Logo

Cool News

New International FANTASTIC FOUR Trailer Hits - It Sucks Less!

Published at:  Feb 18, 2005 3:18:07 AM CST

Hey folks, Harry here... The International Trailer doesn't do much other than have a bit of dialogue and much better music - and my overall feeling is... I like this one. This feels better. Still got a bad feeling, but I don't think it'll be that fantastic... but I'm hoping for it to kick all manners of ass. Here ya go...





20th Century Fox are proud to announce the internet release of the International Teaser Trailer, previously premiered on T4 last Sunday.



 
 

 

QuickTime



 

Small  




Medium




Large



 

Real Player



 





Small




Medium  




Large



 

Windows Media Player



 



Small   




Medium




Large



Harry Size



 


MARVEL’S FIRST FAMILY OF COMIC SUPERHEROES TAKE THE WORLD BY STORM AS THE LONGEST RUNNING COMIC BOOK SERIES IN HISTORY COMES TO THE BIG SCREEN.




 


REED RICHARDS/ MR FANTASTIC, WHO CAN ELONGATE HIS BODY; SUSAN STORM/ INVISIBLE WOMAN, WHO NOT ONLY CAN BECOME INVISIBLE AT WILL BUT CAN RENDER OTHER OBJECTS INVISIBLE; JOHNNY STORM/ HUMAN TORCH, WHO CAN SHOOT FIRE FROM HIS FINGER TIPS AND BEND FLAME ; AND BEN GRIMM/ THE THING, A HIDEOUSLY MISSHAPEN MONSTER WITH SUPERHUMAN STRENGTH, TOGETHER BATTLE THE EVIL DOCTOR DOOM.



 

 

Released: July 22



Distributor: 20th Century Fox



    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 3:23:58 AM CST

    Don't know what the frickin' problemo is !

    by dude_gimme_tabs

    This film looks as good as I expected it to be. I'll be there to see it. Plus it looks a thousand times better than Hellboy ! Shit, there's two hours of my life I won't be getting back.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 3:31:27 AM CST

    I have something to say:

    by monkeybrains

    Jessica Alba.......Thank you

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 3:32:02 AM CST

    I still have a bad feeling ...

    by xeniten

    Ben Grimm still looks bad, Dr Doom is still screwed up, Sue Storm still looks like a pin up model, Reed's stretching effects could have been better and Johnny's torch effect looks no better than it did in the Corman movie. This movie should have been made with more time and a larger budget and with far FAR greater respect to the source material. If it makes a profit at box fine, but it won't be the powerhouse that the Spiderman movies are. I don't see that happening.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 3:35:04 AM CST

    "From the makers of the hit FOX TV Movie, Generation X:

    by monkeybrains

    Will Hasselhoff be making an appearance as Nick Fury: Agent of Shield? I think that he would be fitting for this production

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 3:39:05 AM CST

    1st one was WAY better!!!

    by chalumpa

    Come on... I was not at all pumped up about this flick until the first trailer and them BLAMO it looked like it might rule... but of course this trailer then comes out and ruins my dreams. It again looks like shit and the thing sounds like shit.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Heh. Syndrome.

    Reply to Talkback

  • At least this one doesn't have the goofy "1 will be bad, 4 will be fantastic" thing going on, but that dialogue better not be indicative of the rest of the movie (to be fair, The Thing's line isn't really that bad, but the delivery seems wrong).

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 4:07:31 AM CST

    that was terrible

    by vekt0r

    The older one was better. This one was heavy on the cheese.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 4:11:01 AM CST

    Just as bad as the first

    by mr chuff

    There was nothing to enthral me in this trailer. Just the same as the last one - nothing. I REALLY do see this film bringing the whole comic-book-to-movie roll to a stand-still. I have NOTHING against FF as a concept and used to read it when I was younger. Not an avid reader but even I can tell that theres a lot in this trailer that either shouldnt be there or doesnt make sense. Like a talkbacker said a while ago when the first trailer came out - why doesnt Reed just stretch his whole body under the door? All they seem to have done in this new trailer is take off the Perfect Circle tune (which they probably noticed had the line repeating "go back to sleep" which isnt a good message to send out) and throw in a few new shots.... and not very good ones at that. Sorry FF fans, i feel for you (I'm a Bats fan and I had to endure Batman & Robin) but I dont see this one being too great for you.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 4:15:35 AM CST

    they should have gone with a different approach for a new traile

    by sirbiatchreturns

    because this one is pretty much the same as the last. It just doesn't help. Maybe they could have focused more on the dialogue and 'family' between characters, if it even exists in the movie. Since they're not really showing that, i'm getting a strong feeling that this movie will suck all round. The visuals are meh, nothing amazingly new or innovative. The truck smashing into the Thing is cool for a fleeting moment, as well as Sue deflecting Doom's attack. thats pretty much it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 4:27:13 AM CST

    jessica alba as the invisible girl- wuts the point?

    by dr.bulber

    how can you have a trailer for the fantastic four movie without thing saying its clobberin time?
    chiklis rules. mmmmmm alba-licious.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 4:58:35 AM CST

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    by dolmes

    The transmission sticks HAHAHAHA be still my aching sides.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 5:17:26 AM CST

    My... Brain... 'Urts!

    by charlie & tex

    Ben Grimm sounds like the Gumby from Monty Python's Flying Circusssssss. "It's... clobberin'... time! My... brain... 'urts!!!"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 6:13:14 AM CST

    Chiklis rules

    by gheorghe zamfir

    But not here, in agreement, The Thing sounds like crap, and is it just me or is there a shot there where his hands just look ridiculously disproportionate?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 6:50:20 AM CST

    Susan has a beer and cheats on Reed

    by largojr

    Can you feel it? That's the sensation of pure, raw, unadulterated, straight to DVD suckage. Its almost like being at the ocean and tasting the salty breeze. Mmmmmm.... almost as good as waking up in the morning and tasting metal.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 7:51:57 AM CST

    Why does Ben have downs syndrome?

    by burlivesleftnut

    My name is Corky, can I borrow your car? ACK... every time I start looking forward to this movie I encounter a bit of stupidity that makes me want to gouge SirBiatch's eyes out.

    Reply to Talkback

  • ...And there isn't a brand of detergent, in the Marvel Universe or in our own, that can cleanse the stench of suckage out of this mess. Also, regarding Ben's voice: in the godawful Hanna-Barbera cartoon from the 60s, the legendary Ted Cassidy ("Lurch" from the Addams Family T.V. show) did the voice of the Ever Lovin' Blue-Eyed Thing. He basically did the Lurch voice, only a little more coherent and with a Noo Yawk accent. SAINT KIRBY HIMSELF (yeah, you heard me, True Believers... a Jewish saint! you got a problem with that?) said that's how he imagined Ben's voice sounding. Having it any other way just indicates that the filmmakers didn't do their homework. Not that that's breaking news or anything. See ya in Hell, Fox!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 9:49:31 AM CST

    So is Jessica Alba ever fully invisible in this movie?

    by orionsangels

    You get the sense that in order to keep giving her screen time. The audience is allowed to see her, but as a clear faded image. It's kinda like what they did with Chevy Chase in memoirs, except you could fully see Chase.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 10:30:12 AM CST

    Sucks Only Marginally Less...

    by boxclocke

    Fox has done it again, those crazy so-and-so's.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 10:31:11 AM CST

    "The Transmission Sticks!" "...Not a problem."

    by hipcheck13

    ...not a great trailer, but that does sound like the ever lovin' blue-eyed Thing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 10:43:31 AM CST

    Neither of the trailers...

    by childe roland

    ...have filled me with the same fire of desire that both Spiderman movie trailers did... or that the Batman Begins Superbowl spot did... or even that the Star Wars Episode II trailer did. But that doesn't mean the movie's automatically going to suck. If I can give George Lucy another opportunity to pull the football away before I can kick it with his Episode II, I can definitely shell out a few bucks to see this thing in its entirety before I procalim it shit. Oh... and Burl: doesn't just waking up in the morning make you want to poke out Biatch's eyes and piss in his ocular cavities?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 10:43:35 AM CST

    Poo

    by tarontine

    It reeks of being a Daredevil level of flick. The person who said in a prior talkbalk Lost in Space was right on, I think. Some things cool... others look like they might be weak, but hard to tell. A few good actors, a few not... Alba is filling in for Matt LeBlanc in this one. Her line at the dinner table sound like she is an audition class reading for a detergent commercial. I think the only people that are happy to see her in this movie are guys who think she is smokin' hot. She is, but I can buy maxim for that. Or have her be Johnny Storm's girlfriend instead of that hottie from Entertainment Tonight. On the other side, sure... Alba looks cool when the grits her teeth and fires a force blast. But Hayden Christensen looked pretty cool when he gritted his teeth and zipped across Tatooine on his speeder bike in the Episode II trailer. And we all know how that turned out. I think Chiklis sounds fine when he takes the car. I think The Thing's voice is one of those things where he is not "human" and everyone has some unique but vague idea in their head of what he should sound like. To suddenly have a concrete voice attached to him, no matter how it sounds, is going to be jarring. And any good FF fan's stomach is churning over Doc Doom having his metal exterior grow out of his skin from the cosmic storm. Egad! Some change is okay to make a movie compact. Fine, put him on the space ship. But how hard is it to have him horrifically burned and wear the armor to constantly cool his skin that will forever burn from the fire of the cosmic storm? Or have the armor be a device he is using to harness the power of the cosmic storm and it becomes fused to his body. So, many comic book style rationales, but they opted for Power Rangers.

    Harry was dead on when he suggested this movie should be designed to look like (although it bombed) Down With Love. Capturing that early 60's world with a contemporary twist. Spider-man and Hulk and others are great to make in the now, but if there ever was a comic to make a ripe and pulpy period piece, it was FF.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 10:44:17 AM CST

    Neither of the trailers...

    by childe roland

    ...have filled me with the same fire of desire that both Spiderman movie trailers did... or that the Batman Begins Superbowl spot did... or even that the Star Wars Episode II trailer did. But that doesn't mean the movie's automatically going to suck. If I can give George Lucy another opportunity to pull the football away before I can kick it with his Episode II, I can definitely shell out a few bucks to see this thing in its entirety before I procalim it shit. Oh... and Burl: doesn't just waking up in the morning make you want to poke out Biatch's eyes and piss in his ocular cavities?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 10:45:53 AM CST

    Stupid new forum...

    by childe roland

    ...made me repeat myself. I HATE having to repeat myself. It just irks me to no end when I have to say or type the same thing over and over again. It's so redundant.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 11:08:40 AM CST

    Gah...

    by purgatori

    I rest my case. If this is the new and improved less suckage trailer for the international release..well there you go. And bite me Batman haters. Every trailer for that movie has just gotten better with each new one released. That movie is going to rock because they actually CARE about what they are doing. Plus, Patrick Bateman as Batman? Fucking Amercian Psycho in a cape baby...whoo hooo. "What do you think about Phil Collins as an artist Joker? I must say his earlier work is quite good."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 11:35:45 AM CST

    "Look at me!" "I can't!"

    by empyreal0

    the line had me laughing. mainly the delivery. still looks like a shitty movie, but maybe it will be fun.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 11:37:23 AM CST

    oh, and does everyone agree the new layout's digusting?

    by empyreal0

  • Feb 18, 2005 11:44:20 AM CST

    Suckage

    by kid z

    I agree.... either something sucks, or not. Suckage is suckage, there are no degrees of suckage. In the words of the immortal Beavis and Butt-Head: "Like, the whole world is like divided between stuff that sucks and stuff that's cool." Anything having to do with this misguided FF project is firmly ensconced on the "Suck Side"!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 11:52:42 AM CST

    There are rumors of a live-action Venture Bros. film, so don't g

    by declan_swartz

    http://larryhovis.net/venturecompound/episode007.htm

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 11:54:53 AM CST

    Isn't the Gregorian chant background music getting really old?

    by cookylamoo

    By all rights Carl Orff should more more famous than John Williams.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 11:57:21 AM CST

    Chicklis was the one member of the cast that the nerds were happ

    by barry egan

  • Feb 18, 2005 12:23:10 PM CST

    Chiklis fan but...

    by ecupirate71

    They should have cast Bob "The Beast" Sapp the K1 fighter. He was in the running and is massive, bigger than the comic version of the Thing, but better build.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 12:30:53 PM CST

    And the FF has never been cheesy when?

    by terry_1978

    The whole damn concept of the Four is that they are in fact a family of heroes, and a lot of their dialogue, even in Ultimate, is cheesy, goofy stuff. You expect them to be on fuckin' downers the whole while, a la Bats and the new Spidey?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 1:11:51 PM CST

    Still Sucks

    by virtual satyr

    Nuff Said

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 1:30:15 PM CST

    I have not given up hope yet

    by spectrebeeyatch

    This movie could be a lot of fun if done right. I think the two joke lines in the trailer worked real well. If they balance that with a bad ass Dr. Doom who actually is a threat to someone. I didn't like the first Spider-man as much as I should of becaus I thought the Green Goblin was a stupid bad guy in the movie. Doc Ock was much better and the movie was better, the villian has a big part in how good a comic book movie is. So if its funny and there are some big fights between the 4 and Doom and I'll be happy

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 1:39:20 PM CST

    The Thing-Sound

    by the+hitman

    My main concern is really the sound (or lack there of) when Thing does his thing. He's made of orange frickin' rock, yet when he moves to flip the old lady's car, he moves silently. That's a big problem.

    I'm not sold on them passing on a CGI version of the Thing anyway. He should be frickin' huge (Hulk size), not Chilkis sized with rocks glued on.

    I'm still looking forward to the film and will see it opening weekend.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 3:09:16 PM CST

    They just don't care

    by abelman007

    The people making this are more ensconced with making a profit than a cool FF movie. When you look at the best superhero movies, they all had someone familiar and caring behind them. Sam Raimi was a huge Spider-Man fan. Both those movies were great - from a fan and non-fan's perspective.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 3:19:44 PM CST

    Chill, Frankie baby.

    by childe roland

    Even if this movie does end up sucking the longest of hard ones (and it very well might), it doesn't mean you'll NEVER get a good FF movie. You'll just have to wait a few years until someone decides to remake it. And with the frequency of remakes in Hollywood ever increasing, there's a good chance this could be up against its own remake in the third week of its release.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 3:31:04 PM CST

    tarontine, thanks for two things:

    by thewoodman

    1) Thanks for remembering my rant comparing this to the "Lost in Space" movie a few articles back... that was some of my finest work. 2) Thanks for pointing out that this should have been a period piece set in the 60s. "The Incredibles" was set in the 60s (or at least in a vaguely 60s-like Silver Age), and that doesn't appear to have hurt it at the box office. I'm the biggest F.F. fan around, but let's face it, folks... this is kind of an inherently silly concept here. The guy calls himself "Mister Fantastic", his best friend is a talking pile of bright orange rocks, and they face off against bad guys with names like "Doctor Doom" and "Galactus". The worst possible way to handle the movie would be to present it dead-seriously and filled with "attitude"... so of course that's exactly what they did. A more light-hearted approach, set in the now distant past, would have freed them up to explore all sorts of ridiculous & implausible stuff that could've made this the most entertaining superhero franchise ever... but, no. See ya in Hell. Fox!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 5:18:03 PM CST

    Sweet

    by steve zodiac

    Yep, I'm looking forward for this one.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 5:28:27 PM CST

    CAN WE PLEASE LEAVE CARS ALONE!?

    by pushthebutton

    Is it a rule in every comic book movie to throw a car or stop it dead in its tracks? It's not interesting anymore.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 5:33:37 PM CST

    Alex(s) Was Here

    by iloveewksandjjar

    Hmm- I actually enjoyed the last trailer better. It was sleeker, faster, and just plain cooler. More action, less stupid dialouge, and call me crazy- but I actually preffered the music of the former.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 5:37:52 PM CST

    no subject

    by cookylamoo

    Is flattening out his hand all Mr. Fantastic does in this film? Oh, Elastigirl, where are you?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 8:53:02 PM CST

    Fantastic Four Light!

    by largojr

    Now with less suckage. All the hours of a real movie, and NONE of the quality! Also available with 50% more CHEESE.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 9:36:33 PM CST

    Well...it's not the end of the world

    by ribbons

    The trailer's kind of lame, but I get the sense that some of you are preparing to light cars on fire after watching it. It is what it is, and it might be a bad movie, but it's kind of hard to tell at this point (same goes for the people who seem to think it's going to garner effusive praise; if I were a betting man, I'd cast my lot with the pessimists). As for the 'Lost in Space' comparison being "right on," I'd have to say you're "dead wrong." Futuristic looking spacesuits and a futuristic looking spaceship that'll be in the movie for all of 10 minutes. Oh, and there's a family in it too. Yeah. That's a real prescient observation.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 9:38:51 PM CST

    "Isn't the Gregorian chant background music getting really old?"

    by voice o. reason

  • Feb 18, 2005 10:38:11 PM CST

    "I lie for only you.... And I lie well..."

    by iloveewksandjjar

    "Isn't the Gregorian chant background music getting really old?"

    Yes, it's definitely cliched. But it works, dammit!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 18, 2005 10:50:36 PM CST

    Naomi Watts woulda been a better Invisible Girl.

    by hanfiredfirst

    Umm, Invisible Woman.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 19, 2005 1:16:33 AM CST

    Other was MUCH better

    by chamberfreak

    Sorry Harry but the original domestic one was a hell of a lot better even though there isn't a massive difference. First off APC's "Counting Bodies" was, by far, better music for the trailer. It didn't have the generic comic book movie feel with that music playing. While I do have my doubts about the movie since I was disappointed in the Hulk (Fantastic Four and The Hulk were my two favorite comics with Ghost Rider a close third) I have to say the domestic teaser was the better of the two shown.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 19, 2005 1:36:05 AM CST

    I heard from someone on the inside...

    by negasonic

    ...that everyone working on this film knew it was a pile of crap from the beginning, they barely had a script, the production was rushed, the whole thing was a disaster from the word go. The studio just made them poo it out as fast as they could. Basically the studio geniuses think that superheroes are this year's "thing", and they have to get as many of these turds out as they can right now, before the fad dies down. Basically at this point it's next to impossible for a superhero movie to be any good (excepting Bats and Superman, which were in development for a long time). My theory is that the reason Spidey and X-Men were good is that they were developed at a time when nobody cared about superhero properties. Marvel was in chapter 11 and the rights could be had for a song. Therefore the executives pretty much left Singer and Raimi alone. Now that those films hit big, every superhero film is micromanaged to death and anyone who isn't already a proven commodity doesn't stand a chance of getting any kind of a creative vision out there. Sad, ain't it?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sorry, guys, I hate the redesign. You fixed something that wasn't broke.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 19, 2005 4:16:48 AM CST

    As much as i hate to pile on an already depressing subject....

    by the founder

    I gotta ssay that this film looks so d@mn mediocre. Nothing i've seen of this movie has moved my spirits. I hate to prejudge a movie before it's released, and i do think the costumes looks good, but the Thing just isn't up to snuff period. I don't guys about this one. I loved the F4 more then the Xmen, but it wouldn't surprise me if this fails.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 19, 2005 7:06:12 AM CST

    Ben's voice

    by clark_kent

    Ben's voice in the 60's cartoon was done by Paul Frees (narrator of "George of the Jungle"), not Ted Cassidy ("Lurch").

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 19, 2005 10:44:16 AM CST

    Exp 626. I wasn't blaming the folks in the trenches...

    by negasonic

    ...I was blaming the folks in charge. I'm sure the creative people are busting their fucking asses.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 19, 2005 10:59:34 AM CST

    ''This feels better.''

    by writhe

    No, Harry, it doesn't. Thanks for being a pal, but in the future please refrain from reviewing movie trailers while doped up on pain meds.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 19, 2005 11:06:53 AM CST

    Didn't like the trailer

    by archduke_chocula

    Looks bad, which is sorta no surprise when the director is the guy who made Taxi.....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 19, 2005 12:15:34 PM CST

    Looks better

    by blackbeltjones

    Why is it that the international trailers for films look thousands of times better than the USA versions. They took out the whole 1 will be bad part which makes the film better, and actually introduces the characters for people that may not know who The Fantastic Four are. If they get rid of the organic metal with Doom, it would be a huge improvement, but I can live with than. And lumpy Thing disappointed me at first, but then I remembered that he was lumpy in the beginning. Was not until the 70's that he solidified a bit.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 19, 2005 12:42:28 PM CST

    Kirby perfected The Thing's appearance by the Galactus Trilogy/T

    by dog of mystery

    ... and I hope that if there's a sequel (with The Silver Surfer, naturally) the film-makers will evolve Ben's look more in this direction. But then The Thing's a very cartoony looking character, and a ultra-faithful translation would probably not work in live-action.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 19, 2005 12:57:14 PM CST

    I think this actually might be fun!

    by coen_fan

    Sure, it definitely won't be this year's Spider-man 2, but I could definitely enjoy this. Unless, of course, it turns out to be this year's Catwoman.

    Reply to Talkback

  • There is nothing about this movie that looks all that bad apart from the Thing, who looks, moves and sounds like a spongey orange turd. Fuck you, Chiklis, you tiny bastard.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 19, 2005 4:15:03 PM CST

    A Perfect Circle's Music Was Better

    by zackyh

    The remix of Pet or Counting Bodies Like Sheep To The Rhythm of the War Drums was better music than this. In the latest that's the same music that's in a million different trailers anyway.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 19, 2005 4:19:04 PM CST

    They're really doing a terrible job of selling this...

    by bamf

    It looks so cheesy.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 19, 2005 10:30:16 PM CST

    Why didn't they tell us this was going to be a comedy?

    by sofalord

    'Nuff Said

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 20, 2005 12:17:36 AM CST

    it's the friggin' FF4!!

    by cracker_thompson

    For cripes sakes...The Fantastic Four is supposed to be campy and cheese-ball. When they're all picking out names in the first comic book The Thing looks around and after some dweeb calls himself MR. FANTACSTIC and say, "well I guess you can just call me the Thing." WTF? That just screams the director of Taxi...ugh, I'm glad I didn't pay for THAT movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 20, 2005 3:26:45 AM CST

    Roger Corman's version looks like a masterpiece

    by capt rosenbalm

    God, this looks horrible. I'm afraid that this will be the movie that ends the good superhero movie run we've been having. Oh well, it was fun while it lasted.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 20, 2005 8:46:35 AM CST

    I like it. I like it a lot

    by dentity2000

    Hello bimbo!!
    :)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 20, 2005 8:47:36 AM CST

    and then there was the bandwidth problem

    by mooniewawee

    ok ok ok ok o ko k okok

    Reply to Talkback

  • I truly hate bashing a movie based on a teaser, but nothing i've seen or heard about this project fills me with any hope that this movie will be good. I hope to god FOX makes me eat my words, but as of right now this movie looks like crap. If this movie is good, then FOX is doing a d@mn piss porr job of showing the goodness.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 20, 2005 8:50:30 PM CST

    Ed Asner should be the voice of the Thing

    by crimson dynamo

    He does sound like crap, although I dig the hell out of him flipping that car

    Reply to Talkback

  • I have to say, I am more of a traditionalist fan as opposed to a fan of the Ultimate Comic line. I would have loved to have seeb a retro version of the Fantastic Four done, but oh well. I find it quite odd that I am favoring Corman's movie what with the repulsive Jeweller and his Bob Fosse rejects gang and the overacting Dr. Doom who had a really nice looking costume I might add, as opposed top this Big Budget Marvel produced offering. As much as I like Michael Chiklis and thought he'd be great for Thing, whoever told him to deliver his lines like he has chronic constipation should be shot.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 21, 2005 9:07:49 PM CST

    It seems like a reversal in the wind

    by hamo455

    DC might rule this year with its adaptations and carry that through to next year, while Marvel may go down the tubes, if this is as bad as predicted and X3 gets rushed through at the expense of quality.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback