Logo

Cool News

AICN COMICS!! @$$Holes Review ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN, RUNAWAYS, JSA, HARD TIME, And More!!

Published at:  Feb 10, 2004 7:30:54 AM CST

Hi, everyone. "Moriarty" here with some Rumblings From The Lab...



Well, our favorite @$$holes got embroiled in a bit of controversy the other day that caused their column to go technically hooey for a little while, but I have to say... Village Idiot’s stepped up as a hell of a guest editor while Cormorant takes a well-deserved break for a little while. The column’s looking great these days, and it’s reading as good as ever. Don’t believe me? Check it out for yourself!





@$$hole Comic Reviews FAQ


1. So what happened to all the pictures?


We had to take them down because we had a Terms of Use misunderstanding with a certain photostock database company. So remember those black and white pictures you saw with the intros? Burn those images from your mind!

2. Yes, but what about the cover images? Surely you can still use those.


We're currently at work establishing where we stand with all this stuff. In the meantime, we're all going to be like little Fonzies here. And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda, what's Fonzie like?

3. He's cool?


Exactomundo!

4. Well, you still have the Table of Contents, don't you?


Why yes, as a matter of fact, we do. Speaking of which...









Table of Contents
(Click title to go directly to the review)






JSA #58

RUNAWAYS #11

TOM STRONG'S TERRIFIC TALES #9

HARD TIME #1

ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN #53

THE MONOLITH #1

Cheap Shots!











JSA #58

Geoff Johns, Writer; Leonard Kirk, Breakdowns;

Don Kramer, Penciler; Keith Champagne, Inker

Published by DC Comics

Release Date: 2/4/04

A
Jon Quixote Review



I broke up with JSA about a year ago.

In many ways, comic book fans and their titles can forge a relationship that is not unlike a romantic one, and I’m not just talking about when you’re fourteen years old and your mom notices the pile of BETTY & VERONICA’S DOUBLE DIGESTS in the bathroom. You can have abusive relationships – all those good people who know they should stop reading UNCANNY X-MEN, but they just can’t find the strength. And really, isn’t it their fault? – and you can have short love affairs, where they end quick, but remain perfect in your mind (Zeb Wells on PETER PARKER, I’ll remember you always).

And then there are the relationships that are neither great nor bad, but they just end. It’s not that they weren’t fun, it’s not like you didn’t have some good times; she’s a nice looking girl with a good personality, but you just didn’t quite click, and it was a little too much work for what you were getting. She will make somebody really, really happy some day…it’s just probably not going to be you. So you say goodbye with a handshake and a fair-thee-well, and you move onto new relationships, only occasionally wondering how she’s doing.

And then, one day, you turn on the television, and you see her winning AMERICA’S TOP MODEL and talking about how much she loves to give blow jobs.

And you think…I should probably call her.

It’s called “Black Reign”. Black Adam and his rogue crew have taken over the Middle Eastern Country of Kahndaq. The JSA are there to stop them. The country is in chaos. Teammate squares off against teammate. And it gets…bloody.

Two major character deaths. One nasty dismemberment. One disembowelment. The return of a legendary hero. Major moral choices. Harsh ethical ramifications. And a surprise ending that has the double-whammy of knocking me flat on my ass with surprise, but making perfect sense.

It wasn’t this good before. Was it?

One of the strongest elements of JSA is the thematic undercurrent that props up the whole exercise: legacy. This gets an interesting tweak here as the original Hourman, Rex Tyler, returns to the Society to take the place of his mortally wounded son (who is now stuck in the limbo Rex had occupied…long story). Half Fred McMurray, Half John Wayne, Hourman is poised to become an excellent addition to the team, with his old school sensibilities and irrepressible joie de vivre. His arrival is an excellent example of how JSA is constantly able to keep evolving, its character dynamics always in motion, never failing to surprise its audience – either with a new twist, a jaw-dropping action sequence (check out Hawkman taking down Northwind in such a brutal manner that it’s good they only show it in shadow), or an interesting take on old characters – is there any character in all of comics cooler than Black Adam in the pages of JSA?

I’m so sorry I dropped this book. You have to believe me. It was a mistake. I was an idiot. But I’m willing to admit that. And I’m willing to change.

Thankfully, comic books can’t call you an idiot and make jokes about your winkie size before slamming the phone down on you. It’s a happy day, for JSA has taken me back. Which is a good thing too, ‘cause DAMN she’s hot!!








RUNAWAYS #11

Writer: Brian K. Vaughan

Artist: Takeshi Miyazawa

Publisher: Marvel Comics

Release Date: 2/4/04

Reviewed by
Cormorant



Cloak and Dagger are back – can I get a “hell yeah”?!

*crickets chirping*

No?

C’mon, stop being such a hipper-than-thou hardass – Cloak and Dagger are cool. It’s not so much that they’ve been in a lot of good stories – they haven’t – but the potential is there, and they got a lot of mileage precisely because they are so esoteric. Freaks are cool, y’see, and Cloak and Dagger are about as freaky a pair of heroes as you’ll find in the Marvel Universe. Freaky origin? Check! They were teenage runaways who somehow acquired their powers when mobsters pumped ‘em full of experimental drugs. Freaky powers? Check! Cloak’s cloak is an access point to a quasi-sentient, other-dimensional world of shadows and Dagger throws “light knives,” beams of energy that stun opponents and - get this - clear “impurities” like drugs from their system. Freaky mission? Check! Cloak and Dagger are uniquely street-level heroes, and when they’re not using their symbiotic powers to keep each other healthy, they target drug dealers specifically and help other runaways like themselves.

Which, of course, makes these freaky heroes obvious choices for a book called RUNAWAYS.

And writer Brian K. Vaughan gives ‘em respect. Cloak and Dagger are called to L.A. as specialists to help the cops track down the group of kids who’re the stars of the book. These kids are believed by the book’s public to have participated in a murder that we the readers know was actually committed by their parents (who are secretly part of a worldwide villainous cult called The Pride). Vaughan acknowledges Cloak and Dagger’s third-tier nature in a sly opening exchange between the pair and the officer who called them in (click on the dialogue to see the related images):

Cop: So wait, you’re telling me that drugs turned you into super heroes? That can’t make you popular with the parent groups.

Cloak: Popularity has never been a concern of Cloak and Dagger.

I like that – a believable response to the cop, yet almost a case of breaking the fourth wall! Third-tier these characters may be, but Vaughan does write them as specialists within their niche, easily spotting the dubious elements of the planted story regarding The Runaways - but agreeing to help nevertheless. Meanwhile the kids themselves are getting restless at their “Three Investigators”-style hideout. Being dumb kids, their big ideas for using their powers for good include “freeing all the turtles at Sea World,” but eventually they opt to try their hand at the time-honored superhero tradition of going on patrol. As my favorite character, the not-particularly-swift Chase explains, “We can start small, purse-snatchings and crap.”

I’ve mentioned it before, but when Vaughan is on, RUNAWAYS comes as close as any comic ever has to matching the smarts, wit, and adventure that BUFFY exemplified, and this is one of the “on” issues. The kids’ banter is funny and stupid at the same time (if not particularly realistic), and the kids act as their own foils (which is realistic). Best of all, this issue, as with the vampire story that preceded it, throws the kids into some full-on action. We see their first attempt to fight crime AND we get to see them come into conflict with Cloak and Dagger. Sure, hero-on-hero fighting is a vintage cliché of the genre - actually acknowledged by one of the exasperated kids - but I think Vaughan pulls it off with style. I particularly liked seeing Cloak speaking Spanish to ward off a Hispanic graffiti tagger caught in the dust-up – “Vandalos. Desaparacer o sufrir.” That’s one creepy dude.

The artist is a guest-star for this two-issue story, but a welcome one. He’s Takeshi Miyazawa, whose detailed manga art I’ve glimpsed in Oni Press’s SIDEKICKS series, and the guy’s art is a class act all around – it’s detailed, features terrifically-drawn kids, and is faithful to all the designs established by series’ regular artist Adrian Alphona. Doesn’t hurt that Miyazawa gets to draw Cloak and Dagger, whose appeal is based at least a good 60 to 70% on their striking visuals. ‘Far as I’m concerned, Miyazawa’s welcome to draw this book just about anytime he wants.

Now I don’t know what it says about a series when Cloak and Dagger are the first guest stars, but y’know what? I think they’re a damn sight more interesting than the ubiquitous Spider-Man or Wolverine. In fact, I think Cloak and Dagger are born guest-stars, like Doctor Strange or DC’s Phantom Stranger. Too eccentric for prime time, these oddballs, but when they pop up as a reminder that we’re operating within the anything-goes boundaries of a “shared superhero universe,” they’re the spice that makes the main course great. With so many heroes that are analogs of iconic characters or obvious superhero archetypes (the “armored hero,” the “size-changing hero,” etc.), brother, there ain’t nobody like Cloak and Dagger.

Very cool that Vaughan recognized this, and I suspect readers will too. Hey, and this is even a good jumping-on issue! With a trade of the first six issues due in April, there’s really no reason for latecomers to hold off on this series.










TOM STRONG'S TERRIFIC TALES #9

Published by: America's Best Comics

Release date: 2/4/04

Reviewed by: superninja



I'm writing this review for one reason, and one reason only. Alan Moore can be a really funny guy.

The ABC Alan Moore, the guy that has lots to say about superheroes by way of their pulp origins, is funny. I'm not talking about that other Alan Moore - the guy that wrote From Hell, Watchmen, or V For Vendetta. That guy's funny too, but in a black humor sort of way. Admittedly, the Alan Moore I like best is the one that's channeling his own inner Oscar Wilde, doing commentary on the multiverse of ideas that can be extracted from the superhero equation. It's poking fun at superheroes and their pulp origins, but it also demonstrates a great love for them. That's what America's Best Comics is all about.

The first story, and the only reason worth reading this issue, is:


Millennium Memories

Writer: Alan Moore

Artist: Michael Kaluta

Colors: Lee Moyer

Alan Moore writes in a periodical style about some of the most memorable events in Millenium City's history (a Metropolis "city of the future" amalgam). If you're familiar with any of the collections of his ABC works (Tom Strong and Top Ten, or example), he does similar periodicals as an introduction to those collections. This short story differs only in that it's accompanied by detailed color illustrations by artist Michael Kaluta, whose art just perfectly punctuates Moore's snarky writing.

These snapshots into Millenium's history humorously explore how Tom Strong or his enemies' inventions trickle down into the population and how ridiculously and/or mundanely they use them. It's an often cheeky commentary on both American history and super-technology, and it's pure fun.

My favorite bit (only from the mind of Alan Moore): "Many of these innovations, it must be said, have proven to be both disastrous and short-lived, such as the fad for surgically-enhanced intelligent talking pets, which almost led to a gang of fiendishly intelligent (albeit emotionally scarred and rejected) sewer-alligators successfully running for political office in the city during 1936.

If you like Alan Moore, this story is worth reading. Unfortunately, the rest of the stories in this issue…


Jonni Future: Twice in Time

Writers/Creators/Layouts: Steve Moore and Arthur Adams

Finishes: Kevin Nowlan

I've been reading Tom Strong's Terrific Tales for awhile. The character of "Jonni Future" co-created by Art Adams is a running feature in this title. The character designs are great, but the stories aren't very imaginative. Jonni's "manimal" friend Jermaal is still trying to get her naked, and Jonni's still a clueless action-hero bimbo. The only reason I've enjoyed this in the past is because of the art, but it's obvious here where Nowlan has finished Art.


Young Tom Strong: The Diary of Susan Strong

Writer: Steve Moore

Pencils: Alan Weiss

Inks: Steve Leialoha

This is a pretty decent story, if you've been following Tom Strong. If you haven't, you're screwed. Sorry. Young Tom is discovering that his parents didn’t have a very picturesque marriage. This parallels the recent events in ABC's Tom Strong title, and it's a nice bit of fluff to punctuate those events.







HARD TIME #1

Writer: Steve Gerber

Artist: Brian Hurtt

Publisher: DC Comics

Release Date: 2/4/04

Reviewed by
Cormorant



I don’t know what the execs at DC were thinking when they cooked up the new sub-imprint, “DC Focus.” The high concept – and please, keep your laughter to a minimum – is “realistic superheroes.”

*pause to let that sink in*

Friends, that is such a mind-numbingly played-out concept that I’m not even going to waste your precious time making fun of it. Suffice to say, this is not the kind of bold initiative that gave us the breakthroughs of the Vertigo line.

Still, superheroes are the one bankable, non-manga commodity in the American comic book market as the pre-existing comic audiences ages, clinging stubbornly to the safety of nostalgia, and I’m hardly one to write the genre off casually. I guess I can see why DC did it – superheroes remain commercial and the Focus line allows for them to try some edgier stuff without tainting their classic icons – so let’s give the opening entry its fair shot. Hey, it is written by Steve Gerber, who was once the very picture of cutting edge when he created Howard the Duck.

Of course, that was a quarter of a century ago, and I’m afraid the modern Steve Gerber is woefully out of date. The premise is at least ripped-from-the-headlines: an oppressed pair of teens terrorize their school with guns, only to have what was intended as a prank result in a bloodbath. The more grounded of the pair is Ethan – he really did just want to scare the jocks and bullies, but alas, his pal’s a real nutball. His pal freaks out, kills some students and teachers, and then, out of nowhere, Ethan somehow manifests a superpower – a red bolt of energy – that punches a killing hole through his psycho friend and leaves him confused and carted off by a SWAT team.

Okay, this sounds like edgy stuff, but Gerber’s dated, corny dialog undercuts each and every scene. Whether it’s a nervous student asking a reporter, “Can I go puke now?”, the two would-be Columbine kids saying things like, “Game over, man!”, or predictable satirical discussions of the issues through Oprah and Dr. Phil analogs, there’s just nothing to take seriously here. Nearly EVERY other WORD seems to be BOLDFACED for dramatic EMPHASIS, but UNFORTUNATELY, this is a HOARY old VESTIGE of the SILVER AGE, and only makes THE PROCEEDINGS more CARTOONISH.

In short order, our disturbed lead gets railroaded by Gerber’s over-the-top take on the justice system, tried as an adult, and sentenced to a minimum of fifty years in prison. We know Ethan’s not all bad because he has an angsty outburst of regret while talking to a psychiatrist – “I killed my best friend, dammit...” – but I was more inclined to laugh at the clichés than spend one minute investing emotion in the story. Ethan’s power manifests one more time during his courtroom sentencing, causing electrical and seemingly telekinetic chaos, but it’s written off as a freak electric accident – no one yet knows that he has some kind of powers. Thus the series’ concept: misguided teenager with strange powers trying to survive a fifty year sentence in prison. Under another writer, I might actually buy into it. Under Gerber, it appears to be dead on arrival.

The one bright spot in the book is Brian Hurtt’s clean-line art and the subjective, interesting color palette. Most scenes are monochromatic, or nearly so, with unusual, muted blues, browns, reds, and violets dominating all. I can’t see that the colors actually contribute much other than to make the series look different from everything else on the stand – it’s certainly nothing like the gaudy world of most superheroes – but it’s pleasing enough to the eye.

There is a chance...a slight chance...that this series might find its legs once we enter the world of prison in the issues to come. It’s certainly a terrifying concept, and the addition of weird psychic powers offers the potential for an experience on the order of Steven King’s THE DEAD ZONE or FIRESTARTER, or M. Night Shyamalan’s dark superhero movie, UNBREAKABLE. I want for Gerber to succeed, but I just don’t think he has it in him to pull this off. He created and refined an over-the-top satirical style in the ‘70s, and while it’s not fully active in this series, the influence is still very much there and it’s weighing everything down. He put down his roots in the Late Silver/Early Bronze Age, and they’re not comin’ up.

Not seeing much potential in this book’s future, or the DC Focus line for that matter.








ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN #53

Brian Michael Bendis - Story

Mark Bagley - Pencils

Art Thibert - Inks

Published by Marvel Comics

Release Date - 2/4/04

Reviewed by
Village Idiot



"STOP IT! STOP INTERFERING IN MY LIFE!!"

No, that wasn't my sister talking to my parents circa 1981, that was the enormous supervillain/crime boss Wilson Fisk, aka The Kingpin, lunging after Spider-Man during my favorite moment in ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN #53.

At that moment, it was as if Spider-Man went one smart-assed comment too far, and in an instant we were witness to an eruption of about 25 comic book issues worth of rage. There was something so personal about Kingpin's outburst at this point, so "at-the-end-of-his-rope," it almost sounded like a plea. Fisk is no longer regally condescending to Spidey, he's now dealing with Spider-Man on new terms. Of course, we find out at the end of the issue that there's more working on Kingpin than just the accumulation of Spider-Man's one-liners, or even the constant presence of Spidey as a thorn in Kingpin's side. But still, that one moment seemed so brilliantly organic in the whole scheme of ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN up to this point, it felt real.

And that's what I like so much about ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN. More than any other superhero comic I'm reading right now, USM has moments that feel real.

In the case of Kingpin and Spidey, much of it has to do with the fact that the emotional life of these characters seem to have clearly developed over time. Again, it's organic. There's a consistency to the development that I can only assume comes from the fact that Bendis had the advantage of starting from scratch with this series. Bendis' ULTIMATE Peter Parker has grown, and so has his relationships with the people around him - his Aunt, J. Jonah Jameson, and Mary Jane; grown in a seemingly deliberate way; one that you'd be more inclined to find in a novel.

And of course there's the dialog.

Yeah, I'm one more schlepp who's going to talk about Bendis' dialog.

In ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN, Bendis writes some of the best dialog I've ever read in a comic. It's not over indulgent. It's not over-stylized. It's not in a David Mamet patois that hyper-ephasizes the quirks of human speech. Stylistically, his dialog simply reflects the natural rhythms of conversation (while, of course, advancing the plot and giving insight into the characters). Sometimes it reads so sharp, it can carry a scene. Case-in-point: The first half of ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN #53 deals with Mary Jane after she's run away from home. This is not a comic plotline that I would have asked for, and the margin for error here is humongous. But Bendis made it work, creating a nice little scene between Peter and MJ; one that's certainly better than anything you'd find in the SPIDER-MAN movie. Moreover, this little drawing of this teenage girl felt scared, and her boyfriend felt concerned. I bought it.

And I "buy it" more consistently with ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN than with any other title. I'm sure some credit should go to Bagley and Thibert's dewy-eyed renderings - they carry over a fair amount of emotion in their own right.

Of course, USM #53 was not without a fair amount of action as well. The aforementioned scene with Kingpin takes place in the apartment of Felicia Hardy, aka the Black Cat, along with Fisk's mercenary Elektra and eventually Spider-Man. @$$es were kicked, quips were thrown out, and at the end of the day, that felt as real as it needed to too. USM #53 was another solid issue.








THE MONOLITH

Writer: Jimmy Palmiotti & Justin Gray

Artist: Phil Winslade

Publisher: DC Comics

Release Date: 2/4/04

Reviewed by
Cormorant



I don’t know much about Kabalah, a branch of Jewish mysticism, other than the fact that Madonna’s into it and pop stars getting into religion is almost never a good thing (perpetual exception: The Beatles). So why am I okay with Kabalistic practices being portrayed in the DC Universe in the new book, THE MONOLITH, courtesy of the underrated writing team of Jimmy Palmiotti and Justin Gray?

Because I trust Batman and Superman’s world more than I trust Madonna’s.

Granted, Palmiotti and Gray are walking well-trod ground here, the titular “Monolith” referring to an incarnation of the popular Jewish legend of the golem - a magical, humanoid protector built of clay. For obvious reasons (the startling visual, the heroic themes), golems are probably the most-represented Jewish legend in adventure comics, but it’s hard to be too critical of our writers when none of the previous incarnations have really fired up reader interest. Will theirs be the exception?

