Logo

Cool News

New DOMINO trailer is coming after your @$$!

Published at:  Aug 10, 2005 10:49:21 PM CDT

Ahoy, squirts! Quint here with a link to the new DOMINO trailer. This new trailer drops the flash and gets to the plot. I like the two contrasting trailers. One highlights the style, the other highlights Richard Kelly's script as well as his characters. Walken looks classic in this flick! "Nunchucks are good!" And I think there's even a reference to you guys... a bit of a nod to Tomboy beanpole, believe it or not! I really dig this trailer and I can't wait to see this movie!



CLICK IT HERE TO BE INTRODUCED TO A MERRY BAND OF BADASSES!




    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Aug 10, 2005 10:54:37 PM CDT

    First?

    by justinsane

    Didn't watch the trailer, and don't plan to.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 10, 2005 10:57:34 PM CDT

    Uh ... huh ...

    by chrth

    It's like The Professional meets Closer meets Usual Suspects (depending on whether the interview lasts all movie) meets Natural Born Killers meets ...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 10, 2005 11:01:31 PM CDT

    Damn that looks good

    by blackbeltjones

    I did not even realize that was the sexiest beanpole in that movie. I was already interested in the film and this just sealed the deal.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 10, 2005 11:02:18 PM CDT

    Woman on Fire

    by thebige

    Just saw "Man on Fire" for the first time last week. Looks like Tony's still using the same filters and slow-mo for this one too. What a headache on the bigscreen.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 10, 2005 11:02:54 PM CDT

    Much better than the last trailer, I may actually have to see th

    by big bad clone

    just to hear Chris Walken say "Numbchucks" [sic]

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 10, 2005 11:06:41 PM CDT

    It looked fine, I guess

    by ribbons

    I have to say I feel like we're being pressured to want to see this movie really badly or else hand in our geek cards. But the trailer was okay. Interesting. I don't get the tagline though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 10, 2005 11:07:16 PM CDT

    "Use the numbchucks, numbchucks are good!"

    by dr_dreadlocks

    I swear to God, this film will kick all unholy ass if Walken talks the entire time. I want a film where Walken sits around and riffs for 90 minutes.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 10, 2005 11:07:35 PM CDT

    trailers

    by chuck_schick

    you know what? i turned off this trailer about 10 seconds in. i think i'm officially through with watching anything that may give away too much info about a movie. i'll stick with teasers only if possible. i'm saying this because i just went into watching THE DESCENT tonight without knowing very much at all (other than it's the same guy who did DOG SOLDIERS...which i thought was pretty kick-ass), and i'm glad i did. didn't know much and everything was a surprising payoff. really cool movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 10, 2005 11:14:38 PM CDT

    I'll kick in some money to fund the 90 minutes Walken riff

    by big bad clone

    Give him some props, walk him around New Yopk, have him read that article of him from the Onion (Walken in LA), have a Walken-off with him and Jay Mohr. It'd be the best film ever made...if we include a cowbell

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 10, 2005 11:17:34 PM CDT

    Cool

    by alwaysthere

    Now that I've seen the entire movie in this trailer, I dont have to worry about spending $9.25 to go watch it the theaters.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 10, 2005 11:18:01 PM CDT

    ANNOYING DIRECTORS

    by riccage

    Number one is Michael Bay
    Number two has to be Baz Luhrman
    and Tony Scott is number 3.. (because he made Crimson Tide which was a great movie)

    But PLEASE PEOPLE!! PUT YOUR CAMERAS DOWN FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!!
    I can't stand the MTV 2 second attention span film editing. Dear Goodness gracious it drives me crazy. Man on Fire was damn near unwatchable in parts. All of Michael Bay's movies are pure crap They just can't put their cameras down...not even for a second to let the characters speak and let the audience take them in for a second. Oh wait...they would have to have characters in the first place...maybe that's why they do it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 10, 2005 11:55:04 PM CDT

    Oh yes

    by bob of the shire

    This will be delicious.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 12:11:16 AM CDT

    Trailers on this film just doing nothing for me

    by gheorghe zamfir

    I know he still hasn't shed his MTV sensibilities, but I still dig Tony Scott for the most part, and a Richard Kelly script, Keira Knightley playing a bounty hunter, earlier in the year this was definintely one of the films I was looking forward to this year. After the last two trailers though my enthuthiasm has just completely vanished, can't quite peg what it is, just doesn't grab my interest, oh well, see what happens in October I guess.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 12:32:24 AM CDT

    Meh

    by scrivener

    This trailer sucked a whole lot less than that last piece of shit, but the movie still looks craptacular. Man on Fire gave me a fucking migraine I'll never forget as long as I live. Why would a director deliberately try to enduce siezures in his audience? Fucking stupid.

    Reply to Talkback

  • What if they'd let Richard Kelly direct this?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 12:44:34 AM CDT

    Bombed at Comic-Con

    by jabbathegriffin

    I agree with Ribbons, there seems to be this attitude that we're forced to bow down to this movie. The New-Line exec who introduced the lapdance scene at Comic-Con had that same attitude. As if 7000 geeks had to be told to contain themselves because we were watching Keira Knightley blow smoke down a gunbarrell and watch her double do a bump and grind. Apparently, they DID contain themselves cause you could have heard a pin drop after the clip. Hell, the clip from The Man that ran here last week got a stronger reaction. Nothing more then fast cuts, zooms and flashes. It's a shame because it felt like some music video hack was trying to pay homage to True Romance. Except that hack was Tony Scott himself!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 12:58:09 AM CDT

    Awesome

    by giftedinthepants

    Don't hate

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 12:58:36 AM CDT

    I've Always Wanted To Make A Movie That's Just A Long Ar

    by flim springfield

    Maybe they're on a road trip, fighting over the radio. Doesn't matter, it would be gold.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 1:11:46 AM CDT

    Awesome!

    by lucienpierce

    I absolutely adored Man On Fire. Favourite movie of last year. And this looks fantastic! I had a smile the whole way through the trailer. It could be due to the lack of good movies this year, but I doubt it. I think it's so refreshing that Tony Scott has his OWN style. And you'll always have the haters I guess and that's fair 'cause it's not everyones cup of tea...but you can always tell it's a Tony Scott film and let's be honest here, how many directors actually have a distinct style? Guy Ritchie, David Fincher, Darren Aronofsky, Quentin Tarantino, Robert Rodriguez, Wes Anderson, Uwe Boll...HA PSYCHE! I suppose he does have his own style, putrid crap style. Maybe he takes notes from Paul Anderson...or vice versa. At the end of the day, those with their own style rock it. Even if they're filmmakers I don't particularly love kudos to them for making something different. Let's take Brett Ratner for example, now I don't think he's a bad director and have enjoyed his films but you wouldn't be able to pick whether something was directed by him or not and I think that's possibly a sign of a great director as opposed to a passable one.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 1:12:26 AM CDT

    Actually, the "incoherent" trailer is a pretty spot-on represent

    by el duderino

    Granted, I'm just talking about the test screening print I caught back in April, but it's the same kind of convoluted. It's nearly impossible to replay the film linearly in my head so much goes on and so many characters come into play. Spiritually has far more in common with Snatch than it does with Donnie Darko, which I'm sure will break the hearts of some of you Richard Kelly fans. Anyhow, here's hoping Scott and co. pull through and make it a little more cohesive.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 1:31:05 AM CDT

    Ummmmmm . . .

    by red lantern

    Am I missing something? Is there a lot people wanting to see this film? I never heard about it until now. I saw Man On Fire and it was okay, but not great or anything.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 1:31:48 AM CDT

    T. Scott

    by mafu

    I've decided I hate Tony Scott's style of filmmaking. The quick cuts, the washed-out colors, and obvious MTV "I'm so cool" sensibility leaves me absolutely cold to his movies. "Man on Fire" was a trainwreck of a film, in my opinion, one Scott utterly ruined with his visual style and bad music choices. Even "True Romance" left me cold when I watched it a few weeks ago. I know other people dig his stuff, so I conclude he's doing something right, but I'll avoid all films associated with him from now on, including "Domino."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 1:36:09 AM CDT

    Does anyone else...........

    by solrider77

    Find it totally creepy that this movie is based on the life of someone who just recently OD'D!?!?!?!?!?!?!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 1:39:31 AM CDT

    Vern said it best when he coined "Avid farts"

    by declan_swartz

    http://www.aintitcoolnews.com/display.cgi?id=20132 "Speaking of HELLRAISER sequels, the director of SUBMERGED is Anthony Hickox, who did part 3. The one where Pinhead hangs out at a dance club. At least it's a director I heard of before, but he has the same problems as Michael Oblowitz and other low quality directors of Seagal pictures. I don't know if you guys have noticed this, but I think the digital editing they use now days has caused some bad habits for some of these fuckers. In the old days you had to actually cut the film up and tape it all together and it was a big pain in the ass. Now you don't have to do that so these guys figure, shit, every time it goes to another scene, I might as well throw in ten little flashes of random closeups, some fast speed, some black and white freeze frames, some backwards motion, some meaningless white flashes. Top it off with some computery sounds and thunderclaps and shit. I don't know if there's a name for this type of showboat editing, if not I propose 'Avid farts' or 'digi-rhea'. It's kind of like if as soon as newspaper publishers switched to computers, they started using a different wacky font for every headline and every column. Like the guy with the sunglasses said in JURASSIC PARK or DUEL or one of those movies, just because you CAN do it doesn't mean you SHOULD."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 2:27:11 AM CDT

    MoF owns

    by giftedinthepants

    STFU haters.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 2:32:06 AM CDT

    a bit iffy on seeing this if Joss Whedon wasn't involved . .

    by freak2thec0re

    so is this the first thing Richard Kelly's done since Donnie Darko? Because he admits he threw that script together on the fly, with no planning or idea of where it was going, with the intention of it making little sense, to compliment the fact that, as he said, "Life makes no sense". So it makes me wonder if this script will be any good

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 2:34:37 AM CDT

    and I agree

    by freak2thec0re

    that the editing style in Man on Fire brought the movie way way down, makes you way too aware that you're watching a film, making it impossible to lose yourself in the story, suspend disbelief, all that stuff that makes watching a movie fun

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 3:04:00 AM CDT

    Hooray......something to be positive about...

    by doglips

    What could be bad about True Romance 2, scripted and storied by Richard Kelly, starring a rejuvenated Rourke, and a very fit looking ( and apparently cast brilliantly ) Knightly.....And everyone loves watching Walken.......I'll start saving my pocket money now!! In fact fuck it I'm pre-booking ( it's not often that a film requires a pre-book due to excitement levels but always nice when you can ) I'm simply choosing to forget Scott's films since True Romance, Naive? probably....let's hope that it's the trailer thats quick cut and not the whole movie.....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 3:16:22 AM CDT

    Female Bounty hunters

    by billwiser

    Observed the prior trailer during a sold-out screening of Wedding Crashers on South Beach. It was all crickets and, swear to god, room-wide sighs. This film looks tired, like it's on a stairmaster, saying, "Look, females might bad-ass bounty hunters." Wow, what year is this. QT this is not, hopefully Aeon Flux's got more tricks in the bag.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 3:24:57 AM CDT

    "Cut it better if you don't like it shut the yap."

    by freak2thec0re

    don't have to, because 99% of directors out there are already cutting their films better

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 3:39:06 AM CDT

    hmm

    by docmccoy

    this will be goofy entertainment...i mean,i figured man on fire's subtitles were just a one time thing,then i watched that bmw film scott made years back and IT had subtitles and i killed myself.and did anyone else think denzel's revenge was weak?it was sick...but...i wanted a squib fest.or at least some hammer bashing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 3:40:24 AM CDT

    I wonder if this is about real bounty hunters...

    by kintar0

    and not deluded bailbondsmen like that douchebag Dog guy. That guy is corny as hell. Yeah, bra!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 3:48:22 AM CDT

    I want an air bubble for my pool

    by docfalken

    I don't know what that dude was sitting in while taking that cell phone call, but damn if that wouldn't be the most peaceful quiet place in my house. I think I would spend hours sitting inside a pool if I could.

    Reply to Talkback

  • we've missed out on some hot Keira lesbo action! :(

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 4:38:42 AM CDT

    This looks like utter crap on the ECKS VS. SEVER level. It's

    by negative man

  • Aug 11, 2005 4:42:50 AM CDT

    And another thing: "This new trailer drops the flash and gets to

    by negative man

  • Aug 11, 2005 4:44:51 AM CDT

    *you, Quint? (Damn Enter key! Damn fingers! Damn crappy movie tr

    by negative man

  • Aug 11, 2005 4:58:21 AM CDT

    re: negative man

    by billwiser

    you fine sir, are about to get a lesson in censoring. enjoy yr morning glory while it lasts.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 5:21:27 AM CDT

    I think Kelly referred to it as a "maelstrom"...

    by dr_dreadlocks

    Of events occuring around Domino. So really it being incoherent could be a style... or an excuse. But it seems like a "moment to moment" film based solely on the legs of one scene, moving to the next, and so on. I mean, the trailer makes no sense but it's pretty funny to me. Walken owns the world as far as I'm concered. Tony does chop a little too much, but get used to it or don't watch the movie. I can make sense of the story, if you can't, I'm sorry.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 5:36:34 AM CDT

    Didn't the real Domino die recently?

    by oh_riginal

    Anyway, someone mentioned an idea of Walken and Jay Mohr in a movie together, I say add Kevin Spacey in there too, cause he also does a mean Walken impersonation. Have Walken, Mohr, and Spacey on a road trip to Wally World.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 7:07:41 AM CDT

    re: Billwiser

    by negative man

    Because I didn't like the trailer? Or because I hit the 'Enter' key early? Just a little confused why I would be censored...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 7:26:55 AM CDT

    Gotta Have More Cowbell

    by unbirthday

    If Walken's in it, I'm gonna see it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 7:35:34 AM CDT

    I enjoyed Man on Fire...

    by docpazuzu

    ...but the increasingly frequent, hangover-inducing cinematic stylings of Tony Scott made it a close call. His absolute nadir in this regard must be that "Orange" short film he made for Amazon.com, which was so jarring that I half expected to receive a call from Sadako once I had seen it. So far Domino looks like more of the same lazy, bleached-out, faux-cool, sleight-of-hand shit peopled by the usual grizzled gods of geekdom and the impossibly hot women who accompany them. This crap really is below Scott's true filmmaking skills.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 7:36:34 AM CDT

    Keira Knightley is the Sexiest Tomboy Beanpole on the planet

    by doc_strange

    Someone had to say it. Anyway, this movie looks dope. Chicks with guns + Mickey Rourke + Christopher Walken = Kick ass movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 7:37:05 AM CDT

    Knightly likes it doggy style in that uncomfortable place...

    by masterchappy

    and after seeing this trailer, I think we'd all be fucked in the arse is we went to see this over stylized piece of shit. PAP!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 7:43:01 AM CDT

    I second that

    by doc_strange

    Knightly, Ryder, Portman or any other hot chick being analized on film will definitely get me into theaters.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 7:51:39 AM CDT

    Flim Springfield put DennisHopper in that too. ;-)

    by curryice

    And why the fuck was that trailer edited sooooo slowly? I mean you can definitely edit all the medias in Avid or FinalCutPro so you can see 10000000 frames per second? Why didn't they do it? I want to throw up in the theater which is the only indication that i really liked a movie. ah whatever. As long as Christopher Walken doesn't disappear after 3000000000 fps i'll watch this sucker.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 8:38:48 AM CDT

    why do I have the sneaky feeling this will be another movie with

    by uncooked_meat

    Well, because it looks like Man 0n Fire, that's why.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 8:49:30 AM CDT

    Haven't Seen The New Trailer (Shitty Dial Up!), But I Was So

    by zombiesolutions

    i've been looking forward to this since the first trailer came out. Keira Knightly is one hot piece of space pixie ass (love those skinny, wide eyed, ingenues!) and it looks like it's going to be really funny in an ironic grrl pwr sexy way. the still shot in the first trailer we she says "i am a bounty hunter" and the brief scene where shes in a girlschool beating up a classmate? that alone earned my $6.75 for the matinee when it comes out.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 8:53:37 AM CDT

    Anytime Micky Rourke is....

    by bigjeffrey

    ...kicking ass it's worth my money. He's kind of taking on a whole new wave of "cool" at the moment. And this actually looks like Tony Scott has gone back to his True Romance style. The characters look layered and colourful which, after Man On Fire, can only be a good thing. As for Keira. She's annoying in the extreme. I'd bang the hell out of her but that accent is just taking the piss. I'm from England and the only people I know who speak english like that is the Royal frickin' Family!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 9:00:39 AM CDT

    Why Knightley?

    by kizeesh

    Jesus! why the hell would anyone cast her as Domino harvey? Knightley looks like she could bench-press about a buck 8.
    Firing a gun would probably make her snap like a twig. I mean if she'd actually beefed up a little for the role, and lost the upper-class twit accent. "maaa naame es Domino Haarvheey aaah haaamm aah baaanty huntaa"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 9:27:56 AM CDT

    Right, But Isn't She Supposed To Be A Rich Supermodel Turned

    by zombiesolutions

    i think she's supposed to be an upperclass supermodel brit lass gone bada$$, right? it's ludicrous, sure, but i like the exaggerrated rich girl accent. it's farkin' hot!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 9:57:03 AM CDT

    hmmmm.....

    by occams_razor

    meh, i think i'll skip this and watch Oldboy again....now if the movie was just episodes of gummy bears with every character voiced over by christopher walken....that i would see

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 10:01:26 AM CDT

    Man, they're trying too hard

    by film whisperer

    Love KK, but this whole thing looks like its trying too hard to be hip. Like a bunch of square white boys trying to be wiggers. I was pretty much annoyed halfway through being told the whole plot.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 10:04:44 AM CDT

    to much flash for me... however I may go see it

    by russman

    because the idea is interesting and hey it has Micky Rourke and Walken. At the least, it should be entertaining.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 10:05:52 AM CDT

    Loved OLDBOY, But The "Twist Shocker" Ending Was Lame

    by zombiesolutions

    first, you could see it coming from a mile away. second, it was lame. it's still a masterful film, i just thought the "big revleation" was weak, maipulative and lame. suspension of disbelief...broken and shattered.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 10:14:22 AM CDT

    ZombieSolutions

    by occams_razor

    yeah, i could see the ending coming too but that fucking hammer fight was awesome.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 10:49:55 AM CDT

    I Agree 100% Occams_Razor

    by zombiesolutions

    i LOVE that scene. i must've watched it like 100 times. it's so perfectly shot and it feels real -- like no wire fu, just guys beating the piss out of each other. Oh Dae Su is a bada$$$ mothafugga! [SPOILER / JOKE] badass daughterfugga?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 10:58:44 AM CDT

    Looks Unwatchable

    by sean38

    This movie, just from the trailers, which usually put a movie's best foot forward, looks virtually unwatchable. The epitome of style over substance.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 11:09:41 AM CDT

    They Should Give Out Trailer Awards...

    by manonegra

    They really do make or break a film. I was felling lukewarm after seeing the first but this one sold me on it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 1:01:58 PM CDT

    i still wanna see it, but that trailer was awful

    by s0nicdeathmonkey

    hell, even if it looked like baby genius's id see it because my cousin is in it, and im fond of her.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 1:03:18 PM CDT

    looks awesome

    by actionman420

    looks hard-core and intense...bloody and mean...Tony Scott is a master...Man On Fire was brilliant and kicked ass like few big-budget action flicks ever do...some people may not like his "ADD" style editing, but to me, it's quite visionary and impressive...anyone who sticks to that style and maintains it for over 2 hours is not doing it for a gimmicky purpose...i will see this movie opening night.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 1:46:11 PM CDT

    Dog the Bounty Hunter

    by rj macready

    Gives his approval so that seals it for me.Scott and Walken together again? i'm always in.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 2:07:13 PM CDT

    FIRST!

    by sublimefn87

    http://www.myspace.com/thehonkies

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 2:09:01 PM CDT

    This is Tony Scott trying to be Guy Ritchie

    by tal111

    with a look that is already dated...I know you love your Avid but come on get over it and just tell a friggin interesting story.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 3:22:40 PM CDT

    "anyone who sticks to that style and maintains it for over 2 hou

    by freak2thec0re

    the purpose is that he doesn't feel his content is interesting enough to be sustained over a single shot, so he goes crazy with the cutting and style to take the audience's mind off what is happening and onto his filmmaking style. That's the purpose

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 3:41:08 PM CDT

    Trailer

    by soulpower

    Don't have to watch the film anymore, the trailer gave everything away already

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 5:01:15 PM CDT

    Who would win a fight...

    by rollermonkey

    between Knightley's Domino, Portman's Evey Hammond, Theron's Aeon Flux and Winona Ryder's Robot Chick. Or...um screw fighting how about a 4 way?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 5:36:21 PM CDT

    Richard Kelly is a hack/Tony Scott has lost it

    by thunderballs

    Seriously guys, Richard Kelly had one fucking idea in him, and it was Donnie Darko. Both this movie and Southland Shit deal primarily with reality TV shows. Any cocksucker who writes about relaity shows in his movies is a fucking douchebag who has dated himself before the fucking thing even comes out. And anyone who thinks reality TV is worthy as a film subject needs to get fucked. As for Tony Scott, I liked the old days when he didn't cut film to ribbons, and when he had that good, smokey, smoggy L.A. look like in Revenge and Last Boy Scout. Him and Ridley need to go back to commercials.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 9:03:36 PM CDT

    rollermonkey we all do, we ALL do. (N/T)

    by s0nicdeathmonkey

  • Aug 11, 2005 9:09:42 PM CDT

    Editing

    by scott fan

    For all you guys who keep banging on about Avids and how shit Tony Scott is - you guys aint got a clue! I love the fact you call the editing in his films like MTV, but when was the last time you've seen a music video as stylish as Man On Fire or Domino?? Sure he edits quick, but how old are you guys?? Maybe you lot should start watching Danielle Steele movies - they're edited nice and slow! And as for the music vids I'm sure Usher and J-lo are banging out videos with $100,000's worth of different film stocks and colour grading. As for his film editing - yeah it's frenetic, but for for every Tony Scott film, there's 100 'normal' edited films so lighten the fuck up and enjoy the ride!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 10:11:46 PM CDT

    Dog the "bountyhunter..."

    by kintar0

    isn't a real bountyhunter. He's a showboat bailbondsman. I don't care if he did go to Mexico to try to find that Max Factor dude. He's not a bountyhunter.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 10:19:34 PM CDT

    re: Scott Fan

    by tiredofitall

    I guess I don't understand. Are you trying to say that just because Usher and J-Lo are spending a lot of money on quality equipment and stock, that makes their videos quality? I might be wrong, but just because you throw money at something doesn't mean you will end up with a good thing. I gotta be honest, as "frenetic" as Man on Fire was, I was bored throughout the entire movie. It seems to me that "MTV" or Michael Bay type editing tends to detract from the story and could be construed as lazy filmmaking.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 11, 2005 11:11:23 PM CDT

    What do you think bounty hunters do?

    by gheorghe zamfir

    Pretty much every bounty hunter works for or is a bail bondsman, its why their "official" industry title isn't bounty hunter, but bonds enforcement agent.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 12, 2005 1:58:36 AM CDT

    Ah, the memories...Hulk Hogan Is The Sexiest Tomboy Beanpole On

    by hell's cigarette

  • don't you think?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 12, 2005 2:16:36 AM CDT

    Tough guy not buy...god I hate not having an edit button

    by lezbo milk

  • plastic model being made for all her sceens...muzzle flash added in post production.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 12, 2005 2:55:39 AM CDT

    looked good

    by chief redcock

    and walken seems to be enjoying himself. he seems to have some of his best moments in tony's films, so i'll probably see this at some point.

    "you're talking about a bad primerrr..." oh yeah.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 12, 2005 10:58:56 AM CDT

    a scene that'd fuck you in the ear

    by stigmata

    Have Walken meet DeNiro for a sit down. Shoot it like the trailer scene in true Romance and ostensibly play up the respect factor. Walken is Walken and DeNiro is a mostly suppressed Travis Bicklemetts-his-character from Heat. Outside this meeting is a meeting of the bodyguards; Sean Penn, in State of Grace mode, and Mickey Rourke beginning with a Paul Bettany/Gangster No. 1 mental telepathy "look in my FUCKING eyes" routine. End it with the lights going out and everyone holding baseball bats.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 12, 2005 1:56:33 PM CDT

    Why does Scott feel the neeed...

    by ewokstew

    To makes his cuts progressively quicker, his color palletes increasingly saturated, his films look more and more grainy with each succesive movie he makes?
    Tony, go back and look at True Romance. Editing, color correction, lighting etc... all perfect.
    Quite trying to outdo yourself all the freakin' time and just make the movie.
    Yeah, like Tony Scott trolls AICN. Had to say it, though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 12, 2005 7:43:51 PM CDT

    "My name is Domino Harvey. I am a bounty hunter."

    by one9deuce

    Doesn't the little lady know she can get some bounty at the grocery store?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 12, 2005 9:01:54 PM CDT

    lol

    by chief redcock

    "bounty hunter... grocery store." hah. how did the people on these boards get so fucking funny?

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback