Logo

Cool News

Did ya' see that spiffy new WAR OF THE WORLDS tv spot' No' Click here!!

Published at:  May 14, 2005 5:50:08 AM CDT

Ahoy, squirts! Quint here with another little peek at Steven Spielberg's WAR OF THE WORLDS which includes the very first teeny-tiny itsy bitsy glimpse of an alien. There's also a new shot that has Tom Cruise looking at camera and screaming "Robbie!" which is one of the 3 scenes I saw shot during my visit to the set. You'll read more about that with my second and final WAR OF THE WORLDS set report early next week, but to hold you over you can click at either of the two links below to find the spot! Enjoy!



CLICK IT HERE TO GO TO THEMOVIEBOX.NET... IT'S TV SPOT #2!



OR YOU CAN CLICK HERE TO GO TO EVEOFWAR.COM!!




    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 5:51:58 AM CDT

    I'll check this out

    by john-locke

    right now

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 5:54:38 AM CDT

    There best be some Tripods

    by john-locke

    I want to see some mutherfuckin Aliens Boy

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 5:55:20 AM CDT

    Oh, come on!

    by kintar0

    How many different ways can they show the same goddamn thing? The next commerical or trailer better have a space ship, an alien or an alien war machine in it or SOMETHING. We got it, shit blows up and people run away it in this movie. Are there any godforsaken aliens in this movie or what?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 5:56:38 AM CDT

    Oooh , 2 frames of a tenticle

    by john-locke

    Sweet, better than squat.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 5:59:24 AM CDT

    Spielberg + Sci Fi = Boner

    by rearden

    End of story.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 6:00:29 AM CDT

    Big thingy coming out of the fire!

    by rearden

    There's a big thingy coming out of the fire. Badass! Big thingys!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 6:01:20 AM CDT

    PAVEMENT!!! The aliens hate PAVEMENT!!!! Everyone off the PAVE

    by inspectordoppler

  • Screw you for judging me.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 6:13:23 AM CDT

    Not Impressed

    by kyle.reese

    This just seems waaay too standard. Looking at these TV spots and trailers one could easily mistake War of The Worlds for a Michael Bay film... Sorry but I don't think this is going to be anything special.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 6:22:31 AM CDT

    FULL TRAILER IN FRONT OF STAR WARS

    by d8cam

    i think its pretty obvious that we will finally see the full trailer next week

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 6:37:45 AM CDT

    Will they hurry up and release it already?

    by shan

    Or stop talking about it so much until closer to the release date?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 6:41:21 AM CDT

    TV Spot aired durring Enterprise

    by tygerclaw

    I was watching the last episode of Enterprise on my Tivo, When this TV spot came on by surprise, It was a great spot with at least a tiny glimps of the aliens via a tenticle.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 6:49:19 AM CDT

    You guys might as well stop bitching about being teased

    by gheorghe zamfir

    Chances are we're not gonna get any of the money shots before the movie comes out, probably be easier to just save your time and come to grips with their ad campaign instead of bitching about it every time a commercial comes out.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 7:31:46 AM CDT

    Japanese tentacle porn is so 1980's ...

    by shan

    And it was quite offensive back then too.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 7:33:28 AM CDT

    I liked the teaser better

    by moviemaniac-7

    With all the people coming out of their houses, etc. It was more moody and hopefully this stuff is in the movie. This one is more like a quick re-hash of the last ones.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 7:33:29 AM CDT

    Never mind ...

    by shan

    What posts I was referring to just got deleted. Carry on ...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 7:33:51 AM CDT

    Will see the movie though

    by moviemaniac-7

    Damn these enter buttons

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 7:35:02 AM CDT

    TENTACLE?

    by ra ra rasputin

    What goddamn Tentacle where please explain. Love the teasers tease me more you bad girl, oh too late i have made a mess. Ten minutes and we will be off again.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 7:40:22 AM CDT

    HG Wells Groans

    by netrix

    Well - I rmember the last time Hollywood decided they could make a film about this book. Oh dear. Spielberg is an excellent directory when he's given the right material. But I just don't think he's good with traditional Sci-Fi. Not since Close Encounters. Ai, Minority Report - good grief they were pedentry beauties. Pretty, but slow going and lacked any 'fizz'. But if he treats this film like Schindlers List, Private Ryan and even 'Catch Me if You Can'. Well then we are in for a treat.

    My money is on a film that bears little resembloance to the book but captures the human element. That's something the book touches on and he may take it further. On the other hand it could be a pile of CGI and bigname mush. No. Please don't do another Minority Report. I beg you. I just hope that he's read the book and other Wells books such as 'The Shape of things to come' 'The First Men in the Moon' 'Island of Doctor Moreau' There more social commentaries' And WOTW is the same.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 7:44:09 AM CDT

    THAT TENTACLE COULD IT BE ANY BIGGER

    by ra ra rasputin

    Found it, thats great this film will do for Pavements what Jaws did for the Sea. And the poster who claims that Spielberg is a DIRECTORY is wrong he is a DIRECTOR,gosh that made me chuckle HEE HAW.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 7:45:35 AM CDT

    "Spielberg is an excellent directory"

    by ra ra rasputin

    HEE HEE HAW.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 7:51:35 AM CDT

    Sweet

    by windfola

  • May 14, 2005 8:30:22 AM CDT

    Saw a longer trailer last night before Kingdom of Heaven

    by minderbinder

    Just more running and screaming. Meh.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 8:31:07 AM CDT

    You can see a glimpse of a TRIPOD there as well

    by mac styran

    At the very end, you see two legs behind the people running away. Looks rounder than the previous visualisations ...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 9:44:28 AM CDT

    Tripod leg

    by sleepyhead

    Just behind the toppling church spire. Go look...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 11:02:29 AM CDT

    Taht is the most obnoxious trailer I have ever seen.

    by mister man

    COME ON. Frankly, I don't care to sit around hitting the pause button twenty times during a trailer. It was practically a strobe effect. PLEASE. Show me a trailer, or don't. I suppose it was a love letter to you tweener geeks.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 11:03:16 AM CDT

    THAT

    by mister man

    Shit, no more Mimosas.

    Reply to Talkback

  • ..except Indy 1 and 3, there always has to be some precocious kid in danger. I just hope that girl doesn't do any gymnastic kicks on a tripod.

    Reply to Talkback


  • It won't have a spaceship, as Mr. Spielberg has decided to adapt the most famous space invasion story of all time, and take out the whole 'they came from space' part. To me, ina morbidly fascinating way, this represents perfectly the schizoid nature of hollywood these days. Spielberg: 'Oh, we took out the core of the book, the whole stuff about them coming from Mars. But we added in the red weed from the book! Yeah, I know that stuff only made sense because they were from the red planet, but it proves that we're fans, right? Right??!' All film makers have to do these days is wax poetic about what huge fans they are, while completely disregarding the spirit of the source material, and throwing in little easter eggs for the fans. 'OMFG tehy used the opening from the book in the first trailer!!!11' Fans are the battered wives of hollywood. They keep smacking us around and we keep coming back again. Oh, they raped us with the Batman movies, but they say they love us again. Goyer said it himself. They say they can change.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 11:55:22 AM CDT

    how to spunk away dollars

    by bluemancbrit

    spielberg + war of the worlds= big enough already, why spunk away so much money on casting Cruise? there are loads of quality male actors who can, you know, like, act. seen the trailers a few times now and it looks shit to be honest. he should have made ET2.

    Reply to Talkback

  • The shark!! Where's the Goddamned SHARK!!! Spielberg, you teasing prick! Sigh.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 12:02:33 PM CDT

    I Dunno...

    by bluemancbrit

    you've really confused them by using 'anneurism', good work fella!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 12:13:25 PM CDT

    netrix, you might have a point., if only "pedentry" was a word.

    by some dude

    Christ, it doesn't even sound like an adjective. Does it have something to do with foot-fucking?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 12:22:45 PM CDT

    Help! I'm a Fish

    by bluemancbrit

    is still my favourite film title ever, never seen it, or ever going to. the punctuation makes it

    Reply to Talkback



  • WOTW is a story about the collapse and subjugation of civilization.
    Spielberg, Cruise and Hollywood are trying it seems to give the movie the indy flick look with the dad playing catch in the crappy working class back yard that all but needs a knackered fridge to complete the picture.
    I can only guess at the story line but in the original the main character is just along for the ride and does nothing to influence events.
    So Cruise will run from here to there saving his kid then the monsters get interplanetary aids and die.
    I'll cough up the dough and watch it but despite liking Cruise and loving the original WOTW story (but not the 50's movie) I'm most worried about Spielberg

    Reply to Talkback

  • Granted, that movie sucked, but you know what I'm sayin'. Anyway, neat teaser, I guess. The tentacle was pretty unexpected.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 1:24:43 PM CDT

    I've said this before...

    by rev_skarekroe

    ...but I hope the aliens turn out to be E.T.s.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 1:30:09 PM CDT

    WOTW art?

    by metallicant

    http://www.cgchannel.com/gallery/viewimage.jsp?imgID=8596 this guy is better then Jeff Darrow

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 1:31:35 PM CDT

    Can't see the alien tentacle, could someone screencap it?

    by monkey butler

  • May 14, 2005 1:49:32 PM CDT

    The Tentacle

    by scrivener

    I'm guessing it's the scene right after "Won't be started by humans." There's a big tentacle-looking thing coming through the door like the water alien from abyss. Nothing terribly special though, it looks like a huge rubber tube suspended in the air. Can't fucking wait for this movie though and I hope Speilberg does it justice. WotW has been my dream movie since I was a little kid, and I doubt it can be done properly without an R rating. It's supposed to be like a modern Holocaust with aliens and giant tripod death machines.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 1:57:18 PM CDT

    Yeah, if the Berg had any balls it would be R-rated.

    by performingmonkey

    If he wants to make it like Private Ryan he should go the whole hog.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 2:03:33 PM CDT

    Private Ryan

    by scrivener

    I'm not saying it should be like Saving Private Ryan - it's not really that kind of movie. I'm saying it should be more like Shindlers List and not at all like Independance Day.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 2:34:38 PM CDT

    LOL

    by i dunno

    "Steve, let me pitch this to you. your biggest commercial success was ET. Your biggest critical success was Schindler's List. So I got it. Schindler's List...wait for it...with aliens! Hello? Steve?"

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 2:41:01 PM CDT

    A super intelligence waging war on earth... think again

    by metallicant

    If they really had balls that would make a film about a class II civilization encountering our solar system to some DJ Kristoff music .... that would be some fucking shit... the only plausible way an alien civilization would be a scary earth shattering encounter would be when they were just passing by and absorbed our planet , converted it into some bizarre technological structure. An alien civilization that has passed its technological spike and has become a permanent comic resident would have no interest in war with us HAHAahahahahaha

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 3:01:44 PM CDT

    DIRECT DOWNLOAD LINK: http://media.themoviebox.net/qt/1256368-02

    by alexandra.dupont

    Has anyone found a more direct link than this? http://media.themoviebox.net/qt/1256368-025632-38/wotwtvspot2.mov

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 3:37:55 PM CDT

    I Dunno

    by dark vapor

    THAT was f'ing funny.

    I love the teaser angle, part of me is tired of knowing every frame of a movie by heart by the time I see the whole thing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 4:12:21 PM CDT

    yeah, I really prefer these kind of trailers

    by colonel_blimp

    to for instance the last kingdom of heaven trailer, which pretty much gave away everything but the end credits. the trailer was much better than the movie too...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 4:12:38 PM CDT

    weasels

    by loafroaster

    I know its pretty unlikely, but I'd love it if Spielberg decided to give NOTHING away about the look of the aliens/tripods before WOTW's release; it'd make going to see the film far more exciting. I've already seen and heard too much of Revenge of the Sith to be looking forward to seeing it-Word to the wise Steve, lay off the published screenplays and art of...books until after June 29...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 4:32:56 PM CDT

    The best trailer was for Unbreakable.

    by i dunno

    It gave you nothing. You had no idea what it was about. It was like, "Watch this, don't watch this. I give a fuck".

    Reply to Talkback

  • This will suck so bad because it will be just a soap opera about Tom Cruise emoting.

    A great sci-fi movie it won't be. Spielberg has gone insanely soft (vs Jaws) and we will not see the grittiness necessary to suspend disbelief for such a world changing event.

    And Tom Cruise will have to be onscreen so much that it will be grating - kinda like those horribly gratuitous shots of Frodo at ther end of ROTK. It'll take viewers out of the fantasy.

    C'mon those trailers suck ass. The aliens I am betting will be on screen for about 5% of the time with alien tech only see maybe 10 -15% of the rest of the movie. It's gonna be a snoozer. A soap opera starring Tom Cruise - oh joy.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 5:03:56 PM CDT

    Everyone has an opinion.

    by lost in uranus

    But its only mine that really matters. If you dont wanna be teased, dont fucken watch bitches. No one is putting a gun to your craniums to click on the link;you little sluts.
    Think this movie is gonna suck? Well, I respect your choice NOT TO SEE it. Other than that STFU and let others enjoy the summer hype. Regardless of how crappy or good these turn out to be.

    PS: And unless you have more talent than Spielberg (and proof of such) STFU you ugly-ass whiny malcontents. Thank you.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 5:26:23 PM CDT

    Some Dude -"if only "pedentry" was a word."

    by netrix

    SomeDude - please write this one down: Pedantry: noun, Plural-ries. The practice of being a pedant, esp. in the minute observance of petty rules or details.

    Now you know read my post again.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 5:28:14 PM CDT

    flipster

    by ribbons

    Interesting that you think 'Jaws' is Spielberg's "grittiest" movie. It makes it that much easier for me to disregard your opinion.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 5:29:25 PM CDT

    netrix

    by ribbons

    I'm pretty sure he was talking about your spelling.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 5:31:18 PM CDT

    Ribbons

    by netrix

    I hope so. But is that not a bit pedantic?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 5:32:58 PM CDT

    flipster / Ribbons Jaws

    by netrix

    I agree with Ribbons in part. Jaw is not the most 'grittiest' of his films. But then again - shit this one won't be either. Will it????

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 5:36:40 PM CDT

    Lost in Uranus 2005-05-14 17:03:56

    by netrix

    You don't get it. This is a serious piece of Science Fiction and a 'serious' director. We care about what is being produced and want to see quality film making.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 5:39:13 PM CDT

    What, a hidden spielberg gem?

    by colonel_blimp

    An early, gritty (but not THAT gritty) Spielberg opus called JAW? OK, I know, I'm being pedentic.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 5:40:28 PM CDT

    So Much Bitching

    by rivero

    Jesus, why don't you crybaby cocksuckers reserve judgement until you actually see the goddamn thing??? so flipster, Cruise will just emote for 2 hours, the aliens will be nearly nonexistent and the whole thing will be a snoozer.....thous hast spoken, Nostradamus. While you're at it could you please tell me the winning Powerball numbers in D.C. next week? You fucking douchbag, why don't you and the rest of your ilk on these boards retrieve your ballsack from your wife or gf's purse and quit your bitching for once. As for those complaining about no shots of any aliens or ships......it's called keeping the designs a surprise for the audience you brainless twats. Similar to the trailer for Spielberg's 'Jurassic Park', sure we saw a split shot or three of dinos in that one but the total amount of dino footage equalled LESS THAN ONE SECOND. Ever see the trailer for Ridley Scott's 'Alien'? How about 'Jaws'? No glimpse of the creature there. And those two are considered some of the best previews ever.

    Get a clue you fucking kids.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 5:42:10 PM CDT

    JAW

    by netrix

    Shit man, it's late here in the UK. But think of it! The sequel - Jaw. It's half the shark it used to be! ;-)

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 5:46:33 PM CDT

    RIVERO

    by netrix

    Harsh words. But you've got a point. At the same time. Shit, what is the guy up to? We're just nervous that he will do another AI: a film that you sit though and forget about once you walk out the cinema. Still it's just a film. Right?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 5:49:25 PM CDT

    100% CORRECT, RIVERO.

    by cutest_of_borg

    These are the same ass monkeys that will be whining when Petey Jackson doesn't show da big ape in the King Kong trailer later this summer.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 5:50:52 PM CDT

    King Kong

    by netrix

    What do people think about this one then???

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 6:04:06 PM CDT

    Spielburg condescends to his viewers

    by aerob

    He does it in every movie he makes and it pisses me off. He has gotten worse about it the older he's gotten, too. Still going to see this, though, it's WotW (notice the 't' in that acronoym... does WoW make anyone else automatically think "World of Warcraft"?)

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 6:05:08 PM CDT

    Spielberg with an e

    by aerob

    Damn my spelling issues with his name

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 6:33:50 PM CDT

    Eeeeeewwww

    by frankenchr1st

    that kid looks like Courtney Love! YUCK!!!!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 6:35:27 PM CDT

    Ribbons Netrix & spelling

    by flipster

    No no - I agree Jaws wasn't the grittiest, but just wanted to highlight how he makes more and more "family" fare - I might be still pissed at the removal of the gun from ET -yeah I'm still pissed and have zero faith Spielberg is capable of making a film that caters to the adult segment of the genre.

    If you had to, I would rip apart my post by pointing out that showing tech/aliens isn't what sci fi is all about.. (galacta is a fave sci fi film)

    [This is not the place to whine about someone's spelling. Get a clue]

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 6:39:52 PM CDT

    Rivero Abuse

    by flipster

    look buddy you wouldn't have the balls to say that stuff to my face in the real world so don't be calling me names here, alright.

    If you want to come up to Vancouver sometime leave me your hotel number and I'll come over and beat the shit of you cuz that sounds like what you want.

    Reply to Talkback

  • And Saving Private Ryan was just 5 films back. Granted, The Terminal and Catch Me if You Can made him lose some credibility but he can still do it if he wants to. The question is, does he want to. I'd feel better about WotW if there wasn't the requisite cute kid. I think Spielberg clones them at his ranch.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 8:19:18 PM CDT

    One reason to skip this: You just KNOW the bratty-cute kid (Dako

    by hanfiredfirst

    Spielberg = schmaltz.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 8:31:19 PM CDT

    Scientology tent on set of 'War of the Worlds' per Cruise's dema

    by hanfiredfirst

    Kinda weird... "Cruise was asked specifically why he had a tent set up promoting his religion on the Paramount set of his new film with Spielberg titled War of the Worlds. 'I felt honored to have volunteer Scientology ministers on the set,' he said. Steven Spielberg tacitly admitted it was 'an information tent' promoting a 'belief system,' but then claimed that 'no one was compelled to frequent it.' " http://tinyurl.com/baoah

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 8:37:57 PM CDT

    How many

    by jedistryker

    shots of people looking stupidly at something they're supposed to be awed over are there going to be in this Spielberg film?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 8:52:10 PM CDT

    79th !!!!

    by jesuschrist

    Suck my taint, L. Ron Hubbard!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 8:54:26 PM CDT

    A "religion"

    by jedistryker

    created by a science-fiction author, where you're told that the spirits of evil aliens live in volcanoes and do bad things to people. I'd buy that for a dollar!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 9:13:10 PM CDT

    ID4 Sequel?

    by jedistryker

    I thought that was Day After Tomorrow? Who the hell knows; all these disaster movies are the same. We can only hope to see the Statue of Liberty destroyed in some way.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 9:27:55 PM CDT

    I agree 100% with that sentiment.

    by jedistryker

  • May 14, 2005 9:42:06 PM CDT

    here's an example of a modern alien invasion on film...

    by flipster

    Alright, I'll catch some flack for this perhaps but if you skip ahead to Chapter 11 of the Dreamcatcher DVD, you can see what is meant when we say WOTW will suffer because Spielberg is unwilling to make adult level sci fi, only safe and stale with happy endings.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 9:44:50 PM CDT

    Nothing wrong with a happy ending...

    by aerob

    ...As long as it is earned and not cheated too. Unfortunately, Spielberg often cheats his way to a happy ending (see: the completely unnecessary opening and concluding sequences of Saving Private Ryan).

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 9:55:30 PM CDT

    Heh

    by fitzcarraldo2

    It's an amusing conceit, showing Tom Cruise as a blue-collar Joe who loves his wife and kid. Riiiiggghhtt. I hope the poster consists of a huge shot of his head as usual.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 10:01:12 PM CDT

    netrix: now more retarded than ever!

    by some dude

    No shit you were grasping for the word "pedantry." It is really too bad then that had you spelled the word correctly, your usage would still have been wrong. The word you should have used (and spelled correctly) was pedantic. Better luck next time. PS- If English is your second language, then all is forgiven.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 10:28:32 PM CDT

    Rated R = Much lower budget

    by aerob

    Why do people always cry about this? It isn't going to change anytime soon. Either you have the budget to make a big sci-fi film with the effects it deserves, or you forfeit your budget for an R rating which will limit your audience and sales. If it was rated R you'd be crying about how crappy the effects are.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 10:31:02 PM CDT

    I'd rather have

    by jedistryker

    a limited budget with a better, more mature story than a big-budget blockbuster that is ultimately forgettable. I think that CG can be a crutch as much as it can be a benefit in movies.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 10:32:02 PM CDT

    Alien tenticle?

    by red_weed

    I think that is a tenticle from a tripod or another machine like the one you can make out in those 2 frames at the end. It looks way to big and metally for a creature.

    The teaser poster already shows a hand much like e.t. or the original movie alien, and niether of them had tenticles.

    I remember in the book that a tenticle touched his boot as he was hiding out in the house but did a machine tenticle come in first? it certainly did in the original movie anyway, so maybe this will feature the same sort of scene.

    Yay, my first post!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 10:54:47 PM CDT

    I would argue that

    by aerob

    Rated R is unnecessary for a more mature story. It can produce a more intense, visceral experience, but just because you can't directly SHOW horrific things that doesn't mean you can't make it just as clear that they're occurring. Some of the most intense/emotional moments from movies I've loved have occurred off screen for precisely this reason. Nothing wrong with a little blood 'n guts though

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 10:59:13 PM CDT

    I agree

    by jedistryker

    However, when you try to pigeonhole a concept that is better-suited for an R-rating into a PG-13, you lose something that can't be translated properly. I'm not saying that this particular movie is better-suited to an R-rating, but the original point was that you would lose budget with an R-rating, and my point was that I would rather have a smaller budget and less effects while retaining the original story, rather than forcing it into a PG-13 rating in order to make it into a blockbuster.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 11:15:19 PM CDT

    Some movies should always be rated R.

    by rant breath

    Alien vs Predator, Elektra, WAR OF THE WORLDS!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 14, 2005 11:33:11 PM CDT

    'A.I' deserved to be R-rated material?

    by ribbons

    That seems pretty gratuitous if you ask me. Would you prefer that robots gored the Flesh Fair faculty? Or are you just saying it was "R-rated material" because it was generated by Stanley Kubrick?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 15, 2005 12:08:13 AM CDT

    netrix

    by ribbons

    Yeah, I agree: it is a little on the pedantic side.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 15, 2005 12:38:48 AM CDT

    netrix (part 2)

    by ribbons

    Actually (and this may make it easier for people to ignore MY opinion), but 'A.I.' is one of the few recent movies that stayed with me after I left the theater. Now that might have more to do with where I was then (and now) than the movie itself, but I specifically remember the sensation of thinking about it days afterward.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 15, 2005 12:39:47 AM CDT

    flipster

    by ribbons

    Isn't that the movie where the aliens come out of people's asses?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 15, 2005 12:41:53 AM CDT

    A.I.?

    by jedistryker

    Some movies are pre-disposed to being R-rated. Aliens vs Predator was bad for a lot of reasons, but hamstringing two R-rated premises into one and then trying to lighten it to a PG-13 was a terrible idea, and weakened an already weak movie. I'm not saying that gratuitous gore and violence would have saved it, but it wouldn've have hurt. Also, an R-rating doesn't always necessarily mean sex and violence. That's not to say that all movies should be made to fit an R-rating, but my point is that it would be stupid to take an R-rated movie premise and try to shoehorn it into a PG-13 just to make sure you kept a big budget. If AvP proved anything, it's that a big budget does not equal a good movie. Hell, TONS of movies have proven that.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 15, 2005 1:09:18 AM CDT

    JediStryker

    by ribbons

    ...so, wait... ...are we talking about the same movie here?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 15, 2005 1:16:05 AM CDT

    let me guess

    by dr.bulber

    tom cruise saves the day.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 15, 2005 1:21:32 AM CDT

    I guess I was confused

    by jedistryker

    because I never mentioned AI. You brought it up, and I thought maybe as an example of a movie that wouldn't really work as an R-rated movie. I wasn't trying to say that it should've been R-rated, or that it would've been better as such. Not all movies, nor most movies, should be R-rated. My point, again, was that those premises which lend themselves to an R-rating, such as for example horror movies, should be made as R-rated movies, and not cut-up to make a PG-13 rating just to increase their budget. AI's premise didn't necessitate any of the things that would cause an R-rating, and so there would be no good reason to make it that way. But Aliens vs Predator most certainly should have been R-rated, with all the blood, gore, and cursing that took place in their predecessors.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 15, 2005 1:22:51 AM CDT

    Okay, now I gotcha

    by ribbons

    Sorry for the mix-up

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 15, 2005 1:37:29 AM CDT

    No prob.

    by jedistryker

  • May 15, 2005 7:18:03 AM CDT

    Just shut the hell up

    by mister man

  • May 15, 2005 11:32:57 AM CDT

    BroncoFan

    by ribbons

    The aliens are this movie's ace in the hole. If their picture is all over the place before it comes out, it takes away some of the effect that seeing them for the first time onscreen would have. If you don't want to see it because the marketing department ISN'T ruining that experience for you, be my guest, but I don't think many people will feel compelled to stay away from the theaters for the same reason.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 15, 2005 1:58:44 PM CDT

    Spielberg

    by ribbons

    The sad thing is, I remember right after 'A.I.' came out he said something like "I'm done making films for the lowest common denominator, I'm turning over a new leaf, etc.," when clearly none of that is true. Whether or not this (or 'Terminal'...) is any good, it's Spielberg at his most populist.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 15, 2005 2:27:25 PM CDT

    Ribbons

    by flipster

    yeah - lots not so good in that flick, but those are some scary fucking aliens rendered on screen.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 15, 2005 3:38:39 PM CDT

    'A.I.' is not Spielberg at his most populist

    by ribbons

    'A.I.' is fairly polarizing for a Spielberg movie; also, those were robots, not aliens. I was referring to 'Terminal' and now this, 'War of the Worlds.' Personally I don't give a shit whether or not Tom Cruise's character is divorced; what the fuck does that have to do with aliens taking over the world? But it adds "domestic drama" to a movie that oughtn't need it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 15, 2005 4:15:12 PM CDT

    Re: BroncoFan "I am sick and damn tired of these trailers"

    by john-locke

    You are Trolling aren't ya? That has really made me laugh, seriously dude thats some funny shit to say.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 15, 2005 7:57:29 PM CDT

    Sin City you sure said it! *Sigh* Tired of Speilberg, Tired of

    by oompa_radar

    I can't in good conscience do anything but boycott this unholy union, especially as it's become yet another of the countless cruddy remake films that the inane new Hollywood machine is churning out.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 15, 2005 9:28:07 PM CDT

    Spielberg/Cruise

    by jedistryker

    I'm not a fan of either personally, so when they get together I don't get excited. I think that Cruise is overrated as an actor, personally. I also don't really get them as people, which hurts my enjoyment of their films when they're trying to relate to me (the everyman). Anyway, it's going to be a blockbuster, it's probably going to make a lot of money, and some of us will like it and some of us will hate it, and ultimately it's going to be one of those movies that you'll probably buy regardless and these two will continue making movies.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 15, 2005 9:43:34 PM CDT

    Tom Cruise

    by ribbons

    I can understand why people dislike him so much; there are actors who deserve the work that he gets because of his looks and his star power. I don't admire him so much for his acting prowess (although contrary to popular belief, or so it seems, he's given good performances before), but he has a resume to die for, so whatever you think of the man, his bizarre romantic flings, whatever, at least he knows how to pick 'em.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 15, 2005 11:10:23 PM CDT

    It's not that Spielberg can't get a movie made off his name alon

    by jedistryker

    It's that he's an elitist who chooses to work exclusively with his inner-circle of A-list "friends".

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 16, 2005 1:45:17 AM CDT

    Paul

    by jedistryker

    What brought that on?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 16, 2005 11:53:36 PM CDT

    New TV spot aired durring Everybody Loves Ramond!

    by tygerclaw

    a new WOTW TV spot aired durring the final episode of Everybody Loves Ramond, From What some of the people who posted on the war of the worlds film site, It featured a bunch of new footage, And possibly of a tripod, I hope someone recorded this.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 17, 2005 4:38:08 AM CDT

    ID4 and Signs combined

    by antoniusbloc

    Not a bad money-making idea, but nothing groundbreaking. The teasers, though, are not very impressive. Two major upcoming films that really look promising are Batman Begins and Narnia.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback