Ain't It Cool News (www.aintitcool.com)
Movie News

Another viewer says that THE 40 YEAR OLD VIRGIN brings the funny!

Ahoy, squirts! Quint here with another glowing review for Steve Carell's THE 40 YEAR OLD VIRGIN. After that great uncut international trailer there is no doubt in my mind that this one will bring the goods. Brick rules! Here's another positive to add onto the pile!

Potsie here with a look at THE 40-YEAR-OLD VIRGIN. I have seen a handful of early (and very positive) reviews posted here and lets just say that I’m not one to buy into the hype. The same positive responses were being sent in for WEDDING CRASHERS, a movie I found just mildly amusing if not too long and never funny enough. Let’s face it, WEDDING CRASHERS is a PG-13 movie with a few swear words and some gratuitous nudity. For those of you who felt the same way…have no fear. The R-rated comedy is back in full force with THE 40-YEAR-OLD VIRGIN.

The plot is plain and simple. Andy (Steve Carell) is the title character. He’s a comic book junkie, he keeps his action figures in mint condition and during the day minds the storage unit at a Circuit City-type electronics store. Andy does not drive as he relies on his bike to get him to work, nor does he have many friends (only some old neighbors to watch SURVIVIOR with). In fact, one of his fellow employees believes Andy is a serial killer. All in all, he is your everyday geek with a soft heart and a deep dark secret…he has never been intimate with a woman. A few employees befriend Andy at a Poker game and after learning his secret, become determined to get this man laid. What follows re many humorous attempts from Andy to grab some attention from the ladies with little success. In comes Catherine Keener (BEING JOHN MALKOVICH) as the love interest. I would rather not go into much more plot detail, but what follows is in no way formulaic nor is it what you would expect.

Andy and his new found love’s relationship gives this raunchy laugh fest a soft touch which proves to be effective. By this time the audience had grown quite fond of Andy. We root for him. The loser in all of us must prevail.

Enough plot, on with my thoughts. The laugh a minute ratio on this movie is incredible. Mind you, it was a rough cut and ran almost two hours. However, there is enough material to turn this into a great 100 or so minute movie. Hopefully the editors will take out the one or two flat scenes I caught and tighten up a few loose edges. I seriously hope so because there is a classic laugh fest here just waiting to emerge. Rarely did a joke fall flat. It is R-rated and it is a hard R. The language is relentless and the subject matter is taken to the absolute limit. However this isn’t a gross out comedy, just a raunchy one.

Carell is an absolute joy here and a nice break from Will Ferrell and the rest of the “Frat Pack.” Of which, by the way, there are no appearances by. Carell (who also co-wrote the movie), doesn’t rely on cameos to save his film. He relies on the jokes, and they certainly deliver. Some of the best lines come from Paul Rudd and two unknowns as the friends. Catherine Keener, not one of my favorites, surprised me here with the most serious on screen presence and a believable match for Andy’s personality.

I really hope this does well at the box office. It feels more like a movie that might come and go at the theaters and then become a must see on DVD (i.e. AUSTIN POWERS 1, and OFFICE SPACE). I pray that the positive word of mouth will do this movie good. As we all know, funny comedies are hard to come by these days.


Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • Aug. 9, 2005, 4:48 a.m. CST

    first

    by Chief Redcock

  • Aug. 9, 2005, 4:52 a.m. CST

    i think it'll suck

    by Chief Redcock

    that's just me. old school sucked, and the trailers look pretty one-note.

  • Aug. 9, 2005, 5:05 a.m. CST

    actually I think this has solid box-office potential for a film

    by Demosthenes2

    The marketing has been very present at least where I'm at, and the title alone (well, also the look on his face in the poster) seems enough to instantly make anyone smile, so I foresee a moderate box office success.

  • Aug. 9, 2005, 5:24 a.m. CST

    Dukes Was Funnier Than Wedding Crashers

    by Captain Sulu

    I like Wedding Crashers ok though. Dukes is just gonna be tough to top for the funny this summer.

  • Aug. 9, 2005, 5:28 a.m. CST

    I too tire of the Frat Pack

    by zekmoe

    I thought it was just me that all the movies seem like strung together SNL skits. When the skits are funny, then it's not bad, but when they're not it's just dull. And I am tired of Will "If you can't say it funny, say it loudly" Farrell. I mean, his deer in a headlights looking unaware of the situation is lame after the 100'th time. Outside of the huge erection and gang battle, I though Anchorman was a terrible, unfunny movie. Anyone, Anyone?

  • I realize you can't show the raunchy stuff in the trailer but you can at least hint at it or show a non-raunchy funny bit. The trailer was excruciatingly not funny.

  • Aug. 9, 2005, 8:37 a.m. CST

    I Was Thinking The Same Thing, If This Movie Is So Funny Why Doe

    by Captain Sulu

    You'd think with so much non stop hilarity they could find a minute's worth to plug the movie with.

  • Did you post it? No. You guys suck. :-P

  • and it just gets funnier and dirtier from there. It's pretty damn funny. Hopefully, they didn't cut to much and kept the boobies and porn footage in it.

  • Aug. 9, 2005, 9:08 a.m. CST

    And I disagree with the reviewer - the length was just fine

    by Russman

    I loved the length of it. I remember sitting there laughing and laughing and after checking the time it was an hour and 45 minutes. Maybe some comedies need to be cut down to 90 minutes but this one doesn't need to be 90 or 100 minutes... there's a lot funny stuff that should be seen and it works in this movie so hopefully they haven't butchered it.

  • Aug. 9, 2005, 1:29 p.m. CST

    Oh Chief Redcock....you dirty, dirty.....

    by TisketMaster

    ...troll. I give you credit, though. You stay right with this site, waiting to be first and to troll better than me. But then again, Steve Carrell's character in this movie keeps a better action figure collection than me. Maybe you guys have a lot in common. Smell a puss lately, Chief?

  • Aug. 9, 2005, 2:13 p.m. CST

    I guess this TB hits too close to home

    by Marvin Tikvah

    At least your mom's home anyway. What would AICN be without middle aged sexually frustrated sploozers.

  • Aug. 9, 2005, 2:26 p.m. CST

    Notice How A Plant Review Is Always Followed In The TB By A "I S

    by Captain Sulu

    And impossibly, THAT review is even better than the one they did. It's like the movie studio knows a plant has to say something negative, so not to be spotted, but hates saying anything bad. So Plant #1 mkaes some point about a MINOR flaw or two with the film, then Plant #2 then negates those minor flaws in the TB with the "phantom" review. Every time.

  • Aug. 9, 2005, 2:36 p.m. CST

    i'm smellin' yours right now, tisketmaster

    by Chief Redcock

  • Aug. 9, 2005, 2:37 p.m. CST

    The disappointment that was Anchorman

    by fiester

    I really wanted that movie to be funny...but it just wasn't.

  • Aug. 9, 2005, 3:21 p.m. CST

    It's Not Always A Plant

    by NeoAngelus

    I love how you people always think you know the reviewer is a plant. In my case, you were wrong. AICN posted a review of mine that I wrote for National Treasure last year, and you convinced yourselves that I was a plant. Fucking cut it out, you aren't the know-it-all's you think you are.... And besides, what difference does it make. Most TBers have already made up their minds about going to see the movie, so even if it IS a plant, it's not going to affect you one bit.

  • Aug. 9, 2005, 3:41 p.m. CST

    Me? You Talking To Me Neo?

    by Captain Sulu

    I convinced myself of nothing because I never called you a plant. I wasn't referring to National Treasure. I've just noticed a pattern, that when a plant posts there's always the phantom review in the talkbalk. If this was the case in your review of National Treasure then my theory is blown. I would have thought you would appreciate my efforts to help people spot a true plant so legitimate sources like yourself are not mistaken for one. In other words, what I'm saying is one sign of plantage is a poster in a TB saying "Why didn't you post my review? I sent it in two week s ago and it was even better." This follows a review that is insanely complimentary to begin with.

  • Aug. 9, 2005, 3:44 p.m. CST

    yawn

    by lopan

    there are plants. they send in reviews. always have, always will. you can't stop em. it sort of sucks. who gives a shit though really? it ain't the end of the world.

  • Aug. 9, 2005, 3:51 p.m. CST

    Sulu... I'm not a plant

    by Russman

    Oh my. I've sent in a number of reviews that have been posted. I saw the movie and yes I sent a review in and I never said it was better, but yes it was better than this one and I know so because my Mommy told me! But really, I don't work at the Universal lot in Building 15 on the east side. Seriously, I don't. So let's recap, not a plant, don't work in building 10 on the universal lot, off the 101 Freeway, never said my review was better but my Mom said it was, george bush sucks.

  • Aug. 9, 2005, 8:07 p.m. CST

    RUSSMAN'S REVIEW

    by Darth Philbin

    dude. if your review uses words that are more than five letters long and doesn't sound like you were sucking the cock of the producer, chances are it won't get printed.

  • Aug. 10, 2005, 5:05 a.m. CST

    i have it on good authority that steve carrell has a helluva lot

    by Trader Groucho 2

    they didn't need to use a stunt gorilla for any of that stuff. carrell's got a strong second city background. looks like he's really found his voice. as for keener, after the movie walking and talking she wanted to sharpen her game as an actor, so she looked up ivana chubbbuck. the result: a strong turn in being john malkovich and now this film (if the reviewer here is right).