Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

ROTTERDAM: Elaine writes in on BROTHERS and DALECARLIANS!!!

Hey folks, Harry here... if you were terrified like me that Elaine had been assassinated by AICN's other writers contributing from Rotterdam... never fear, she is back and giving us a rundown on where things are right now with the fest and a look at two really different films. One picked up the audience award at SUNDANCE - the other... well, I'll let you read about it all as Elaine elloquently details below. Enjoy - and to say, I'd rather be in Rotterdam than this goddamn fucking hospital... is the understatement of the century. Here ya go...

34th ROTTERDAM INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL

First of all, my apologies for my prolonged absence. Contrary to popular belief, I did not turn into a RIFF-wraith, although I fear that that fate cannot be far off now. Nor did I drown myself because I got outscooped by fellow RIFF attendees (although the thought did cross my mind) or turn into a complete zombie, although there are those who dispute the latter - notably the guy who suggested a few nights ago that I change my name into Zombaine or Zombine, which is just the sort of thing a girl wants to hear when she's busy and stressed out of her skull. Nope, what happened is that I took a couple of days off from film-watching and reviewing. And not to rest, as some of you kindly suggested, but rather to finish the work assignment that was due on February 1st, which, amongst other fascinating things, involved the looking-up of piles of Nietzsche and Proust quotes in German and French, as well as the English translations of certain Buddhist sutras in Pali. It was interesting in its way, but I'd much rather have spent my time watching subtitled films about mules falling off Tibetan cliffs.

To tell you the truth, I'm rather miffed at having missed two whole days of the festival, as it seems I missed some good films. I'm particularly disappointed I missed the two classic Tomu Uchida films I had tickets for, since the buzz surrounding these films is fantastic; I've rarely heard such enthusiastic responses to a retrospective. It's as if someone discovered a whole stash of forgotten Kurosawa and Ozu masterpieces and decided to screen them here all at once. I may still get to see a few of these gems on the final days of the festival, but I'll have to give up a few other films I've been looking forward to in order to do so, so on top of being in the final stages of zombification, I'm now in a conundrum. Aaargh.

So far, my favourite film of the festival is "Sideways", followed by the two Kim Ki-duk films (which I WILL review at some point - bear with me), "The Edukators", "Mysterious Skin", "Hana and Alice", "Nobody Knows" and "Cronicas". My least favourite films would have to be "Izo" and "Casshern". I'm sure I'll get crucified for disliking the latter, as it seems to be quite a fanboy favourite, but sod it, it's a bad film - so bad it's downright laughable. I'll admit I had some fun watching it, but for all the wrong reasons, I think.

The festival is only at the halfway point, but the first prize has already been awarded. A few days ago, Russian director Ilya Khrzhanovsky was handed the Cactus Award (a brand new award for a daring, politically risky feature film) for his absurd debut "4", a film I was planning to see but had to cancel on account of the Nietzsche quotes. Subject to censorship in its home country, "4" is described as dealing not only with social and political changes in Russia, but also with, um, cloning. You've got to admit that sounds interesting.

Not all the films in this year's programme have been screened yet, but even with a few unknowns still in the bag, it seems certain that the audience award will go to either "Brothers" (reviewed below) or "The Edukators", an occasionally screamingly funny German/Austrian film which proves once and for all that, yes, Germans do in fact have a sense of humour, thank you very much, and that even films with a lot of political talk can be entertaining. I'll get round to reviewing "The Edukators" eventually, but I'm not going to make any promises as to when. You'll just have to read and find out.

The top-10 at the halfway point, with their approval rates (points out of five):

1) The Edukators 4.62

2) Brothers 4.62

3) Bin-jip 4.45

4) The Devil's Miner 4.37

5) Hawaii, Oslo 4.35

6) Leaving Home, Coming Home 4.35

7) Sideways 4.34

8) Dalecarlians 4.33

9) Beautiful Boxer 4.33

10) Le chiavi de casa 4.31

So far, I've seen five films from the top-10, which is unusual for me; I tend to manage only two or three. If all goes well, I'll be adding a sixth on the closing day of the festival, when I'll be watching "Hawaii, Oslo", a Norwegian film which is getting its European premiere in Rotterdam and is very popular with audience and critics alike.

Which leads me to today's reviews. Today I'm going to focus on two Scandinavian family dramas which are proving popular with the Rotterdam crowd: "Brothers" and "Dalecarlians". "Brothers" has got its fair share of attention on AICN recently, and for good reason; it won the audience award at Sundance and might well pull the same trick in Rotterdam. "Dalecarlians" (a Swedish debut which is getting its international premiere in Rotterdam) is a film along similar lines: a typical Scandinavian tragi-comedy which successfully mixes heartfelt emotional drama with some deliciously black humour. Fans of the genre (for yes, Scandinavian family dramas ARE a genre onto themselves) should relish it, as they obviously do here in Rotterdam.

Anyway, that's enough by way of introduction, I think. Enjoy the reviews, mellyn. I'll be back later with more.

BROTHERS (Brødre)

(Written by Anders Thomas Jensen, co-written and directed by Susanne Bier)

If you have ever wondered what "Gladiator" star Connie Nielsen looks like as a blonde and sounds like in her mother tongue, Danish, Susanne Bier's "Brothers" is the film to check out. It features Nielsen's first part in a Danish film, and it's a decent one, although she's outacted by both her male co-stars and her on-screen daughter. The film itself is pretty good, as well - a well-scripted, well-acted and emotionally honest family drama which fits seamlessly into the great tradition of well-scripted, well-acted and emotionally honest Danish family dramas, whose achievements I'm not going to enumerate here.

A huge box-office hit in its country of origin, "Brothers" tells the tale of two, well, brothers. The eldest, Michael (Ulrich Thomsen, the protagonist from "The Celebration"), is a happily married army major; the youngest, Jannik (Nikolaj Lie Kaas, also seen in quite a few Dogme films), is a bitter, aggressive mess who has done time for armed robbery. On the day Jannik is released from prison, Michael is told he is to go to Afghanistan to join the UN peace-keeping forces. After a not-quite-successful family reunion, he leaves for Afghanistan, where the helicopter that is supposed to take him to a Taliban rebel camp is shot down. Back in Denmark, his family are told he has died. Devastated by her loss, Michael's wife Sarah (Connie Nielsen) turns to her brother-in-law, with whom she never used to get on, for solace. Unexpectedly, a mutual affection develops between Sarah and Jannik; they even fall in love with each other. Over the next few weeks, Jannik is transformed by his love for Sarah; he more or less re-invents himself as a responsible partner, and becomes a great surrogate father to Sarah's two daughters. For a while, life seems good for the bereft, despite the pain they're all feeling. And then they hear Michael is in fact alive, and not quite himself.

"Brothers" has been called a Danish version of "Pearl Harbor", but that doesn't do the film justice. Not only is "Brothers" a far better film than "Pearl Harbor", but it actually belongs to a different genre. It is not so much a film about a love triangle set against the backdrop of a war as a family drama in which Michael's kids and parents play almost as important a role as Michael, Jannik and Sarah themselves. Nor do the titular brothers merely fight for the woman they both love. They learn important lessons about themselves and the nature of relationships, and in the course of the film change in ways one would deem unimaginable at the start of the film, but which nevertheless seem entirely believable.

The screenplay is a thing of beauty. I've heard complaints about Michael's surviving the helicopter crash with as little injury as he does, and I have to admit that this does indeed come across as fairly incredible, but as far as I'm concerned, that's the only flaw in an otherwise brilliantly effective and well-paced script. Because Anders Thomas Jensen, who has scripted many a Danish hit, is far too accomplished a story-teller to let a film be ruined by one badly handled plot twist. In "Brothers", he proves once again that he excels at depicting dysfunctional families, and also that he has a superb eye for the things grieving people (kids as well as adults) do to steady themselves, and for the way two people who both miss the same person will turn to each other for comfort. With great eye for telling details, he gives the actors some splendid material to work with; Bier's confident direction (refreshingly free from Dogme influences) does the rest.

There is some wonderful acting in the film. Thomsen is utterly convincing as the seemingly self-assured, unemotional army man who has to learn how to cope with the trauma of his Afghan experiences. His final breakdown may be a little over the top, but everything leading up to it is perfect. You really sense his pain as he asks Sarah again and again what happened between her and Jannik, insisting that he doesn't mind if something did happen ("It's only natural that you should have turned to each other under such circumstances"), but inwardly seething with jealousy. Nielsen and Kaas also convincingly run the gamut of emotions, making both their attraction to each other and their guilt and concern for the man neither of them wishes to hurt tangible. Yet the best performance comes courtesy of young Sarah Juel Warner, who is astonishing as Sarah and Michael's eldest daughter, a troubled child who loves her father (although she pretends not to) but comes to prefer her uncle. Warner's Natalia is one of the most convincing adolescents I've ever seen depicted on screen - rebellious teenager one moment, innocent child the next. Her intensity practically jumps off the screen whenever she makes an appearance, and makes for some harrowing moments. By comparison, Nielsen seems a bit bland and expressionless (she keeps on smiling no matter what happens), but since that's part of her character's personality, you don't really mind.

Ultimately, what makes "Brothers" work is the emotional honesty with which the story is told. It all has a heartfelt quality - never sentimental or weepy, just genuinely emotional. It's also genuinely funny. Despite the emotional heaviness of the subject, the film never feels oppressive, because even painful scenes (of which there are plenty) are infused with that black humour which seems to be a Scandinavian hallmark. In other words, "Brothers" is an excellent tragi-comedy, well worth catching if it ever comes your way.

DALECARLIANS (Masjävlar)

(Written and directed by Maria Blom)

Quite frankly, I'm a little surprised to see "Dalecarlians" score as highly in Rotterdam as it does, for while it's unquestionably a good film (all the more impressive for being a feature-length debut), my main thought as I was watching it was that it was obviously written and directed by a woman, and as such might not be too appealing to men. Clearly I was wrong about the latter, for not only is "Dalecarlians" a hit with men and women alike, but its staunchest defenders appear to be men. Not bad for a relationship drama about three sisters who never take their kit off and probably wouldn't look too pretty if they did.

The protagonist of "Dalecarlians" is Mia, a thirty-something yuppy from hip and happening Stockholm who goes back to the countryside where she grew up (the Dalecarlia of the title) to celebrate her father's seventieth birthday. This is not as straightforward an occasion as it might seem, for not only is Mia not particularly close to her family (a bunch of rustics who never look beyond the borders of their own county, let alone the borders of their own country), but she also feels no affinity whatsoever for their village, a drab dump which is firmly stuck in the 1950s. To make matters worse, bad things tend to happen on her father's birthday. In the past, several relatives met with accidents on the old man's birthday; one of them even blew his brains out to mark the occasion. So pretty much the first thing Mia's relatives do when she arrives at her parents' place, after pointedly not asking her about her life in Stockholm, is jokingly speculate on what bad luck might befall them this year. Needless to say, this is the prelude to an eventful family reunion during which many bottles of home-brewed alcohol are consumed and the skeletons just keep tumbling out of the cupboard. In the end, several members of the dysfunctional family learn a useful lesson in life, but not before tragedy has come knocking on their door.

"Dalecarlians" is a solid tragi-comedy, full of painful little touches which will strike a chord with anyone who has ever felt alienated from his family. Most of the drama stems from Mia's family's inability to communicate - their habit of not asking each other questions which matter and not listening whenever someone volunteers an important bit of imformation. This inability to communicate results in a fair number of botched conversations, painful silences and arguments, all of which have an authentic feel. The family's communication problem is made so tangible that one really feels Mia's frustration when, after a full day in the village, no one has shared her happiness at her just having been promoted at work, and no one has asked just what kind of work she does. But the lack of communication isn't just Mia's problem. As the film progresses, one gets the feeling that the whole family is suffering from it - that lurking behind the mask of lack of interest and occasional hostility is a family which desperately wishes to communicate and be a real family again, but doesn't know how to turn back the past twenty years.

There is a lot going on here. While the main theme is evidently communication (or lack thereof), there's also the obvious contrast between the hip urbanite and the stubborn, occasionally narrow-minded villagers, people who've seen the world and people who are content always to stay in their own village, and the generation gap which exists even between Mia and her elder sisters, two devoted mothers who just can't understand why Mia would prefer a job to a family. And as if that weren't bad enough, there's also a lot of unresolved stuff from the past, not to mention some secrets waiting to be revealed.

What makes "Dalecarlians" the little gem that it is, is its compassionate depiction of the characters. Initially, one sees the family through Mia's eyes, meaning one looks down upon them a little and feels sorry for Mia for having to stick it out with them for a few days. However, the perspective gradually shifts, to the point where one somewhat changes one's mind about both Mia and her relatives. First of all, one realises that, despite their seeming lack of interest, Mia's relatives do in fact care a lot about their lost daughter/sister - as one neighbour succinctly puts it, "They may not say much to you when you're here, but you have no idea how much they talk about you when you're gone." Next one discovers they're all worthy people, old-fashioned and narrow-minded though they may be. With a few well-observed touches, even Mia's bossy elder sister Eivor, who clearly envies Mia with a vengeance, is turned into a likeable character. If anyone is at all being judged, it is Mia herself, but it's hard to tell as Blom largely refrains from judgement. She is content to let her characters present themselves in all their sodden glory, making "Dalecarlians" not only a very honest film, but also a very human one. With its stress on emotions and relationships, it is inevitably a very feminine film, but as I said, this doesn't seem to prevent men from enjoying it - probably because in all its well-observed detail it's very recognisable, and features some very funny moments.

If I had to sum up "Dalecarlians" in a sentence, I'd say it was like a Swedish version of Baltasar Kormakur's "The Sea", which was quite a hit on the festival circuit two years ago. If you liked that film (an Icelandic tale of a family reunion gone horribly awry, with plenty of nasty confrontations and some very black humour), chances are you'll enjoy this, too. If not, well, there's always "Home for the Holidays", you know.

Elaine

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Click for previous story Talk Back More on this story Click for next story

User login


Reader Talkback

Firstastic
by Boxclocke
Feb 3rd, 2005
12:53:41 AM
Why I despise Elaine
by Miami Mofo
Feb 3rd, 2005
09:07:13 AM
Dalecarlian means...
by Kjotvi
Feb 3rd, 2005
11:21:43 AM
You say "There's always Home for the Holidays" as if that's a ba
by mortsleam
Feb 3rd, 2005
12:55:45 PM
'Brothers' sounds really good.
by raw_bean
Feb 3rd, 2005
05:15:08 PM
Yep, bean, Brothers is really good
by Sabster
Feb 4th, 2005
06:21:12 AM

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.