Logo

Cool News

Madsen spills more on INGLORIOUS BASTARDS! It's gonna get RAW!

Published at:  May 23, 2005 7:45:04 PM CDT

Ahoy, squirts! Quint here. I'm busy packing up for a sojourn up to the Great White North (Vancouver to be specific), but I got this bit of news today from Joe Utichi over at FilmFocus who got some more info out of Michael Madsen about the Tarantino war flick INGLORIOUS BASTARDS. He's read the finished script and describes it in the vein of THE DIRTY DOZEN and confirms Adam Sandler's involvement. I really liked Sandler's dramatic turn in Paul Thomas Anderson's PUNCH-DRUNK LOVE, so I'm open to the idea. Madsen says not only is Sandler gonna be in it, but so are Tim Roth (yay!) and Eddie Murphy (...).



I love classic Eddie Murphy from his BEVERLY HILLS COP/48 HOURS/RAW/DELIRIOUS days and would love to see him regain some of his lost cool (DADDY DAY CARE, anyone?). Tarantino has a way with actors... look at Travolta in PULP against Travolta in BATTLEFIELD EARTH. Look at Sam Jackson in PULP and JACKIE BROWN against Sam Jackson in the prequels. I personally love the idea of Tarantino giving Murphy his cool back and I can't wait to see what a Tarantino World War II flick looks like! How about you folks?



CLICK IT HERE TO READ FILMFOCUS' CHAT WITH MADSEN!!!




    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 7:49:19 PM CDT

    First and?

    by octavis

    this sound awesome.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 7:51:36 PM CDT

    Adam Sandler

    by melbrs

    this worries me. i hate Sandler, but I haven't seen Punch-Drunk Love... so maybe he's not as grating in his dramatic work as he is in his comedy

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 7:53:02 PM CDT

    You have to hand it to Tarantino, he keeps it interesting

    by 007-11

    Let's hope he moves forward with this.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 7:53:21 PM CDT

    Eddie Murphy. Adam Sandler. They're cops.

    by 3 bag enema

    At least in the hands of Tarentino during a Dirty Dozen-type war flick, you can almost guarantee seeing both of these actors suffering violent, bloody deaths. And that's good.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 7:54:06 PM CDT

    Will Disney allow Murphy to use dirty words?

    by vekt0r

    just wondering.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 7:54:08 PM CDT

    Sandler...eh....Murphy...awesome

    by bean_

    Maybe Sandler can redeem himself?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 7:57:14 PM CDT

    Has anyone seen Masden's hair on the pic?!?!?

    by 3 bag enema

    Looks like all that bad poetry finally went to his head. HIS HEAD!! Get it? Heh.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 8:00:54 PM CDT

    Tim Roth = Underused and Super F'ing Cool

    by jimmy_009

    I think Tarantino can being the cool back out of Eddie Murphy.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 8:05:48 PM CDT

    I hope he meant Charlie Murphy.

    by nice marmot

    Eddie doesn't deserve anyone to throw him a cool role. He's blown it. Let him be in a modern Swiss Family Robinson or something.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 8:07:54 PM CDT

    Just no sprinkler blood...

    by strongbadmonkey

    As long as any decapitations/loss of limbs include a lawn sprinkleresque type of blood loss. It was cool then, but not in a WWII flick...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 8:08:41 PM CDT

    Strike that....

    by strongbadmonkey

    I mean does not include... damn

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 8:11:45 PM CDT

    He should include Jimmy Fallon and Ashton Kutcher

    by -sfx-

    And Steve Martin, and Whoopi. And let's not forget Paris Hilton as zee germans.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 8:16:57 PM CDT

    Does this mean no Sam Jackson?

    by blackstormy

    or will there be two black guys.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 8:17:48 PM CDT

    You know who else he should get? Carl Weathers and Fred Ward.

    by mr. waturi

    Both those guys never got the roles they deserved.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Makes sense. Inglorious Bastards is too much of a mouthful. Remove the "In.."

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 8:29:12 PM CDT

    Hi, this is Quentin Tarantino (natch)

    by quin the eskimo

    please give me suggestions, I've come so far by listening to people who's scripts are so good that they've been snapped up by the studios, people like you.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 8:34:29 PM CDT

    Well, Quentin

    by quin the eskimo

    Drop the In and just make it Glorious Bastards, turn Kill Bill into a movie that is so long that people will be bound t check there watches, oh, Kill Bill Volume Three should be anime. Please drop anything to do with Television and focus on film, Whats that you like TV? Well don't. Please me not your passion that brought us Pulp Fiction. Don't use Sandler he's a no talent hack who just likes to scream. You can't have lightning strike twice and pull another Travolta career altering performance out of a hat. Or maybe that's four times, not quite sure.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 8:36:39 PM CDT

    It would be the bees knees

    by quin the eskimo

    if Harrison Ford would work with Tarantino

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 8:39:52 PM CDT

    this seems up eddie murphy's alley

    by blackthought

    i mean seriously, daddy day care and inglorious bastards are thematically the same.

    Reply to Talkback

  • They're goofballs when given a goofy script, but with something like this....we may see a whole new side.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 8:59:52 PM CDT

    I love Quentin but...

    by crackerfarmboy

    ...he needs to make up his fucking mind and direct something!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 9:06:04 PM CDT

    If by "Murphy" and "Sandler" QT means

    by stigmata

    "Norris" and "McShane" then that's fuckin' GREAT! The media always gets casting news mixed up so I'm SURE what has happened here is that Tarantino actually casted "Norris" and "McShane" (deep breaths, deeeeep breaths) and "van Damme" and "Schwarzenegger," as opposed to "Carrot Top" and "Bud Cort." Actually Bud Cort would be fine to get him back to his M.A.S.H. roots (only it'd play the irony card and be more of an ode to "Harold & Maude" instead!).

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 9:11:23 PM CDT

    Best news i've heard all day.

    by john-locke

    Old School Eddie Murphy was one funny mofo, I hope QT gives Murphy a better character than the last time he played Military in that piece of shit movie "Best Defence" with Dudley Moore. Bring out Delirious on DVD already mutherfuckers

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 9:13:22 PM CDT

    Don't know if this one will get made

    by zigster

    there's a few roadblocks in the way, such as some actors whining about who dies in the film.

    Script reputed to be fair.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 9:28:51 PM CDT

    Quint just couldn't resist, could he?

    by hktelemacher

    Gotta get in there and jab at the prequels every chance he gets. I wonder if this is becoming awkward for him in day to day life - this steak wasn't as good as that really good one I had in 1980 ... kind of like the Star Wars prequels. Hate them all you want, but check it at the door. There are plenty of worse things with Sam Jackson - The Negotiator, for instance, is drek of a much lower level than anything Lucas has ever done, Howard the Duck included. Anyway - been wanting to get that off my chest for a while. Viva Michael Madsen!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 9:29:14 PM CDT

    Glorious Bastards is a better title but...

    by jimmy_009

    ... it means something totally different. Inglorious: 1 : SHAMEFUL, IGNOMINIOUS
    2 : not glorious : lacking fame or honor. Guess Tarintino has something else in mind.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 9:38:10 PM CDT

    cuba gooding needs his cool back more than murphy

    by josh_strapp

    gooding isn't even considered black anymore so tarantino needs to help him badly

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 9:49:07 PM CDT

    Who the hell are you? Who the hell is he?

    by honky tonk

    Can anyone take Murphy seriously these days? I mean, when I see Murphy, I think "Haunted Mansion". He does have some of the creamiest thighs in Hollywood, though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 10:25:36 PM CDT

    enough with the daddy day care already!

    by mr brownstone

    don't you people remeber 48hrs, Coming To America, Delirious and Beverly Hills Cop. FUCK!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 10:31:05 PM CDT

    Some of these kiddies are too young to know the Raw Eddie from t

    by terry_1978

    And you know it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 10:34:45 PM CDT

    people remember 48hrs, Coming To America, Delirious and Beverly

    by slappy jones

    .....it's just that we also remember
    haunted mansion,
    vampire in brroklyn,
    dr doolittle 1 and 2,
    boomerang,
    daddy day care,
    I spy,
    pluto nash,
    showtime,
    holy man and
    metro.

    the films you mentioned were about 20 years ago.

    beverly hills cop three

    Reply to Talkback

  • I have faith in Quentin, but I don't need this cast to be piled with names like these.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 11:14:30 PM CDT

    horay

    by joshintransition

    I think this film is what you were talking about. Don't think QT's is a remake, though: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0076584/

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 11:16:22 PM CDT

    Inglorious Bastards - Vol. 2

    by judge doom

    Bastardier

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 11:16:46 PM CDT

    45th!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    by kwingjr

    so lame this practice is.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 11:17:27 PM CDT

    I'm with you hktelemacher...

    by lando griffin

    Quint just had to get that jab in - cheap. As if Jackson, on of the baddest mf'ers on the planet had anything to do with the Lucas' writing. And you know what else, Jackson wasn't terrible as Windu - HE JUST DIDN"T HAVE MUCH TO DO! Thats like me saying "Man Jackson was bad in Deep Blue Sea - ummm nevermind the fact that he died halfway through the movie" (in one of the coolest/most surprising/funniest death scenes ever!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 11:18:56 PM CDT

    Madsen must love this film

    by gheorghe zamfir

    Cause he can't stop talking about it. Seems every scoop related to this film are always coming from something he's said, Sandler, the film being broke into two pieces, now this bit.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 11:22:03 PM CDT

    And I don't want to see Eddie Murphy get his "cool" back

    by gheorghe zamfir

    You just know as soon as he regains whatever credibility he's lost in recent years he'll just turn it around to use it on more Pluto Nashes, Dolittles, and Nutty Professors. If QT wants to give a guy a break throw Keenan Ivory Wayans a bone, just to let the guy do something other than work for his little brothers. Or wrench Charles S. Dutton out from his world of TV movies.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 11:22:23 PM CDT

    Great shout for Kurt Russell and Lee Majors!

    by balajazz

    Kurt would turn into a whole new badass in a QT movie.

    And Eddie Murphy performs fucking beautifully with a great script - FACT

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 11:27:17 PM CDT

    Casting

    by black satin 2

    Did anyone notice how Tarentino used actors in multiple settings? I have faith in his moviemaking and his ability to get a great performance out of people so maybe inglorous will be better than the slow scenes in Saving Private Ryan. We don't need a remake of the Dirty Dozen + 3.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 11:39:04 PM CDT

    Eddie and the Nazi

    by moviepirate

    I just wanna hear Eddie said to the nazi " Hi, I'm Buckwheat, eat leads, mothaf*cker."

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 23, 2005 11:44:53 PM CDT

    who the f cares? inglorious whatever--battlefield earth 2 indeed

    by watashiwadare

    but as long as the same age group of nerds controls media and websites the hype will continue to bore us.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 12:24:12 AM CDT

    Tarantino is a tiresome hack.

    by quantum_ken

    All he does is truncate 'coolness' from decades past. It's like reading the encyclopedia.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Are you serious? That guy has about as much believability in a hard core war flick as Tarantino in an acting role would. Former professional QB and now war badass. Pathetic delusions of masculinity.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 1:09:16 AM CDT

    This film needs MARK HAMILL !

    by vatoloco

  • May 24, 2005 1:24:43 AM CDT

    Tarantino should have directed those Prequals...

    by lutz

    Think about the magic he pulled with Kill Bill. In essence that is the kind of movie the Original trilogy was. Tarantino would have understood that and given the movies direction instead of having all those elements that would have been cool (Darth Vader Frankenstein) just looking out of place. While Lucas tries to make good old shlock movies Tarantino actually CAN make them.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 1:31:23 AM CDT

    Taking Bets...

    by thethrill

    So who's gonna be snorting the line of coke in this one? My money's on Murphy. If you wanna shed that Disney image, you gotta do it right!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 1:33:33 AM CDT

    ...

    by leckomaniac

    The fact of the matter is QT is NOT a hack and this film will own...Eddie Murphy is fine...but Adam Sandler? I am hesitant...but I must agree that Mark Hammil needs to be in this movie...for no other reason than to entertain me...oh and fuck you Quint the new triology was amazing...honestly hating the new trilogy is so 1999...get over it...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 1:43:58 AM CDT

    Kill Bill sucked: 1/2 plus 1/2 equaled jack squat

    by sgtelias

    Holy crap. I loved PF, RD, even Jackie Brown. But KB 1/2a and KB 1/2b BLEW. Flashes of brilliance then bored off my ass. I was seriously happy to leave the theater at the end of KB 2. No DVD, no 2nd viewing. I've seen Pulp Fiction and Reservoir Dogs many, many times and they are still fun. KB was so watered down to make it two movies it tastes like the new lame ass watered down Jack Daniels. QT is otherwise awesome. I hope IB is a return to form.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 2:07:59 AM CDT

    You won't be seeing Delirous on DVD anytime soon

    by harry coin

    Eddie's been trying to promote his new family friendly career and he doesn't want his raunchy stand up routines released on DVD. I don't think he owns the rights to Raw, which got released on DVD, but I think he owns the rights to Delirous. I doubt we'll see him in Inglorious Bastards, since he seems to love his current career enough to suppres his old stand up movies. Charlie Murphy would kick ass in this film though. If you're gonna have Arnie, Sly and Bruce in the Movie, why not throw in Chuck Norris. Throw the guy a bone, and then kill him off early.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 2:51:25 AM CDT

    What about the soundtrack?

    by thethrill

    Original Music? Or more use of 70's classics?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 3:08:02 AM CDT

    I'll be first in line to see this when it comes out in 2012

    by liberty valance

    Love QT but he's the slowest, most lackadaisical fucker on the planet when it comes to developing his projects. Do you realize it was 7 YEARS between Jackie Brown and Kill Bill? The next few years he'll fuck around, direct a few TV episodes, do some shit with Robert Rodriguez, snort enough coke to kill Keith Richards twice over, and drop the occasional hint about Bastards just to keep us interested. Quentin I adore your movies but to paraphrase one of your own lines from True Romance, "You're a director. Direct, motherfucker!"

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 3:15:47 AM CDT

    Sure Murphy's made some shit of late but...

    by spacker dave

    ...what about Bowfinger? Now that is a fucking comedy classic in my book. But I don't think we'll see Ed in this flick as it just smacks of the same career revival talk that does the rounds before all of QT's films post Pulp Fiction. Would be nice though. (and it'd be nicer to get a Delirious DVD, too. GOOONEY GOO GOO!)

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 3:52:56 AM CDT

    I still want to see

    by wild at heart

    John Goodman and Ed O'Neill in this. I don't know why but the idea of these guys playing hardcases in a Tarantino movie really appeals to me.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 4:50:46 AM CDT

    "My wife Camiiiiiiiiillllllllllle. . ."

    by groggy

    Back in the days of Raw and Delirious Murphy took the baton from Pryor and ran with it. He was young and didnt give a fuck. Then his ego got in the way, followed by Disney big fat paycheques. Eddie Murphy has genius when his vanity ain't getting in the way - as someone said Bowfinger has been a very lonely high spot for him in the past 20yrs - he just needs the right opportunity and guidance to channel that it again. I call SAndler as a good choice, for some reason I can see him playing a cowardly opportunist character hiding alone under some rubble, just waiting for his sneaky chance to gain one over on his enemy and peers. Inglorious indeed. Mark Hamill, Lee Majors and Chuck Norris sound like a good call - if only Burt Reynolds hadn't gone a fucked up his face, then he would have been a shoe in.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 5:43:27 AM CDT

    The Bandit Cruise

    by theboyfromulster

    I hate slow news days, sooo bored at work. Anyone see Tom Cruise on Ophra??? What a wanker!! Is he a bufty???.......... Dirty Dozen is an all time classic, there was an interview with QT a few years ago when he said Where Eagles Dare was his favourite War movie, so if its a cross between them two I'm there.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 6:33:15 AM CDT

    Sexual Chocolate

    by cuervojones

    let your soul glow

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 7:17:47 AM CDT

    Eddie is getting his due

    by movieplex

    All that's happening is Eddie Murphy is getting his dues the same with Christopher Lee,Travolta,Rouke,hauger and several others. You gotta remember that these people has inspired the current new breed of directors that are changing our industry. These guys like Tarintino,Rodriguez,Jackson are essentially casting people that were part of their film making childhood experiences and they get the chance to remind the general audience that with a decent script these people are good actors. Murphy like the others I mentioned has been in the wilderness for years of shite films. Of course many of those may be his own making but the point is Murphy has the talent and QT has the talent to draw it to the surface again. The thing about these directors is that they don't cast their "heroes" for the sake of it they cast them if they fit the part. Rouke was perfect for Marv,Christopher Lee is the definative Sarauman and If what Madsen say is true then QT has a part for Eddie Murphy that he is very suited for. I haven't seen a QT moive where a actor he chose for in a film is miscast in the role.

    But of course it's better to bitch and whine about a movie that no one has seen yet and doubt one of the great directors of modern times before he proves you guys wrong again and then you say "that was great...eddie was great in it." I don't call it "a wait and see if you can suprise me" mentality i call it stupidity. If you cannot learn from your reservations on people with a proven track record like QT than I say you have the memory of a goldfish.
    Some people in this once great site have a memory of a goldfish.

    Reply to Talkback

  • and tell them to tell HIM to stop fucking about and get the fuck on with it. You dont see Spielberg fucking around for years going "oh I might do this next... or that one.. or maybe not..." Bollocks to it. If he had the threat of all the funds being ripped out from under his lazy ass he'd soon start typing, the banana-chinned cunt.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 8:19:19 AM CDT

    It's funny...

    by docpazuzu

    ...Lots of you folks diss Murphy for being in shite movies and I'm no exception. However, I'm not quite following the logic of the continued slamming of him when it's being hinted that he might end up in what will possibly be a really good film for the first time since Bowfinger. "Yeah, you're talented and are gonna be in a Tarantino flick, but you were in Pluto Nash, motherfucker!" Murphy's got both comedic and dramatic talent in droves. Kick his ass when he appears in shit, but let's at least be happy when he gets attached to cool projects. Give him the benefit of the doubt. On the other hand I've loathed Sandler in every movie and episode of SNL he's ever been in. That bastard's got a lot more to prove to me than Murphy does.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 8:47:27 AM CDT

    Mr Chuff is a genius

    by henry's cat

    "Banana chinned cunt" - nice.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 8:56:04 AM CDT

    Eddie doing Mr.T impression in Delirious

    by john-locke

    "Hey Boy, you look real cute in those tight Jeans.... Why don't you come over here and fuck me up the ass....Come on boy...Yeah thats right, now pump it harder...You don't start pumping harder boy i'm gonna tense my goddamn Butt Cheeks and rip your goddamn Dick Off!" Eddie you were one funny ass mutherfucker back in the day, in fact you is argueably the second funniest guy on the planet when you are on form (Behind Richard Pryor who is, was and will always be the funniest man on the planet).

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 9:08:32 AM CDT

    If Rob Schnieder is in this, I swear to God...

    by leflambeur

  • May 24, 2005 9:11:34 AM CDT

    Delirious was fantastic

    by docpazuzu

    I got tired of waiting for the DVD so I burned my VHS copy onto a disc. Way back in the mid-80's I just thought it was hilarious, but watching it today adds an extra shocking dimension to it because of how horribly PC everything has become by comparison in just 20 years. To me, Delirious just keeps getting funnier and funnier because of Murphy's shameless ridiculing of EVERYONE. Delirious has the perfect balance of outrageous comedy and real heart. Raw, on the other hand, felt much too mean-spirited at times to reach the heights of Delirious.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 9:18:11 AM CDT

    John-Locke

    by docpazuzu

    That's what Murphy meant by people fucking up his jokes by the water cooler the next day.... ;)

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 9:57:37 AM CDT

    EDDIE MURPHY KICKS ASS.

    by reze11even

    Trading Places, Coming to America, and BHC 1 and 2, 48 hours....

    Just forget everything from the 90s onward.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 11:31:38 AM CDT

    Movieplex

    by gg

    "one of the great directors of modern times.."[on Quentin Tarantino] Dude, that was hilarious. Or sad as hell. You choose. You don

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 11:48:30 AM CDT

    Yea, RR works pretty fast

    by gheorghe zamfir

    but most of his films are pretty forgettable, though fortunately with Sin City at least the writer did take time, even if RR doesn't, so the film actually ends up being something worth watching. If QT takes another 5 years that's fine with me, I'd rather he do whatever it is he does than just trying to rush out a film to get it out there.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 12:12:10 PM CDT

    You know, Eddie could be...

    by childe roland

    ...fantastic in an action flick with elements of comedy to his character (essentially playing a grown up Reggie Hammond), and Sandler can turn in a shockingly good and moving dramatic performance when given the right material (Punch Drunk Love). The one with a lot to prove to me on this project is Quentin. Kill Bill was a piece of shit, particularly because of how long we had to wait for that directionless, empty, all-flash-and-no-substance pile of morning-after-gluttony-meets-greed vomit. He just took every drug-addled thought or image he'd deemed "cool" over the seven years it took to finally make the fucking thing and crammed it all into one (no, wait, TWO) movie(s) populated with unreal, unsympathetic and totally uninteresting characters who did nothing but kill each other (and nowhere near fast enough). What a fucking waste! Quentin, I loved you back when you and Avary were cranking out some of the most resonant, fresh and thought-provoking dialogue in Hollywood. My advice is to make nice with him and start collaborating again. Without him, you're like Garfunkel without Simon.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 12:20:11 PM CDT

    I think the Idea of Sandler playing a interrogator with

    by quin the eskimo

    a mean streak would be great. I'm sure Tarantino has thought up something much cooler though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 12:24:22 PM CDT

    Garfunkle without Simon (Roland)

    by quin the eskimo

    Without Simon, Garfunkle would have drowned in that troubled water. I could be wrong but wasn't Avery responsible for that stinker of a movie with Van Der Beek and Jessica Biel. It was so unremarkable I can't even remember the name. I could be wrong.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 1:23:58 PM CDT

    dunno

    by jack the lad

    Sometimes I get the feeling Madsen pounds down 12 Guinesses before these interviews and makes up stuff about Inglorious Bastards so he won't have to really talk about anything. And Tarantino lets him because it keeps people interested, even if the info is way off-base. Having said that, if it happens to be true, I'd be curious to see Sandler in it - with PUNCH-DRUNK LOVE and SPANGLISH he's shown he's a real actor. I actually haven't seen any of the "real" Sandler movies like HAPPY GILMORE.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 3:40:14 PM CDT

    Rutger Hauer

    by jaguart

    Needs the Tarantino treatment.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 4:34:25 PM CDT

    From the title of this story...

    by hamo455

    ...I thought that it meant the movie would have some wrestlers in it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 5:14:42 PM CDT

    considering his closet hatred of asians and africans as evidence

    by watashiwadare

    just pointing out the obvious.

    Reply to Talkback

  • will Eddie be forced to shave off that cheese ball mustache he's been sporting for the last 20 years?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 6:13:28 PM CDT

    Kill Bill 2 left me a little flat...

    by hellhouse

    ...but KB part1 was extremely fun. After the masterpiece that is Pulp Fiction, Tarantino gets a lifetime of get out of fuckup free passes from me.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 6:41:14 PM CDT

    Off topic but....

    by mr chuff

    "I love you Ro-land".... sorry I'm bored and tired.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 7:09:00 PM CDT

    speaking of off topic....

    by payton 34

    does anyone know anything about the new band of brothers mini series? That was some of the greatest tv ever made!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 24, 2005 9:20:16 PM CDT

    So Much Love For Great "Forgotten" Actors In This Thread

    by lickmybeets

    *sheds tear*

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 25, 2005 4:41:18 AM CDT

    Preparation H Raymond would be fucking amazing in this!

    by sgtelias

    I don't know the guys real name (as Conan is a douchebag). But that dude is funny as shit. He would be so friggen amazing. Why doesn't QT find new gold instead of trying to replate Oldie Von Moldies? Seriously, Travolta is a fat face Frankenstein that I wish he could be deanimated.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Lee should play some fat general a-la-Welles in Catch-22... called Major Majors.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 25, 2005 12:22:12 PM CDT

    band of brothers great?

    by coffeeshopdemon

    Watch "In the Company of solderis (Storyville)". Im tired of ppl romanticising american GIs. I don't know how much they've changed but them boys representing over in middle east are fucking retards. I ain't surprised one bit when arabs wanna kick seven shades out of america's ass when the dudes waving guns and driving the tanks around their country are such nobs.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 25, 2005 12:26:06 PM CDT

    The word is "Cast"

    by numberface

    Not "casted". as in "He cast Denzel Washington as Abraham Lincoln". not "He casted Denzel Washington as Abraham Lincoln." That's almost as stupid as people who say "I could care less..." When they're supposed to say "I couldn't care less". WHY DOES THIS BOTHER ME SO MUCH???

    Reply to Talkback

  • Whats that all about? That's the movie I want to see!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2005 12:12:14 AM CDT

    I'm optimistic about Eddie Murphy

    by thirteen 13

    Especially knowing that this is a Tarantino project. I remember everyone being horrified when it was found out that Michael Keaten would be playing Batman and he did a wonderful job. Everyone was also horrified ( including me ), when Tom Cruise was chosen to play Lestat, and his performance for that role was perfect. And everyone pretty much forgot about John Travolta and thought he would never work again until he did great job playing Vincent in Pulp Fiction. Tarantino has proven again and again that he knows what he is doing when it comes to choosing actors for his movies. I think Eddie Murphy will do just fine.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2005 4:29:39 AM CDT

    Great news...

    by gluecifer

    After the best gangster films of all time and the best kung fu/chambara movies of all time (fuck, he even invented Asian action movies, some even think he invented martial arts!), Tarantino will direct the best war movie of all time.

    Just kidding, Tarantino the mixer blows!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2005 7:41:04 AM CDT

    I LOVE Pluto Nash...

    by thefatman

    Seriously.
    Think what Joel or Mike and the 'bots could have done with it.
    Comedy Gold, Baby!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2005 9:03:45 AM CDT

    GG

    by movieplex

    Show's how much you know. Modern times as in recent times from the ninties onwards. QT is definatly one of the great directors to come out of hollywood and shape it's future. But hey why don't you make a film better than QT's or any of his contemparies huh?
    That's right because you can't and that's why you love to criticise others because it's easier to mask the truth that you know deep inside that you ARE VOID OF TALENT.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 27, 2005 1:24:33 PM CDT

    Terry Carter!

    by duanejones

    wow, what a blaxploitational flashback! good call -- terry over eddie forever!

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback