Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

ROTTERDAM: Dapascha on L'OEIL DE L'AUTRE & IN MY FATHER'S DEN

Hey folks, Harry here with another peek from Rotterdam from Dapascha, whose name in a morphine daze I misspelled last time. Let this be a note to you folks out there that think about updating with the monkey on your back... it can lead to foolish mistakes... that then become international incidents like this one. Heh... Sounds like Dapascha got one terrible and one pretty damn good one. Here ya go...

Hello Sharry, Moshriarty and friends, one more time this year from the Lowlands… (Yeah, great, so I make it to aintitcool’s front page, and they spell my name incorrectly…. Figures. I guess I’ll blame it on the morphine.)

My last three days on the festival, with a quiet Thursday to begin with. Decided to skip CLEAN, a pop-star-using-dope-drama with Maggie Cheung and Nick Nolte, which hasn’t been doing very well on the review circuit. So I slept in and made my first appearance at 15:30hrs at a live conversation with minimalist composer Terry Riley, part the What (is) Cinema? program, which features discussions on mostly experimental- and art-house cinema related subjects. This one was attended by about ten people, an indication of how little respect for and knowledge about the influences of minimalist music movement (which Riley pretty much initiated in the 1960s) on modern styles like dance and ambient, and pretty much every other musical genre as well, from jazz to classical. It was pretty interesting nevertheless, and nice to see mr. Riley talk in person about his relationship with film and filmmusic. He comes across as a very kind and interesting person (cue for your meaningless compliments nausea). We got to see the short and nice film LOOKING FOR MUSHROOMS by Bruce Conner from 1967, a nice collage of footage shot in Mexico City, with a trippy fire-works sequence.

L'OEIL DE L'AUTRE

I left the theater slightly dazed and made my way towards my first genuine stinker of this year: L’OEIL DE L’AUTRE (lit. “the eye of the other”), a French film by director John Lvoff, if the spelling in the program is to be believed. Lvoff?? Silly names aside, the movie is a pretentious pile-up of overdone art-house clichés.

Main character of the story is a girl working as a technical photographer, who is sent out for an interesting but stupidly executed science project, where once a year the exact same picture of a landscape is taken to track large time-scale changes in form. Stupidly executed because half the pictures are of non-descript ruins, trees and buildings, and not of the (beautiful) landscapes obscured by them. Which sort of makes me wanna go there and cut down that tree.

Anyway… she is replacing a well-known English photographer who has disappeared mysteriously during his last time roaming the French Provence taking cliched-art-photos posing for stupid-scientific-purpose-pictures.

Her employer and mother’s ex makes a stilted attempt at making a pass at her, which she cuts off decidedly. Julie Dépardieu (daughter of famous actor Gerard D.) plays the girl, whose character was so annoying I refuse to remember her name. But I’ve looked it up and it’s Alice. And yes, Lvoff is really called Lvoff who therefore should get the award for Name Most Sounding Like Pitoff, whose name is always a bad sign for the movies it’s even remotely connected with.

Alice is very shy and insecure, and is lost for having a genuine voice and probably even personality of her own. But hey! Wait! I get it! There’s a connection with her lack of having a look (or no, I should say a regard, ofcourse) of her own and her being a photographer replacing another photographer! And with her having to take technical exact replica’s of other pictures! And with her boss making a pass at her! She also meets Juliet, the photographer´s mistress in the Provence, who should be noted for her bizar performance. I seriously believe the director shot her full of mescaline and told her they were filming some lame fantasy flick where she stars as The Ominous Oracle.

Luckily it’s not all boring and depressing encouters for Alice, as she meets a semi-handsome and free-spirited dude (he paraglides, you see) in the hotel she stays in and has a little romance. Sadly these scenes still remain boring and depressing encounters for the audience. Mostly due to the fact that her new lover and his friends are so free and open, and joyous, but she’s so insecure and closed, which results in her acting like a rude, impolite, total jackass to most people she meets. Jeez man, I’m insecure about many things as well, but that doesn’t mean I can’t be polite!

But, on the positive side, mademoiselle Dépardieu is nice to look at, and her bland acting I blame mostly on monsieur Lvoff, who is apparently a big fan of the mandatory 1,5 second Significant Moment of Silence after each and every single fucking line of dialogue spoken in the movie. Jezus, I could have been out of that theater at least twenty minutes earlier if the editor had done his or her job properly. But I sat it out, just so that I could have the justified satisfaction of writing this review and confirm my fears that there really is no interesting character development or satisfying thematic conclusion in this film.

I think I selected it from the program based on the short description, and was hoping for some nice shots of the French countryside, but alas, there’s maybe three of them in total out of a hundred-and-something bland ones. I’d like to conclude my time wasted on this steaming heap de merde with one last bit of trivia, which might be a saving grace for a few lucky ones out there: the English photographer, who we see on pictures several times, is played by none other than Otar Iosseliani! A name that means absolutely nothing to me, but according to the festival-catalogue he’s worth an exclamation mark after his name, so I thought I’d pass that one on to you guys.

IN MY FATHER'S DEN

A quick cigarette and some more coffee, and then on to IN MY FATHER’S DEN, part of the un-official Crowd Pleaser program, always featured heavily in the last three days of the festival and also starring IZO, UNDERTOW, HOWL’S MOVING CASTLE and the mysterious surprise film (SUBMISSION?) on Friday. This year TEAM: AMERICA was also a late surprise addition. This film from pretty much the exact opposite side of the earth (from Rotterdam’s point of view, that is) also fits the crowd-pleaser category, and it quickly erased my cynical mood-left overs from the previous film and dragged me into a dark story of guilt and mystery. Directed by Brad McGann, it tells about buried family secrets in a small town in New Zealand. War-photographer Paul Prior (a strong performance by Matthew McFadyen) returns to his hometown after many years for his father’s cremation and a strained reunion with his brother and his wife. He resettles, starts teaching and begins a friendship with Celia (played by Emily Barclay, who gets to display a whole wide range of emotions), the young daughter of his ex-girlfriend who has a teemage crush on him. Things turn mysterious when she suddenly disappears, and Paul has to face some skeletons in his family’s closet and tough questions by both the people of the town and the authorities. While this all may sound a little predictable and done-before, which it is, IN MY FATHER’S DEN is nonetheless a very powerful film, thanks to great acting by everyone involved (including a small but nice role by Miranda Otto has Paul’s sister-in-law), a fittingly dramatic soundtrack by Simon Boswell, beautiful photography of the New Zealand countryside by Stuart Bryburgh (THE PIANO, SEX AND THE CITY) (huh?) and a strong directing effort by Brad McGann. The tension and mystery has a gradual build-up, and while the suspense grows, the look of the film becomes increasingly more obscured. The disappearance of Celia, for instance, starts out casual, and only slowly does it become clear that darker events may have taken place than those we have seen so far. There’s a fair deal of jumping back and forth in the storyline, which works well to keep the audience intrigued and guessing for what has really happened to Paul and Celia. Strangely enough, the title of the film, which was written by McGann himself and based on the novel by Maurice Gee, pretty much gives it away (but certainly not entirely… there are a few twists), and the director doesn’t shy from a few hints here and there as well. This slight predictability and it’s done-before feel for me keeps IN MY FATHER’S DEN from being a great movie to just being really good.

I’ll split this last report in two, and I will be back tomorrow with reviews for Friday and Saturday. For now,

greetings

dapascha

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Click for previous story Talk Back More on this story Click for next story

User login

Reader Talkback

None posted yet.

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.