Ain't It Cool News (www.aintitcool.com)
Movie News

Zod & Others attend FANTASTIC FOUR screening in New York - the verdict'

Hey folks, Harry here... I can already see a trend here... Better than expected, but still not that fantastic. Blaming screenwriter Michael France for these paper thin characters and plot isn't apt at all. Had they shot Michael France's screenplay - I'd be a happy camper - it was, the bomb. Problem is like on all of his Marvel scripts - after he hands in a draft that should just be shot as is - they go in and hand the script to a whole group of folks without a clue what to do with the characters. Seriously - you find his PUNISHER draft and it's jaw-droppingly cool. You read his HULK and it is extremely true to exactly what you wanted from that film. His FANTASTIC FOUR - pretty damn close to being dead on. I really dislike the whole Dr. Doom as Donald Trump thing. And the script they did shoot had wonderful 'moments' but dammit, I don't want a partial. I wanted them to nail this one. I don't want an O.K. FOUR - I wanted THE FANTASTIC FOUR. We got 3 reviews here - the most positive one is the last one - and he says it is at the low-end of a 7 out of 10. Beware of spoilers... nuff said..

I don’t think it is as bad as we all feared, but it is certainly far from “Fantastic.” Just got back from an advanced screening of “Fantastic Four,” and it had the crowd cheering at the end. This is a crowd that also cheered for “Ice Age 2” and “Big Momma’s House 2,” and about thirty other FOX sequel trailers that played before the feature. About ten percent of them might have known who the Fantastic Four are, and most of the rest probably saw the words free on a piece of paper and thought it was the perfect place to drag their annoying kids to. The other five rows were Execs and so forth, and I’m pretty sure Tim Story was sitting dead center in the theater.

When your script is from the writer of “Punisher,” “The Hulk,” and… “Cliffhanger” I’d say you’ve gotten yourself in some deep shit. Weak writing is what heroes in a lot of these comic book adaptations are really battling against, and they’re losing. Even “Batman Begins,” which overall I loved, has most of it problems in the script. I know there are talented writers out there that could do a hell of a job with any superhero, maybe even Aquaman, but most of what has been coming out seems like it was written by a room full of monkeys chained to typewriters.

I’ll try to keep it spoiler-free at first, before I get into it. It’s better than “Punisher,” “Hulk,” “Daredevil,” “Electra,” and Roger Corman’s “Fantastic Four. I guess that’s not saying much.

It doesn’t spend much time on character like “Spider-man” and “Batman Begins” did, and even less on logic. The movie goes by fast. One second Reed and Ben, who really has no purpose being there, are trying to convince Reed’s old college pal, good ol’ Vic Von Doom, to finance him some money and a space station for his space experiment that will cure cancer or something. We don’t even see the iconic shuttle launch that is in every Fantastic Four origin, Ultimate excluded, and we just skip right to the shuttle. Guess it wasn’t in the budget. Then there’s the cosmic rays, and right back to Earth we go. Probably in the span of ten minutes. If you’re one of those people who said “why do we have to wait an hour to see Batman,” you might be more pleased with this. We don’t really know much at all about the characters, except from the tired “their character matches their powers” thing. “Always stretching,” “You don’t pay any attention to me,” “What a hothead,” “You’re a real tough, solid guy,” “The guy’s so vain he has a statue of himself.” Yeah, we get it. It’s been done in the comics, but the writers really beat it to death here. Reed is bankrupt. Ben for some reason just follows Reed around and Susan is the hottest scientist, I guess that’s what she was, you’ll ever see.

There just isn’t much dimension to any character in the movie, which works if you’re a hothead, a word oft said in the movie, who wants fame, riches, and women. Chris Evans probably found that part he was born to play, and he gets the best material in the movie. Though if you’ve seen the trailers, you’ve seen pretty much everything he does. Evans I can believe in his character. Everyone else though, not so much.

Ben Grimm spends most of the movie trying to pick things up and breaking them, or sitting on things and breaking them, or trying to pick up small things with his big rock fingers. One gag after another inbetween the “you turned me into a monster! Argh!” stuff. I didn’t really belong to either the “Thing must be CGI!” or “CGI is bad!” crowd. The suit could have been done better. You’ve all seen it. In the movie there are a few times you catch someone touch what should be solid rock and you see it move like it is foam. Sometimes when he moves and you hear a gravelly kind of sound, and then sometimes there’s not. Sometimes when he walks everything shakes like if a giant boulder kept being lifted and dropped, then sometimes not. It’s rather inconsistent. Personally I would have gone for a mixture of CGI and prosthetics. At least they could have made him bigger that way. A Chiklis size Thing is hardly imposing. He does look good in the fedora and trenchcoat. I like Chiklis and he is competent enough with what he is given.

The love/hate relationship between Ben and Johnny works for the most part. Johnny has been retconned in the movie into being a pilot, like Ben, and Ben was his commanding officer when they were in the military. There are some good bits of pranking between the two.

Reed and Sue are just boring. There really isn’t any reason Sue should be interested in him, or Reed to be in love with her, other than she being hot. They’re the responsible parents types to Johnny and Ben.

The powers are pretty good. Flaming Torch again looks the best. A lot of stuff you’ll recognize from the comics, like Reed wrapping every which way around Ben to try and stop him. With Sue, we’ve had enough invisible man movies to get that down, and they already had Jean Grey doing force fields in “X-men” so it wasn’t that tough to pull off.

You seen “Spider-man”? I didn’t know Green Goblin was going to be in this one too. Victor Von Doom is essentially the same character as Norman Osborn was in “Spider-man” minus the son. Same big giant company who’s investors are cutting out or backing out. Same taking revenge on them. Same power leading to total madness. The both have lame, useless helmets. There’s certainly nothing scary about Doom in the movie, where instead of guy who uses his genius to get the Fantastic Four, Doom uses Electro’s powers.

Other characters from Ben Grimm’s wife to blind girl (to act blind you just make your eyes move all wacky) Alicia Masters are even less dimensional, though thankfully don’t have much screen time. Apparently Ben Grimm’s super hot wife was able to accept Michael Chiklis’ form, but one look at the Thing and the heartless bitch drops her wedding ring and runs off. I’m guessing there was more to Alicia Masters, since I recall set photos showing her gallery and statues of Ben, but it is nowhere to be found in the movie.

There are some entertaining action scenes. Popcorn movie this is. If you’re a diehard Fantastic Four fan, there will be some stuff for you to enjoy. I really can’t say much about Tim Story’s directing. I haven’t seen anything else he’s done. I mean he directed “Taxi” for fuck’s sake. With his filmography, and no real distinct style, it’s like he’s the black Brett Ratner. He does an alright job with the script he is given, but plug in any other run of the mill director and I doubt you would have ended up with much different.

From now on there are bigger spoilers.

Fantastic Four is often described as the celebrity superhero team. I recall reading something about Tim Story saying he wanted to make a part of the movie. But he takes it to really fucking stupid heights. Sulking about being orange, Thing ends up causing a huge pile up on the freeway. The other three show up and they save a few lives that they were responsible for endangering. BOOM! They are the most popular people around. Everyone knows them, dubs them The Fantastic Four. They really haven’t done much of anything. They aren’t a team. They don’t have the uniforms yet. But everyone’s applauding. They don’t even leave the Baxter building for the next fifteen minutes afterwards, but we keep hearing about the crowds of people outside who in two minutes have shown up with signs saying how hot Johnny is and the already have a merchandising section in the Baxter building. All this while Reed insists they not leave and concentrate on a cure. Come on. It’s just way over the top. They are like reality stars who somehow reach Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, or TomKat levels of publicity and paparazzi in a matter of seconds.

There is also a completely illogical scene for the sole purpose of having Jessica Alba take off her clothes. I’m all for having her take off her clothes, but have a reason. She turns invisible, and then suddenly she has her clothes back on, and somehow this has helped them save the day.

The movie keeps going with what is more like skits than scenes. Johnny blows some shit up. Reed falls asleep on his keyboard giving him a droopy face. Sue keeps turning invisible at inappropriate times. Ben breaks stuff. And Stan Lee is the friendliest mail man ever.

Reed spends a majority of the movie saying he’s trying to find a cure for Ben. Sue doesn’t really do anything but be the love interest. Johnny is anxious to get out there and meet his adoring public. Its all pretty much like a Reader’s Digest version of the comic book.

Anyone who was bitching about Doom not being the ruler of Latveria will be happy, or more likely annoyed to know there are a bunch of throw away references to the place, including the very end of the movie. Other people wont know what the fuck it is, or why it is mentioned. For some reason Latveria loved Victor so much that they gave him this trophy, which is actually the stupid mask he puts on. Like Osborn he seems to have a mask fetish. Who knows why he needs a metal mask when we can he see his entire body is made of metal now. So vain he covers his face with what is under his face.

Other throwaway references include how they get their names and how they get their costumes, both having to do with Johnny getting all eXtreme. This scene will also make you really want a Pepsi.

There are some funny moments, mostly involving Ben and Johnny, like Johnny doing the ol’ shaving cream on the hand and having trouble tickling Ben’s rock face, or Ben making a ball out of Johnny’s Porsche, which he has somehow adorned with a vanity plate that says TORCH’D even though they haven’t had their powers long enough for him to go down to the DMV.

Eventually Victor Von Doom, becomes Dr. Doom. He must just keep a green cloak lying around the office. He comes up with the ingenious plan of freezing Mr. Fantastic, blowing up Johnny Storm, and turning the Thing back into Ben Grimm. Doom’s motive doesn’t really make much sense. He holds Reed responsible for what happened to him, both his transformation in to Metal man and the destruction of his company, but also seems happy with his new form and the power it gives him.

Of course there wouldn’t be room for a sequel if he succeeded. So, “It’s Clobbering Time!” The Fantastic Four join their powers together, Human Torch’s ability to make things hot, Invisible Girl’s ability to put a force field around things… and Thing’s ability to smash fire hydrants with Mr. Fantastic’s ability to turn into a human water slide, to defeat Dr. Doom by turning him in to a statue… Hey, just like the giant one of him in front of his office at the beginning! Isn’t that clever!?... Reed gets the girl. Johnny gets the girls. Ben gets the blind girl. Big 4 in the sky.

With a stronger script and a little more expansion on the characters and plot (the movie was only about 95 minutes long) it could have been closer to the “Fantastic Four” movie we all wanted to see. Like I mentioned before, it would seem there were entire plotlines taken out (Ben and Alicia). As it is, it’s a fast, cookie cut plot, thin character, popcorn fest, that is somewhat better than what Marvel has given us outside the X and Spidey franchises. I’m sure there are some that will have a good time with it. It’ll make money. Regardless of it’s quality, FOX will probably announce F4 Squared after opening weekend, and maybe it will have Galactus and the Ultimate Nullifier, which will spin-off into Silver Surfer. That’d be cool… maybe.

--Zod. AKA ZodsIllegitimateSon. AKA That Asshole.

Next we have DeuceX with a look at it. He seemed to just be bored to death by the film - only watching for Jessica Alba's cleavage. Here ya go...

The Fantastic Four, yeah I've seen it, now I'm gonna tell ya about it.

I've never been much on the Fab 4 books but I did know the story. I decided to take it from the point of view of the average joe who knows it's a comic adaptation and went to it anyway.

Heres what I learned about the world. Scientists are hot but stupid, rich people are evil and two dimentional and men don't have naughty bits.

I grew up in a family of physicists and have met several so I can say with certainty that in reality physicists hair cuts cost 5 bucks and look like it, if it's not jeans and a t-shirt it's the cheapest suit available that fits. If asked what Armani is the answer is “some new sub-atomic particle?” So when I met the swave, stylish and oh so clueless Reed Richards, decided to suspend disbelief and let it ride. It was a down hill ride.

I waited 5 minutes and ignored the rolling sillyness and was rewarded with Alba cleavage. “Yes,” I said to myself “I have their number.” Like pavlovs dog I waited for my next tossed bone and settled in for the invisible girl In underwear shots that I knew would be forthcoming and plentiful.

The big sequence where the storm hit worked well enough and it was good to see they didn't waste to much time and cleavage shots to get us there. The storm rolled in and everyone got zapped and then came the whiplash. Right when the storm was getting good, BAM, we're back on earth in a fancy hospital. Everyone is recovering nicely. I prey it was a projection screw up and not an edit because everyone in the theater thought it was a screw up by the projection guys. From what I know of how those things work it wasn't a screw up and it was SUCH A BAD EDITING DECISION THAT THE AUDIENCE THOUGHT IT WAS.

Now on to Jonny storms Wing Wing. Poor man must have lost it in the accident. He would “flame on” and there would go the clothes. As the man stood nekkid in a test chamber flames covering him and shooting out in a dassling display of CGI you could see his expressions, his eyes, mouth, ears, nostrils, corneas, fingers and I think even nipples, But no Mister Happy. Happly that didn't stop him from being a 2 bit babe hound. If you pay attention at the end you find out the same thing happened to Doc Doom too. Poor guys.

The best part of the film in my opinion was the obligitory music video that showed everyone getting used to living with each other ala Real Life. Reed reaching across the hall for the shit tickets, Jessica Alba reaching for the towel and going invisible when reed walks in on her exiting the shower, etc.

Other bits? Chickless is a great actor but six inches of latex hides his skill rather thoroghly. Someone should have realized that the corporate back stabing stuff was done in Spiderman, and I mean the EXACT same stuff. The collapse of Grims merriage was glossed over and lame. Stan Lee had the most lines I've seen him do in a movie. Nice use of star power in that.

If you are going to it to see Alba cleavage Get the GQ, they did a better job. It wasn't utterly lame but it wasn't up to par with the other big budget comic adaptations we've been seeing. Well on par with Hulk and Punnisher.

Tomorrow night I see Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. Wish me luck.

DeuceX

And now there's Dr.No Is A Yes - and he likes it, giving it a low 7 out of 10. This is the most positive of the reviews...

Hey Harry and everyone else. As everyone usually says with these, first time writer and whatnot. Just got back from a screening for the Fantastic Four movie here in NYC and I have to say something about it. It was itching away at my brain like a cancerous tumor. Something I wouldn't think I would say.

I liked it. I actually liked it alot when you put it in context with the characters in this story. Everyone's been bragging about how terrible this film will be. Go and see it when it comes out. Give it a chance because I did and I was pleasantly surprised.

No spoilers but I'll delve into each player in the story. Ioan Gruffudd as Reed Richards/ Mr. Fantastic was a choice I didn't get all goo goo eyed for. But when I saw the pics starting to leak with the little gray in his hair, I was excited. He was the lame, science driven, oblivious nerd I grew up loving.

Jessica Alba as Sue Storm/ Invisible Girl was passable. She isn't bad in the role... just nothing special going on. She is a looker and she did look good throughout, so that's going to guarantee a bunch of horny boys running in to spank it. The relationship between Reed and herself is a little strained in the beginning... but the more they delve into it, the more it was believable.

Chris Evans is the embodiment of Johnny Storm/ The Human Torch. The wise cracking asshole of the group, he plays the part perfectly. He looks as if he's having a blast throughout the whole film. They threw in the typical teeny bopper 'EXTREME SPORTS!!' angle in there, which i could care less for, but I can see where they were going.

Michael Chicklis, who I've loved since The Commish and with The Shield is the anchor of the film. The Thing/Ben Grimm is the scapegoat, the one who got the worst part of these extraordinary powers and has to live with his difigurement everyday for the rest of his life. A line he says to Sue actually got the whole audience to give an "AWWWW" just for him. This is in regards to everyone having powers as well as problems.

"You know how badly I wish I could be invisible."

And Julian McMahon as Victor Von Doom/ Dr. Doom wasn't bad actually. Wasn't familiar with his other doctor work on Nip/Tuck, but he makes for a fun bad buy. Not scary, but fun. Getting changed like them, the little scar getting bigger and when he realizes the power he has, going made and just blasting holes through people. Very surprised to see that in a PG -13 movie. I just hated the fact that they made his outfit very GQish, but of course, I can get over that.

The special effects were very well done for each character. The stretching looked a little cheesy at points though, but in my head all I could keep saying was, "At least it isn't paper mache'. By far the Human Torch's parts looked best when he would be flying around and throwing fireballs at various things.

And to all the people badmouthing The Thing being non-CGI. Some peopel have pointed out that if Hellboy was CGI, it would've been a big pile of shit. I agree. This film would've looked ten times worse if he wasn't on screen with them all, interacting with the people and the objects around him. Trying to pick up a fork or crushing a glass in his hands looked like a man who has to learn all over again how it is to live a 'normal' life. The creases people keep talking about... yeah, I could see them, but thought of them as where his joints were. Yes, he's made of rock. He's a big pile of walking rubble. But I could tell they wanted to show him as a man who had a gift given to him at the wrong time, always sad now because his wife has left him because of the way he looks and the only person who sees his beauty is a blind woman. Isn't that always the way it is?

I'd give it a weak 7 out of 10. In the regions of a Daredevil/Hulk type film... where there is a lot of hope with a sequel. At least it isn't an Elektra. Or worse, a Catwoman. Or even worse, Man-Thing. And with most comic book movies, the end is never truly the end. Now to play more of the Fantastic Four game I bought today from a crackhead for 5 bucks. NYC can be great sometimes.

If you use this, call me Dr. No Is a Yes.

Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • June 28, 2005, 8:10 a.m. CST

    Fantastic flop?

    by liljuniorbrown

    God i hope not

  • June 28, 2005, 8:24 a.m. CST

    I Can't Believe That The Guy Who Brought Us Jimmy Fallon in

    by Aquatarkusman

    Sadly, the phrase "4-time Oscar Winner Michael Chiklis" may never become reality. P.S. If I ever heard an entire audience say "AWWWWWW," I would probably involuntary vomit.

  • June 28, 2005, 8:24 a.m. CST

    "At least it isn't an Elektra."

    by Rupee88

    Now there's a ringing endorsement.

  • June 28, 2005, 8:24 a.m. CST

    Johnny Storms penis is made up of midichlorians

    by c4andmore

    Why the pre-occupation with Johnny Storms penis? Freud would have a field day with that review.

  • June 28, 2005, 8:28 a.m. CST

    Thre is nothing wrong with changing your oppinion...

    by boomstick81

    ... at least it shows that you're not a stubborn asshole.

  • June 28, 2005, 8:32 a.m. CST

    do we get to see alba's hairy axe wound?

    by banthafodderUK

    flame on and kneel before zod

  • June 28, 2005, 8:33 a.m. CST

    But according to an interview with Michael France

    by adambalm

    The Doom as the fifth member of the team, the Doom getting metallic skin armor powers from the cosmic exposure, the changing Johnny from teenager (even having some crap about Ben being his former instructor), them investigating a 'cosmic ray cloud', which I'm sorry is even goofier science than the comic origin...he's responsible for all this, and yet Harry loved his draft. Okay. To each his own.

  • June 28, 2005, 8:34 a.m. CST

    Tim Sory = Brett Blackner?

    by HypeEndsHere

    Johnny: "It burns when I pee. It burns when I don't pee. It burns!"

  • June 28, 2005, 8:37 a.m. CST

    They cheered for trailers like Ice Age 2, etc.

    by moviemaniac-7

    What sick people cheer for a trailer anyhow? Are their social lives so pathetic they cheer for a small piece of fucking film? A whole movie, I can imagine, but a fucking trailer... Come on!

  • June 28, 2005, 8:47 a.m. CST

    Writers and comic book films

    by liljuniorbrown

    Nothing against Tim Story,Barbershop was great....but Batman Begins and Spiderman perfect examples of how with these movies an A+ director and writting are absolutely nessecary to make these movies work.Having perfect CGI and costumes and all of that are very important but when you get down to it the reason comic books are so addictive is the stories and how the heros make the choices they do,the sacrifices,and how it affects those they love.The cover art is what draws you in and obviously you wouldn't have any appeal to the comics without the illustrations of these characters and there amazing powers,but if you are not intrested in them as people why keep reading?Starting with Xmen Bryan Singer proved that writting is the key and i think any successful comic adaptation will have to follow in those footsteps.Don't get me wrong,if you get to serious into a character study and you don't have any fun or kick ass action staying true to the comic then you will not have an audience,see Hulk as an example on that one.Studio heads don't care,they just want a huge opening weekend and merchandising out the ass but they can have all of that and stay true to the comics, Batman Begins Spiderman and Spiderman2,Xmen and X2 all made a ton at the box office,dvd sales,and merchandising and still made fanboys every where happy at how true they stayed to the comics,but Singer,Rami,Goyer and Nolan are all wonderful story tellers who make you invest emotions into the characters.Superman Returns,Spiderman3 and a Batman sequel can't get here quick enough.

  • June 28, 2005, 8:49 a.m. CST

    FF

    by Knight of Ni

    If this movie is indeed as good as Daredevil and the Hulk, then I think I will be happy enough with it. The fantastic four have never been as interesting as the X-men anyways, so its hardly right to expect a movie about them to be as good or better. At the risk of being thoroughly trashed on these talkbacks for being upbeat and optimistic, I think this summer is shaping up to be an excellent one in terms of movies being released.

  • June 28, 2005, 8:53 a.m. CST

    Im so fucking tired of hose supposedly bad Hulk was.

    by JCubedz

    Most of you are like a fucking herd of sheep, its easily one of the best 3 comic adaptations so far. Putting it in the same breath as Punusher or Elektra is showing your absolute ignorance about real movies let alone comic book movies. Fucking fanboys just want their action beats and one liners.

  • June 28, 2005, 8:59 a.m. CST

    It looks like people who don't know the FF (99.9923% of the

    by FrankDrebin

    The FF don't themselves consider themselves superheroes. They're researchers. The wear lab coats. The don't have secret identities. They don't have a secret lair. They need a babysitter before going out. The government would like to lock them up as dangerous--how many times have Ben and Johnny trashed lower Manhattan while arguing?--how many times have Reed's inventions let in interdimensional conquerers? This movie might be fun, but be prepared to get upset over the changes. (*500,000/6,500,000,000)

  • June 28, 2005, 8:59 a.m. CST

    I told you self-important comic geeks...

    by Lost Skeleton

    F4 is going to have the non-comic geeks loving it and as long as Fox can put $50 million in their coffers on opening weekend they will be happy. Rothman is just looking at the bottom line that is why Ratner is doing X3. Kudos to Warner for going with quality; however, the name of the game is still box office and the non-geeks want to see this I am telling you.

  • June 28, 2005, 9:04 a.m. CST

    Oops, that should have been (*6,499,500,000/6,500,000,000). May

    by FrankDrebin

    I, too, will take comfort in Jessica Alba's curves--but if they can deflate Lindsay Lohan digitally, they can INflate Jessica Alba. Still, I don't care, curves are curves.

  • June 28, 2005, 9:11 a.m. CST

    I like the look fo this...

    by neoaddix

    Looks light and entertaining. Oh, and I am FIRST!

  • June 28, 2005, 9:12 a.m. CST

    If you read past...

    by Childe Roland

    ...all the instances of snarky bullshit where the first reviewer believes he's being hip or clever, that review is actually as positive if not moreso than the third one. Harry's still trying to color this film as bad before even seeing it, but his position sounds weaker and weaker the closer it gets to release (possibly because he keeps qualifying things he's said earlier and watering down his irrational hatred). As for the reviewers themselves, if I hear one more dumbass latter day fanboy complain about how the Thing is supposed to look like he's made of rocks because he's a walking pile of rubble, I'm going to hit that fanboy with a slab of concrete. You want to know what the Thing's skin is like? Look at your feet. Unless you're wheelchair bound or ultra vain, you've got some callouses near your heel and on the edge of your bog toe. Try to hurt that skin. You can't, really. You could put a cigarette out on it and not really feel it. Now imagine that all over your body only thicker. Thick enough to stop bullets. That's essentially what the Thing has going on if you look at the way Kirby originally drew him. Sure, eventually it starts to dry and crack (actually becoming harder) on the surface as it continues to build up (making him look bulkier). Eventually it takes on the appearances of a jigsaw mosaic of orangey rock, but FOR THE LAST FUCKING TIME, YOU UNIMAGINATIVE TWATS, HE IS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE MADE OF ROCKS! Your head may be, but not the Thing.

  • June 28, 2005, 9:13 a.m. CST

    That line about acting blind by making your eyes move around a l

    by Ray Garraty #47

    The blind chick in Blade: Trinity, The little girl in "The Langoliers" miniseries, and Jean Claude Van Damme in "Bloodsport" right after the giant roided Asian throws that powder in his face during the Kumite.

  • June 28, 2005, 9:14 a.m. CST

    Actually, I am deluded

    by neoaddix

    Still, Jessica Alba is a hornbag

  • June 28, 2005, 9:14 a.m. CST

    Second that JCubedz

    by Trevor Goodchild

    People that compare comic adaptations failures with Ang Lee's noble interpretation have probably never seen it. It's just something they feel they have to say to endear them to the geek mases. I've seen Punisher and Daredevil and I'm sure pretty sure that there isn't a fanbase as passionate for these two like there is for Hulk. I know a lot of people don't like the Hulk but I'm fairly certain thet nobody loves The Punisher. Whenever Hulk gets shat on in a talkback there are always half a dozen passionate defenders. I never see that for Daredevil.

  • June 28, 2005, 9:15 a.m. CST

    Langoliers.

    by Trevor Goodchild

    Wish that got made into a real film. One of King's best.

  • June 28, 2005, 9:30 a.m. CST

    Who cares about FF? Piglet is dead

    by TheBaxter

    If Tigger can get an obit on this site, why not Piglet?

  • June 28, 2005, 9:36 a.m. CST

    Hulk would fucking annihilate The Thing in a fight

    by John-Locke

    and I seriously doubt that FF will be as good as Hulk, just look at the actors, Eric Bana, Jennifer Connelly, Sam Elliott, Josh Lucas, Nick Nolte. Thats some Grade A talent right there, apart from Chiklis I don't care about any of these actors one bit. I'm sure the kiddies will lap it all up but i'd be more excited to see a Hulk sequel.

  • June 28, 2005, 9:47 a.m. CST

    Though I have no interest in seeing this...

    by PVIII

    I have 7 bucks off the ticket price (from the Man on Fire SE dvd), so I've decided to drop 3.50 on this 100 million dollar crapfest. And yes, I live in NYC so tickets cost 10.50. And they wonder why reciepts are off 7%. Assholes.

  • June 28, 2005, 9:48 a.m. CST

    Irwin...

    by adambalm

    So, I called bullshit on you for saying BB got 72 million openning weekend and you're gonna take your crying about it to other threads?

  • June 28, 2005, 9:48 a.m. CST

    I didn't mind Hulk.

    by dr_dreadlocks

    But it's tone was all over the damn place for two hours. The opening was dramatic and rather well paced, aside from the overly done split screens. I understand it's "emulating" the comic book style. But when you're mounting the film essentially as a drama, you have to do away with the more "comic" involved bits. Also, when Josh Lucas' character dies and we flip out into it being an ACTUAL COMIC, you lost me right there. The film then turns into a schlock fest with "TAKE IT, TAKE IT ALL!" From then on out it loses any drama it could possibly imagine and becomes 150 million dollars wasted. Let's face it, it was okay in the first act. Once Lee decided it was a drama, comedy, hulk-dog fest, and eventually a literal comic book adaptation, he lost his audience. It's one way or another. I'm also not a sheep, although that shepherd guy does look rather alluring... What a nice staff.

  • Well I guess the same could be asked about studio execs and they get paid a lot more money.

  • June 28, 2005, 10:17 a.m. CST

    The Hulk will be remembered slightly better thanks to the DVD cl

    by RealDoubleJ

    The dramatic stuff was great but geez, the action fell flat for the most part in the cinema because no bugger in the audience could tell what the fuck was going on at night. The Hulk-dog scene was quiet as a morgue with hundreds of kids crying cause they couldn't see what the hulk was doing. Also, the end with Nick Nolte went down like a lead balloon because all we could make out was that it looked like he turned into a whirlwind before being sucked up the Hulk's ass. The DVD came out, it all made more sense, and i do have to put the Hulk high up on the list of Marvel's comic-book films...Mind you, it does help re-watching it without some schmuck of a kid asking his dad every ten minutes (ESPECIALLY at the end, "IS he still the Hulk Daddy?".

  • June 28, 2005, 10:20 a.m. CST

    Dr. Doom is an FOREIGN EVIL DICTATOR!!!!!

    by Drath

    Look I agree that corporate America has many evil men running it and they are an underrated menace to society (we reward people for being assholes, what do you expect of the American business scene). But Dr. Doom is an evil dictator and that IS relevant now with terrorists like Osama Bin Ladin and leaders like Kim Jong Il in the world. In fact that's almost a real world example! We'd rather go after someone like Saddam who might have Weapons of Mass Destruction in the future, but we're not gonna touch someone who has them now and is ready and willing to use them if he likes. Doom is that evil, and frankly I think American are still more fearful of that than they are of evil business men. We've grown tolerant of greedy corporate America, and frankly they laugh off the media demonizing them, so the studio has effectively made Dr. Doom into a benign entity. Probably because the studio is as corporate and greedy as the next Trump clone. I won't forgive.

  • June 28, 2005, 10:23 a.m. CST

    Hey, cut Nick Nolte completely out of the Hulk film and I'll

    by cookylamoo

  • June 28, 2005, 10:28 a.m. CST

    I Liked the HULK

    by ZombieSolutions

    it was a lot smarter and more deeply felt than i ever remember the comics being. the biggest mistake Ang Lee made the mistake of trying to make a good film, when all america wanted was another BIG DUMB LOUD nothing. in the not too distant future, i imagine movies will just be one long car crash, shoot out and explosion backed by some kind of nightmarishly bad nu-metal/blingbling rap soundtrack. no more stories. just 'splosions, 'splosions, 'splosions, product placement, evil brown skinned person (or whomever the "enemy " of the republicans are that that month) hot blonde jailbait with kung fu powers, and then more 'splosions, 'splosions, 'splosions. ah, the decline of the empire. how amusing!

  • June 28, 2005, 10:29 a.m. CST

    Hulk fought a fucking poodle......boo

    by occams_razor

    If the Hulk movie had been 2 hours of Hulk fighting the moon men and their giant scorpion-bots then I would've loved the movie. I'm all for character development and plot but the movie was just dumb. People were laughing in the theater....and not the "wow, that was funny and poignant" kinda laugh, but more like a "wow, am I really seeing the Hulk fight a fucking evil poodle?" kinda laugh. I like Ang Lee and I commend him for trying to make something different with the Hulk but it didn't work...at all.....a fucking poodle!!!!

  • June 28, 2005, 10:32 a.m. CST

    I guess I'm one of "hose" people

    by sith-vol

    Yeah I thought the Hulk was utter crap. If this thing is as good...then guess what? It will be crap too. I am tired of people shitting on comic book fans. News flash for ya, if there were no comic book geeks, fans or fanboys...then Batman, Spider-Man, Fantastic Four etc. would not exist. I know they all say the same thing; "It has to appeal to a mass audience" Well last time I checked, these comics had a mass audience already. I know the bottom line is getting people's butts in the theatre seats but for christ sake why do we keep seeing project after project that has less and less to do with the source material? If every time we pick up an issue of our favorite comic and read it, everything about the origins of a character changes, would we continue to read it. Minor changes I can deal with, but major changes to the very fabric of what made the character cool in the first place makes no sense at all to me. I guess my whole point is this: If you've got a billion people all obsessed with a big green cube sitting on a rock in the middle of a lake, and every one loves this cube and books are written about it, why then one day do you decide to make a movie about the cube and change the big green cube to a rather small blue telephone sitting on a bed that no one cares about? Like I said, it makes no sense to me. It all comes down to one thing and one thing only, money. If Avi Arad, and Stan Lee weren't so intent on squeezing all the money they can out of every Marvel project available, this would never happen. I wish someone somewhere cared enough about a comic book and its characters that they would make a quality project with the actual source material...oh wait there is and his name is Bryan Singer and look what Fox did to him. Sorry for the long rant...I'm out.

  • June 28, 2005, 10:37 a.m. CST

    Off topic, sorry,, but Harry how about a forum discussing the re

    by JohnnyTremaine

    It leads into questions regarding the direction of content distribution technology, the movie business, the much talked about lowered audience attendance at theaters, etc. etc.

  • June 28, 2005, 10:43 a.m. CST

    johnny

    by whatyoufear

    who gives a shit? just like this fantastic movie i'll be not watching.

  • June 28, 2005, 10:44 a.m. CST

    Hey, Sith-Vol, What About Sam Raimi's SPIDERMAN Films?

    by ZombieSolutions

    clearly Sam Raimi cares about and loves the characters. and he made the two best comic book movies EVER. i loved the XMEN movies, but the SPIDERMAN movies really hit it out of the park. they are perfect comic book films. Fox fucked Singer, but Singer wanted to do Omnipotent, Boring, MidWestern, Aryan, Goodguy, Boyscout Man, i mean, SUPERMAN , more than the XMEN. my guess is he would have left anyway.

  • June 28, 2005, 10:53 a.m. CST

    Am I alone in thinking Spiderman 2 was crap?

    by TonyWilson

    I liked the first one alot. But the second was a retread of so many other ideas and then a major plot point stolen completely from Superman 2. Oh and don't get me started on the ending. Just chessy bollocks. FF looks good, not great not crap just good. I have been saying The Torch will be the best thing since the script was leaked. But that is because he is the one without any weight or pathos. So they nailed the shallow show off and just went for the saccharine crap witht the Thing. I can see why hardcore FF fans are fuming. I'm only a small fan so i can live with is as pop corn fun now the really great early summer films are all out.

  • June 28, 2005, 11:02 a.m. CST

    Hulk love Doomed

    by oisin5199

    Sorry, just trying to fit in the names. Jumble of thoughts here: First, it's good to see some Hulk love here after the endless knee-jerk Hulk bashing on this site. I admit, the film was flawed, the CG distracting, and the ending didn't really work, but I thought the overall concept and the anger issues and the Betty/Bruce relationship and even Nolte's bat-shit craziness worked well. I thought it was intelligent and kinda trippy, not the Hulk-SMASH fest everyone seems to have wanted, but really if all you want is that, watch the cartoons. Most of these early Marvel concepts just don't work in reality and trying to do the concepts straight would be really difficult. You have to update the "science" or the emotional stakes. I'm usually one to say that it makes more sense that Doom would be corporate. We already have an interesting terrorist character in Rh'as al Ghul and having Doom just be a terrorist would be boring and just doesn't fit in tone with this FF origin. I do like what I'm hearing about the Latverian connection, though. Maybe they're building up to him becoming a dictator and the sequel will make the FF more relevant to the world (or galaxy), not just NYC. The true FF was always much more sci-fi than the other titles, after all. I'm also one of those people that really liked Daredevil, especially the director's cut. The only weak spot for me was Garner's Electra - the casting and the portrayal of that character was all wrong. Matt and Electra should have been two totally different worlds, instead of looking like prom dates together. What better character to do a spinoff? (that's sarcasm). The A-list director thing is good advice, but was Raimi, the guy who most knowm for the Evil Dead movies, really an A-list director? Spiderman was certainly entertaining, but people have to remember that comic book films aren't Shakespeare. Every now and then we get something with more substance like BB or occasional moments in the X-Films, but with FF, this sounds exactly like what I expect. Finally, that second review was completely incomprehensible.

  • June 28, 2005, 11:10 a.m. CST

    Once again...

    by The_Iceman2288

    AICN, bypass the good bits and go STRAIGHT to the negative.

  • June 28, 2005, 11:13 a.m. CST

    I also love the Hulk movie

    by adambalm

    It was just a failure of audience expectations. You could just as easily blame a 'dumb audience' as poor marketing. In any event, people thought they were getting Star Wars, and they got 2001: A Space Odyssey. I think Hulk will eventually be rediscovered by the critics, but I don't know if it will ever be anything but reviled among the majority of fanboys.

  • June 28, 2005, 11:15 a.m. CST

    The HULK CGI...

    by Dolph

    ...was, for the most part, awesome. ILM talked about how green was their greatest enemy in making him believable. Look at the scene when he emerges from the sewer

  • June 28, 2005, 11:15 a.m. CST

    Tony Wilson I know why Spidey 2 was crap....

    by www.valiens.com

    Because it was a nice little romance movie that happened to have Spider-Man in it. Take out Spidey and you've got a decent enough film. But that's not what we paid for. Maybe the third one will actually have some Spider-Man in it. As for Fantasic Fuck Up--it's 2005. If you're telling me that you can tell there's a foam rock in a big budget hero movie at this point in movie history, you might as well not finish the review unless it's about Roger Corman.

  • June 28, 2005, 11:25 a.m. CST

    I too also loved the Hulk

    by boomstick81

    Wow, nice to see all of these Hulk fans stepping forward. Though, I must say, all of the recent Marvel movies and BB have been pretty true to the tone of their comic counterparts. Spider-Man has always had romance in it (Should I date Gwen or Mary Jane?! Or.. It's hard to date when I'm Spider-Man). Batman is dark, psycological and moody. And, FF4 is a comedy/sci-fi/adventure. Everything may not be exactly as they are in the comics, but more importantly the tone is right.

  • June 28, 2005, 11:30 a.m. CST

    Wow. I Can't Believe There Are Comic Book People Who Didn&#

    by ZombieSolutions

    you've GOT to be fucking kidding me. they were fucking classics! the only retread from part 1, is the scene where Parker goes in to the burning house to rescue the kid. it's virtually the same in part 1. but, ah! this time around, he's just plain old Peter Parker -- emo nerd/ex superhero. both of them were fantastic movies with well-rounded characters, great dialouge, and supercool action sequences. i mean, the train scene alone was fantastic. oh wait, let me guess, this is just more of that inconsolable comicbook geek contrarianism that hates everything for no other reason than boredom. it's not that you didn't like it, but that, liking it doesn't start flamewars.

  • June 28, 2005, 11:31 a.m. CST

    Not a problem Irwin, just double check your facts before you pos

    by adambalm

    And don't mindlessly regurgitate what you read in a press release. I go to the source and look at the actual numbers being reported before I open my mouth. What's also interesting to me is that I've only commented on Batman Begins in a couple of threads, maybe a dozen posts total, out of the hundreds of posts I've made on AICN. But every single post I've seen by you, is talking about box office numbers, and all the while bitching about other people doing the same. This is the equivalent of those who bash people for judging a movie to suck before it comes out, who then go on to say the movie will rock. Fine, call me a hater if it makes you happy. As I posted in the last FF thread, I didn't even really talk about the box office that much until the mindless zealots like you kept misrepresenting the facts to fit their arguments, and calling anyone who tried to kill their buzz "haters" and trolls. Then I had to call bullshit on them. I specifically said in the last thread that Batman Begins, despite a hairy openning that some of us wondering if it did bomb, the later numbers showed a piss poor, lukewarm, but respectable showing which could not be categorized as a flop. I also specifically said at the same time, that I liked the movie. And further in the thread, I stated I thought Fantastic Four may do better, despite my prediction that I'll probably like it less than Begins. See, you're the only one who associates the financial success of a movie, with the quality of the film. Batman Begins didn't drop like a bomb, and nor soar like an eagle. It will make its money back and it will probably get a sequel, although I doubt they'll approve a budget before they see how the initial DVD orders are.

  • June 28, 2005, 11:31 a.m. CST

    I think this movie will do good

    by BatShtCrazy

    I believe this movie will do good because it seems to be catering more to the general masses then the fanboys, and if it works more power to them, I doubt they'll get my money , I just wish it was more old school fantastic four than Ultimate FF Doom. As for the 2nd reviewer, anything and everything he says should've been thrown out in the garbage, go get some tissues and spank it instead of wasting our time with that crap you call a review. P.S. I have always thought the Hulk movie was ok, I don't think it's the masterpiece some people make it out to be but it's not the steaming pile most seem to think it is...I think it got a little too wordy for my tastes but over all it was good enough in my opinion to pick it up as part of my movie collection

  • June 28, 2005, 11:31 a.m. CST

    Too much character development??

    by TonyWilson

    I can't believe I'am dumping on a film because of that. But I think you are right for the most part Valiens. I know it's always hard romance in it but it wasnt 75% romance and character development that didn't really go anywhere. I have been happy with 50/50 split or even a BB style drama over action. But not romance. Just not my thing in a Superhero movie. Ah well.

  • June 28, 2005, 11:35 a.m. CST

    ummm.....

    by FertilityHollis

    I just signed up to say this is the funniest shit I've ever had the pleasure of reading. Tom Cruise better keep up his kookiness so I'll have something to do while I'm at work. I had no idea Scientology was so fucked up, they're like those Heaven's Gate fuckers who killed themselves to rendevous with fucking aliens on some comet, or was that some other cult? I dunno they all start to run together after a while.

  • June 28, 2005, 11:35 a.m. CST

    "We don

    by genro

    Avi wanted to make Bendis' Ultimate FF but was forced to go back to some standard FF stuff. Von Doom was Van Damn, Boreanz before Chiklis, the uber-celebrity stuff, so on and so forth...

  • June 28, 2005, 11:38 a.m. CST

    ooookay, that was supposed to be in the tom cruise talkback.....

    by FertilityHollis

    FUCK!! I'm so fucking stupid, I don't even know where I am half the time...

  • June 28, 2005, 11:38 a.m. CST

    Zombiesolutions

    by TonyWilson

    No you have got me wrong mate. I don't care about dissing a film for the sake of it. It is just my opinion with Spiderman 2. When I said retread of Ideas i didnt just mean from Spiderman 1 i meant from most book films. And come on what about the total ripping off of Superman2? Surely that is not a good thing to do? I only posted because i wanted to see if other people agreed with me not to start anything. So take it easy. I loved Spiderman 1 as much as the next fanboy. The fight on the train had a great ending but the bits on the top just seemed a bit too videogame for me. It is just opinion though on this one at least. As for the characters...well the development seemed to go round in circles a bit. But come one surely that ending was really bad. Really cheesily bad?.

  • June 28, 2005, 11:50 a.m. CST

    Quit being pussies, just admit it....

    by crackerfarmboy

    THIS FILM SUCKS COCK! If you can't tell that from the trailers alone, then you are retarded.

  • June 28, 2005, 11:51 a.m. CST

    A lot of Harry's premature hatred of this stems from his lov

    by MrBoinfoint

    Which is sad. Because being a Fantastic Four comicfan is just barely a step above being a DC comicfan. Exept for Batman, that crazy rich guy rocks. The reviews above are so full of faux-witty "ain't I the worst" cattiness that they might as well have been written by David Sedaris.

  • June 28, 2005, 11:57 a.m. CST

    Did anyone see the cast of FF on the Today show this morning?

    by mortsleam

    That Alba is one hot idiot. Chiklis was all enthusiasm, despite having to deal with a vaccuum like Matt Lauer. Gruffud looked a little uncomfortable, and Evans grew some ridiculous facial hair. They all seemed game though, enthusiastically talking about the characters, powers and relationships and looking excited over the prospect of making a sequel, and didn't spend the entire interview saying how embarrassed they were to be in comic movie, unlike a certain Oscar Winning actress.

  • June 28, 2005, 12:09 p.m. CST

    spider-man 2

    by occams_razor

    Spider-Man 2 bored me, though it was better than the Hulk. The scene where the people on the train pass Spidey over them and he's striking the Jesus pose....I rolled my eyes. Here's to hoping Spidey 3 will make me smile as much as the first one did. And Hulk still is, and will always be, a bad movie.

  • June 28, 2005, 12:11 p.m. CST

    crackerfarmboy, that's your problem

    by The_Iceman2288

    You're judging the movie, only from the trailers. I think we all know who the real retard is.

  • June 28, 2005, 12:14 p.m. CST

    ZombieSolutions

    by sith-vol

    That is a prime example of what I was saying about being able to handle minor changes in a comic book film. I was pissing and moaning so much in my rant I failed to mention Raimi, who is a great talent and I think is a prime example of what is right in Hollywood which is very little. I could sit through 1000 viewings of Spidey 1 & 2 before ever watching the Hulk again. Thanks for calling me on that one bud.

  • June 28, 2005, 12:16 p.m. CST

    Michael France's script

    by Killgore

    Does anyone know where I can get the Punisher and Hulk scritps?

  • June 28, 2005, 12:19 p.m. CST

    Hulk was a good movie and FF will make more money then Batman

    by JUSTICE41

    .FF will be a better watch than Bats, for the family. Let's face it in the summer it's about being able to take the entire family out for some relatively cheap entertainment. Can't take the chillen to see WOTW or any other violent or overly sexual movies. FF is the perfect family flick. It has a flame guy a rock guy and a stretchy guy as well as a bad guy in armour and a sexy chick who turns invisible. People will say this movie is the live action version of the Incredibles, not knowing the FF came first. But money will flow, the audience will laugh and enjoy themselves and pass on the good word to friends and co-workers alike. That is how you make money kiddies, not dark gloomy movies. That's for wacko's who think dark gloomy movies are cool or some such nonsense. Take note, the brighter more kid friendly a comic book movie is the better attendance it get's. People want to be thrilled and amused not put off or pissed off or turned off. I loved Batman Begins but knew it wasn't going to make much overall and was really hoping the production costs weren't high, bcause a high prod cost and relatively low BO return is a sure sign it will not have a sequel. Well that was before DVD's follow-up three months later. The Hulk's sequel is being delayed for exactly that reason. It made much from DVD's, but it's initial worldwide take only netted 60 million above costs and marketing. I wonder how many water headed retards will light themselves on fire and jump off the roof of their house after watching Storm light up?

  • June 28, 2005, 12:20 p.m. CST

    Spider-Man 2 ripped off....

    by boomstick81

    Amazing Spider-Man #50. Gasp! And the other countless times Spider-Man "quit".

  • June 28, 2005, 12:22 p.m. CST

    Boomstick81

    by TonyWilson

    He didn't quit then lose his powers because of a girl. Superman did though.

  • June 28, 2005, 12:23 p.m. CST

    Spidey moments

    by oisin5199

    I do admit that my favorite moments from the Spidey films were the sentimental "New York" moments, like people throwing shit at Green Goblin, or the train sequence where the people see PP unmasked and swear to keep his secret. These are unrealistic of course, but as cinematic moments, they were particularly moving. Maybe this has to do with the first movie nod to 9/11 with removing the Towers from the original poster. But that's the spirit of Spiderman, the NYC sensibility. I also loved Molina's Doc Ock - actually love Molina in most things - his scene in Jarmusch's Coffee and Cigarettes with Steve Coogan was hilarious, for instance - who would have thought Mr. "Throw me the whip" would have such a great range? My problem with SM2 was mostly the Parker character and Maguire. The whiney Spidey angst just gets tired after a while. If I want angst, I'll watch Batman. I'm still waiting for the wisecrackin' Spidey I know from the comics and the cartoon. That Peter Parker had troubles, sure, but he joked his way through them, not whined and cried. There was a lame attempt at the Spidey humour in SM2 in the bank robbery scene, but it fell flat, imo. Maybe if they ever do that Deadpool movie...

  • June 28, 2005, 12:24 p.m. CST

    A lot of Harry's premature hatred of this stems from AICN no

    by MikeCSVU

    Why do you think Nolan, Singer, Spielberg and Jackson get such five star treatment on this site?

  • June 28, 2005, 12:26 p.m. CST

    Spidey has lost his powers before when sick......

    by JUSTICE41

    Or overly stressed in the comics. They took a bunch of things from all the comics. I've seen a scene in the comics where spidey runs out of web fluid and had to catch a ride on top of a cab. They had to re-jigger the story to fit the organic nature of the Movies Spidey but I think it worked well.

  • June 28, 2005, 12:28 p.m. CST

    This movie sounds like it's a piece of shit

    by Doc_Strange

    You know I never really read FF comics except for the Heroes Reborn which was done by Jim Lee. But even I know that Doc Doom should be a fucking genius Dictator of Latveria, not some lame ass cliche CEO bent on revenge because he's being ousted. Shit, Doom would come up with a way to kill all the stockholders without being incriminated, hell he'd probably kill them all outright. This was a gaping hole of a missed opportunity for one of the greatest villains in the Marvel universe. I won't go into the rest of the characters because that would be too much talkback.

  • June 28, 2005, 12:32 p.m. CST

    I have to agree with JUSTICE41

    by sith-vol

    This looks like a popcorn movie and while I may rant about the fact they have severed any tie to the source material, this will probably make a ton of money. Both my sons (5 and 2) love Batman, but there was no intrest from either of them when a trailer was on, but show one of the crappy Fantastic Four trailers and they come running. So I can see your point.

  • June 28, 2005, 12:45 p.m. CST

    Kids love fire and rock guys

    by JUSTICE41

    I have 3 year old nephew who loves Batman. he even has a batman costume he wears around his house as he jumps off furniture. I showed him the Batman trailer and he just went back to running around. I showed him the Spidey 2 trailer and he sat down and started pointing at the screen saying spiderman, and giggling. May be anecdotal but it's enough proof for me. Children are only looking for amusement and laughs and maybe even something to get sad over like Bambi's mom getting blown away or watching the little baby in Ice age get turned over to it's parent. Robert Rodriguez has hit the nail on the head with his movies.

  • June 28, 2005, 12:59 p.m. CST

    Doctor Doom as Donald Trump?

    by Thorfin

    I don't want to see them destroy a great villain and reduce him to an evil capitalist who looks like a character out of the old 1980's Flash Gordon (Flash.... ah ahhhhh... savior of the Universe!)

  • June 28, 2005, 1 p.m. CST

    As far as Doom, keep in mind that this is an origin movie

    by Terry_1978

    He doesn't die at the end apparantly, and sets himself up to be Latverian ruler.

  • June 28, 2005, 1:18 p.m. CST

    People who blame the screenwriter...

    by droog

    Know little or nothing about the process of big-budget filmmaking. If they're lucky, a credited writer has maybe 10-30% of their initial/best script make it into the finished film. After that it's a matter of incorporating an endless series of notes from director, producers, actors, etc. -- basically people in higher positions who THINK their ideas are better. As hard as it may be to believe, the vast majority of writers actually do not set out to write a piece of shit (there's a reason they're cashing $500k checks for their function). It's just what the movie becomes over the course of production. Too many cooks...

  • June 28, 2005, 1:32 p.m. CST

    How am I supposed to believe that last review?

    by enemakid

  • June 28, 2005, 1:33 p.m. CST

    Daredevil was...

    by Rapmaster C

    ...nowhere near as bad as people say. I'm not that a big fan of him comics-wise (more of a Spidey fan myself) but the film itself was good. At the time of its release, everyone seemed to focus on their unyielding hatred for Ben Affleck, much like people are dissing WOTW just because Tom Cruise has been in the news recently. Fantastic 4 sounds better than expected - hopefully it does well enough to garner a sequel. If they're going to mess up the Phoenix storyline in X-Men 3, at least give us Galactus.

  • June 28, 2005, 1:35 p.m. CST

    How am I supposed to believe that last review?

    by enemakid

    Guy says Hulk and Daredevil in the same breath... "At least it wasn't Elektra". Some consolation...

  • June 28, 2005, 1:47 p.m. CST

    Also

    by Rapmaster C

    That second review was awful. Honestly, why was it shown? It was like the worst Cumpston-esque rip-off I've ever read.

  • June 28, 2005, 1:48 p.m. CST

    Hulk Love: It's a beautiful thang

    by Laserbrain

    I am pleased to count myself among your numbers, Hulk fans. I consider it a strange, sad, awesome but still quite flawed piece. I wouldn't have thought you could have mixed comic-book-movie with Oedipal-psychodrama with 60s-Trip-Film so successfully but... it worked. For me anyway. And, Jesus, you get about 15 minutes of the Hulk jumping about in the desert smashing the pus out of tanks and helicopters. How much more HULK can ya get? Oh, well- they never GOT Blade Runner in 82 either...

  • June 28, 2005, 1:50 p.m. CST

    Sounds like shit

    by Doc_McCoy

    Trailers look like shit. Director has a history of making shit. Reviewers were not impressed. I will not be seeing this movie in the theater or on DVD.

  • June 28, 2005, 2:16 p.m. CST

    Love Hulk Love

    by Trevor Goodchild

    Never seen one of my TBs so reinforced. Makes me glow with faith in human intelligence. The soundtrack during the leaping across the desert sequence. The brutallity of the dogfight. The hallucinigenic visions. The primal YEAH as he pulls the turret off the tank. Apparently Arad wants him smaller in the sequel and more purposely heroic. Diet Hulk as he called it, so the first film is going to be one to treasure. And to whoever said Hollywoods Hulk would annihilate Hollywoods Thing. Absolutely. Are they supposed to be equals in the comics though?

  • June 28, 2005, 2:17 p.m. CST

    LaserBrain

    by Bulldoggie

    Dude, I've been saying the exact same thing in regards to "people" not getting Hulk just like no one got BladeRunner back in the day for about 2 years now!! Agreed 100%. As far as the FF goes, I'll be there the first day with my Thing hands (specially modified to hold beer cans and cigar). . .

  • June 28, 2005, 2:29 p.m. CST

    Hulk was the best directed super hero film with a weak script.

    by Mr. Profit

    It looked nice, had good editing, but the story was weak and there was no big pay off ending.

  • June 28, 2005, 2:31 p.m. CST

    C omputerized G rimm I n my opinion.

    by Trevor Goodchild

    I have nothing against practical effects. Hellboy and Abe Sapiens were perfect but neither were made entirely of stone. You just cannot get around the fact that this new Thing looks and moves like rubber. Even in the posters. There should be real friction at every boulder join and a puff of dust and grit. They didn't even have to go as far as a completely Gollum/Hulk CG character. Just some digital enhancement. But CG is at a level now that could have made a man made of orange rock more believable. Look at the scene in Hulk after his old house is destroyed by the FAYE bomb. His turn to camera as the dust clears and then him observing his cut healing. Absolute perfection It's the little tiny moments of obsevered movements that make a CG creation acceptable to the human eye. Sorry to go back to Hulk but if I can't rave about it in this talkback then where? Also, wasn't Grimm bigger in the comics?

  • June 28, 2005, 2:36 p.m. CST

    "If you don't like Hulk, you don't get it"

    by Trevor Goodchild

    Disagree with that standing. I appreciate that it's very much an aquired taste. I just love the Carlos Casteneda senseabilities and seeing the military reduced to toys.

  • June 28, 2005, 2:40 p.m. CST

    Silver Surfer

    by mikal

    I'm currently doing dialog rewites for a combined Silver Surfer/Doctor Strange film. It will of course have to have an origin-laden first act with the usual overdose of exposition, but I think the screenplay solves the problem quite nicely. Funding is almost all in place, but no talent is attached as of yet. Should be a goodie- loads of greenscreen weird extra-dimensional stuff, with GALACTUS making an appearance of course. Not at liberty to discuss any more details, like our first choices for director or further plot details, but I wanted to let all the freeks n' geeks know first!

  • June 28, 2005, 2:40 p.m. CST

    And people really need to stop acting like Spiderman 1 and 2 and

    by Mr. Profit

    They were all mediocre films that are only regarded as being "good" or "Great" because they did not outright suck. Spidey is hobbled by bad CGI and villains you dont really care for. And Spiderman 2 was nearly 3 hours long with maybe 3 major action sequences. A sequel is supposed to up the ante and the only good scene in that entire film was Doc Ock bugging out in the emergency room. Xmen 1 was a boring film with poor dialogue and characters that were all wrong. And the way the homorepressed director (Singer) made being a mutant the equivalent of being a homosexual in the closet was not genius, it was dumb. What's next, Superman is going to use closets instead of phone booths? X2 was flat and cheap looking and for 135 million looked like a superstation original film. That film also reduced the Xmen to Power Rangers status where they all bitched out in the end and looked for Wolverine to bail them out. Just like the way those corny ass rangers used to look for Tommy. Hulk was beautiful to look at and it looked like the director spent a couple of bucks. Too bad it wasn't blockbuster enough. At least Ang Lee tried, but they underestimated Americans who for many their only reference to The Hulk was the TV show with Bill Bixby. Adding too complex a story and an ending that was to me a bit confusing, the movie tanked and is hated. Anyhow superhero films are all getting stupid. They will only get better when Avi Arad steps down. Batman Begins was finally a serious step in the right direction, but it was far from perfect. For the sequel, Nolan needs to do the action better. I'm shocked with superhero films because there is no reason why any of these films are not better than the original Matrix. Shit they aren't even as good as Aliens and that came out in the 80's. Can Cameron please come out of retirement and school these hack motherfuckers on how to satisfy an audience? We'll forgive you for Titanic...

  • June 28, 2005, 2:57 p.m. CST

    Silver Surfer!!! Galactus!!!

    by docfalken

    Please please please don't let this suck. I want to see Galactus eat a planet. I want to see the Power Cosmic unloaded on some bad guys. Maybe have SS duke it out with another Herald? And since I'm making a Christmas list, how about some Inhumans and a Beta Ray Bill appearance?

  • June 28, 2005, 3 p.m. CST

    You hear that??

    by I've been Banned

    That's the sound of a fat man back-peddling.

  • June 28, 2005, 3:10 p.m. CST

    Mr. Profit Have to half agree with you

    by JUSTICE41

    But not all SFX houses can be ILM or WETA. Spdey's EFX was good enough, not great but good enough. The Hulk was the best CGI character I've ever seen next to Gollum. Just watch the scene when he was about to toss a hunk a street at the helicopter. The pause, the muscle movement, the un-flexing and un-tensing of the corded muscles all looked perfect. Suer he looked like a barbie doll facially at times like when looking at his reflection, but the first transformation was spot on. Him slipping and falling, slicing through the observation room to pull apart the gamma machine, beautiful. The shot of him smashing out of the water tank, the Hulk rolling in the sand after being shelled. My only issue with the movie was it should have started when Banner was riding to work and ended when Betty calms him down so he change back. That should have been the movie. Hell I bought the dvd and imported into my computer and re-edited it so the movie starts at Banner riding his Bike and ends when Betty and Banner hug. I threw in the Banner experiment stuff in as flashbacks Thank you final Cut Pro and Adobe after effects. Too bad I didn't have a DVD burner at the time.

  • June 28, 2005, 3:11 p.m. CST

    Mr. Profit, get your head out of your ass.

    by BurlIvesLeftNut

    What an over long, dumb post trying to justify why your opinion is better than others. Just so you know you will never be able to prove your opinion is better than others. NEVER! EVER! Get it out of your head, pussy lips! IT CAN'T BE DONE! So get over yourself and except that people disagree with you. Whiny bitch.

  • June 28, 2005, 3:22 p.m. CST

    Justice

    by Mr. Profit

    Yeah I personally like the film I thought it was well made, but needed something to make mainstream audiences like it. I still own the film though. And Burl you can try to insult me all you want but 1) my opinion still stands, and guess what it's my opinion, you dont have to agree. And 2) no one told you to read my post. If it upset you so much that you are seemingly on the verge of tears well I apologize. Spiderman 1 and 2 and X 1 and 2 are mediocre IMO. I didn't say I was L Ron Hubbard and that you had to go on talk shows spouting my message.

  • June 28, 2005, 3:29 p.m. CST

    Mr. Profit's homo-repressed issues

    by oisin5199

    Sheesh. I thought we already talked this issue to death about people's inane ideas about Singer's gay agenda. I'll say it one more time. You can call mutants outcast of any type, whether it's being gay, or religiously or politically different, or simply not fitting in. Singer's gay identity may have influenced how he read the story, but all of those metaphors were already there. These films were not gay agenda films, like so many queerbashers seem to think. The X-Men films weren't masterpieces by any stretch of the imagination, and some of the casting was weak (I'm looking at you, Halle) but there were certainly moments of brilliance (Like the Xavier/Magneto verbal sparring, Wolverine and Rogue's relationship: "Does that hurt? Every time.") that showed us that we could care about comic book characters on the big screen and that the quiet moments were just as important as the fights. And in an unrelated note: Doctor Strange AND Silver Surfer? Isn't that a bit of a genre mix? Shouldn't there be a straight sci-fi Silver Surfer/Galactus story and a straight Dr. Strange mystical sorcery story?

  • June 28, 2005, 3:31 p.m. CST

    oops, I guess I should have said "straightforward" considering t

    by oisin5199

  • June 28, 2005, 3:40 p.m. CST

    Dammit, Trevor!

    by Childe Roland

    What part of "HE IS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE MADE OF ROCKS" do you not understand? Look at the original Kirby art in FF #1. Not only is he orange and lumpy (because his skin isn't made of rocks, it's basically just a big callous that hasn't started to dry and crack yet), but he's a test pilot. Pretty strict maximum height limitations there. Sure, some of those hack artists in the 90s drew him as a 7-foot-tall rocky man-mountain - and maybe they even thought he was supposed to be made of rocks, but they weren't exactly known for their attention to detail or history/continuity in that era. Ben Grimm's right around 6 feet and starts out relatively smooth (albeit lumpy). Later he gets more craggy as his epidermis hardens and continues to layer (making him look bulkier).

  • June 28, 2005, 3:41 p.m. CST

    Sorry I missed that stuff, I wasn't a member of this site in

    by Mr. Profit

    And I'm not homo repressed in anyway. In the year 2005 if I were gay I don't think anyone would give a fuck about it. That is unless I lived in middle America.

  • June 28, 2005, 3:42 p.m. CST

    People who wanted more HULK SMASH....

    by Ribbons

    ...would have been better served watching '2 Fast 2 Furious' or masturbating.

  • June 28, 2005, 3:45 p.m. CST

    Spider-Man 2 WAS A Great Film

    by Sean38

    Sorry Profit, you missed the boat on this one BIG TIME. Spider-Man 2 is the GOLD STANDARD by which all other superhero movies should be judged. It had character, action, heart, drama, plot and a great villian. Only 3 major action sequences? Who cares! They were great action sequences that mattered all the more because Raimi actually bothered to tell a STORY rather than simply loosely link a series of set pieces together. The scene with Spider-Man and Doc Ock on the train was the FIRST time I'd ever truly seen a comic book come to life. And the scene right after, where the train goers realize he's just a kid, his heart breaking. On top of that you've got the PERFECT bittersweet ending with Mary Jane staring out the window as Peter swings off into the distance. The DEFINITIVE order is this: 1) Spider-Man 2, 2) Batman Begins 3) Superman (I'm counting 1 and 2 together), 4) X2, 5) Hulk. I don't expect FF to live up to any of these movies, but so long as it's better than Daredevil or the VASTLY overrated Hell Boy, or at least on par with the original X-Men, I'll be happy. It doesn't look brilliant, but it looks like fun.

  • June 28, 2005, 3:54 p.m. CST

    try last week, prof.

    by oisin5199

    We've been discussing Singer and the whole gay issue incessantly on almost every comic book movie related talkback for the last month, ever since homophobes cried "gay!" on the new Superman costume and the whole Ratner thing happened. Not that I expect everyone to read every talkback, but when an issue so patently irrelevant keeps coming up, I get pretty annoyed. Don't know what the rest of your post means.

  • June 28, 2005, 3:55 p.m. CST

    I WANT to reappraise Spiderman 2

    by TonyWilson

    I saw it twice at the cinema and did not bother with the dvd. There are certainly great moments in it. Sean38 i agree the end of the train fight is absolutley great. But the fight on top looks like a videogame. The plot is disjointed really more sequences of Parker's life there is no driving momentum. The ending? Well it has more slo-mo/heart swelling music than the end(s) of ROTK it is just a bit too saccharine. I want to reappraise it and i will rent it out again but I still think most of what i said stands.

  • June 28, 2005, 3:58 p.m. CST

    Spider-Man 2 was lame

    by Rupee88

    I liked the first Spider-Man but the sequel was just poor filmmaking.

  • June 28, 2005, 4:01 p.m. CST

    sean38's "definitive" order

    by oisin5199

    I'm sorry, but there's no such thing as a definitive order. Perhaps an opinioned order. Spiderman2, while entertaining (and I also loved those scenes you mentioned), is by no means a gold standard. If hard pressed, I'd say BB, but I've been saying that it doesn't even belong with most comic book movies, especially since it's more of a drama and the emphasis is definitely not on CG or fight scenes. I'm not even going to throw a list out there because those things are useless to most people.

  • June 28, 2005, 4:04 p.m. CST

    FF

    by Neal Cassady

    hi

  • June 28, 2005, 4:08 p.m. CST

    TonyWilson, you hit the nail on the head

    by oisin5199

    You've summed up the problem I had with SM2 - the whole thing just seemed a bit too overwrought and too precious. At least ROTK earned its sentiment. Certainly SM2's a good, entertaining film, but the height of the genre? I don't think so.

  • June 28, 2005, 4:24 p.m. CST

    Spidey 2 isn't the height

    by JUSTICE41

    Spidey two was middling at best. I lost a lot of respect for that movie the moment I saw Spidey's CGI head talk when he ran out of fluid the first time. From there I was watching CGI Spidey dolls. Best Comic Book Movie? The Crow in my opinion. The original, not anything that came after. Not basing it on SFX or any of that crap Just based on the movie matching the feel of the books.. If you want to go by SFX or VFX then Shit City would be the best. Until I see spidey actually crawling all over the walls like he does in the comics, tossing out a running stream of one liners like Bruce willis in Die Hard, while interacting with the people around him as he climbs the walls then I will be a little happier. They came closer in S2 but not enough for me. The old tv show had more spidey clinging to walls than this. FF looks to have truly realized and will demonstrate the hero's full powers, not watered down versions like in X-meh. Just the torch doing that cyclone of flames bit already shows they gave them their full powers and not what early rumors said about him just flaming on his hands. That was just some idiot making fun of the Corman travesty. I'm looking forward to seeing this at least twice in the theaters and once if it's at the Imax.

  • June 28, 2005, 4:27 p.m. CST

    "And people really need to stop acting like Spiderman 1 and 2 an

    by BurlIvesLeftNut

    Profit... read that dictum and tell me it leaves room for other people's opinions? Quit acting like you are cock of the fucking walk, douche. God you are dumb.

  • June 28, 2005, 4:30 p.m. CST

    Someone, ANYONE, who hated X-Men 2, show me how this was a bad f

    by www.valiens.com

    I just don't get it. Did you haters see the same film I saw? Name a flaw! It juggled all those characters brilliantly, was fast-paced, cool, funny, smart, the effects were great, the cast was mostly great, the plot was great--this was one of the best super hero movies ever. Pretty please with sugar on top show me where I'm wrong. What in the movie didn't work to the extent that you've written off the entire film?

  • June 28, 2005, 4:44 p.m. CST

    X-MEN 2. I don't know why some people hate it either.

    by TonyWilson

    I guess some people have problems with the 3rd act, but I thought it was a quite a novel take on the big superhero setpiece. But I'd like to hear what was so bad that you can write it off as awful. It's flawed but, why do peole think it s such a really bad film??

  • June 28, 2005, 4:47 p.m. CST

    Mr. Craptastic

    by Sparhawk38

    Listen....while the Spidermans, X-mens, Hulk, Batman Begins, and Sin City may not be perfect films, they have one thing in common. People working on them who respected the material. They made a real effort to capture their vision of the characters. If people shrug their shoulders and say "What the hell, it isn't a good movie but it is OK for a summer excapism flick" we are going to get more of the same. Which will really mean less quality as the studios just chase the profit. If a movie is good...it's good, if it is less than it could be we should want and expect more. If you like the FF movie, more power to you, but don't say it wasn't very good, but so what.

  • June 28, 2005, 4:51 p.m. CST

    my opinion..

    by whatyoufear

    ..i'm still getting all emotional about dr. doom's organic web shooters.. i mean, T-800 Endoskeleton..

  • June 28, 2005, 5:04 p.m. CST

    OK I'm haven't even read this article before posting....

    by Enter4None

    But since Harry is obviously not being paid by the FF production I can really expect something positive from him. at least not at the discustingly gross Blade 2 review......the shame!, the shame!

  • June 28, 2005, 5:06 p.m. CST

    Wow... Who's Dumber?

    by Mr. Profit

    Seriously, I am not here to fight. I dont fight on the internet, but if you live in the NYC area maybe we can throw telephones at each other in a hotel lobby. Anyway "You Need To Stop" or any variation of that is pretty much an expression. People say it and you shouldn't take it so literal. How the fuck to I look if I was serious? As if I am holier than thou and better than everyone. Who the fuck do I think I am? Seriously, I never seen anyone so upset by a comment. Relax, it's only a message board. I just dissed a movie, nothing more. And if you look, some people actually agree with me.

  • June 28, 2005, 5:11 p.m. CST

    Re: Spiderman

    by Ray Garraty #47

    I'm surprised that even MORE talkbackers here didn't complain about two specific things in the first Spiderman movie that stunk despite the fantastic first hour of the film: the awful Green Goblin effects and the climactic bridge scene, in which all suspension of disbelief, tested already by the superhero premise, is stretched to the breaking point by a 180 pound man on a hoversled holding on with one outstretched arm to a cable that is attached to a cable car weighing at least a ton. That, to me, speaks to the fact that the movie appealed to many viewers in ways other superhero movies did not and was skillfully crafted otherwise.

  • June 28, 2005, 5:12 p.m. CST

    Hulk is the best of these movies

    by zekmoe

    so if this is a quick and to the point effects flick, I'll love it. Hulk had the depth and realism (get a real projection system feeders) that makes repeated viewings more enjoyable. FF is more for kids, and always has been, so a quick and show the powers type movie is what is required. I took my son and nephews to Batman Begins, and although I liked it, they were bored silly for the first hour. They weren't looking for character development. They were looking for the Batmobile. My son, my nephew and myself will be looking for fire and crushed cars and smashed buildings in the FF. The character development can wait for X3

  • June 28, 2005, 5:57 p.m. CST

    The answer would be the guy who thinks sarcasm and subtle hyperb

    by BurlIvesLeftNut

    And frankly, I get irritated with anyone who claims their view is the ONLY view... like that asshat who said SM2 was the gold standard of comic movies. We all know that Howard the Duck is the only movie that could bear that description.

  • June 28, 2005, 6:12 p.m. CST

    Well...the first guy's review was pretty valid

    by Ribbons

    Yes, he was trying to be cute, but most of what he had to say about the movie should also be taken into account. If they really did skimp on the character development, that's a shame, because the FF are pretty clearly drawn characters and you could've done a lot with them, even in the course of one movie. Eh well.

  • June 28, 2005, 6:14 p.m. CST

    Oh, and...

    by Ribbons

    ...they have a clip of "extreme sports Johnny" up on Yahoo.com, and if you haven't seen it, or if you're still one of those folks who thinks that all the X Games cross-pollination is okay because "Johnny's a thrill seeker in the comics," go ahead and watch it. It's incredibly lame and tedious.

  • June 28, 2005, 7:25 p.m. CST

    who the hell cheers for a trailer

    by josh_strapp

    i mean seriously you're saying people are that easily impressed. wow

  • June 28, 2005, 8:22 p.m. CST

    Nice little quit taken from IMDB(extreme sarcasm below)

    by Terry_1978

    Hi, I've only seen the trailer, but based on those thirty seconds of footage I feel I am able to form a well informed, thoughtful, and insightful critique of the entire movie. First: Jessica Alba isn't Arian enough to be the invisible girl. Lord knows how disappoining it is when an actor or actress doesn't fit my exact mental image of a character that has been rendered dozens of ways by dozens of different artists. I nearly goose stepped a circle in my carpet, I was so upset about this. Second: The thing is in a rubber suit. Actors in makeup just are not believable anymore. Give me my cgi! Which of course I would also have complained about, because it wouldn't have lived up to the incredible standards set by Golum from LotR. Third: The dialog is corny! I don't want ANY comic relief in a movie based on a...comic book. Afterall, aren't comics all for middle aged, paunchy men like me, not kids? Playful banter and corny lines might actually make it more accessable to people who aren't fans of super heroes, or the genre, and we can't have that. Fourth: The explanation of the Invisible Girl's powers is like, totally unrealistic. I will now be completely unable to suspend my disbelief every time she uses her powers to protect a guy that can stretch like a rubber band, a guy that flies and bursts into flames, and a guy made out of rocks and can stop a semi doing 60 mph. Fifth: The director has no experience with this genre. Look how badly a schlock gore movie director adjusted to fantasy in LotR! Those movies were a financial and critical disaster! Anyway, there's tons more, but I'm getting tired of typing. Hope you enjoyed my insightful observations as much as I enjoy hearing my own voice, reading my own posts, and ****ing people off!

  • June 28, 2005, 8:51 p.m. CST

    ...

    by SoonerSean

    I'll see F4 b/c I'm a fan of the book... but the The Thing just isn't good enough as a man in a rubber suit. This is a character that SCREAMS for CGI work. A big massive BOULDER of a character. The fact that the actor and rubber suit don't pull of the massive brow of The Thing that we know and love is bad enough... but the fact that he's nowhere big enough is a real loss for this film.______________________________________________________________________________________________As for Spider-Man 2... am I the only one that noticed that the only villain in the movie vanishes for a huge chunk of time and no on screen character seems to notice? Honestly... a guy with metal tentacles arrives, trashes the town, almost kills Aunt Mae and Spider-Man, then he leaves and no one cares. Peter Parker can't wait to give up the hero-gig long enough to catch Doc Ock? Give me a break.

  • June 28, 2005, 9:01 p.m. CST

    You want to see Harry backpeddle? Wait till this makes more $$$

    by Triumph poops!

    Wait and see. The amiable, lighthearted tone of this combined with some nice effects work and a decent "origin adventure" movie (where you feel like you got your money's worth) will actually push FF past BATMAN at the box office. The whole cast was on the TODAY show today and there is just a more fun, accessible spirit permeating the FF movie. I actually think it's going to surprise people and do much, much better at the box office than many predict -- Harry included. At which point I can't wait to read his next column ranting and raving over how the general public chose the FF and Tim Story's vision as the better movie over BATMAN and Nolan's...

  • June 28, 2005, 9:36 p.m. CST

    Wow

    by Ribbons

    Hey, "ICQPIMP," get that sand out of your thong and stop talking about me when I have nothing to do with your point. I'm not an apologist, but at least I'm not a professional asshole. Learn to condense all your inane rants into one post so they're easier to skip over next time.

  • June 28, 2005, 10:37 p.m. CST

    wtf?

    by Ribbons

  • June 28, 2005, 10:50 p.m. CST

    AICN's treatment of the FF borders on the god damn ridiculou

    by LordEnigma

    Seriously, this whole site has been out to take a piss on FF for close to a year. Now we have Harry doing the most pathetic bit of business in the world; TALKING ABOUT THE SCRIPT. Dude wants to be a producer but cant grasp the process. Utterly ridiculous. This flick never got a fair shake from this site. Nor would I expect that little rich boy Zod to get this film. Let alone criticize it. He has never proven to have much more ability than to drink and eat during late night periods.

  • June 28, 2005, 10:55 p.m. CST

    RED WEED

    by Darth Philbin

    this is a red weed movie. smoke up some of that shit before you see it and who give a goddamn if you are watching hulks or robots or ben affleck. shit i saw short-round dancing on my fucking china cabinet.

  • June 28, 2005, 11:18 p.m. CST

    I really want to love this...

    by kenobi82

    but the trailers make it hard to get excited. It really looks like a 3rd rate X-Men ripoff, which is sad. Maybe if they had followed the tone of the earlier comics, as opposed to the Ultimate series, this would have been something. But now, its another stinker in the heap of bad comic book movies. www.kidcavalier.com

  • June 28, 2005, 11:26 p.m. CST

    Stop trying to act cool by dissing movies you guys sound like ol

    by andrew coleman

    Does anybody like anything anymore? Every post "Spider man movies are fucking gay", "X-Men suck", "BB's action was too fast" who cares!!! Do any of you guys sit down and just enjoy movies or does everything have to be serious? Maybe if you guys didn't take this shit so seriously it wouldn't suck so much. It's like any movie that isn't directed by Peter Jackson is utter crap on this site. Guess what I loved both Spider-man movies. Had a great time watching both X-Men movies, thought the Hulk was actually better than I expected. Think Batman Begins is one the best movies of the year because it didn't bow down for kid approval, and I bet I'm going to enjoy the fuck out of FF because I like the cast and it looks fun.

  • June 28, 2005, 11:27 p.m. CST

    Sooner Sean

    by Ribbons

    "As for Spider-Man 2... am I the only one that noticed that the only villain in the movie vanishes for a huge chunk of time and no on screen character seems to notice? Honestly... a guy with metal tentacles arrives, trashes the town, almost kills Aunt Mae and Spider-Man, then he leaves and no one cares. Peter Parker can't wait to give up the hero-gig long enough to catch Doc Ock? Give me a break." ---- Heh. Good point.

  • June 28, 2005, 11:43 p.m. CST

    thanks Nintendo

    by oisin5199

    for turning a reasoned, sober opinion of someone like TonyWilson into a juvenile "this movie sucks" attitude. I think if you look at his posts (or even Justice41), nowhere did he say Spiderman 2 sucked. He had some problems with it as did I, but you've gladly brought the conversation down to the lowest common denominator. And you managed to be a vulgar sexist, racist, queerbasher all at once. Kudos! You hated BB, yet you saw it TWICE? If you think anyone takes you seriously, you're fairly delusioned. But hey, that's why this site exists so people like you can mindlessly vent. So once again, I say congratulations!

  • June 28, 2005, 11:54 p.m. CST

    I'm So There!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    by Odeonandthekid

    Yeah baby!

  • This is the one

  • June 29, 2005, 12:19 a.m. CST

    I know who's Silver Surfer is!!..Billy zane bitches

    by FinalSolace

    yep billy sane would be my number one choice. wearing a giant blue gimp suit to super impose liquid mirror effects on.

  • June 29, 2005, 12:21 a.m. CST

    Ps- Spiderman 2 sucked- not for bad reasons it just made me yaw

    by FinalSolace

  • June 29, 2005, 12:24 a.m. CST

    This film is going to be a bomb!

    by Rogue_Leader

    This is the Catwoman of 2005. Mark my words.

  • June 29, 2005, 12:31 a.m. CST

    Is it really that suprising?

    by Yellow Belly

    The Fantastic Four were and will always be the most corny 'heroes' drawn on paper. So is it any suprise that their transfer to the big screen would be met with complete mediocrity? Someone wanted to turn it into a comedy for god's sake. These characters just don't fit the day and age we live in, and The Human Torch yelling "flame on!" is a good example of this.

  • June 29, 2005, 1:14 a.m. CST

    Sounds like a lot of haters are going to eat crow. All the revie

    by The Founder

    they enjoyed it, but don't want to admit it, so they'll really hark on the weak points of the movie. Pathetic! I was never expecting FOX to get the F4 right, but it looks like they adapted it better then expected.

  • June 29, 2005, 1:17 a.m. CST

    F4 time

    by Nomad817

    Why can't they put them in the time period they're from instead of updating it, I like all the "cold war science" whatever you want to call it from old comics and science fiction, I probably would have liked Hulk better too if it was more like that.

  • June 29, 2005, 1:56 a.m. CST

    What's with the Hate with Batman

    by Lukecash

    Eveyone I talked to LOVED the movie. A hell of a lot more than they loved the Hulk, Daredevil or any other lame ass movies. Really. I don't think this is going to do well..considering WOW is coming out.

  • June 29, 2005, 1:58 a.m. CST

    Ribbons

    by zabbadoo

    Yeah, god forbid that in a movie about the Hulk we should want more smashy smashy and less Nick Nolte's thespianic scenery chewing. You'se fucking guys! Whats wrong wit chu! They have a 12 foot 1200 pound superstrong indestructible angry dude, what a waste that they never included the scene of him reading fucking poetry about trees!

  • June 29, 2005, 1:59 a.m. CST

    sarcasm lando

    by Nomad817

    Everything on his list were sarcastic remarks, trying to show people who complain that this director doesnt know this material might be wrong.

  • June 29, 2005, 2:01 a.m. CST

    Landoasskissian

    by zabbadoo

    Haha you are a moron! Next time read the f'ing subject line "(extreme sarcasm below)". Imbicile.

  • June 29, 2005, 2:13 a.m. CST

    zabbadoo

    by Ribbons

    You can get "smashy smashy" in any fucking generic summer movie you want. I'm not saying 'Hulk' was the shit, but a bunch of stuff blowing up real good wouldn't have made it any better. I love how people are outraged that they didn't "honor the character they love" by making the movie into another outlet for pent-up aggression. Go see the fucking Punisher and see how well that turned out for yourself.

  • June 29, 2005, 6:31 a.m. CST

    .

    by Ribbons

  • June 29, 2005, 7:08 a.m. CST

    Good Enough to Survive?

    by Roboteer

    For a sequel that is. That's the question 'cause critics are sure to beat up on the flat characters and continuity problems. Then again an FF2 would not be better without changes. The Corman travesty had one good thing that this version couldn't pull off.... with far less capable actors, it had a poignant moment when an older Reed obviously in love with jail bait Sue, waited for her to grow up and marry. Where's the heart in this one or anything to make us care about the characters. To cut this version so short, one can only imagine how bad it was with the chopped up scenes. Thing is, this was supposed to be Story's strength. Maybe if he had spent more time studying what turned fans on to the FF, and less time trying to turn this into THE WIZ..... Arad's done a lot of great things lately, but this doesn't appear to be one of them.

  • June 29, 2005, 8:15 a.m. CST

    Excuse my ignorance Childe.

    by Trevor Goodchild

    But still, the new version does not look like a hard crust either. I always thought their alterations depended on where they were when the rays struck. Grimm was behind some space rock/debris, Sue behind special space glass, Reed behind a rubber tube etc.

  • What, am I to believe that THE HULK was a good film because it attempted to be dramatic? The same film that had annoying-as-hell "comic book panel" split-screen shots that killed any narrative flow the movie might have had? The same film that turned Bruce Banner's abusive trauma at the hands of his father that creates the Hulk persona into "Love Me Daddy, Even Though You're a Third-Rate Excuse for the Absorbing Man"? Yes, Christopher Nolan sucks at directing fight scenes and yes, Raimi lays on the sappiness extra thick at times, but BATMAN BEGINS and the SPIDER-MAN films have more heart and solid performances in one single act than THE HULK had during the entire film. Those films also had better scripts, which is why you can quote lines from them, unlike THE HULK, which (apart from "Don't make me angry...") you need to look up on imdb.com. Oh, and as for the FANTASTIC FOUR, it probably will do better financially than BATMAN BEGINS. It's geared toward the MTV crowd, which means it's bunch of soulless glitz, but you can take your kids to it. In fact, it's such a generic Hollywood product, I'm surprised Will Smith isn't starring in it as Mr. Fantastic. "We gotta stop a dude callin' himself 'Doctor Doom'? Aw, HELLLLLL no."

  • June 29, 2005, 10:26 a.m. CST

    How Could This Movie Be Fantastic?

    by SpankTMonkey

    I dread seeing this film, not becuase of the hype and trailers, the trailers look pretty good actually, but BECAUSE I am such a fan of the original work that there's no way they could modernize it and make it work well. This movie SHOULD have been a period piece, set in the mid to late sixties, making the same "cold war" style statement that the original work did. Truely some of Stan Lee's BEST writing blended with the sheer imaginative genius of Kirby. Setting these characters up in the sixties, even having them race against the Russians for the moon, using The Red Ghost and his monkeys, even bump into the blue spot on the moon and meeting The Watcher, THAT would ahve been Fantastic, and would have made for a Fantastic origin story, leaving Dr. Doom for the sequel, thus giving the character a true chance to breathe, would have been the way I would have taken it, but then I'm just a monkey...

  • June 29, 2005, 10:37 a.m. CST

    I'm so sick of people telling my WHY I must not have liked

    by Sayhey Kid

    ...The Hulk. Spider-Man and Batman didn't show up until half way through the movie in their respective origin films either...yet, somehow, these movies didn't bore the fuck out of me. I wasn't wanting a "Hulk Smash" film, I didn't want a poorly written superhero film pretending to be a "drama." Oooo, he's brooding...they're talking about his childhood...this must be deep. And Spider-Man 2 didn't "rip-off" Superman 2 douche bags. Raimi was paying homage to those movies...from the opening credit recap this is obvious. Well, maybe not obvious to you...you probably thought you had noticed something clever. I've seen nothing about FF that doesn't look like it will be fun.

  • June 29, 2005, 11:34 a.m. CST

    Spiderman2/Superman2

    by TonyWilson

    You don't pay homage to a film by recycling it's major plot to add some depth your own film. I didn't think I had noticed something clever, because it's pretty damn fucking obvious mate. Most film magazines in the UK mentioned it aswell.

  • June 29, 2005, 11:38 a.m. CST

    Batman Begins was great even with it's minor problems. But n

    by Mr. Profit

    There is no reason for Batman 2(?) to be weak. And so what if he was Batman an hour into the film? The film is a great origin story.

  • June 29, 2005, 12:13 p.m. CST

    "Mother is the word for God on the lips of children."

    by occams_razor

    I remember when I was 15 and the Crow was the shit to me and my friends cause Bruce Lee's son died making the movie. Well, I'm 24 now and I recently caught it on TBS at 2 am and about thirty minutes into it I started to chuckle and changed the channel to a Fairly Odd Parents rerun. Maybe it's getting older but the movie is kinda lame to me, so was the comic, for that matter. Though I still have my copy of the soundtrack.

  • June 29, 2005, 12:21 p.m. CST

    Nintendo

    by lofe101

    Sweet Jesus nintendo. do you like anything, or is it that you hate your self so you half to bash everything and everyone. Im glad OISIN5199 wrote back to your sorry ass. maybe if you stop playing video games and got your dick wet for once you might be alittle happier and excitted about things. quick crying about everything and end your racist remarks, no tolerence for that over here.

  • June 29, 2005, 12:21 p.m. CST

    "Haha you are a moron! Next time read the f'ing subject line

    by DR mandrake

    If your going to comment on someone's intelligence, you should try to spell it right. Imbecile

  • June 29, 2005, 12:38 p.m. CST

    batman begins....to fight

    by oisin5199

    Not to bring it back to BB, but in the sequel...I still won't care about Batman fight scenes. Seeing a guy dressed in a bat suit trying to have a proper fight is silly at best. Just ask Adam West. I think Nolan did it right - he's not super-strong, he works by "misdirection and theatricality" - it's actually a theme in the movie if you pay attention. I have no desire to see another Batman/Joker fight scene ala Keaton and Nicholson. And I certainly have no interest in generic henchman, especially ones in uniform. Instead, I hope the next movie explores Wayne's slipping sanity to mirror the Joker. I hope the Joker TOTALLY fucks with his head and makes Wayne question why he's doing everything. The Joker is also not super strong, so he works through psychological methods. And how cool would it be to have a moment like the end of "Killing Joke", when the Joker tells a sick joke that's relevant to their relationship and they both crack up. Move it to Arkham as Batman visits him and offers him help. To end on that note would be so great - sick and dark.

  • June 29, 2005, 1:06 p.m. CST

    As I feared, Dr. Doom is COMPLETELY screw up!

    by Daredevil

    Besides rehashing Green Goblin's story in Spider-Man, it sounds like they are even trashing the very essence of Dr. Doom's character by having him go crazy. That's the Joker, Green Goblin, even Bullseye. But Dr. Doom? He's supposed to be the OPPOSITE of crazy. He's supposed to be Professor Moriarty: smart, intelligent, calculating, logical, and FULLY IN CONTROL OF HIS MIND! He's a bad guy. Not a normal person who went bad because they went crazy, he's a full on evil villain who wants to take over the world because he WANTS TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD. Oh, and the Man-Thing was not as bad as Catwoman.

  • June 29, 2005, 1:19 p.m. CST

    Sayhey

    by Ribbons

    Hey, I'm not telling you that you MUST like the 'Hulk.' I said that the people who didn't like it for the sole reason that it didn't have enough Hulk Smash for their tastes piss me off. I know that it sucked anyway. Yeesh.

  • June 29, 2005, 1:29 p.m. CST

    Nintendon't

    by Agent sith

    WTF is with those sick comments you racist ass hater? Jesus juice! I wouldn't see a movie just because a "brotha" or "boricqua" is directing it,what matters is the movie is any good regardless who was behind it. I think the Justice league unlimited series,is one of the best animated series since Spawn. these aforementioned shows were predominatly scripted by Mc duffy and Mc elroy who are both Black. not irish lol)So in the meantime, i'll reserve judgement on the Ff until i actually see it next week. and for those who were quick to diss(miss) DD, should take a look at the director's cut, which IMO should have been the original theatrical release.

  • June 29, 2005, 3:06 p.m. CST

    Spider-Man 2/Superman 2

    by Sayhey Kid

    I guess Superman one ripped off the story of MOSES then... I'm glad the UK papers caught on to the similarities...maybe there's hope for them. My point is that is was made CLEAR what they were doing with Spider-Man 2...from the opening flashbacks to their variation on losing powers (which has been done in the comics multiple times). It wasn't veiled plagiarism like Point Break/Fast and the Furious. And there's a difference between someone being angry at those who simply wanted "Hulk Smash" and stating that the ONLY people who didn't like it were those with those expectations...which is normally what is intimated.

  • June 29, 2005, 4:27 p.m. CST

    When reviewers start by saying Hulk was one of the bad ones, ACN

    by chien_sale

    It`s like somebody saying:"here`s my Star Wars 3 review but let me tell you that Episode 1 was one my favorite film of all time". The guy killed his relevance right there and should comit suicide.

  • June 29, 2005, 5:41 p.m. CST

    So now you're telling me what I intimated?

    by Ribbons

    I don't think that 'Hulk' is a very good movie, all things considered. I'm sorry you got overly defensive and went off on me for a perceived affront to your own opinions, but I don't know how to make it any clearer than "those who wanted to see more HULK SMASH"....

  • June 29, 2005, 5:49 p.m. CST

    You must be a self-hating bastard, moviemack...

    by Childe Roland

    ...or you clearly aren't paying attention to what I'm typing if you think I remind you of you. I'm just doing for the "the Thing is supposed to be made of rocks!" crowd the same thing I did for you during all those Batman Begins talkbacks. I'm advising them not to let their personal perceptions of the character color their opinions of the film before they see it. The difference is, you were basing your opinions on some things that actually had been established in the comics (the white eyes, the non-armored bat-suit, the whatever kind of batmobile you were advocating) even if they weren't consistently or universally applied concepts. At no time in the history of the FF has anyone established that the Thing is "made of rocks." On the contrary, as I've demonstrated by pointing out this site -- http://www.marveldirectory.com/individuals/t/thing.htm -- and others, the Thing started off very lumpy and relatively smooth. If you read the history of the character or get a hold of some of those back issues and read them for yourself, you'll see that the FF film got the Thing's original (key word - ORIGIN) appearance pretty much right. Go ahead and debate that point with me, moviemack. I dare you. If they'd made him appear rocky, I'd be fine with that, too. How is that possible? Because he did have a craggy appearance in the later comics (just like I was fine with the Begins batmobile looking like the Dark Knight Returns batmobile). I know you have trouble with understanding how the look of a character will change with the passage of time, but even you have to admit that for people to dismiss the lumpier non-craggy appearance of the Thing as inaccurate or wrong because "he's supposed to be made of rocks" is more ignorant than your constant bitching and moaning about how Batman's eyes don't look the way you think they ought to look. Now go home and get your shinebox.

  • June 29, 2005, 8:14 p.m. CST

    Spider-Man 2/Superman 2

    by TonyWilson

    I hear you mate. I do, however, think that the similarities are too substantial to ignore. I know that there have been comics where Spidey has lost his powers and indeed there have been one's in Supes has aswell. But what I think the problem is, is that in Superman he chooses to lose his powers because of a woman. Looking at it like that then, the film just recycles the plot and themes of Superman 2.

  • June 29, 2005, 9:22 p.m. CST

    Ribbons...

    by Sayhey Kid

    The Hulk Smash was not aimed directly at you, but to people like the post way at the top about most people wanting "Hulk Smash" and dumb America etc. This is what is normally intimated, not necessarily by you. I recognize the similarities Tony, but I think Spidey losing his powers was more than just a woman...it was affecting his entire life and he was becoming "sick." But, if they were going to borrow from another movie, at least they picked a good one with Superman 2. We could've gotten Chris Rock as a computer employee stealing fractions of dollars :)

  • June 29, 2005, 9:31 p.m. CST

    moviemack...

    by Sayhey Kid

    Can you please remind us again how you predicted Batman would suck? I mean, with the overwhelming positive reaction from fans who've seen the movie across multiple sites, as well as being well received by critics, I don't think you've quite converted some of us. Maybe if you posted it sucks a few more times a couple of its defenders will start to believe it. You were wrong. Deal with it. Wasn't this movie "old news" and you were too busy "getting laid" to comment on it anymore, anyway?

  • June 30, 2005, 12:27 a.m. CST

    summer o' shit movies. maybe 2006 will be better - oh wait

    by flipster

  • June 30, 2005, 12:48 p.m. CST

    I pretty much agree with spy guy

    by bigcheckonthat

    erm, that's all.

  • July 4, 2005, 12:30 a.m. CST

    Reviewers... remove your lips from Harry's ass.

    by attizachi420

    Why don't you imbeciles stop already. The first review is so obviously from a lonely reject who is craving a fathers love. He is so eager to be in with Harry he has lost all sense of self. As for Harry himself, dude you are making yourself look like an Asshole everytime you bash this film. It smacks of a huge bunch of sour grapes your choking down your fat face. I for one am looking forward to seeing Fantastic Four with my wife and kids, munching popcorn and remembering just how lucky a man I am for having kids that I can share this most American of genre film with. As for all you morons that are pissing on this film prior to seeing it. Fuck Off, put down your mint condish copy of Fantastic Four Unlimited, turn off the Playstation, stop casting X-3 in your head and go out and find some companionship. Hey I'm a comic, Movie, Music geek from way back in the 70's and 80's it is so much easier to live with yourself when you finally realize that this shit is just entertainment. Some great some not, but entertainment. The Force is not a religion, there is no such place as Middle Earth and you can search NYC for the next century and your never going to find The Daily Bugle or The Baxter Building.