First thing you’ll notice is that this comic’s a big mutha, golem-sized if you will. It clocks in at 44 pages, twice the length of a normal comic, and works in a lot of story in that space. We open with a murder – an elderly Jewish couple brutally dispatched by a pack of robbers. A startling action scene follows, with a shadowed, hulking figure pitching the murderers out of windows and into eighteen-wheelers like the second coming of Ultimate Hulk. The detailed, utterly spectacular visuals by artist Phil Winslade sell the hell out of the action, but it was the quiet scene that followed that marked the point when the book first really caught my attention. The unseen figure –it’s a golem, duh - carries the murdered old couple to their bed and places their bodies beside each other with what can only be described as reverence. It’s a truly tender moment, very pleasantly unconventional.

After the prologue, we’re introduced to our lead, Alice. She’s a street kid living in New York - using drugs, hanging out with drug dealers, and crashing in prostitutes’ apartments. She’s about a step away from falling completely into that world when she’s informed that she’s inherited her recently-deceased grandmother’s estate. She doesn’t give a crap – she’s got no money to pay the taxes on the crumbling old Brooklyn tenement – but on the run from a loan shark out for blood, she takes refuge there. This is where the story gets interesting, because this is where the walls begin talking to her and she discovers her grandmother’s diary chronicling her life in the ‘30s. In fact, a good half of the story is told through flashbacks to Alice’s grandmother when she was a girl, struggling to make a living under conditions not dissimilar to Alice’s own. It’s a world of grueling child labor, mob threats, and the omnipresent danger of starvation, and after one blood-soaked night, it sees the birth of the mystical golem that we’re sure to see more of in the second issue. Presumably, Alice will find herself as the modern keeper of the golem, but I’m just as interested to see more stories of her grandmother’s life (and it looks as though we will).

On one hand, some of the characterizations felt a little stock to me, a little traditionally “comic booky.” I may grouse about Brian Bendis’s plotting at times, but his street level characters and dialog are so dead-on convincing that I can’t help but use them as a new high water mark, and Palmiotti and Gray’s somewhat cartoonish depiction of street life can’t help but come up lacking for the comparison. On the other hand, total realism isn’t the end-all be-all of drama, and I still found their story compelling.

What really grounds the story is Phil Winslade’s artwork. It is amazing in its detail, 100% New York with every nook and cranny covered with posters, rust, and a decades-lived-in look. It’s little wonder that Winslade was called in to draw Marvel’s new HOWARD THE DUCK miniseries a year or two back, as he’s certainly one of the modern successors to HOWARD’s best-known artist, Gene Colan. Like Colan, Winslade gives the reader shadowy, detailed reality – almost photographic at times – but also like Colan, he allows his camera to rove around daringly. Gutsy “bird’s eye” and “worm’s eye” views that would scare the pants off of lesser draftsmen are the norm in his world, a mature extension of the lessons taught in the corny but genuine classic, HOW TO DRAW COMICS THE MARVEL WAY. These wild camera angles are a smart visual compliment to the story’s melodrama, and a welcome change from the staid camera work of other urban-themed comic artists like Alex Maleev and Michael Gaydos.

The test of this book will be in how well it interacts with the DC Universe when the connection is made explicit. I suspect THE MONOLITH will be mostly self-contained – no recurring Green Lantern appearances for a book this street level – but I can easily see characters like Batman, Catwoman, even the urban-oriented Flash, interacting with Alice. DC fans looking for a break from the gaudier side of superheroes should check it out. We’ve got a solid launch here.








Cheap Shots!



WOLVERINE/CAPTAIN AMERICA #1 (2/4/04) - I bought it. It had Captain America. Don't waste your money. It reeks of everything that was wrong with Marvel in the early 90s. - superninja


SUPREME POWER #7 (2/4/04) - The seventh installment is just as interesting, thought-provoking, entertaining, visually stunning, and filled with action and adventure as the previous six. JM Straczynski and Gary Frank are concocting a modern masterpiece that can only be compared to THE WATCHMEN. If you are not reading this book you have no business reading comics. - Ambush Bug


JUSTICE LEAGUE ADVENTURES #28 (2/4/04) - I don't get the chance to watch the cartoon very often, but I do read the comics. It's hit or miss, and this issue is a miss. It's has the Legion (as it says on the cover) but it reminds me of one of those Betty and Veronica issues of Archie Comics where the girls try on new outfits. In this case, Wonder Woman and Hawkgirl. I give their new outfits an 8. I give the issue a 3. - superninja



LOBO UNBOUND #5 (2/4/04) - This issue was not so good. Not only is this issue so late that anyone who had been following the "loose at best" storyline is lost from page one, but the use of language in this issue is maddening. Keith Giffen chooses to splice one part alien-speak dialog with two parts ebonics, making the book almost impossible to read without slowing one's reading down to a crawl to sound out the sentences. One dialect at a time, Giffen. My brain is doing loopty loops trying to figure it all out. Reading Lobo should not be this hard. Giffen tries to explain what has happened in the last few issues to catch us all up, but you'd have an easier time translating the Dead Sea Scrolls. The book's best moments (surprise, surprise) revolve around Ambush Bug, who POP!'s in on Lobo to warn him about an army of inch-high Moyle Men who live to circumcise anything in their path. Yeah, you read that last line right. It's funny, Ambush Bug shows up halfway through the book and gives a criticism of how the book is going so far (kind of like I'm doing) and then he gets the shit beat out of him by the people he criticized (kind of like the verbal beatings I often take in the Talkbacks). I guess you could say this is a case of life imitating art. - Ambush Bug


SUPERMAN: BIRTHRIGHT #7 (2/4/04) - Forget the vaguely creepy Michael Rosenbaum on TV's SMALLVILLE, Mark Waid has shown us a young Lex Luthor that actually seems like he could grow up to cause real problems. Yet this misanthropic Lex and Clark still manage to hit it off, via flashback, in what turned out to be some of this issue's best moments. Overall, the series is still chugging along at a pace that's almost glacial; to the point where we're past the midpoint and I still feel like we're just getting started. And I also have to mention the beginning of the issue, where Clark's co-workers gloating over ditching him in a way that seems almost sadistic. (What - are they all Steve Lombards?) Still though, nice work with Lex. - Village Idiot




DRAGONLANCE: THE LEGEND OF HUMA #1 (2/4/04) – If you were a kid in the ‘80s, especially any kind of a dork or geek, there’s a good chance you read the DRAGONLANCE novels. I was a dork. I read ‘em. Well, at least the original trilogy (the first of the forty thousand or so trilogies to come). It was based on a particular Dungeons & Dragons setting, and pretty decent pulp fantasy for those who’d yet to discover the more imaginative works of Tolkien, Moorcock, or LeGuin. As a onetime fan of the setting, I was ready to give this comic spin-off its due, but the muddled art (bad computer coloring’s the big problem) hamstrings a decent story that’s at least faithful to the novels’ moderately interesting fantasy world. Plus, the legendary era it covers isn’t as interesting to me as the era of the novels’ first trilogy. Pass. – Cormorant


Y: THE LAST MAN (2/4/04) - Wow, I never thought I'd be rooting for the last man on Earth not to have sex. But Yorrick's abductor is so sadistic, both physically and psychologically (she's already mind-f@#ked him), to give in to her would seem to run contrary to heroism. And heroism is more important than sex, right? (Answer: Yes, it's supposed to be.) Nevertheless, Y has begun to head into some challenging and even disturbing territory, exploring the more nightmarish aspects of its premise and themes, not to mention taking a few presentational changes-of-pace along the way as well. Interesting stuff and well worth the read. - Village Idiot







This week's column is dedicated to the work and memory of
Julius Schwartz (1915-2004)






    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Feb 10, 2004 7:50:48 AM CST

    Naked Cupid Harry...

    by *tk*

    I will be able to watch no more movies, for my eyes are now permantely bleeding. lol, FIRST

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 10, 2004 7:57:15 AM CST

    No review of Secret War?

    by lurk3001

    Isn't the new Bendis Marvel Secret War coming out this week? The art looks interesting.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 10, 2004 8:15:27 AM CST

    No copy of Secret War to review.

    by vroom socko

    Once I get my grubby little paws on a copy, you'll see a review. I've been looking forward to this one for a while now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 10, 2004 8:24:13 AM CST

    Secret War

    by lurk3001

    Cool. Can't wait to get a copy in my grubby mitts as well.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 10, 2004 9:18:54 AM CST

    X-Statix

    by blok narpin

    How come X-Statix rarely, if ever, gets mentioned here? It's just about the best book on the shelves these days (with Flash, Titans, and Fantastic Four following closely). Wizard reported last issue that Even Dorkin and Mike Allred are going to be launching an all new Metal Men! Ginchy!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 10, 2004 10:03:45 AM CST

    Corm- Three Investigators!

    by renonevada2000

    Damn, I thought I was the only oldtimer around these parts who remembered them. Wonder what Jupiter and the boys are up to now?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 10, 2004 10:23:02 AM CST

    What I bought last week:

    by rev_skarekroe

    Cerebus 299: This series looks like it's going to end with a bang. Shame it took several years of suckage to get here.
    Lobo Unbound 5: Ambush Bug stuff = good. Lobo stuff = ungood.
    Y the Last Man: Yorick's got problems.
    Ultimate Six 6: The big fight scene, and I can't for the life of me figure out what the hell is going on. Bah!
    Ultimate Fantastic Four 2: Good, but why would they let Ben Grimm and Johnny Storm anywhere near the test area? It would have made a lot more sense if Ben was one of the soldiers guarding the project or something. But they don't pay ME to write it. Dammit.
    Walking Dead 3 & 4: This series gets better with every issue. In a year or two, it's going to be one of the top comics out there.
    sk

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 10, 2004 3:13:53 PM CST

    R.I.P. Mr Schwartz

    by havoczer0

    From all the interviews I've read, He's alsways seemed like a geniunely good guy doing his best to help a lot of creators out. Sorry to hear him pass on.

    As for me, got 2 issues to add I picked up this week:

    Ult. Six #6 - The action goes all out and damn, Hairsane's art is sweet. Spider-Man/Cap vs. Green Goblin...Hell Yeah! Pick it up.

    X-Men Unlimited #1 - Awesome Pat Lee cover....boring as sin stories inside. Skip It.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 11, 2004 12:54:52 AM CST

    Ulitmate Spider-Man

    by waspo

    USM is the best comic book going right now hands down! The dialog is gold, and the artwork is epic! Each comic makes me realize why Spider-Man always has and always will be my favorite superhero... Bagly, Bendis, great job all around!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 11, 2004 1:12:47 AM CST

    Not to be finnicky here...

    by ribbons

    ...but it's dialogue. What you're using is as different as tong is from tongue, and we should at least try to keep up some pretenses of an actual language here. Good review though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • I'm just sayin' is all. And I'm glad to see someone else remembered the three crime-solving kids with the question mark business cards, Reno. My mentioning them was an age test. Those who didn't recognize the reference are clearly teen punk bastards with no credibility. Those who *did* are mature badasses whose opinions actually *mean* something. Congrats! Yeah, those books were pretty cool when I was a kid - creeped me out a little, even - though I don't know how well they'd hold up now. They did have Alfred Hitchcock's sanction, though, so I theorize that they at least leapfrog the R.L. Stine circle of kiddie-writing-hell simply for associating with greatness...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 11, 2004 1:17:53 AM CST

    Lets give the cheap shots a raise.

    by fantomex

    I love the cheap shots. I skip over most of the reviews but I always read every cheapshot. So you'll excuse me if "this is just bad don't read it" doesn't work for me. If you can't do a real review, just don't post it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Why does Bagley give so many of the women in the book, Mary Jane in particular...somewhat *masculine* facial features? C'mon, you guys know it's true. The noses and jutting chins in particular give the ladies a manly look that's just a little unsettling. 'Sup with that? Bagley is good - an excellent storyteller in particular - but methinks he needs to broaden his repertoire of facial types.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 11, 2004 1:28:50 AM CST

    Hey Ribbons...

    by jonquixote

    ...I hope you've got grey temples, an tweed jacket that stinks of pipe smoke, and the complete MASTERPIECE THEATRE on DVD, 'cause you're gonna have to do a lot more to sell yourself as a successful English snob after this little blunder. Dialog and Dialogue are interchangeable, probably like "color" and "colour". http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=dialogue I also prefer the "ue" variant m'self, but the other one is still a-okay.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 11, 2004 1:41:57 AM CST

    I really dug that issue of Y

    by dave_f

    It seems to me that the series has become a little meandering recently, and while this latest issue served up an unlikely scenario at best, I thought it was a much-needed catalyst to give the book its edge back. Was starting to feel like Yorick was safe, just going through his monthly adventures...but not any more! Maggots in the testicles? Jesus CHRIST, that's as opposite of "safe" as you can legally write about! As I was reading it, though, I did get to wondering about Vaughan's bizarre set-up to get inside Yorick's head. Way I figure it, Vaughan realized he'd painted himself into a bit of a corner on Yorick's characterization over the last year. Yorick's only travel companions are Agent 355 and the doctor lady, and while he theoretically might've told 'em some of this stuff, we the readers weren't privy to it, and since we don't have thought balloons or narrative captions to get inside his head and see what really makes him tick...voila, enter the sadistic interrogator! A bit of a contrivance? Yes! But I've come to the conclusion that for this series to work as an ongoing serial, it pretty much has to work with contrivances somewhat. Or does anyone want to read the story arc where Yorick just travels aimlessly for a few weeks and doesn't really encounter any women or moral dilemmas of note?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 11, 2004 2:01:57 AM CST

    You crackin' wise about X-STATIX, Blok?

    by dave_f

    'Cause they were just talking about it in last week's TalkBack, if not the reviews proper. Consensus seemed to be "not so hot anymore," which may explain why none of us have felt compelled to review it recently. Me, I wouldn't know for sure, since the book lost its charms for me as far back as when it was still X-FORCE, but it fits the pattern I saw. My big problem was always that the satire was so broad and obvious that there was no bite to it. And yet, aside from Allred's art, the satire was the only real draw for the book since the characters were so damn cartoonish (c'mon guys, even Edie was pretty two-dimensional). I think the book would've been a lot more interesting if the characters themselves had been portrayed with a much higher degree of realism, with only their *circumstances* being larger than life. I guess that's POWERS, though, right? And that book lost me for its excesses too. With POWERS, my beef was that the characters were so real, so flawed and human and fucked up, that it got to the point where I couldn't see why that world would have ever even developed superheroes approximating the Marvel/DC paradigm. Suspension of disbelief went out the door as I realized the kind of people Bendis was showing would never have put on gaudy costumes in the FIRST PLACE, would never come up with corny code names, would never have been given any sort of legal sanction to operate, would never have even a veneer of innocence in the public eye. At which point the book's entire premise starts to fall apart... ******** But, hey, about Dorkin and Allred on a new Metal Men book - that's frickin' cool by me! I only know the Metal Men peripherally, but they're one of the cooler novelty teams of the DCU, and I especially liked the handful of stories I read with 'em in the out-of-print ART OF WALT SIMONSON. Hoo doggy, that Simonson can draw one hot Platinum! Is it wrong of me to think such thoughts? And, of course, I was a big fan of Dorkin's other recent Silver Age foray, THE THING: NIGHT FALLS ON YANCY STREET. Wonder if the Metal Men stuff is gonna end up so dark?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 11, 2004 3:58:20 AM CST

    Hell, yeah, I remember the 3 Investigators

    by spacephil

    Went through every one of those fucking books in the elementary school library. Good times. Good memories.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 11, 2004 4:25:17 AM CST

    Dragonlance

    by darth thoth

    Is some of the best stuff ever!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 11, 2004 5:28:46 PM CST

    hmmm

    by chasesequence

    Still almost exclusively super-hero books and no mention of last week's Optic Nerve anywhere ...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 11, 2004 6:56:05 PM CST

    my 60 cents

    by creepycritic

    I wouldn't deny that I'm a fan of Ultimate Spider-Man, but Bendis' writing is so light and fluffy that by the time I'm done reading an issue, usually about 4 minutes after I've started, I don't feel like I've read anything at all. His stories definitely work as arcs, and there's no denying his skill with dialogue, but as individual issues they leave a lot to be desired. Maybe that's just the new Marvel and, more or less, The Way It Is. But they don't CONSISTENTLY do it: I had this realization reading Supreme Power #6 and following it up with Ultimate Spider-Man #whatever part #whatever. Supreme Power was like a fine meal: dense, flavorful, full of nuance, and it gave me tremendous gas; USM was like a tic tac - fine for after a fine meal, but insubstantial in and of itself. Supreme Power is TERRIFIC. Yes, it IS a serial story, it IS episodic, but not in the vapid 'here's-the-middle-22-pages-of-the-full-story' way that the Ultimate books are. Something happens in each issue. But back to my original rant. This prolonged-payoff storytelling is the result of the continuing cinematization of comics, a bad move born of a new greed in comic storytelling where a single $2.25 issue gets you nothing, but buy all 6 for $14.50 and you get the story. Further, reading used to be more active, with the reader filling in their own pregnant pauses and sweeping 'the camera' to the next panel - in other words, allowing a reader to use their imagination. I can only imagine how many New Marvel issues it would take to tell the classic GI Joe #21 (the silent issue) At least four or five, with pages full of nothing but eye movements. This cinematization feels as if the creators don't trust their readership enough and are turning comics into something akin to television - something to look at, but not necessarily be actively engaged by. If it's possible, they're dumbing down a medium that's already viewed as not terribly smart. Will I continue my sheepish run of reading issue after issue of the Ultimate Books? Hell yes. I enjoy the stories, like I said. I just wish I could get the stories month after month instead of twice a year. And I agree with The Rev on Ultimate FF #2. Makes no sense that Ben and Johnny are at the podium in the closing sequence. 'Visiting your friend, you say? Well, fine, put on this uniform and stand close to the unstable object. We'll be back here.' Will I keep reading it? Sigh. Yes. And hey, while I'm at it, I've got a bitch about Marvel in general these days. There was a time when the cover told you what happened in the issue. Now it seems that half of the covers are nothing more than what used to pass as pinups. Anybody remember what happened in the issue where Spidey is crouching on a building on the cover? No? How about the one where he's crouching on the building? Or the one where he's sticking to the wall? Anyone? I think this is a bad move for Marvel. I'm not as old as all that, but half the time I'm in a comic store, I can't remember if I own an issue or not based on the cover, because THEY TELL ME NOTHING. Is it that artists are paid less for these 'stock' covers? I wonder. And I AM old enough that any Three Investigators reference is appreciated. Red Gate Rover, y'all.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 11, 2004 7:09:16 PM CST

    random thoughts

    by fuzzyjefe

    I don't know the 3 Investigators, but I do remember reading countless Encyclopedia Brown books. My prediction for the "superbrawl" coming in Supreme Power (if anyone cares to know): The crystal recognizes Mark as the baby from the ship way back when, thereby neutralizing any damage that either can do to each other. However, I believe that a large section of countryside will be laid waste. Either that, or the crystal will be Mark's krytonite. But I don't see JMS taking that more obvious path. On to Ultimate Spider-Man: does anyone else get the feeling that the Watsons are about to make an unexpected move somewhere far away? It feels like just the kind of wrinkle that could set the stage for all kinds of torment for poor Peter. Damn, 616 Peter had it easy in the early days by comparison. It sure seems like it's taking quite a while longer for Ult PP to pull it together, powers-wise. He is continually getting his butt handed to him. But hey, that makes for an interesting comic. I'm just ready for him to open a can of whup-ass on anybody.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 11, 2004 7:37:17 PM CST

    Wow, Creepy Critic, you sound like a grouchy old-timer...

    by sideshowbob

    ...but I completely agree with you.

    Regarding the covers, this is one of my top gripes with comics these days. I LIKED having the cover hint at what was inside, it's like seeing the teaser trailer before the movie...when I was a kid I used to go to the comic store with my $5 a week allowance and pick up a book, look at the cover and think "I wonder what happens here". I used to sometimes buy books based on that curiosity.


    Ultimate Spider-Man: I've tried jumping on board with the title several times and every time felt like I just read 22 pages of nothing. Nuff said, really. And I like Bendis, I like his work on Daredevil in particular, but that style works on a dark, slow-cooking Daredevil story. Not a kid-friendly Spidey title.

    Speaking of Bendis, anyone read Secret War yet?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 11, 2004 7:44:27 PM CST

    I knew it

    by creepycritic

    I knew I would just come off sounding like a grouchy old ass, but I can safely say I'm not that old. Am I a grouchy ass? Yes.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 11, 2004 7:49:17 PM CST

    Well, I didn't make ya no promises, Flickhead...

    by dave_f

    ...and don't expect the superhero reviews to lessen anytime soon. Superheroes are still the absolute dominating force of the American comics market and they're still what people most want to read and talk about. So, yeah, we're gonna have our weeks like this that go superhero heavy, but in the last few weeks we've also discussed WALKING DEAD, MIDNIGHT MASS., CEREBUS, SCOOTER GIRL, FREAKS OF THE HEARTLAND, FALLEN ANGEL, KISS KISS BANG BANG, and yes, THE BOOK OF BUNNY SUICIDES. Plus I've got some more manga shit to recommend in the next column, so you'll want to be there for that! Now as for OPTIC NERVE in particular, I think Liz is the only among us who might follow the series, so for simplicity's sake I'm just going to blame her for not rising to the occasion. Based on that, her recurring tardiness, and her foul mouth, we may have to let her go. But I don't like leaving our readers in a lurch, so I went out and *found* an OPTIC NERVE review for you. Comes courtesy of Alan David Doane's blog, which emphasizes the more progressive side of comics than does our little populist haven. It might be to your liking: http://www.addblog.com/ (you'll need to scroll down a few entries) Incidentally, I just looked at Doane's most recent entry, a post about indie distribution, and he notes that OPTIC NERVE #9, while printed, hasn't been sent out through Diamond yet. So...good chance most of us haven't even *seen* it yet. Damn, Flickhead, I can't believe you almost made me fire Liz over a book that's not even in the hands of the general public! Bastard. Go read your OPTIC NERVE review and think about what you nearly did.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 11, 2004 8:50:21 PM CST

    another grouchy old ass

    by sideshowbob

    Nah, I'm not that old either...28...and I was thinking the other day, the comic book publishers seem to be pursuing the coveted "young reader" niche, by attempting kid-friendly content, or easy jumping-on points, or even completely re-inventing the universe with the ultimate line to reflect the Marvel movies. But, really, what it comes down to is that they're just too damn expensive. When I was kid, comic books were the best way to get the most bang for my allowance. With $5 I could potentially get 8 comics at $0.60 apiece. Nowadays I'm an adult and I make a decent salary and I don't feeling like buying much at $3.00 a pop. Has anything else besides comic books gone through a 500% price increase since the mid-80s?

    Reply to Talkback

  • 'Cause what I'm seeing is a darn good comic, but one that's not even in the same ballpark as WATCHMEN when it comes to depth of themes or sophistication of presentation. JMS is good, but I don't think he'll be creating any characters as brilliant as Rorschach or the Comedian, or penning any sequences as powerful as Dr. Manhatten's visit to Mars.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 11, 2004 10:12:36 PM CST

    ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN , story decompression, and YOU!

    by village idiot

    Hey Creepy Critic, Village Idiot here, and I must say, it's nice to see someone else assume the mantle of grumpy old man around here for a change. (It's usually me.) And as a matter of fact, I share your misgivings about "decompressed storytelling," the scourge of grumpy old comic fans everywhere. However, if there's one thing ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN has taught me, it's that story decompression is not necessarily an all or nothing, love it or hate it issue. Like with just about everything, sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't, and I would argue that with ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN, it really works well.__________But before I launch into a full scale defense specifically in regard to USM, I'd like to address one of your points that goes to the issue of decompression in general. You said: "This cinematization feels as if the creators don't trust their readership enough and are turning comics into something akin to television - something to look at, but not necessarily be actively engaged by. If it's possible, they're dumbing down a medium that's already viewed as not terribly smart." I think that's an interesting way of looking at things, but I don't think that's what really goes on with the kind of storytelling we're talking about. With more traditional compressed storytelling, I don't think that between the panels readers are "filling in their own pregnant pauses" etc., I think most readers are just moving onto the next panel. The plot moves quickly, and that's okay, sometimes great, but I would suggest that this efficiency came at the expense of a degree of emotional depth and subtlety -- depth and subtlety that decompressed storytelling can, when used effectively, bring. And I'd say that this kind of emotional depth not only enhances the melodrama, but is actually *more* engaging, more challenging, requires more from the reader than a more plot heavy story presentation. You have to pay attention, and invest yourself a little more, and let yourself feel what's happening. And in the end, if it works right, the payoff can be pretty satisfying.But of course, like__________I said, sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Sometimes the story is stretched out not with emotional beats, or subtle emotional transitions, but with, say, architecture. I don't need to see too many pages to establish setting. And sometimes, the emotional beats can seem a little self-indulgent. There was a sequence in Mark Waid's EMPIRE, shortly after the main villain killed his daughter where we were subjected to what was essentially the same panel over and over again, seemingly to drive the point home that what we just saw was Very Important. And not to pick on Mark Waid, too much, but for me, but whatever emotional depth we're supposed to be getting from the very decompressed BIRTHRIGHT doesn't seem to be paying off very cost effectively. Decompression can suck.__________But it doesn't suck in ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN; perhaps because Bendis is really good at it. Bendis has a lot of panels of people just looking at stuff (usually at each other). And when they do, it means something, it says something - sometimes something that couldn't be said otherwise, or at least said on the same level. And that has value. That's satisfying. When it works best, you feel like you've been somewhere with real people; and in a way, that's as good as people in costumes hitting each other, or talking about how they're going to be hitting people soon. Like in USM #53, the scene where a teenage kid is talking to his runaway girlfriend worked for me in such a way that I found myself interested in a teenage kid and his runaway girlfriend. At by the end of the issue, it all felt full enough.__________And so, I like it. But it may not be everybody's bag -- and that's okay. I could make one suggestion for you regarding USM, it would be to *read it slower.* Take your time. Give the panels a little more consideration. (Don't study them, but don't rush through them either. Believe it or not, the online comics at mavel.com are good for this: you're forced to look at everything, and at least give it a moments consideration. It may not help things for you, but then again, maybe it might. And really, more traditional comic storytelling isn't going anywhere, and can be effective in it's own right. One need look no further than something like JLA/Avengers, which I think is pretty fantastic.__________Nevertheless, I would like to take one more second and suggest that I deserve a little credit for the Three Investigators jag when I mentioned it in an @$$hole inter-office memo recently. And although the adventures of Jupiter Jones and the boys were loads of fun, I'm sorry, Harry Potter rules their auteur-loving @$$.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 11, 2004 10:31:28 PM CST

    I don't think I'm going too far...

    by ambush bug

    I recently re-read THE WATCHMEN. I agree Manhatten's trip to Mars, the way it was mapped out, was awe-inspiring storytelling. I agree Roscharch's capture and prison interviews were some of the most chilling moments in comics. The hook for the Watchmen was "What if super-heroes lived in the real world?" JMS is doing the same thing. Watchmen dealt with age old heroes reminiscent of the JSA and the old Charlton heroes (the heroes of a generation before) and set it in modern times (which was then the eighties). JMS is doing the same thing by taking a team who was essentially Marvel knock offs of DC's icons and plopped them into today's big government, commercialized, media-driven society. Both books are commentaries of how heroes are viewed in the day and age that the books were produced. I'll give it to you, there will never be another WATCHMEN. Comic book writing reached an all time highpoint with that series, but JMS is doing an equally amazing job. Take for example the conversation between Nighthawk and Hyperion in issue 6. What could've been another boring slugfest turned into a morality debate with racial subtext. It's an extremely smart argument, one you rarely see in today's comics. The talkbacker who said that he leaves SUPREME POWER with his appetite satiated is dead on. No other comic on the shelves is packed with this much goodness. THE WATCHMEN and SUPREME POWER are three course meals in comic book form. Like THE WATCHMEN before it, SUPREME POWER uses superheroes as an allegory to our times and fills each issue with cool moments, intelligent themes, and embraces the idea of comic books and what makes them special.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 12, 2004 12:42:25 AM CST

    Feel no shame, Creepy

    by jonquixote

    I had to double check my log on three times to make sure your post wasn't written by me...AND I'M A GENIUS!! *** I don't know about WATCHMEN v. SUPREME POWER yet, because they're very different beasts and it's still early. But when all is said and done, such comparisons wouldn't surprise me. *** And I don't know about statements like "It Works in USM", VI. I used to read it in trades and even then buddy, it didn't work for me. Note the crushing overuse of full-page panels - there's a different between "decompressed" or "leisurely" and "inefficient". In my experience, USM might be the former two, but it is also definitely the latter.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 12, 2004 2:21:20 AM CST

    actually, that was for superninja

    by fantomex

    I read a lot of great marvel comics in the 90s. if you can't do better, there are a lot of other people on this talkback who can.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 12, 2004 4:00:53 AM CST

    Actually, I'm not an English snob at all

    by ribbons

    Which I guess would explain why I didn't know the two were interchangeable. I wasn't trying to "diss" anyone when I pointed it out though, so lay off.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 12, 2004 9:05:08 AM CST

    Joss Whedon X-men Boon out in MAY

    by holidill

    I just saw a black and white copy of the March Diamond Previews Magazine and Joss Whedon and John Cassaday are not taking over New X-Men. They have their own book called Astonishing X-men that is due out in May. Also as part of the X-men Reload, New X-men is dropping the new and will now just be known as X-men.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 12, 2004 10:03:30 AM CST

    full-page panels

    by sideshowbob

    The full-page panels, and even 2-panel pages are way overused in modern comics. They can be very effective when used in moderation. Part of me thinks it's to give the artist a little space to stretch out and show their stuff. But the cynic in me wonders if the Bendis and Millars out there have spread their writing duties too thin, and throw those full-page panels in there out of laziness or to help churn out product at a faster pace. There's not a lot of writing that goes into those pages. It certainly helps to make a strong point in your story, or to have a big moment, but when you overuse it, something about it reads as being a false or contrived way to get a big moment by cheating. And for God's sake, don't use the full-page panel to have the character spout a Schwartzaneggar-esque one-liner before offing an enemy ("Do you think this "A" stands for France?"). That trend needs to stop.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 13, 2004 11:56:21 AM CST

    USM

    by antboy

    Even though I like a lot of what Bendis does, at the end it's still not delivering the things you read superhero comics for - good superhero action, exciting villains, and clever cliff hangers. I like good characterization and realistic dialogue too, but frankly, there's plenty of good Vertigo comics for that. I'm also kind of annoyed at how ineffectual a superhero Spidey seems to be lately in this book. I know he's a lot younger but still, losing to the likes of Electra and the Black Cat, c'mon.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 13, 2004 12:03:07 PM CST

    JLA

    by antboy

    The problem with any comic book version of JLA is that the cartoon is so much better. They actually managed to turn John Stewart GL and Hawkgirl into great characters. This version of Hawkgirl is sooo much better than the JSA version.

    Now if they'd just explain the limits of the Martian Manhunters powers and stop having Superman getting knocked down by anyone with a cannon, the show would be near perfect. The MTV version of Spiderman is pretty good too. I think this could be one of the hidden problems for comic books - the TV and movie versions hold up pretty well against them - and they're free.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 13, 2004 1:09:35 PM CST

    MTV's Spider-Man

    by creepycritic

    Man, that style of animation just kills me. Looks like the whole thing takes place underwater, they move so strangely. I keep expecting Spidey's next villains to be the moving guys from the Dire Straits 'Money for Nothing' video. Looking forward to The Batman, though. Got that Toth/Mazzuchelli look going on (in stills, we'll see how it moves...) But I dig it so far. Hey, I said something positive!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 13, 2004 3:22:56 PM CST

    JLA cartoon/comic

    by homer sexual

    The cartoon has several advantages over the comic. As stated above, Hawkgirl is a terrific character in JLA cartoon, my favorite. JSA Hawkgirl, kind of boring. Same with Martian Manhunter. And the cartoon plays fast and loose on continuity and character development,with simple, short storylines. This approach works, albeit to a lesser degree, with Teen Titans as well, they are focused on fun. The cartoons aren't great, I don't seek them out, but they are enjoyable fluff when I watch them.

    As far as the comics, well I want a little more meat from a comic. I don't even buy JLA, though, because IMO, these characters in comics have been done to death and don't interest me at all. I picked up the storyline with an "alternate" JLA led by Nightwing while the heroes were in Atlantis. That story arc blew, and I dropped JLA again. It was much better in the 80's, and I am one of the (apparently few) fans of the Chuck W. (Wojieski? Can't remember spelling, at work and can't check) run with IceMaiden, Fire, Blue Devil, etc.

    It's hard for the comics to be fresh. A few, like Supreme Power, succeed. Even occasional more mainstream comics like Thor are interesting right now. But other books, like JLA, are just stodgy, mired and dull.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback