Logo

Cool News

Remember Remember the 5th of... March'!'

Published at:  Aug 18, 2005 1:47:07 AM CDT

Ahoy, squirts! Quint here with some... weird news. I guess it isn't too big of a shock, but V FOR VENDETTA has been pushed back to March. Bummer since they had such an awesome tag-line that tied the film so perfectly to its release weekend. The claim is that the flick is being delayed due to "accomodate the movie's post-production schedule," which is very likely. I'm sure there are lots of effects to perfect and I'd rather wait longer to see a finely tuned film than see a rushed work in November. If they moved it to put distance between the recent London bombings and the release of the film I'd be a little upset, but I can understand that logic as well. Click the link below for the full story!



CLICK IT HERE FOR OFFICIAL WORD AT SCIFI.COM!!!





    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 1:58:31 AM CDT

    Looking forward to this

    by red lantern

    Should be good.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 2:09:41 AM CDT

    Not Gonna Say It, Not Gonna Say It

    by mark twain

  • Aug 18, 2005 2:24:52 AM CDT

    They Should Of Moved It To May 5

    by diana rules!

    Then the slogan could be "Fear the sky-o on cinco de Mayo."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 2:44:23 AM CDT

    the number one reason for studio's to move release dates...

    by griffinmill

    ... still is that the flick in question is a crapfest. Just saying... (whilst thinking about the four hours of my life I never get back by watching the Matrix sequels)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 2:52:38 AM CDT

    Awww c'mon, push it up a little farther. "Remember remember

    by inspectordoppler

    Cause it rhymes!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 3:02:31 AM CDT

    I would also rather see a better movie, but having it near Nov 5

    by iamnicksaicnsn

    Spider-Man 3 Villains = Sand-Man, Green Goblin 2, and yes, Venom! I never though he'd do it, but he did!

    Reply to Talkback

  • oh god, griffin is back with this wise words. They bring a film out and you don't like it, fine. They hold off on a film to make it great and you bitch. Get a dog or something. you sound like you need the company.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 3:14:33 AM CDT

    I don't know if this is good or bad news.

    by spectrebeeyatch

    Bad being that March is not a very big movie month. I mean BO wise so that means WB thinks V is either too complicated for viewers, or it is bad. Or this means they care about this movie to the point they want to make it perfect so sticking with date doesn't matter so much. I wish Fox would do that with X-men.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 3:29:33 AM CDT

    Also they're changing the title to "Pacific Air Flight 121".

    by frankdrebin

    Alan Moore must be spinning in his grave!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 4:53:45 AM CDT

    I dont know.....

    by emeraldboy

    I do get the feeling that this is in the can already. Like it or not july 7th/july 21 may effect this movie. I loathe censorship as much as the next person. Fans may foam at the mouth and beat a path to my door but the scene where V has bombs strapped to his body may have to be excised altogether.

    By moving this to march, means that studio is getting jittery about this movie already. It was made before recent events. Which was and is unfortunate.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 5:09:16 AM CDT

    This Is A Bad Sign

    by captain sulu

    If they had confidence in the movie, why not move it further so they could realease it for the summer blockbuster season? March is a terrible time for big budget films. Yeah, they got lucky with The Matrix once, but does anyone believe this is the new Matrix?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 5:19:07 AM CDT

    Remember the Mattress

    by liquid_hotpants

    Remember when the matrix (original) was released in the early April period? They probably want to capitalize on the lack of good flicks being released in Spring as well.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 6:14:22 AM CDT

    They should push it back to the end of time

    by angry chimp

    Because you all know it's gonna be terrible.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 6:22:48 AM CDT

    BREAKING NEWS on VforVendetta!

    by human2

    "The studio has just hired Heather Graham to play V's girlfriend in some reshoots through mid-late September. Her character who also works for the Voice as a secretary and helps V in his quest to topple the government." This is GOOD NEWS for fans of the graphic novel!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 7:22:47 AM CDT

    Too bad...

    by renonevada2000

    Pity, as this November is the 400th anniversary of Fawkes' Gunpowder plot. It made a nice meta-textual parrallel.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 7:39:22 AM CDT

    This Has Blood In The Water Written All Over It

    by prophet jeremiah

    My guess is that this movie is not filling anyone with confidence. The trailer does nothing to inspire anyone (although I do like the music), at least in the theaters where I've seen it played. This smells like putting it in front of weak competition and hoping for the best.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 7:41:32 AM CDT

    wtf

    by burlivesleftnut

    Quint keeps stealing me scoops!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 8:06:16 AM CDT

    cool thats my birthday

    by fried samurai

    Along with Andy Gibb.MMMMMMMMMM Andy Gibb..dreamy....peace

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 8:38:17 AM CDT

    knowthyself

    by occams_razor

    V isnt gay, he's just kinda fucking nuts

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 10:32:10 AM CDT

    knowthyself

    by occams_razor

    Yeah, I could see him as either a minority or a homosexual (maybe both). I always just thought of him as different and then the medical tests made him something else all together. Regardless, here's to hoping the movie doesn't suck cause I'm getting sick of bad movies.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 10:36:23 AM CDT

    Told You So

    by harker-writes

    I posted on this forum a month back that V for Vendetta would not make it's November deadline. For obvious reasons, no movie that conjures up images of Parliament being blown to bits is going to open this year. Even a British television documentarye on the history of Guy Fawkes is currently in jeopardy due to sensitivity about the bombings.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 10:38:48 AM CDT

    winter wars

    by billwiser

    this is such a Fall film it's depressing. i feel like kill bill vol 2 just got moved again.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 11:52:16 AM CDT

    Trailer Music

    by saluki

    I enjoyed the trailer, and to the poster above that said they liked the music, then pickup the Batman Begins soundtrack, that's where it's from. March? Feels more like a Hellboy/Sin City/Matrix early April release. Coming a week after Zorro was just too crowded for this type of picture. As a matter of fact, at one point Jarhead, Zorro, Domino & V were all set for November 5th!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 12:48:50 PM CDT

    Remember Remember,,,,,,,

    by darthcorns

    the fifth of march? arent people gonna be confused when they see the trailer for the first time? wtf?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 12:54:33 PM CDT

    Nothing Good Ever Happens on the Fifth of March.

    by nadine_cross

    I know. I was born that day.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 1:16:29 PM CDT

    Dang

    by ribbons

    I was looking forward to 'V for Vendetta' too. Although I'm not entirely sure that the "post-production schedule" is genuinely why they pushed the film's release date back, I had been wondering how they were gonna produce a film in, like, 6 months. Well, if they are doing this because of post-prod, then I suppose it's better to get a good movie than a rushed one.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 2:13:58 PM CDT

    DAmnit!

    by johnno

    I was so looking forward to this to supply my film needs for the fall! And ti sucks because the tagline isn't as cool anymore. Oh well, at least there's Advent Children releasing in September...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 3:03:51 PM CDT

    Being hispanic in a concentration camp

    by elpaw

    in Britain???

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 3:29:44 PM CDT

    The British Used Concentration Camps Before The Nazis

    by ill clinton

    So anything is possible.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 3:31:44 PM CDT

    I meant emphasis on hispanic

    by elpaw

    Hispanics are a "discriminated" minority maybe in the US, not in Britain

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 4:05:48 PM CDT

    Uh, no

    by ill clinton

    Hispanics are not discriminated against here, not sure where you're getting that. I suspect latinos (as we call em here), get a much better shake than they do in the UK.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 18, 2005 5:29:26 PM CDT

    We all know what this means...

    by tango fett

    Hugo Weaving has been replaced with...Vanilla Ice. Go ninja, go!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2005 4:16:28 AM CDT

    Beware...Beware...

    by justaguy

    ...this movie is going to suck bigtime.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2005 4:44:47 AM CDT

    This flick was fucked anyway....

    by doglips

    Now they've got extra time to add some more bullet time....great........this was always going to be Matrix 4.......Bald people, Hugo Weaving, over choreographed fighting, fuck V will probably have a hovercraft.....The brothers grim obviously decided that actually writing the fourth script was too much for them and their tiny collection of ideas, so promptly used Moore's instead....As I have said before this should have gone to British talent, namely Simon Pegg and Edgar Wright, a comic film by comic fans....how refreshing it could have been....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2005 5:40:52 AM CDT

    Well to be honest...

    by justaguy

    Everyone knew the film was likely going to be pretty bad once Moore disassociated himself from the film...he called the script "imbecilic"...I mean come on.

    http://www.joblo.com/index.php?id=7638

    Reply to Talkback

  • I WANT EVERYONE TO REMEMBER WHY THEY NEED US!!!
    Very disapointing, I was looking forward to seeing this so much. I love the trailer (seen it dozens of times)John Hurt as the fascistleader...brilliant. This'll be the next big thing since EQUILIBRIUM. And it even has EQ soundtrack in the trailer (another sign of its impending greatness)ANd another great quote:
    "every verdict is vegeance...A VENDETTA".

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2005 9:53:20 AM CDT

    Anchorite

    by jesuschrist

    Wow! A Fantasticks reference? Impressive...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2005 11:23:11 AM CDT

    Postponed

    by maguasynfield

    If they keep backing up the opening date on this every time something in the world explodes, we will never see this picture. And some have said that this would not be entirely bad. Did Alan Moore really turn his back on it and retch? ( metaphorically speaking) Definately not a good sign. Pity. When will the Marius VanDerLubbe film get made? With Matt Damon?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2005 1:22:50 AM CDT

    Ah, Winter. Where Bad Movies Go To Die...

    by flim springfield

    Maybe it will be up against the Pink Panther.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2005 9:16:47 AM CDT

    Those British concentration camps.

    by peter charles

    Just to be fair to those crazy Brits. When the British used "ConcentrationCamps" they intended to "concentrate" people i.e. keep them together in one big mass............... The Nazi "concentration camps" were in fact Extermination Camps - their intention was Death...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2005 2:40:28 PM CDT

    Ill Clinton

    by seepgood

    You don't get it. Hispanics, Latinos, whatever you want to call them, persons of Latin American extraction are not a disadvantaged minority group in Britain *because there are scarcely any there*. There are a few in London, because there are at least few of everyone in London, but nationally the number is absolutely negligible. What "knowthyself" said is like talking about the persecution of the Japanese community in Angola, or the Sri Lankan minority in Greenland. This may stun and amaze you, but not every country in the world has the same ethnic composition as the USA. Oh, and as for "Hispanics are not discriminated against here"...hmmm...riiight. I can't claim personal experience here, but from what I've read and seen and heard on the subject, I think you may just be off in a world of your own on that one.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2005 3:04:56 PM CDT

    Nearly right, Peter

    by seepgood

    As I understand it, the Nazi extermination camps were actually something quite distinct from their concentration camps. The concentration camps were set up some years earlier, before the war, and were simply detention camps where Jews, Communists and other and other individuals targeted for persecution were locked up. I believe the name "concentration camp" was chosen specifically in order to blunt international condemnation, by drawing a parallel with the camps which the British had set up in South Africa to intern Boer civilians for the duration of the Boer War. The use of the same term enabled the Nazis to say "look, we're only doing the same as the British did in South Africa". The death camps came later, after the institution of the "Final Solution", and they were not described as "concentration camps". The widespread use of that term to describe them today is just one of those popular inaccuracies. When people come out with the old chestnut about how "the British invented concentration camps", I sometimes wonder whether they realise that they're effectively quoting Nazi propaganda, with an added dose of distortion.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 21, 2005 4:02:08 PM CDT

    No Discrimination In US

    by ill clinton

    You can say it exists all you want, but it doesn't. Sure you can find an isolated act by any idiot against an individual based on whatever, but whatever anti US propaganda you're reading, put it down. Unless you are referring to affirmative action, in which case I apologize for misreading your posts. But in this case latinos are benefitting from discrimination, not the reverse.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 21, 2005 4:05:54 PM CDT

    Concentration Camps Are Concentration Camps

    by ill clinton

    Yes, the Nazis went further than the Brits or the Americans, but to somehow let the British off the hook because they weren't as bad as the Nazis is bass akward.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 21, 2005 5:31:57 PM CDT

    Those Concentration Camps...

    by peter charles

    You are right

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 21, 2005 10:05:23 PM CDT

    I'm Not Sure Who Is Equating The Two

    by ill clinton

    I don't think anyone yet has stated that British, American or Spanish concentration camps reached the same level of brutality as the Germans. The original post that started this all was someone posting to the effect that the British putting a "hispanic" in a concentration camp seemed unlikely. Since the British used them and the movie "V" follows an alternate reality from established history, I then pointed out that it certainly fell within the realm of possibility and the movie wasn't asking anyone to swallow too much from a historical point of view. No one's calling the British as bad as the nazis. I am, however, calling a "concentration camp" an evil no matter who does it. The Nazi camps, as someone else pointed out, became death camps. You round the people up in the first place, it makes the killing a whole lot easier, but that's a lesson for another time.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback