Logo

Cool News

New Japanese Trailer For WAR OF THE WORLDS Continues To Amaze!

Published at:  Apr 06, 2005 8:02:36 PM CDT

Hey folks, Harry here... I don't know about you, but I'm literally intoxicated by WAR OF THE WORLDS. Now, I've been this way most of my life. H.G. Wells, Orson Welles and George Pal are all patron saints due to their involvement in the WAR OF THE WORLDS mythology. I have the old Amazing Stories Pulps that featured those amazing war machines, I own George Pal's director's chair that he directed WAR OF THE WORLDS from... and just recently I picked up this original first LP edition of Welles' WAR OF THE WORLDS radio broadcast that panicked a nation autographed by Orson himself!












There's something so vitally immediate about the story of WAR OF THE WORLDS that perfectly suits it for adapting into any era. Watching the trailer campaign for Spielberg's version has been so much fun, but at the same time... utterly confusing. I am trying to figure out, just from the evidence we have... these trailers, interviews that folks involved have done, and little things that Quint remembered when I applied the hot irons to the soles of his feet. At no point in any of these trailers do we see any main character do anything, but care for their family and run. There's no, "Ok, what we have to do is explode the gas main under the war machine, throw it off balance then we can bring these buildings down atop it." No, there isn't any of that.



Somewhere along the way Spielberg said he wanted this to be the great American refugee film. It seems that what he has planned here is a survivors tale. The story of what it was like to live through the War of the Worlds. Steven has said he loves the immediacy of Welles' radio play, that 'You are there!' quality. This new Japanese trailer furthers that idea even further. When Cruise meets the Army - he's trying to talk them out of going in the direction of the invaders. This doesn't seem to be a hero's tale, but one of a father and his kids just trying to see another day. That's powerful stuff. This new trailer also shows a cylinder unscrewing. Goosebumps! Can not wait to see this sucker!




Check out the new Japanese trailer at DreamworksFansite.Com













    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Apr 06, 2005 8:08:22 PM CDT

    Dreamworksfansite.com refuses my connection!

    by gheorghe zamfir

    For shame!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 06, 2005 8:12:14 PM CDT

    meh

    by i speak jive

    Tom Cruise playing Tom Cruise. Exciting.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 06, 2005 8:13:10 PM CDT

    Pretty Freeaaking Cool!!!!

    by smurfeus maximus

    I liked it! I'm another big WOTW fan, all my life, so this looks good...or at least better than that WEIRD-ASS TV show loosely based on it in the 90's. Oh, and FIRST!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 06, 2005 8:13:40 PM CDT

    "'Star Wars' fans wait at wrong theater" (CNN)

    by hanfiredfirst

    "Star Wars" fans wait at wrong theater - Studio says film will open May 19 at ArcLight, not Chinese. LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- "Star Wars" fans will have to find the right theater before they can leave for the dark side. Seven weeks before its release, "Star Wars" fanatics started lining up outside Grauman's Chinese Theater for the sixth installment of the popular George Lucas movie series. The vigil began Saturday. But there's a problem: "Star Wars: Episode III -- Revenge of the Sith" won't be showing at the Hollywood landmark when the movie is released May 19. The studio, 20th Century Fox, opted instead to open the film a mile away at the ArcLight theater. Still, the resolute "Star Wars" die-hards aren't moving on. Beneath a makeshift awning, 11 people refused to relinquish their spots in line. "We've heard all this before," fan Sarah Sprague said, noting there were plenty of rumors in 1999 and 2002 that previous "Star Wars" movies weren't opening at the Chinese Theater. The rumors were false and the films were shown there. Fox and the ArcLight haven't completed their "Star Wars" deal, but executives on both sides told Daily Variety "Revenge of the Sith" will play at the ArcLight, not the Chinese. Yet Sprague was adamant the line wouldn't be moving to the ArcLight. "This is still the epicenter for 'Star Wars' fans. For the big iconic pictures of the 1970s, people lining up were here. They weren't at the Cinerama Dome (at the ArcLight)," Sprague said.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 06, 2005 8:20:53 PM CDT

    Got it

    by gheorghe zamfir

    Though I didn't see the cylinder unscrewing, unless we're talking about what looks like a jet engine in the house and I completely misinterpreted that scene.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 06, 2005 8:34:16 PM CDT

    Cylinder Unscrewing?

    by whiskeyknight

    That's a jet engine Harry.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 06, 2005 8:43:07 PM CDT

    Star Wars line?!

    by kampbell-kid

    What purpose was posting that old story thats been up on other sites much here in a War Of The Worlds TB? So what if they admittantly choose to stay lined at the Chinese theater. It's a tradition to them to line up for this film because no other films down the line will probably envoke such a need to do so ever again. No matter how bad these films got.. SW was the reason we got excited and lined up for movies in the first place. So tired of degenerates finding that story and posting it in some failed attempt at spreading humor in it because it's now chic/cool to hate SW. If they wern't there mainly for charity I can maybe understand the "teehee" and "haha" in that but it's not funny when it's about the Starlight Foundation. They even stated if they moved the line the charity wouldn't make as much money at the other theater which is the goal of a continuing charity.. to make more money than before. Anyway... as for this War Of The Worlds trailer. I love it, I like how they are keeping the invaders mysterious.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 06, 2005 9:23:09 PM CDT

    "Wait a minute....Bombs don't unscrew"

    by kongmonkey

    They made that sound from the Pal version by opening a mayonaisse jar inside a toilet.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 06, 2005 9:30:57 PM CDT

    Well, if ROTS ain't opening at Mann's then WOTW oughta.

    by hanfiredfirst

    But I still think ROTS should open at Mann's Chinese ... tradition and all.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 06, 2005 9:32:15 PM CDT

    you'd think Harry would also be interested in that OTHER WOTW fi

    by realdoublej

    being the great big fan he is. You know, the one being done in England and being completely faithful to the book. It also comes out before Spielberg's modern-day update where the Martians don't come from Mars. I'm looking forward to Spielberg's movie. But it looks more like a serious Independence Day remake than a War of The Worlds homage.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 06, 2005 9:44:21 PM CDT

    At first I thought that 'real' WOTW adaption was a joke....

    by gil-galad12

    turned out it wasn't. Too bad.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 06, 2005 10:23:24 PM CDT

    The alien vehicles look like the walkers from Halflife2 I bet

    by orionsangels

    No biggie

    Reply to Talkback

  • never seen that before!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 06, 2005 11:07:44 PM CDT

    RealDoubleJ

    by hattori_hanzo

    gotta link?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 06, 2005 11:14:15 PM CDT

    WOTW is actually pretty timely and relevant like all good sci-fi

    by johnnytremaine

    It'll probably be a huge hit, one of the reasons being that it, like the novel, taps into modern day anxieties arising from foreign, i.e. terrorist threats to economic worries, and channels it via a science fiction premise. It'll connect with people and the flick will likely have legs for a long summer run. Plus, the FX look awesome.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 06, 2005 11:25:08 PM CDT

    1988 Tv show

    by darth thoth

    Was the bomb. I was very young but I remember enjoying it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 06, 2005 11:33:34 PM CDT

    Like I died and went to heaven

    by asseyes

    Sweet! BRING MORE TRAILERS!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 12:11:18 AM CDT

    Doesn't do much for me...

    by jimmy_009

    ..this trailer looks a lot like the other ones. when are we going to see some alien stuff?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 12:21:59 AM CDT

    Rumor has it the new, final trailer (showing more stuff) goes ou

    by triumph poops!

    Which would make sense...attach the trailer to the second biggest event of the summer to the first biggest to maximize exposure. Not that WOTW needs it. I'll be there opening night! But I can't wait to see the full out full trailer that does show more...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 12:44:20 AM CDT

    Crap, I think I saw some smoke in that trailer.

    by jollysleeve

    Looks like I'll have to think of some other completely arbitrary reason to condemn the latest Spielberg film before it's even out of the editing room so that I can maintain my image of free-spirited independent thinker.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 1:45:58 AM CDT

    High hopes

    by billemic

    The somber tone of the advertisements for this film has it as my most anticipated movie of the summer. I'm hoping it doesn't turn out to be just another big-budget sci-fi flick but rather that Spielberg turns in a potent 9/11 allegory. Either way I'm there in the theatre, opening day. I can't wait.

    Reply to Talkback

  • ...this look's SMOKIN'.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 2:11:30 AM CDT

    another boring WOTW trailer...

    by kintar0

    all the fucking GRAVITAS! I can't fucking take it! Soooo fucking SOMBER. Whatever. Show me some aliens, goddamnit. Or some fucking spaceships. If you want my ass in the theater. show me something unique and exciting, not Tom Cruise portraying Tom Cruise in a baseball hat. Hmmm... big budget sc-fi flick in one hand... 9/11 allegory in the other... hmm... yeah, that's a touch choice.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 4:00:27 AM CDT

    I love Spielberg...

    by drworm2002

    ...He has never made a bad move. Not one. THis will be great. He brings heart to everything and I know he is kicking ass with this one too....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 4:25:35 AM CDT

    It's not that it looks *bad* or anything - it doesn't.

    by noriko takaya

    And I'll probably go see it, it's just that so far I've had nothing more from this film other than an overwhelming feeling of "meh." None of the trailers excite me, not one. It really does remind me too much of ID4, Armageddon and a number of other sci-fi/disaster films. Natrually I could be wrong; this wouldn't be the first case of good movie/bad trailer syndrome. But thus far Batman Begins, Revenge of the Sith, Kingdom of Heaven and even Fantastic Four all look like better bets as far as quality goes. Toppu o Nerae!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 5:09:41 AM CDT

    A movie...

    by gluecifer

    with Tom Cruise, Tom Cruise and Tom Cruise...starring Tom Cruise, guest star: Tom Cruise, featuring Tom Cruise's best actor friend: Tom Cruise...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 5:41:23 AM CDT

    OOOOOOOLLAAAAA

    by trevor goodchild

    Recently bought the Jeff wayne musical and I've not heard it since I was was wee. Incredibly atmospheric still and can't beat a bit of Prog. Anyone know what's happening about the animated version of that album? What I loved about Close Encounters was Richard Dreyfuss's everyman quality. The best scenes were just him struggling with his sanity. Spielberg seems to have disregarded this in his casting of Tom 'featuring me' Cruise.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 6:25:15 AM CDT

    apologies for lateness of linking

    by realdoublej

    that's what's gonna happen if I make this my last post before going to bed in the UK and a bit shocked to find a response. http://www.pendragonpictures.com/WOTWKEY.html

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 8:21:39 AM CDT

    I don't recognise one person in that other WoTW flick..

    by big_bubbaloola

    No stars= no or limited release. Coming soon to a bargin dvd bin near you!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 8:27:01 AM CDT

    Same

    by trevor goodchild

    I am looking forward to this but that really was not worth the effort. Especially me still being on dial up. There is no cylinder unscrewing at all, it's quite blatantly a jet engine. LET'S SEE SOME FUCKING TRIPODS.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 9:21:43 AM CDT

    How many shots do we need of someone

    by ingeld

    turning slowly and looking up and off camera in shock?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 10:34:20 AM CDT

    While I love me some Spielberg...

    by childe roland

    ...and even enjoyed 1941, there were many who panned the hell out of that WWII farce. And I think AI was about the most boring and self-absorbed futuristic robot movie I've ever seen. After the first two hours of being beaten over the head with the Pinnochio parallels via Blade Runner, I wanted to gouge my eyes out witha melon baller... and the movie just kept going! I despised iRobot, but I'd watch that again twice before even downloading ten minutes of AI. So when I hear Spielberg is going back to the Sci-Fi well with his Minority Report star (a very ho-hum movie given the potential promised by the premise), I get a little nervous. And none of the trailers or images I've seen so far have done anything to reassure me this will be anything but a very melodramatic ID4 without the "rah-rah" factor or Will Smith. On the plus side, maybe this exercise will cleanse Stevie's palette of the need to make sci-fi so heavily allegorical so he can loosen up and have some fun with the Transformers movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 11:59:29 AM CDT

    It was better than I expected -

    by monkey butler

    I'd written this off as a "serious ID4 ", as somebody said earlier, but Harry's right, this teaser at least gave the feeling of the characters being "refugees", rahter than "Tom CruiseTM learns to be a good father again in the face of tragedy, while also implausibly helping to save the human race and kill the aliens". Still a bit ambivalent, but it's pretty reassuring.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 12:29:03 PM CDT

    Don't Wanna See The Aliens

    by saluki

    As uneventful each of these new trailers are (it's really just the same trailer over and over), and as amped up that Spielberg is about his PEOPLE STARING AT THE CAMERA IN HORROR/SHOCK... This is fine for me. I want to be surprised AT the theater for a change. It should also be noted... Don't count on the aliens being from Mars in THIS version either.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 12:53:06 PM CDT

    1980's WOTW Show...

    by kid z

    ... SUCKED! HARD! Your childhood memories are faded and have fogged your thinking. The show also had the problem of changing the damn alien protagonists each season. "Well, thank god an even more powerful alien race came in and chased out all those damn martians... OOPS! Now they're killing all us humans, too? GODDAMMIT!" Interestingly, that bad Gene Roddenberry show from the 90's with all the aliens who looked like Buddha had the same problem in later seasons.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 4:23:32 PM CDT

    "if we had really had to fend off an attack from another, more t

    by stan the bat

    "...don't you think we probably would have put aside a lot of our petty differences and started to work together?" Aww, how sweet. But no, we wouldn't have. You watch too much TV, or believe too much of what you watch. A "real" WOTW scenario would end with various nations scrambling to adapt alien technology so they could be the first to ravage the globe with it. "Hey, we HAD to- otherwise somebody ELSE would have done it. We only wanted the heat ray as a DETERRENT... and fortunately we're a nation of GOOD people who will only use the alien heat ray again BAD people. Pre-emptively."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 4:58:34 PM CDT

    To appeal to the Japanese, they're handing out glasses that see

    by boris the blade

    Me so solly.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 5:57:29 PM CDT

    looks like ass

    by the_pissboy1

    Lets see Spielberg, Koepp, Fanning and Cruise. That's not exactly a group I associate with good movies. Koepp's written one good film (Trigger Effect) and Cruise has been in maybe 2 good movies in a 20+ years of making them. Spielberg has maybe one good film out of 10 made and fanning's never been in a good movie. My guess is, this movie will be ass.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 9:31:28 PM CDT

    Gimme a break. The people who post or recommend the Pendragon ve

    by triumph poops!

    Seriously, because I can't imagine ANYONE wanting to see such an utter piece of shit. Voicebox5's comment above that it looks like a low budget, bad reenactment film that you'd see in a museum, where I can picture then sitting on some bad padded stool facing a small TV monitor, was dead on target. Best quote about the Pendragon version I've EVER hear and will probably be the ONLY positive "blurb" that the Pendragon people will be able to use once their crap gets flushed away by the might that is Cruise and Speilberg!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 9:51:16 PM CDT

    what was the trailer music?

    by darthchase

    i really liked the music they used in that japanese trailer. does anyone recognize it? it doesn't sound like typical John Williams crap (yeah, i said it, john williams is crap. deal with it.)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 07, 2005 10:31:17 PM CDT

    trailer music

    by anomaly

    The music used in the second half of the trailer is the main theme of King Arthur by Hans Zimmer.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2005 12:02:47 AM CDT

    coolio, thanks

    by darthchase

    ah, that makes sense. i thought it sounded like Zimmer. thanks!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2005 2:06:53 AM CDT

    The aliens are'nt real people. The S-man is just pulling an M.

    by cherrycola

    The aliens are not real. Where does the trailer show the aliens? Now before you people start flaming me....A guy at work told me this and I'm just repeating it. It may be that the over active imagination of the tom cruise character and the people around him and in overdrive and this is a re-telling of the infamous orson wells radio stunt from many moons ago. I know, not gonna happen. But still, It would be pretty damn funny to find out it was all fake.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2005 6:37:39 AM CDT

    fuck you, I ain't no shill

    by realdoublej

    I'm more interested in a faithful adaptation, regardless if it hasn't got any "stars" in it, than yet another movie where we see modern-day earth get blown up. The reason why I posted about the Pendragon picture was I found it humorous that Harry calls himself such a WOTW fan and yet not a word about this other pic which has been in production longer than Spielberg's. It had to stop production after 9/11 because no one wanted movies where buildings blow up. People's comments about this being a "dramatic re-enactment" might hold up, this might be a film to go straight in the bargain DVD bin, but it has just as much chance as Spielberg's in either being good or being shit.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2005 6:47:49 AM CDT

    It ain't worth shit if it doesn't have a single werewolf in it.

    by uncle stan

  • Apr 08, 2005 9:53:38 AM CDT

    RealDoubleJ I agree with you.

    by ingeld

    It reveals a great deal about this site, when Harry will post about some kids doing an 8mm remake of Raiders of the Lost Ark but will not post a story about a film company making an adaptation of one of his favorite works. The obvious conclusion one can draw is that Harry is in bed (ugh what an image) with certain movie studios, directors, etc. AICN is just a PR tool posing as a geek website.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2005 10:37:12 AM CDT

    Public Access TV maybe...

    by realdoublej

    but the trailer still looked more credible than recent Sci-Fi Channel originals. Mansquito anyone?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2005 10:49:09 AM CDT

    @voicebox5

    by thebuffalo

    "Would we have even HAD a WWI or WWII? So maybe setting it in the present works best for the purpose of the story". Yes, unless you want to be faithfull to the book, which was first published in 1898. Before WWI and before WWII.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2005 11:07:05 AM CDT

    re: voicebox5

    by ingeld

    Voicebox, the Pendragon movie may well be crap, but AICN has reported on a lot of worse crap than that. It deserved a mention somewhere along the line on a site that is supposedly dedicated to all movies geeky. It just takes a situation like this to see how much a shill AICN has become. It reveals the emperor has no cloths. (Uggh, there's that image again.)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2005 4:49:50 PM CDT

    war of the worlds trailer

    by silverstorm

    the trailer reminds me of Dantes Peak.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback