Ain't It Cool News (www.aintitcool.com)
Movie News

Early Script Review Of Scorsese

Hi, everyone. "Moriarty" here with some Rumblings From The Lab...

There are very few remakes that get me really excited from the moment they’re announced, but this is one of them. It just seems like a perfect match of material and director, and the cast they’ve put together is incredible. This is the first script review we’ve had for the piece, and it’s got me interested enough that I’m going to have to track it down for m’self. Check this out:

Hey Harry, just got the script for The Departed by William Monaham (based on Hong Kong’s highest grosser of 2002, Infernal Affairs) and thought you might like a bit of review and a quick synopsis.

Executive producers are Roy Lee and Doug Davison. Jennifer Aniston, Brad Grey, Brad Pitt and Martin Scorsese are producers for Warner Bros./ Miramax. Martin Scorsese will direct.

The cast is loaded. Leonardo DiCaprio is set to play Billy, Matt Damon as Colin, and Jack Nicholson is signed for Costello.

I should start off by saying that I did not see Infernal Affairs, though I know the reviews were quite good. I’m judging the script as is.

Spoilers follow, though I’ll try not to reveal the twists towards the end.

The script opens thirty some-odd years ago. We get a bit of a back story of the three main players, Costello, Billy and Colin. Costello is in his prime. He runs his area of Boston--everyone fears him. You see a 14-year-old Colin watch as Costello comes into a grocery store (a front for a bookie operation) to pick up his back end. Costello grabs a bunch of things off the shelf and drops them into a bag for Colin. You get the sense that Colin looks up to him. At the same time Costello’s not your classic one-dimensional gangster--this guy’s smart and affable. He demands respect. Next you get Billy’s run-in with Costello. Billy’s father is an honest man, working baggage down at the airport. He refuses to work for Costello. Billy watches it all unfold. The last scene from the past is Costello executing a man down by the shore. Cut to present day. We get a quick look at Colin’s and Billy’s paths to law-enforcement. Both are in state police. Immediately we learn of a relationship between Colin and Costello, as Costello watches him graduate the academy behind the wheel of an Oldsmobile. Next we see Colin, who has already passed the detective exam, ushered into the Organized Crime Unit by Captain Queenan and Dignan (two of my favorite characters). He’s got the perfect position for a mole. Next is Billy’s interview with the same to men. It goes a bit differently. The two grill him, picking up on family connections to the mob, anger issues, etc. Finally, they assign him as an undercover agent--a position that only the two of them will know exist. They need to bring Costello down, and they’re certain there’s a mole within OCU.

The mid-section of the movie plays out reasonably predictable, much like Donnie Brasco. Billy gets Costello to trust him, not by being a usual grunt, but by being intelligent and fiercely violent. DiCaprio is going to get some brutal scenes in this movie. He’s written as a fighter, and in one scene, as he beats the living crap out of two gangsters, he actually breaks his hand as he snaps one of their jaws.

Colin on the other hand works his way up the totem pole quickly, finally landing head of Internal Affairs over OCU. He’s basically promoted to find himself.

For Costello it’s different. He knows there’s a mole within his organization, and he wants Colin to find out who it is. He’s supporting Colin’s lifestyle, and you get the hint that Colin’s where he is because, and only because of Costello (that’s not to say he isn’t intelligent, he is). There’s also an unfortunate subplot having to do with stolen micro-chips which Costello’s crew jacked, which doesn’t really go anywhere, and truthfully, doesn’t seem to work at all.

One of my favorite things about the script is that Colin and Billy never meet each other, let alone have a scene with each other until the last 20-some-odd minutes of the screenplay. I have a feeling it’s going to be strange, yet oddly compelling to not see the two stars in the same scene, yet knowing that their jobs are to find each other (one would lead to an arrest, the other, a death).

Another interesting aspect of the screenplay is Madeleine, OCU’s shrink and Colin’s fiancée (they meet each other early on in the script). Other than Queenan, Dignan and Costello she’s the only character who directly connects Billy to Colin, and it’s during her sessions with the two that we learn how similar their personalities are (Colin and Billy, respectively). Other than their upbringings, both are intelligent, street smart, and in way over their heads. On another note, she also prescribes Valium to Billy who’s having more and more frequent bursts of panic-attacks while on the job.

I have no doubt Nicholson will be fantastic as Costello. What I think he’ll bring to the character is a sense of likeability that many classic mobsters often lack. Yes, Costello’s murderer, but he’s also charismatic as hell. Nicholson’s a great choice.

I went into this script already knowing who was cast as Billy and who was cast as Colin, and I came out of it wanting their roles reversed. Personally I’ve had enough of DiCaprio cast as the “good-guy.” I would have loved to see him as the sleazy Colin, constantly trying to wiggle his way out one situation, climbing higher and higher through the ranks of the OCU. With Damon it’s the exact opposite. I loved him in the Bourne Supremacy, and some his fight scenes in that film were brutally fantastic. It’s he who I see shooting out a guy’s knee, not DiCaprio. And yes, we’ve also already seen Damon as the weasel (Talented Mr. Ripley, mumbling Linus in Ocean’s 11, 12). Obviously the film’s already been cast, but personally I’m starting to like hard-assed Damon over pussy Damon.

The script on its own reads well, with strong, grounded dialogue. On occasion it runs into stilted patches (what scripts don’t?) but I have no doubt the actors will be able to work around them. My only qualm is when the script sacrifices areas of character development for a plot-twist. Personally, I’d take a movie like Mystic River which relies mostly on character development instead of movie which relies on kitschy plot-devices any day of the week. Another frustrating aspect is that the script manages to kill-off almost every character (won’t say who) which leaves little emotional resonance with the reader (and I assume it will be the same with the viewer as well). I’d rather leave some of the characters alive, and let the reader find out how they pick up the pieces, or at least imagine how they would, then leave us with a dead-end.

Overall the script is strong, with the exception of the unnecessary micro-chip subplot, and I have no doubt it will translate to screen honorably with Scorsese at the helm. The film continues Scorsese’s love-affair with DiCaprio as the unheralded hero, and since the script reads fast, I assume he might be able to keep this one under three hours. I’m not sure if it’s Oscar-caliber (if that is indeed what Miramax’s looking for), but it’ll be a great, entertaining film no matter what.

Hope you’re feeling better Harry and if you use this,

PVIII

Thanks, man. I’m sure Harry appreciates the continued well wishes from everybody, and I appreciate the review.

"Moriarty" out.





Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • Feb. 13, 2005, 9:46 p.m. CST

    Remakes rock!

    by Setion_Pirate

    Or not. But if I had to put faith in someone...

  • Feb. 13, 2005, 10:22 p.m. CST

    Does sound good...

    by viola123

    Sounds great actually. I really want this to be awesome, and so I'll have my fingers crossed. I know Marty will tribute "Infernal Affairs". It's going to be cool and I love it that he and Leonardo are always working together. Why mess with such success. He brings wonderful acting out of all his actions; Leo is no exception. I hope Harry feels better too. :)

  • Feb. 13, 2005, 10:26 p.m. CST

    Oh brother

    by Phloton

    So are we to assume the Billy's father is executed by The Joker? The typical Hollywood studio contrivance is that everyone has to be conected somehow, otherwise characters have no motivation for doing what they do to each other. It's crap. Infernal Affairs isn't set up that way. I wonder if they'll keep the same ending (not the alternate ending) as the original, that would be a shock from a studio film.

  • Feb. 13, 2005, 10:28 p.m. CST

    Scorses uses DiCaprio because he gets expensive pictures green-l

    by Ralph Cifaretto

    DiCaprio was very good in "Gangs of NY," it's just too bad the movie didn't need that character or that plotline. Got the film made though, didn't it?

  • Feb. 13, 2005, 10:59 p.m. CST

    WATCH INFERNAL AFFAIRS!!

    by Gimmemyp'wrd!

    I saw the first one, and dropped $80 on the trilogy. Part two is the best, I feel. You guys need to see this shit.

  • Feb. 13, 2005, 11:02 p.m. CST

    Hyperion?

    by Thing-Fish

    Whatever happened to Scorcese doing "Hyperion"?

  • Feb. 13, 2005, 11:47 p.m. CST

    You lost me when . . .

    by mascan

    The opening takes place 30 years ago, and Matt Damon's character was 14? Meaning that Matt Damon's going to be playing 44? Not buying it.

  • Feb. 13, 2005, 11:53 p.m. CST

    Infernal Affairs

    by Mafu

    Based on hype I read on this site, I bought the DVD of "Infernal Affairs" that was released last December. I wanted to like the film, but ultimately I just thought it was silly. I know what the director was going for, but he didn't make it happen, in my opinion. Scorcese will hopefully add some realism and drama to the hackneyed Asian film, and Matt Damon in any movie adds credibility. You go, Martin.

  • Feb. 14, 2005, 12:13 a.m. CST

    Matt Damon is, like, 34 now.

    by Osmosis Jones

    Playing a decade older shouldn't be too difficult, especially with some makeup assistance. MATT DAMON!

  • Feb. 14, 2005, 12:26 a.m. CST

    I agree with this guy... the leads should be reversed

    by Wonder Man

    Damon in the Tony Leung role would rock out loud -- he's got the likeability and, as he proved in the Bourne films, he can be a badass -- and DiCaprio would be scarily perfect in the Andy Lau role; he's got that lean, devious and seductive look that Lau brought to the original... hell, he even scowls like him. Other than that, it's all shaping up to be UNASSAILABLY cool. The Great Marty, Leo, Matt D... and Jack Nicholson playing the American version of 'Sam': GENIUS! The Boston location is an inspired choice; Beantown always brings the atmosphere. Scorsese doing a high-powered cop flick in Boston... just gets me all tingly in unmentionable places...

  • Feb. 14, 2005, 12:30 a.m. CST

    Off the topic, it's the return of our beloved Earl Dittman!

    by FrankDrebin

    The tv spot for "Son Of The Mask" is filled with raves--all from one man: Earl Dittman of Wireless Magazine. In case you don't know, there is no Wireless Magazine, and Earl Dittman publishes no reviews. What he does is fax a few sentences of praise to the studio, in case they can't get any positive comments from a real critic. Sometimes Earl has even seen the movie. He disappeared for a while, so I was worried that he had a karmic mishap.

  • Feb. 14, 2005, 1:48 a.m. CST

    mascan

    by Arnzilla

    You're assuming "present day" means 2005. Maybe the film plays out in the mid-90s.

  • Feb. 14, 2005, 2:14 a.m. CST

    Great Casting

    by pomattovich

    I loved Infernal Affairs and the thought of DeCaprio, Damon, and Nicolson in these roles excites me to no end. This has the potential of being perhaps the best crime movie since Heat. Can't wait.

  • Feb. 14, 2005, 3:31 a.m. CST

    The original is a taut 90 odd mins not a flabby 3 hrs!

    by elab49

    Which says all you need to know about how dodgy the remake currently looks. Patchy at times indeed.

  • Feb. 14, 2005, 3:38 a.m. CST

    elab49

    by Arnzilla

    I think the writer was only referring to Scorsese's last two films being close to three hours.

  • Feb. 14, 2005, 3:50 a.m. CST

    INFERNAL AFFAIRS was good, but not the second coming everyone ma

    by Cash Bailey

  • Feb. 14, 2005, 8:43 a.m. CST

    movie takes place in 1995

    by bluelou_boyle

    pretty sure i read that somewhere (AICN ?) looks good

  • Feb. 14, 2005, 10:52 a.m. CST

    Sorry, I thought Aviator really sucked

    by BigTuna

    It's so damn boring and tells us nothing about who Hughes really what. Nice to look at and well acted but the story sucked. A very overrated movie.

  • Feb. 14, 2005, 11:23 a.m. CST

    I can't see Matt Damon in the Andy Lau role...

    by Monkey_King

    Brad Pitt would've been better. DiCaprio makes a shitty Tony Leung.

  • Feb. 14, 2005, 1:39 p.m. CST

    Remaking asian films.

    by Shigeru

    Is Hollywood finally getting that excellent films come out of asia a lot?? Well with the announcement (over at chud) that scorsese is remaking a KURASAWA film next, I have to cry BS. Fuck remaking asian movies. Think up your own ideas. But if this shoots in Boston I am stalking Marty.

  • Feb. 14, 2005, 1:44 p.m. CST

    I agree that this is a great combo of filmmaker and material. W

    by Barry Egan

    If the start shooting next month, will this come out in December?

  • Feb. 14, 2005, 2:43 p.m. CST

    Do you think Asian filmmakers are dying to remake "Are we there

    by Garbageman33

    Fortunately, there's already an Infernal Affairs II. Otherwise, if The Departed went over really well, they might have to come up with their own goddamn idea for a sequel.

  • Feb. 14, 2005, 4:26 p.m. CST

    Phloton is so right-on

    by eraser_x

    Why does hollywood think that every character should have a motivation that can be neatly traced back to a single defining event from their past?! It's ridiculous! I mean, even "the Waterboy" was savvy enough to make fun of that lame convention by having the Waterboy's father supposedly dying of thirst <wink> <wink>. If Scorcese's movie really does have Billy's father killed by "the Joker", as seems likely, then we can say that even Adam Sandler is too refined to embrace Scorcese's schtik.

  • Feb. 14, 2005, 5:14 p.m. CST

    Marty and Harvey

    by Barry Egan

    Why does Scorsese keep working with things attached in some way to Miramax? Is he a glutton for punishment?

  • Feb. 14, 2005, 5:55 p.m. CST

    Scorsese

    by BillEmic

    From what I've read, Scorsese hasn't even seen "Infernal Affairs". His knowledge of the film is rather limited and he's basing this movie solely off the script that gets turned into him. Make of that what you will. Personally I'm a big fan of the series and I think "Infernal Affairs II" is the rare sequel that is a great movie in its own right AND it actually *improves* viewings of the first film.

  • Feb. 14, 2005, 9:32 p.m. CST

    Another moronic remake of an excellent film...

    by SalvatoreGravano

    All that because I hear that there are too many illiterate imbeciles populating US cinemas, imbeciles who refuse to read and will only watch "them thay'r films what's spoke in Anglish" or will not "like, ohmigod, like watch the, like, films that, like, have, like, written text, like, on the, like, ohmigosh, like, bottom".

  • Feb. 15, 2005, 12:31 a.m. CST

    there are so many wonderful, unadapted novels and plays out ther

    by beamish13

    why do good directors feel the need to create what's already been made? Is it to increase box-office clout? Or do they genuinely feel that they can do a "better" job with the story? Scorsese hasn't had a genuine monster hit since THE COLOR OF MONEY, and most of his subsequent films have been big money-losers.

  • Feb. 15, 2005, 1:41 a.m. CST

    Actually beamish13...

    by Phloton

    ...I believe Cape Fear (a remake) is Marty's biggest commercial success so far. Color of Money was the biggest up to that time. I don't know if directors think they can do a better job with their remakes (I'm sure some do). I can't think of a remake that was ever better (I'm sure there's some). But they probably like the challenge, but they also like the money. The more money you earn, gives you the ability and clout to do your pet projects. Kubrick really only did Eyes Wide Shut as a contractual agreement with Warners, and was going to use the money for AI. Unfortunately he dropped dead, and Spielberg ruined it. Marty's closer to the end than the beginning and he'd probably like to squeeze out a few more personal projects before he goes. And extra cache always helps in this industry.

  • Feb. 15, 2005, 2:47 a.m. CST

    Remakes that were better

    by alpha

    Well a lot of the silent stuff got remade. De-Milles 10 Commandments comes to mind. The Ring is better than Ringu. It used to be the case that things like Robin Hood, & Zorro got remade every 20 to 25 years or so and certainly some versions were better than others. Rakht a hindi version of the Gift poos on the original from a great height. Ive got no problem with people doing remakes especially when its from a different language because whilst I'm happy reading subtitles I hate dubbing and a lot of people dont like either option and will miss out on a good plot. Good plots can translate - and can even be fiddled about to keep only the plot points whilst the characters themseleves mutate - 10 things I hate about you, Forbidden Planet, Clueless, Luhrmans Romeo & Juliet, Magnificent Seven, Fistful of Dollars & Star Wars all played fast and loose with classic plots from Shakespeare, Austen or Kurosawa but all worked.

  • Feb. 15, 2005, 3:28 a.m. CST

    Oh yeah...

    by Phloton

    ...and Cronenberg's The Fly was superior to the original. I had a history of film teacher say that the original should be burned and Cronenberg's version be declared the original. The Thing is also an awesome remake (and closer to the original story than the first film, including character names). The problem with translating foreign films into American movies, is that usually what made the original work is lost in the translation. The different cultures create a unique point of view and we can accept them more easily when they're in a alien tongue (maybe that's just me). For example, and maybe I'm crazy, but I always thought that Joe Vs. The Volcano might have worked much better if it had been a foreign film. Audiences may have accepted some of the weirdness more if the film had unknown actors speaking in an unfamiliar language. A Stephen Chow movie works better in its mother tongue simply because we don't do that kind of film here, and if we tried it would probably fail. Think of the differences between British humor and American humor. Black Adder, Spaced, or Black Books, could never be made in America. Take Coupling for example. I saw the first few minutes of the American version, and it was god awful even though it contained the same jokes as the British version. But coming from the mouths and sensibility of the British, the jokes worked. This is all just my opinion. What works for me doesn't have to work for everyone.

  • Feb. 15, 2005, 5:32 a.m. CST

    BillEmic!

    by CurryIce

    "Scorsese hasn't even seen "Infernal Affairs". His knowledge of the film is rather limited and he's basing this movie solely off the script that gets turned into him..." Are you sure what you're talking about? I've never heard about this rumour but it sounds very unlikely that he'd actually never seen the original trilogy...

  • Feb. 15, 2005, 6:27 a.m. CST

    CurryIce

    by Arnzilla

    http://www.empireonline.co.uk/site/news/NewsStory.asp?news_id=16450

  • Feb. 15, 2005, 9:08 a.m. CST

    remakes that are better

    by Shigeru

    IE: Ringu and The Ring is the perfect example of this. I thought The Ring was the better film. But if it wasn't for Ringu, The Ring would not exist, since 75% of The Ring was SHOT FOR SHOT Ringu. If you are going to do a shot for shot remake and just spruce up a few things along the way, make the shots a little prettier, make the acting a little better, make the effects more scary, then when does it stop??! We could be stuck in loops of remaking movies and just making them a TINY bit better. Would anyone want to see a clone remake of say Casablanca and insert a good actor in like the 2 cheesy lines? Fuck that. arg.

  • Feb. 15, 2005, 9:49 a.m. CST

    by ScaryJim

    i agree shigeru , the question we should really be asking is how the hell can't a remake be better , surely the point in the remake is to make it better . If it fails to do that it fails completely . Suffice to say i'll probably always find a Japenese horror film scarier because freaky dead Japenese women staring with one eye creepily gazing through their black hair will always be scarier than well , any hollywood actress doing it!

  • Feb. 15, 2005, 10:21 a.m. CST

    This is just funny

    by Darth Kong

    http://www.uweboll.com

  • Feb. 15, 2005, 1:15 p.m. CST

    Same writers as...

    by jpdill

    ... Jurassic Park 4. Must be good.

  • Feb. 15, 2005, 1:19 p.m. CST

    I hope it is better than "Southie"

    by filmnazi

    For those of you not familiar, the Boston Irish mob of the 70's was no joke. they are still finding bodies all over South Boston and Dorchester. I wonder if this film can capture that. I for one can't fucking wait.

  • Feb. 15, 2005, 2:19 p.m. CST

    burn, Hollywood, burn!

    by CuervoJones

    Fuck remakes

  • Feb. 15, 2005, 3:52 p.m. CST

    Thanks, Arnzilla

    by BillEmic

    I do remember reading something to that effect but I didn't want to quote it like Gospel. Thanks for providing the source to confirm that Scorsese hasn't seen "Infernal Affairs". This could be seen as a good thing or a bad thing. A plus: most likely his film will have its own visual identity and won't be duplicating some of the famous shots from the original...however, Scorsese doesn't know just how good the original is and how much his film has to live up to.

  • Feb. 15, 2005, 6:58 p.m. CST

    re: Phloton

    by beamish13

    some directors have remade their own films, although except for Yasujiro Ozu's FLOATING WEEDS, most are regarded as being inferior (e.g. Roger Vadim's 1988 ..AND GOD CREATED WOMEN; Ole Bornedal's NIGHTWATCH)

  • Feb. 18, 2005, 2:35 p.m. CST

    Well, maybe...

    by Boxcutter

    Original IF spanked my panties, it must be admitted. As long the remake keeps the sweaty claustrophobic vibe, it might drag Scorsese away from that "look-at-this-film-making, would ya?" technique that oversugared everything from "The Age of Innocence" through that tiresome retro wankfest designed to capture Oscar's heart ,"The Aviator" - and direct him toward his best character-based work again. The casting is a bit dodgy, though.