paragraphs in, scrolled down, thought "fuck it" and then began furiously tossing to porn.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 6:00:17 PM CDT

    I could tell just from the trailer that Venom would stink

    by thirteen 13

    And I didn't realize this review for Venom was so long until it took me 12 minutes to scroll down the whole thing and skip straight to the talkbacks. And then I was even more shocked when the usual pre-teen gimps missed this article and didn't scream "FIRST!!!!".

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 6:00:51 PM CDT

    I couldn't make it through the whole review

    by smokey mcspliff

    Did he recommend the movie or not?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 6:09:21 PM CDT

    And whats with that stupid logo

    by thirteen 13

    Oh gee another indie slacker wearing his baseball cap backwards and making fun of Christianity. Oh wow, thats only been done 2,000,000 times before. Even Christains don't get offended at this stuff because its copied so much and so unoriginal and boring.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 6:14:49 PM CDT

    Thirteen 13, maybe that was his point lol.

    by calami-shami

  • Sep 11, 2005 6:20:08 PM CDT

    Intentions good, writing gibberish

    by the good doctor

    When Harry blathers on for weeks about some basically average film you may disagree but you rarely pass out from boredom by paragraph 5. Massawyrm is just a poor writer ; no structure, no point and no talent do not a good review make. Eh ?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 6:20:32 PM CDT

    Yeah, the logo is pretty lame

    by i dunno

    Is that Harry's logo? The head of the site? Wow. that's just...wow. And I don't mean wow as in shocking or offensive or intellectually challenging, I mean wow as in I hope you didn't pay the pissed off 5th grader more than $20 for that.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 6:23:11 PM CDT

    George Bush Doesn't Care About The Black Cat

    by nathan barley

    That nerdy polish(?) chick who lived next to Parker in Spider-Man 2? The Black Cat. And Venom sucks.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 7:51:32 PM CDT

    Massawyrm just trying too hard...

    by grandmufftarkin

    Yeah, I know you want to do good while the bosses are away, but dude, edit your work abit before going to press, or take some Kaopectate for the diarrhea of the mouth you're experiencing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 7:58:17 PM CDT

    Just for the record, this is the same movie that was previously

    by pardon_my_zinger

    I saw the preview under the original title back in June and posted the early review (under another name) right here on AICN: http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=20673 It'll be interesting to see how the changed the movie (other than the title) since then.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 8:05:13 PM CDT

    Short Attention Span Review

    by massawyrm 1

    There were pretty people. They got killed in boring ways. Don't bother. - Looks like some kids forgot their ritilin today -

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 10:07:25 PM CDT

    "Venom is the perfect example of how modern horror is done wrong

    by 3 bag enema

    At this point I'm ready to tear my own fucking hair out. Who could read this?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Firstly, we need a pecking order. Good, bad, right, wrong, crap, terrible, absolutly terrible, retarded, sick...rate these from best to worst with a left inner join at context. That would be a start.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 11:01:20 PM CDT

    Thomas Beckett

    by massawyrm 1

    Thank you for your kind words. A few notes: 1) I'm a christian 2) The logo was Harry's idea of a joke taking a shot at me and my "Christlike" appearance 3) It's a joke. Although I'd like to note that you said "Only a coward makes fun of something they are sure there will be no reprisal for." I'd also like to note that my guess is Thomas Beckett isn't your real name and despite there being a link to my e-mail address right here on the article, you chose to make a public display that didn't include the ability for me to respond to you personally. "Without fear of reprisal?" Coward. And oh yeah, Hypocrite. Bash on my writing all you like - it's what talkbacks for. But maybe, I don't know, e-mail me and ask the facts before you start throwing around accusations.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 11:17:57 PM CDT

    Thomas Beckett gets the "Terrible Mr Grimshaw" award for this ta

    by iamjack'suserid

    If you can name the reference, you are THE man or woman.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 11:21:01 PM CDT

    I actually thought that was a good review...

    by el scorcho

    Much better writing than most of the stuff here on AICN. A few grammatical and spelling mistakes, but a well-written review. I look forward to more of your reviews, Massawyrm.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2005 11:22:54 PM CDT

    But I am slightly offended by the "logo"

    by el scorcho

    But, oh well.

    Reply to Talkback

  • ...I think not!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 12, 2005 12:11:07 PM CDT

    Bwahahaha..

    by david assholehof

    Massawyrm's review was long and slightly un-focused, but quite entertaining at points. At least until I ducked out after: "It

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 12, 2005 1:35:24 PM CDT

    By ODIN'S DINGLEBERYS!!

    by largojr

    I shall SMITE thee MIGHTILY, for thou hath wasted the Odinson's valuable fapping time on this unecessarily long review of empty twadle! BRING ON THE HERMAPHRODITIC PORN BITCHES! And the Logo looks like Silent Bob after he got his blood wings and lost weight from all the uncontrolled vomiting that followed.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 12, 2005 2:22:21 PM CDT

    I thought this was a great review

    by dorkmanscott

    In my opinion, don't say something sucks unless you can think of what would be better. Massawyrm shares with us what he thought would have been better, and given the choices, I'd have to agree, a lot of his ideas would have made the movie a lot more interesting than it sounds. Just because you don't understand it doesn't make it bad writing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 12, 2005 3:54:29 PM CDT

    Yeash.

    by david assholehof

    It wasnt a bad review, just a little drawn out. Give the guy a break. And drop the religious B.S. Yeash.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 12, 2005 4:20:28 PM CDT

    I really liked this movie the first time I saw it...

    by fiester

    ...when it was called "Pet Cemetery!" Tah-dow!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 12, 2005 4:24:27 PM CDT

    Was it really worth it?

    by darth chode

    that guy just wrote 3,000 words on Venom -- a movie i don't remember anyone caring about in the first place.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 12, 2005 4:52:19 PM CDT

    Damn!!!!!!!!!!

    by capt. blackadder

    Another Spider-Man rumor.......to hell I say.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 12, 2005 4:57:06 PM CDT

    ThomasBeckett...

    by tango fett

    Hey, Allah, YOU SUCK AND STUFF! YEAH, C'MON, STOP ME, BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHApuke. I know you weren't asking me to do it, but you just can't not take advantage of an opportunity. Oh, and your pic is kind of offensive (being as I'm a Lutheran), what ISN'T offensive on this site?

    Reply to Talkback

  • and you make the baby Jesus cry.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 13, 2005 4:19:46 AM CDT

    no subject

    by darthmango

    Why do you keep referring to the koran incident, your either offended by the cartoon or your not, and yes, blowing up a 1000 year old statue makes you gay, and yes, that cartoon was a cheap and easy shot, and yes, i did like the review in freaky kind of way!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 13, 2005 9:11:56 AM CDT

    This is why I worship Crom....

    by maguasynfield

    A couple of people posting here need to light up some sweet Malaysian skunk weed, take a valium or get a life. All this venom over a lousy movie called Venom & a dufuss cartoon. A waste of passion.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 15, 2005 12:31:30 PM CDT

    Why A Review of A Bad Movie Needs To Be Long

    by www.valiens.com

    Because if the reviewer didn't justify every little quibble, you fuckers would be all over him with your pseudo-intellectual horror fanboy speak. For more on what that looks like and how annoying it is, please see sentence one.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback