Logo

Cool News

WAR OF THE WORLDS has a new poster... feel like bowling'

Published at:  Apr 29, 2005 4:58:26 PM CDT

Hey folks, Harry here... I've been hearing 'off the record' stories about things that were in the R-rated side of the development of WAR OF THE WORLDS that had to be abandoned at the development stage for being way too hardcore for what Spielberg was going for here. Having said that - when my source gives me the ok to spill, I'll share - but this one thing was so over the top, that it could have backfired and resulted in giggling, and from all reports - Spielberg wants this film to be the American Survivor tale and I couldn't be happier about it. Meanwhile, on to the image below. I got something from Paramount that made me get where and when Steven got inspired to do this film. If you go back in your Cinefantastique files to that old WAR OF THE WORLDS issue. Well that cover has essentially the below image... not as dramatic with with flames and black... but that classic alien hand and the world. Now - do you think the Wayans are gonna make an alien invasion parody film called BOWL FOR THE WORLDS with essentially the same image below? We'll see... Personally, I can't wait to check this one out!












    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 5:03:19 PM CDT

    I tell yah

    by right bastard

    Dakoda Fanning still kills this for me.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 5:03:42 PM CDT

    Eh

    by gheorghe zamfir

    All their posters have been pretty much the kind of posters you'd expect. That's fine, still looking forward to the flick, and I dig what we've seen in the teasers.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 5:04:45 PM CDT

    Nice

    by loafroaster

    Nice image, but the lettering reminds me too much of Team America:World Police.

    "Tom and Steve-F**k Yeah!"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 5:04:47 PM CDT

    IT SUCKS

    by mr_t

    I don't like it. At all.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 5:05:19 PM CDT

    This just in...

    by crackerfarmboy

    ...this poster's old!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 5:07:41 PM CDT

    OLD NEWS

    by jmid

    hasn't this ad campaign been around for a while? remake LXG!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 5:08:13 PM CDT

    Meh...

    by iamnicksaicnsn

    forsooth, I am unimpressed, verily.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 5:11:16 PM CDT

    STEEEEE-RIKE!!!

    by iblis_mage

    But isn't that just the poster for the War of the Worlds TV show turned upside down??

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 5:15:14 PM CDT

    Seems old

    by oski

    Wasn't that image used on the original teaser or trailer page?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 5:15:21 PM CDT

    Jesus

    by malx

    That was the most incoherent intro/report ever. "I have stuff I can't tell you but it's funny now here's a poster." And was that a reference to the Wayans brothers for some reason? Time to check the lead content in the AICN drinking fountains.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 5:20:26 PM CDT

    Decent poster

    by dr_boll

    But shit apple has new HD trailers for mac users...fucking sweet...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 5:22:17 PM CDT

    Nah....

    by sleepyhead

    Not sure. Looks like an ad for a wrestling match or somethin'. Last time I looked the official WotW site had the previous Ben Hur-lettering type poster all done in international languages. They all looked better than this. This movie will still rule though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 5:28:50 PM CDT

    Turn it upside down.....

    by lostvegabrother

    & it looks like a testicle....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 5:32:02 PM CDT

    Bowling for Mars

    by judge doom

  • Apr 29, 2005 5:33:28 PM CDT

    dakota fanning!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    by silverstorm

    what?dakota fanning?did tom cruise use up all the budget and leave nothing for decent co-stars!woe betide us!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 5:35:59 PM CDT

    The way Tom Cruise is at the moment

    by prevert

    He'll be dating her soon

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 5:36:13 PM CDT

    Did I hear Cruise is dating Fanning?

    by lostvegabrother

    ...or Katie Holmes, they are about the same age are'nt they?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 5:39:45 PM CDT

    Wouldn't it be cool if all the aliens turned out to be from the

    by rev_skarekroe

    He's back - and he's pissed!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 5:48:51 PM CDT

    This SHOULD be R-rated!

    by performingmonkey

    If Spielberg's going for a sort of Private Ryan feel to the invasion he should do it totally balls to the fucking wall and have body parts flying everywhere and the aliens being an ACTUAL threat rather than unseen and background CG explosions, aliens and humans actually fighting each other with guns instead of people just cowering away. We've got massive weapons of great destruction, for fuck's sake! nuke the alien scum!!! I hope Cruise does a little more than just running/driving away during this movie. But I hope it doesn't end up with Cruise being bigger than the movie rather than the other way around which it SHOULD be. This could still suck donkey balls, in a similar way that The Day After Tommorrow did. I WANT to believe that this will be better than the mediocrity of ID4 (though it did have some good moments IMO, like the President not knowing about Area 51, that made me laugh, and the alien talking through Brent Spiner (the guy who says 'intriguing' a lot in TNG). It was funnier than it probably was meant to be. I don't know, at least it had entertainment value. If WotW is too Shindler's depressing and Ryan boring second act it might not work. And if the aliens die by catching a cold like in the original it will reach new heights of suckage. Woah, using words like 'suckage', maybe I'm turning into a sick fanboy......

    Reply to Talkback

  • its getting old

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 5:59:02 PM CDT

    trifecta

    by surprider

    ep3,wotw,king kong...the trifecta of 2005...then land of the dead,hhgttg,sin city,kung fu hustle...damn so far it has been a good year..

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 6:00:35 PM CDT

    War of the Worlds: part 2 Cruise Controll

    by harry paratestes

    Hey... it could happen...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 6:44:25 PM CDT

    I totally agree SniperCA....

    by j-dizzle

    ...Mars Attacks! had a better ending.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 6:57:15 PM CDT

    Do the aliens attack Earth or are they already here?

    by darth voodoo

    It would really suck if the aliens are already here and we don't get any shots of saucer's attacking. From what I've heard this is more along the lines of Signs than the original War of the Worlds. I don't want to see a film about a guy getting a divorce and his relationship with his daughter. I want to see a remake of War of the Worlds.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 6:59:43 PM CDT

    I know how it ends: HUGE SPOILER

    by thebaxter

    all the aliens get killt when humans realize their allergic to water

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 7:00:20 PM CDT

    Spielberg and his hand fetish

    by batutta

    Look at the E.T., Schindler's List and War of the Worlds posters back to back.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 7:04:59 PM CDT

    The Wayans suck, and this looks mildy interesting at best.

    by noriko takaya

    Still think it should have been set during the 19th Century, but oh well. I'll give it a shot, especially since it's supposed to be the first of a trilogy and the aliens are interdimensional, not actually from Mars. We'll see how it goes.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 7:06:23 PM CDT

    Martians Dying

    by the_alienist

    I really liked the take on it Alan Moore did in the second League of Extraordinary Gentlemen story arc- martian killed by germ warefare. Except they arent really Martians...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 7:09:52 PM CDT

    Good call rev_skarekroe - there's no glowing fingers on these ba

    by angry chimp

    This is gonna be sooo shit.

    And, as it's Mister Berg it will end, and then go on for another 20 minutes with an even shitter ending.

    Should be set in England. Should have Woking and the surrounding area getting fucked up, then London, the protagonist should be British and blah blah blah...

    You fucking BASTARDS!!! GIVE US BACK OUR BALL!!!

    Fucking Tom Cruise. Jesus.

    What was that? American Survivalist type did the big S say? - Uni Bomber vs Alien Wankers - FIGHT!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 7:10:29 PM CDT

    I have a feeling this will be good, but not great...

    by hail

    The last time I was blown away by Spielberg was Saving Private Ryan. But even that had a few faults. Then he began a slow sewage trail of suckage starting with AI, then Minority Report, then the godaweful Terminal. I'm gonna say one thing...if Fantastic 4 turns out to be the "Family Adventure" film people are saying it is, then Marvel will rule the summer again. The market for family adventures is huge! Pirates of the Carribean came out of nowwhere to really surpass all expectations, and even the "oscar winner" National Treasure was able to suprise people with an excellent return. Not to mention F4 might be seen as a "live action version of the Incredibles" (which it CLEARILY IS NOT). People, especially families and kids, might soil their pants to see F4 more than a few times.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 7:11:24 PM CDT

    Damn it!

    by order66

    I was digging it until you mentioned bowling!! Damn, damn, damn.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 7:18:27 PM CDT

    So...are the fanboys taking the stance that...

    by hail

    the movie will suck if it takes the same ending as the '53 version? Which, consequently, was twisted by Shyamalan in Signs. "Why would the aliens try to conquer a world where Oxygen is an abundant element?"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 7:20:23 PM CDT

    Martians land in Woking

    by the_alienist

    i agree Angry Chimp- it should have been set in victorian london- but with a steam punk look...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 7:58:04 PM CDT

    Good movie, bad poster.

    by cabron

    This one's gonna be big...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 8:07:02 PM CDT

    The Wayans

    by the_alienist

    Harry, ssssh! You'll give them ideas!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 8:56:05 PM CDT

    Wait, what was harry rambling about for the first half?

    by dented helmet

    I was expecting him to actually relay one of these R-rated ideas.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 9:02:52 PM CDT

    Fuck it, dude...

    by roncattobraathen

    ...It's very un-dude.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 9:18:34 PM CDT

    I actually rate Minority Report

    by performingmonkey

    But there is some point close to the end of the movie when you simply stop caring about what's going on. It needed around 20 minutes taken off of it. A.I..... I still don't know what that movie is. Probably would have been a classic if Kubrick had got chance to direct it. The Kubrick influences are obvious in the first part of the movie, but then it trawls off into Spielberg drivel of the likes I thought we'd seen the back of in Hook. (if I hear the phrase 'blue fairy' I just want to die) I think a MAJOR problem was that the Berg hadn't actually penned anything since *checks out IMDB* since Poltergeist, and that was with 2 other dudes. It wasn't wise for him to pick up the pen for A.I., just like Lucas for the SW prequels, he should have NEVER been allowed to write and direct alone - there's no-one there to tell them when something (i.e. the Anakin/Padme 'love' story) is shit.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 9:26:00 PM CDT

    Minority Report wasnt soooo bad...

    by the_alienist

    It was enjoyable enough to watch. Im a huge Philip K. Dick fan (heard rumours about A Scanner Darkly being made into a film, which is interesting), and it certainly wasnt the worst adaptation of any of his work.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 9:36:05 PM CDT

    Fingers? Why do they even have hands? There arent supposed to be

    by supermonkey321

    I guess the "aliens" will look more like the ones in the uber shitty 50s move rather than their description in the amazing classic novel. They arent supposed to have hands and/or fingers, they are basically just brains with tentacles, mouths, and creepy big black eyes. Seems that's changed. They better not have one big tri-colored eye in the middle of their torso. That was the dumbest looking alien ever! Spielberg fucked the pooch by not setting this movie in Victorian England and basing it on the classic. All he did was steal the title. I'll still watch it cuz i am like all the other whores who continue to give Spielberg a chance even though he has been on a continuous sucking streak for years now, plus Tom Cruise is still fun to watch as always. Oh well, didnt i hear something about some independant studio doing a REAL WotW adaptation?? What ever happened to that?? Supermonkey out.

    Reply to Talkback

  • after having directed Minority Report, which was based on a short story by Philip K. Dick (who's know for his particular views on alien interference on this planet). Sure, he says that he has been playing with the idea of adapting H.G. Well's book for ages now, but I find it poignant that it has taken him this long to approach the subject from another perspective. And eventhough I consider Schindler's List the point in his career when he managed to establish himself officially as a "serious" director (i think he always was,), I find that he still remains an idealist, and no matter how hard he tries, he will never "understand" the themes that he approaches. I found that the most frustrating part of AI (which otherwise I consider one of his most intruiging films): Spielberg was not philosophical enough, while Kubrick gave it to him because he felt it was more up his alley (not so much less philosophical as more fantastical, considering the "child's perspective", though I wonder it is correct or not, let alone what Kubrick himself thought, considering that Philip K Dick wrote the short story, though i can't say since i haven't read it). My mind reels when imagining the conversations he must have had with Kubrick, who seems so much his opposite. Kubrick always brought fourth the ugly part of humanity. Spielberg camouflaged it. Maybe it's best to see the two together. Maybe then we can transcend their works. After all, perhaps Kubrick failed as well at what he was attempting to create, only he was more subtle in his construction that we are more willing to be accomodating . Still, I think that Spielberg's movies work best when he sets the events in his stories against an idealistic background of how humanity should be and act. Unfortunately, too often that winds up being his greatest flaw, since it is all too easy to go overboard in the idealism department (and why he ends up so often [too often, now that it has become a fashion] being criticized for being too PC and family friendly), which was not such a problem for Kubrick, whose movies have always been appreciated by smaller segments of the viewing public, and which always felt more detached and/or cynical, that any facile emotional characterizations felt innapropriate (and uncool, if you want to pass as a film connoiseur).Story wise, Spielberg always seems to focus on the fantasy and wonder (even mythical) element (Indiana Jones, Close Encounters, E.T., even Catch Me and The Terminal, while Schindler's is a rare ecxeption in that he was willing to tackle a more sensitive subject that had to be historically accurate, though I think that it was his focus on the extreme "otherwordliness" of the whole story, that made it feel like an epic fantasy, complete with a climactic, though bittersweet, resolution (which for most Jews was not the case). Kubrick, on the other hand, always seemed to chew on something that involved a process of dehumanization, while Dick dealt with "reality" (or lack of) and what makes one an "authentic human" (or not), which are subjects which definately touch. And now Spielberg comes with War of the Worlds, which from the looks of things, he's probably gonna draw some particularly poignant parallels with WWII and the holocaust, since how else would you describe what the aliens will be unleashing on us come summer? Considering the parallels, it was probably inevitable that he felt that he had to tie these events somehow. The thing is, what does Dick, or maybe even Kubrick have to do with all this? Maybe Eyes Wide Shut can be of some help, or maybe Philip K. Dick's own life, just like Kubrick's affiliations with "Fidelio: Journal of Poetry, Science and Statecraft" ("fidelio" also happened to be the secret password in EWS), or NASA and US government officials (like Kissinger, Bush, Rumsfeld and others, who all talked about this in a documentary about allegations of some kind of alien coverup, but was actually a hoax) that he worked with when making moon landing videos (in exchange of special cameras to use while making Barry Lyndon, which is a feast to the eyes thanks to these). Or maybe that's all bullshit. In the end, I get the feeling that, just like Philip K. Dick, they are/were struggling with something, maybe they even know something (or think they know something) that we don't, but either they can't get the courage and flat out tell us, or they are just unable to do so. That's not to say that what they what they believe in (or think they believe in) is correct or anything (not by a long shot), just that they might be trying to say something more than what they seem to be letting on (kinda like Dick, though he was more honest in divulging the reasoning behind his thinking, though maybe that's because he was just more doped and didn't give a fuck what other people thought, atleast not that much). Anyways, I forgot what my point was, so I think I'll just mosey on down to some other thread... (here's what Dick was talking about if you're interested: http://www.geocities.com/pkdlw/howtobuild.html)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 9:43:35 PM CDT

    supermonkey321- Spielberg screwed the pooch?...

    by the_alienist

    ... that'll be the R rated action Demented Helmet was asking after.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 10:01:49 PM CDT

    Apologies Dented Helmet

    by the_alienist

    I didnt mean to imply you were demented. i really should stop posting at 3AM, lol

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 10:42:43 PM CDT

    Every Article on the Cruise/Holmes Relationship Mentions Their U

    by flim springfield

    Am I a cynic?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 10:47:39 PM CDT

    Flim Springfield

    by the_alienist

    No- the world is *that* screwed up.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 10:53:56 PM CDT

    Minority Report

    by billemic

    I think the problem with "Minority Report" is that Ah-nold wasn't in it! That's right, the short story that inspired "Minority Report" was actually Phillip K. Dick's sequel to "Total Recall". Arnold was supposed to come back from Mars and establish a pre-cog crime fighting unit with the telepathic mutants. How awesome would that have been - Arnold in "Total Recall 2", directed by Steven Spielberg?! Instead they tried to make it stand on its own and throw in Tom Cruise - who is NOT gay, by the way. How could anyone even think that Cruise is gay - we're talking about the man who starred in "The Outsiders" and "Top Gun" for crying out loud - oh. Oh, wait. Nevermind...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 11:34:29 PM CDT

    It wasn't Dick's sequel

    by gheorghe zamfir

    Though Minority Report was floated as a sequel to Total Recall, with basically the idea you posted, that wasn't Dick's doing, Minority Report the actual story is its own, independent thing, and is no way connected to Total Recall, especially considering the actual short story Total Recal is based on, "We Can Remember It For You Wholesale," has no mutants, telepathic or otherwise.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 11:46:37 PM CDT

    Plot hole with Minority Report

    by johngalt2005

    Just how to Max Von Sydow set his plan into motion? Think about it, the prevision depends on Cruise reacting information he could only get from the prevision. It's the same old trick that's wrong with every movie with some sort of time shift---something from the future causing something in the past. Of course, it makes no sense. That said, it was a pretty good movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 29, 2005 11:50:17 PM CDT

    Thanks for clearing that up, Zamfir

    by billemic

    Although I slightly feel like an idiot now, I'm glad you cleared things up. I was kind of misinformed by the "Total Recall" commentary track, because Paul Verheoven and Arnold talk about "Minority Report" like it was written by Dick as a sequel. Still, I think the idea behind "Total Recall 2" would have been better than what we ended up with. People underestimate Arnold's acting abilities; I really enjoyed his performance in "Total Recall". He's much better than Tom Cruise has been of late - although when he wants to, Cruise can deliver ("Taps").

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2005 12:25:15 AM CDT

    What it means to be a "geek"

    by ribbons

    I'm sick of hearing that the only redeeming qualities of 'A.I.' can be attributed to Kubrick. Fucking would-be intellectuals who worship the man even though you don't know what you're talking about. Oh, and even though this is old news and I regret even having gotten riled up enough to respond, 'A.I.' ending with David praying to the Blue Fairy "over and over" would have been a horrible, horrible decision.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2005 12:30:00 AM CDT

    Also...

    by ribbons

    I also regret having been drawn into this, but here goes: you know how in the trailer for 'War of the Worlds' that guy asks Tom Cruise "You know what your problem is?" to which he responds "I know a couple of women who'd be happy to tell you." That's the type of semi-autobiographical line people play drinking games to, if you know what I mean.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2005 12:54:09 AM CDT

    I also enjoy Prodigal Son at the Main Point

    by brimacombe

    I love Incident with the violin and then the siren at the end. FUCKING BRILLIANT!!!!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2005 12:56:54 AM CDT

    Don't like it

    by moviemaniac-7

    I am looking forward to the movie, but this poster downright sucks balls.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Seriously.. that looks more like a book cover than a movie poster.. I think it might have something with the font style they chose for "War of the World." Do you think that's intentional?..

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2005 1:25:23 AM CDT

    Looking better

    by thefakemoriarty

    Just seems that the trailers rock, but the poster really never did anything for me. This one's okay, but oh well. It's still my number one movie of the summer.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2005 1:59:55 AM CDT

    So, this movie's tagline is TOM CRUISE BUT IN EVEN BIGGER LETTER

    by scrumdiddly

  • Apr 30, 2005 2:23:10 AM CDT

    abysstare

    by ribbons

    It might be a conscious thing. I was actually thinking the same thing when I saw it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2005 2:28:28 AM CDT

    IMPOTENT

    by taquito man

    That poster looks impotent

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2005 3:51:28 AM CDT

    Damn, I hoped the aliens would win this time...

    by lord_soth

    Yet another american surviving tale? That sounds rather uninteresting. Those coffee-junkie ILM workers deserve a better and refreshing storyline!

    Reply to Talkback

  • You know, when it's the last, there's no more. So either a bunch of pacific faggots survive or nobody!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2005 4:13:26 AM CDT

    PACIFIC FAGGOTS

    by miltonwaddams

    good one.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2005 4:55:40 AM CDT

    Aliens Felt Up My Balls!

    by squarejawhero

    Now, cough!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2005 8:01:49 AM CDT

    War of the World cups.

    by emeraldboy

    On imdb I was called a douche bag for writing that Spielberg must be privately hoping that Star Wars sucks.

    I had heard a rumour that this film was going to released next year, which has turned to be untrue.

    Beating Sith is going to be hard thing to do for any studio to do this summer.

    What wih its faust/frankenstein undertones and that iconinc image of Anakin as Darth Vader and the preceding Lord Vader/yes master/ riiissse dialogue.

    But I agree with the poster who said this looks like being a very good summer indeed.

    For me the film I most looking forward to is the depp/burton collaboration Charlie and the choclat factory.

    Trying to predict box office performances is really hard.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2005 9:48:50 AM CDT

    Martians with hands? where are the tentacles?

    by cuervojones

    War of the Worlds only in name

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2005 10:19:33 AM CDT

    Red weed

    by the_alienist

    at least it looks like the red weed will make an appearance

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2005 10:28:14 AM CDT

    You dudes have it all wrong with Cruise

    by lost in uranus

    He would never date that ugly ass kid Dokota Fanning. Cruise is just to hot a man for that fugly little girl. Plus doesnt everyone know that all great/good child actors/actresses (not the lame ones) get hit with the ugly stick mercilessly once they hit puberty?
    And all signs point to Dakota not being the exception. Now just to disturb you a little bit, I leave you with a perfect example:

    http://www.imdb.com/gallery/granitz/2166/Events/2166/HaleyJoelO_Cohen_1524438_400.jpg?path=pgallery&path_key=Osment,%20Haley%20Joel

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2005 2:38:25 PM CDT

    Fanning was cast for but one reason...

    by salvatoregravano

    It's impossible to find an adult female who isn't taller than Gnome Cruise.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2005 3:50:27 PM CDT

    Poster looks a lot like...

    by black satin 2

    I seen this poster on the old "War of the World" series. It even started off each episode so what's so new about it?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Excuse me while I jack off profusely. Sigh.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2005 5:28:17 PM CDT

    Minority Report wa not a sequel to Total Recall.

    by i dunno

    You're referring to all an author's shit being the same (in this case implanted or misread memoies -add Blade Runner to that-) to the stories being connected in some way.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2005 12:37:27 AM CDT

    I can't help but imagine

    by samsquanch

    the next image, of the alien trying to shake the globe off it's suction-cupped fingers, and the inevitable thup! thup! thup! sounds...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2005 1:42:31 AM CDT

    Fanning will ruin this...

    by bong

  • May 01, 2005 9:24:01 PM CDT

    Fanning is just sooo cute and adorable! Oh, I could just give h

    by hung-wei lo

    We all know she's going to steal the show! Reminds me of that Family Guy episode where Stewie's on that Cosby show about kids, and as soon as he starts saying stupid things, the audience adores him, and he realizes what a bunch of twats people are. Goddamn Fanning! Die you rotten little ... oh, I mean, look at how pwetty she is! Now back to the movie. I predict Katie Holmes will swoop in from the Batman Begins movie and save Cruise from the wreckage that will be WotW. On a side-note, we all know Holmes just a beard to disguise Tom's craving of sausage. Cruise likes it when women pitch it to him -- dirty sanchez style. But then again, who doesn --? Nevermind.

    Reply to Talkback

  • A more accurate summation of this movie might be difficult to acheive.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback