Hey folks, Harry here... if you were terrified like me that Elaine had been assassinated by AICN's other writers contributing from Rotterdam... never fear, she is back and giving us a rundown on where things are right now with the fest and a look at two really different films. One picked up the audience award at SUNDANCE - the other... well, I'll let you read about it all as Elaine elloquently details below. Enjoy - and to say, I'd rather be in Rotterdam than this goddamn fucking hospital... is the understatement of the century. Here ya go...
34th ROTTERDAM INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL
First of all, my apologies for my prolonged absence.
Contrary to popular belief, I did not turn into a
RIFF-wraith, although I fear that that fate cannot be
far off now. Nor did I drown myself because I got
outscooped by fellow RIFF attendees (although the
thought did cross my mind) or turn into a complete
zombie, although there are those who dispute the
latter - notably the guy who suggested a few nights
ago that I change my name into Zombaine or Zombine,
which is just the sort of thing a girl wants to hear
when she's busy and stressed out of her skull. Nope,
what happened is that I took a couple of days off from
film-watching and reviewing. And not to rest, as some
of you kindly suggested, but rather to finish the work
assignment that was due on February 1st, which,
amongst other fascinating things, involved the
looking-up of piles of Nietzsche and Proust quotes in
German and French, as well as the English translations
of certain Buddhist sutras in Pali. It was interesting
in its way, but I'd much rather have spent my time
watching subtitled films about mules falling off
Tibetan cliffs.
To tell you the truth, I'm rather miffed at having
missed two whole days of the festival, as it seems I
missed some good films. I'm particularly disappointed
I missed the two classic Tomu Uchida films I had
tickets for, since the buzz surrounding these films is
fantastic; I've rarely heard such enthusiastic
responses to a retrospective. It's as if someone
discovered a whole stash of forgotten Kurosawa and Ozu
masterpieces and decided to screen them here all at
once. I may still get to see a few of these gems on
the final days of the festival, but I'll have to give
up a few other films I've been looking forward to in
order to do so, so on top of being in the final stages
of zombification, I'm now in a conundrum. Aaargh.
So far, my favourite film of the festival is
"Sideways", followed by the two Kim Ki-duk films
(which I WILL review at some point - bear with me),
"The Edukators", "Mysterious Skin", "Hana and Alice",
"Nobody Knows" and "Cronicas". My least favourite
films would have to be "Izo" and "Casshern". I'm sure
I'll get crucified for disliking the latter, as it
seems to be quite a fanboy favourite, but sod it, it's
a bad film - so bad it's downright laughable. I'll
admit I had some fun watching it, but for all the
wrong reasons, I think.
The festival is only at the halfway point, but the
first prize has already been awarded. A few days ago,
Russian director Ilya Khrzhanovsky was handed the
Cactus Award (a brand new award for a daring,
politically risky feature film) for his absurd debut
"4", a film I was planning to see but had to cancel on
account of the Nietzsche quotes. Subject to censorship
in its home country, "4" is described as dealing not
only with social and political changes in Russia, but
also with, um, cloning. You've got to admit that
sounds interesting.
Not all the films in this year's programme have been
screened yet, but even with a few unknowns still in
the bag, it seems certain that the audience award will
go to either "Brothers" (reviewed below) or "The
Edukators", an occasionally screamingly funny
German/Austrian film which proves once and for all
that, yes, Germans do in fact have a sense of humour,
thank you very much, and that even films with a lot of
political talk can be entertaining. I'll get round to
reviewing "The Edukators" eventually, but I'm not
going to make any promises as to when. You'll just
have to read and find out.
The top-10 at the halfway point, with their approval
rates (points out of five):
1) The Edukators 4.62
2) Brothers 4.62
3) Bin-jip 4.45
4) The Devil's Miner 4.37
5) Hawaii, Oslo 4.35
6) Leaving Home, Coming Home 4.35
7) Sideways 4.34
8) Dalecarlians 4.33
9) Beautiful Boxer 4.33
10) Le chiavi de casa 4.31
So far, I've seen five films from the top-10, which is
unusual for me; I tend to manage only two or three. If
all goes well, I'll be adding a sixth on the closing
day of the festival, when I'll be watching "Hawaii,
Oslo", a Norwegian film which is getting its European
premiere in Rotterdam and is very popular with
audience and critics alike.
Which leads me to today's reviews. Today I'm going to
focus on two Scandinavian family dramas which are
proving popular with the Rotterdam crowd: "Brothers"
and "Dalecarlians". "Brothers" has got its fair share
of attention on AICN recently, and for good reason; it
won the audience award at Sundance and might well pull
the same trick in Rotterdam. "Dalecarlians" (a Swedish
debut which is getting its international premiere in
Rotterdam) is a film along similar lines: a typical
Scandinavian tragi-comedy which successfully mixes
heartfelt emotional drama with some deliciously black
humour. Fans of the genre (for yes, Scandinavian
family dramas ARE a genre onto themselves) should
relish it, as they obviously do here in Rotterdam.
Anyway, that's enough by way of introduction, I think.
Enjoy the reviews, mellyn. I'll be back later with
more.
BROTHERS (Brødre)
(Written by Anders Thomas Jensen, co-written and
directed by Susanne Bier)
If you have ever wondered what "Gladiator" star Connie
Nielsen looks like as a blonde and sounds like in her
mother tongue, Danish, Susanne Bier's "Brothers" is
the film to check out. It features Nielsen's first
part in a Danish film, and it's a decent one, although
she's outacted by both her male co-stars and her
on-screen daughter. The film itself is pretty good, as
well - a well-scripted, well-acted and emotionally
honest family drama which fits seamlessly into the
great tradition of well-scripted, well-acted and
emotionally honest Danish family dramas, whose
achievements I'm not going to enumerate here.
A huge box-office hit in its country of origin,
"Brothers" tells the tale of two, well, brothers. The
eldest, Michael (Ulrich Thomsen, the protagonist from
"The Celebration"), is a happily married army major;
the youngest, Jannik (Nikolaj Lie Kaas, also seen in
quite a few Dogme films), is a bitter, aggressive mess
who has done time for armed robbery. On the day Jannik
is released from prison, Michael is told he is to go
to Afghanistan to join the UN peace-keeping forces.
After a not-quite-successful family reunion, he leaves
for Afghanistan, where the helicopter that is supposed
to take him to a Taliban rebel camp is shot down. Back
in Denmark, his family are told he has died.
Devastated by her loss, Michael's wife Sarah (Connie
Nielsen) turns to her brother-in-law, with whom she
never used to get on, for solace. Unexpectedly, a
mutual affection develops between Sarah and Jannik;
they even fall in love with each other. Over the next
few weeks, Jannik is transformed by his love for
Sarah; he more or less re-invents himself as a
responsible partner, and becomes a great surrogate
father to Sarah's two daughters. For a while, life
seems good for the bereft, despite the pain they're
all feeling. And then they hear Michael is in fact
alive, and not quite himself.
"Brothers" has been called a Danish version of "Pearl
Harbor", but that doesn't do the film justice. Not
only is "Brothers" a far better film than "Pearl
Harbor", but it actually belongs to a different genre.
It is not so much a film about a love triangle set
against the backdrop of a war as a family drama in
which
Michael's kids and parents play almost as important a
role as Michael, Jannik and Sarah themselves. Nor do
the titular brothers merely fight for the woman they
both love. They learn important lessons about
themselves and the nature of relationships, and in the
course of the film change in ways one would deem
unimaginable at the start of the film, but which
nevertheless seem entirely believable.
The screenplay is a thing of beauty. I've heard
complaints about Michael's surviving the helicopter
crash with as little injury as he does, and I have to
admit that this does indeed come across as fairly
incredible, but as far as I'm concerned, that's the
only flaw in an otherwise brilliantly effective and
well-paced script. Because Anders Thomas Jensen, who
has scripted many a Danish hit, is far too
accomplished a story-teller to let a film be ruined by
one badly handled plot twist. In "Brothers", he proves
once again that he excels at depicting dysfunctional
families, and also that he has a superb eye for the
things grieving people (kids as well as adults) do to
steady themselves, and for the way two people who both
miss the same person will turn to each other for
comfort. With great eye for telling details, he gives
the actors some splendid material to work with; Bier's
confident direction (refreshingly free from Dogme
influences) does the rest.
There is some wonderful acting in the film. Thomsen is
utterly convincing as the seemingly self-assured,
unemotional army man who has to learn how to cope with
the trauma of his Afghan experiences. His final
breakdown may be a little over the top, but everything
leading up to it is perfect. You really sense his pain
as he asks Sarah again and again what happened between
her and Jannik, insisting that he doesn't mind if
something did happen ("It's only natural that you
should have turned to each other under such
circumstances"), but inwardly seething with jealousy.
Nielsen and Kaas also convincingly run the gamut of
emotions, making both their attraction to each other
and their guilt and concern for the man neither of
them wishes to hurt tangible. Yet the best performance
comes courtesy of young Sarah Juel Warner, who is
astonishing as Sarah and Michael's eldest daughter, a
troubled child who loves her father (although she
pretends not to) but comes to prefer her uncle.
Warner's Natalia is one of the most convincing
adolescents I've ever seen depicted on screen -
rebellious teenager one moment, innocent child the
next. Her intensity practically jumps off the screen
whenever she makes an appearance, and makes for some
harrowing moments. By comparison, Nielsen seems a bit
bland and expressionless (she keeps on smiling no
matter what happens), but since that's part of her
character's personality, you don't really mind.
Ultimately, what makes "Brothers" work is the
emotional honesty with which the story is told. It all
has a heartfelt quality - never sentimental or weepy,
just genuinely emotional. It's also genuinely funny.
Despite the emotional heaviness of the subject, the
film never feels oppressive, because even painful
scenes (of which there are plenty) are infused with
that black humour which seems to be a Scandinavian
hallmark. In other words, "Brothers" is an excellent
tragi-comedy, well worth catching if it ever comes
your way.
DALECARLIANS (Masjävlar)
(Written and directed by Maria Blom)
Quite frankly, I'm a little surprised to see
"Dalecarlians" score as highly in Rotterdam as it
does, for while it's unquestionably a good film (all
the more impressive for being a feature-length debut),
my main thought as I was watching it was that it was
obviously written and directed by a woman, and as such
might not be too appealing to men. Clearly I was wrong
about the latter, for not only is "Dalecarlians" a hit
with men and women alike, but its staunchest defenders
appear to be men. Not bad for a relationship drama
about three sisters who never take their kit off and
probably wouldn't look too pretty if they did.
The protagonist of "Dalecarlians" is Mia, a
thirty-something yuppy from hip and happening
Stockholm who goes back to the countryside where she
grew up (the Dalecarlia of the title) to celebrate her
father's seventieth birthday. This is not as
straightforward an occasion as it might seem, for not
only is Mia not particularly close to her family (a
bunch of rustics who never look beyond the borders of
their own county, let alone the borders of their own
country), but she also feels no affinity whatsoever
for their village, a drab dump which is firmly stuck
in the 1950s. To make matters worse, bad things tend
to happen on her father's birthday. In the past,
several relatives met with accidents on the old man's
birthday; one of them even blew his brains out to mark
the occasion. So pretty much the first thing Mia's
relatives do when she arrives at her parents' place,
after pointedly not asking her about her life in
Stockholm, is jokingly speculate on what bad luck
might befall them this year. Needless to say, this is
the prelude to an eventful family reunion during which
many bottles of home-brewed alcohol are consumed and
the skeletons just keep tumbling out of the cupboard.
In the end, several members of the dysfunctional
family learn a useful lesson in life, but not before
tragedy has come knocking on their door.
"Dalecarlians" is a solid tragi-comedy, full of
painful little touches which will strike a chord with
anyone who has ever felt alienated from his family.
Most of the drama stems from Mia's family's inability
to communicate - their habit of not asking each other
questions which matter and not listening whenever
someone volunteers an important bit of imformation.
This inability to communicate results in a fair number
of botched conversations, painful silences and
arguments, all of which have an authentic feel. The
family's communication problem is made so tangible
that one really feels Mia's frustration when, after a
full day in the village, no one has shared her
happiness at her just having been promoted at work,
and no one has asked just what kind of work she does.
But the lack of communication isn't just Mia's
problem. As the film progresses, one gets the feeling
that the whole family is suffering from it - that
lurking behind the mask of lack of interest and
occasional hostility is a family which desperately
wishes to communicate and be a real family again, but
doesn't know how to turn back the past twenty years.
There is a lot going on here. While the main theme is
evidently communication (or lack thereof), there's
also the obvious contrast between the hip urbanite and
the stubborn, occasionally narrow-minded villagers,
people who've seen the world and people who are
content always to stay in their own village, and the
generation gap which exists even between Mia and her
elder sisters, two devoted mothers who just can't
understand why Mia would prefer a job to a family. And
as if that weren't bad enough, there's also a lot of
unresolved stuff from the past, not to mention some
secrets waiting to be revealed.
What makes "Dalecarlians" the little gem that it is,
is its compassionate depiction of the characters.
Initially, one sees the family through Mia's eyes,
meaning one looks down upon them a little and feels
sorry for Mia for having to stick it out with them for
a few days. However, the perspective gradually shifts,
to the point where one somewhat changes one's mind
about both Mia and her relatives. First of all, one
realises that, despite their seeming lack of interest,
Mia's relatives do in fact care a lot about their lost
daughter/sister - as one neighbour succinctly puts it,
"They may not say much to you when you're here, but
you have no idea how much they talk about you when
you're gone." Next one discovers they're all worthy
people, old-fashioned and narrow-minded though they
may be. With a few well-observed touches, even Mia's
bossy elder sister Eivor, who clearly envies Mia with
a vengeance, is turned into a likeable character. If
anyone is at all being judged, it is Mia herself, but
it's hard to tell as Blom largely refrains from
judgement. She is content to let her characters
present themselves in all their sodden glory, making
"Dalecarlians" not only a very honest film, but also a
very human one. With its stress on emotions and
relationships, it is inevitably a very feminine film,
but as I said, this doesn't seem to prevent men from
enjoying it - probably because in all its
well-observed detail it's very recognisable, and
features some very funny moments.
If I had to sum up "Dalecarlians" in a sentence, I'd
say it was like a Swedish version of Baltasar
Kormakur's "The Sea", which was quite a hit on the
festival circuit two years ago. If you liked that film
(an Icelandic tale of a family reunion gone horribly
awry, with plenty of nasty confrontations and some
very black humour), chances are you'll enjoy this,
too. If not, well, there's always "Home for the
Holidays", you know.
Elaine
|