Logo

Cool News

New DAWN OF THE DEAD remake trailer hits!

Published at:  Jan 08, 2004 10:40:41 PM CST

Hey folks, Harry here... Looks like they've got a new trailer over at the official site. I couldn't get their Quicktime to work, so I had to endure Windows Media. Ugh. The trailer is pretty nice, that opening is nearly verbatim out of the script I read and this thing is looking really handsome. I still wish it wasn't called DAWN OF THE DEAD... maybe... UP & AT 'EM... hehehe, nah, I still like the NO MORE ROOM IN HELL as a title concept. DAWN OF THE DEAD just constantly reminds that it wants to be that in others' minds, whereas this is very different, in many many ways. Like the cast and the look. Wish the zombies moved slower. More eerie than GOTCHA scares is my preference. Anyway, check it out!






Love your site. (I have been reading it for several years)


I noticed your article about the new Dawn of the Dead poster. Well, the new trailer is also out on the offical web site, DawnOfTheDeadMovie.Net. I saw it on Access Hollywood, and it is interesting (especially the end.)


Just F.Y.I.


Keep up the great work and maybe I will see you at BNAT 6.


Regards,


Ricky H

Kyle, Texas



    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Jan 08, 2004 10:53:18 PM CST

    The trailer just aired on Access Hollywood.

    by bendevil

  • Jan 08, 2004 10:53:23 PM CST

    Bingo!!!!!!!!

    by zillabeast

    coooooool trailer, too

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 08, 2004 10:53:24 PM CST

    First!!

    by joe cool #2

    That, and the trailer actually looks OK. Maybe this won't be a sorry descecration of the original after all. After The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, anything's possible.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 08, 2004 10:55:15 PM CST

    OK, fine, NOT first...

    by joe cool #2

    ...but I still liked the trailer.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 08, 2004 11:04:56 PM CST

    That is a great trailer!

    by harosa

    Regardless of what you think of the idea of this remake, that is one cool trailer and an inventive ass ending.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 08, 2004 11:12:06 PM CST

    Cool

    by vulgarbob

    Awesome trailer. Looks like this one might be better than the original.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 08, 2004 11:16:49 PM CST

    saw this trailer like a week ago.

    by bourne greyelf

    hows this new?
    anyway, I agree with the tb-er that said faster zombies are scarier. the whole thing that usually made zombies un-scary is the fact that you could just run, find enough time to moon a zombie, do a dance, and still getaway before the zombie could even get close. however, thanks to the cool upgrade they get from this remake, if you get surrounded, you are fucked, no ands ifs or buts about it. these fuckers are fast and furious.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 08, 2004 11:17:37 PM CST

    Looks good.

    by cmsapp

    I love the seen of Sarah watching the crazy bastards just running through the neighborhood. And fuck there was a lot of them in the mall parking lot. May have to rethink that mall shelter idea. :)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 08, 2004 11:20:09 PM CST

    Noice!

    by elgordo

    I've really dug these two trailers that have been made for this film. Innovative and interesting and not your basic run of the mill horror trailer. Plus the footage looks amazing. Can't wait to see this.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 08, 2004 11:20:24 PM CST

    Sarah Polley and Lindy Booth ROCK!

    by elmstreetkid

    these two women have talent to match their stunning looks. (i swear if any of you guys ever get to see them in person you will MELT, then become SOLID..........)
    anyway, i have faith that this film will be a lot of fun. very different in tone than the original.
    from what i understand (friends worked on the film) the faster zombies are the ones that are recently inflicted, not the reanimated corpses.
    cheers!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 08, 2004 11:27:46 PM CST

    Wow, this talkback is positive so far, now I really think there'

    by boris the blade

    The trailer rocks. I like the idea that the fast ones are the newly reanimated and we still have the shambling ones in there.... So far so good....ALIVE INSIDE

    Reply to Talkback

  • What are you talking about? That's the best kind of zombie! That's how all the good zombie movies depict them. The creeping dead are more scary then the running dead. That's not scary at all. I don't see how a decaying corpse could run anyhow. And that's how they get you, they mob you or you get tired after cutting one down and then another takes it's place, and then another... and another... and another....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 12:28:21 AM CST

    Hold on a sec -- did I really just see the return of Baby Selwyn

    by trav mcgee

    Either (1) All right, Baby Selwyn got a new agent! Good to seem him working again. (2) Peter! Fran! Call your lawyer! ...Actually, I look forward to Ving Rhames talking him for a carriage stroll in the park... *pound!* *pound!* "He's, uh, hyperactive." ...Thank you. This post was for Braindead fans only. Thank you.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 12:36:05 AM CST

    OOoooo.... Zombie Babies..

    by grando

    They rock!

    Reply to Talkback

  • I am so there. The trailer looks great, especially just the shot of the car driving down the road. Nothing spectaculat, but still an interesting shot.
    Anyways, the movie looks like it could be cool. I wanna see it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Expect his whole "I wanted it to be a surprise" schtick if it's true. This will, of course, be AFTER months of pimping on this site.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 1:18:21 AM CST

    Actually the fresh zombies being fast and capable of doing more

    by smeg for brains

    ... but somebody who has just died would probably be able to move pretty much as they could while alive, at least for a little while.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 1:22:58 AM CST

    speaking of cameos, did anyone notice Harry's cameo on Sealab 20

    by smeg for brains

  • Im a big time fan of the first 2 films..the 3rd..well THAT could be remade i think..But this remake looks pretty darn good..I love that shot of the woman looking at the nighborhood

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 1:35:34 AM CST

    That's a REALLY fucking good trailer

    by fatboy_roberts

    That shot of the THOUSANDS of Zombies in the Mall parking lot, as the camera cranes up over the roof--Goddamn. Jaw Drop. Remake or no, I'll go in open minded. Just like I did with Chainsaw. That movie disappointed--but there's nothing that says THIS movie will. Even with the deck stacked against it. Visually it looks impressive. Very impressive.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 1:48:46 AM CST

    romero's an overrated hack

    by renata

    Heresy, you say? Most of what he's done since NIGHT and DAWN is crap. DAY OF THE DEAD was repetitive and poorly paced and acted. MONKEYSHINES??? I did some reading for a company a few years ago and read some scripts of his that never got picked up. One was some love story/murder mystery that was just laughable. Something you'd see on the USA Network. Sure, he did the low budget horror indie breakthrough thing before HALLOWEEN and BLAIR WITCH, but this guy isn't sacrosanct. This remake looks like a fun, skillfully made fright flick. And I'll bet anything with Sarah Polley and Ving Rhames the acting will be 100 degrees better than anything in a Romero movie. My only issue is with the fast zombies, but not because I think all zombies should be slow and lethargic. But because 28 DAYS LATER just did it and did it so well, that I think this might not have anything new to add. But we'll see. The trailer's really good.

    Reply to Talkback

  • This trailer was great. This looks like the movie I've been waiting to come out of the zombie genre since I first caught the original Dawn. We have never gone into the realm of domestic survival as we have in the first Dawn. But there were still unexplored possibilities that haven't been answered in any movie since. At least I got to see what happens to a zombie dog's head when you kick it in the face from Resident Evil, but what have movies like 28 Days Later or just about any other zombie flick shown that wasn't already covered? How many fucking times to I have to have the damn evil military base, or the cool black guy (oh wait, I guess there is Rhames in this case, but whatever...). Ironically, though, this remake looks to provide something very fresh. I always wanted to see what happens when your HOME is seiged by Zombies, and that's why I'll see this movie in march. This is the zombie flick of the future.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 3:21:07 AM CST

    re "the quick and the dead"

    by docpazuzu

    As a rule, I prefer shamblers in my zombie flicks, but there are a few cases where the rancidly rapid do work -- most notably in the ROTLD series, especially in part 3. The angry yellow guy the scientists reanimate in that enclosed space always freaks me out. On a semi-side note -- Mindy Clarke! hubba hubba...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 3:25:48 AM CST

    I just love:

    by walnutr113

    News reports on Movies and TV about horrendous end of the world type stuff. Im a sucker for it: it makes my blood run cold. Why do you think that is?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 3:32:03 AM CST

    Zombies vis-a-vis 28 Days Later

    by myglockyourmouth

    Did we ever make a definitive determination as to whether the homicidal freaks in 28 Days Later were zombies or not? I remember a lot of hunkering down and hovering over the dismembered. They weren't quite dead and they may or may not have been canabalistic. What must be "dead" to constitute a zombie? Brain, heart, respiratory system? Would Jeb Bush allow these creatures to be Kevorkianed? I want to know and I don't want vapid, half-assed opinions.


    Free Battle Royale to DVD. Let my movies go!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 3:48:37 AM CST

    new zombies

    by lachface

    I admit, the trailer does look great, and inspired that bone chilling "what if this really happened" feeling in my spine, however i have a problem with fast zombies. It makes sense that zombies would have diferent range and quickness of movement based upon manner and time of death, but wouldn't the recently dead be almost board stiff with rigor mortis? Also, why are there not clouds of birds and other scavaging animals come to pick on the meals on wheels? And for the record I prefer the slow zombies, they have sort of a toroise and the hare, unrelenting, unswaying, unthinking brain-lust that manifests itself in a huge wall of slow moving ravenous necrotic flesh. But I withhold my final judgement until i see the movie and can see how they piece everything together. Braindead/Dead alive remains my favorite zombie flick....for now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 4:11:25 AM CST

    Im Lovin it.

    by bcfreeb

    I love it. And since so many people have been waiting on pins and needles for my opinion, I am glad to be able to give it to you so easily. I love it. Go me.
    www.unseenfilms.com

    Reply to Talkback

  • Howdy, everyone. My name's Scott, and I'm yet another amateur film critic operating out of Dallas on the internet. I've finally corralled a section of a friend's webpage to post my online reviews (which are sent out to people on my mailing list; Heretofor, I was too lazy to set up a website, someone offered to give me the space), and I'm sending out word to all my fellow film geeks: Please stop by and read some of my stuff! We writers need ample feedback, and I figure my fellow bitter, cynical film geeks are the best people to ask for support! The friend who set up the pseudo-page for me is the director of FRIENDS WITH BENEFITS, which is a student-film/comedy set in an unnamed college, which you can find at friendswithbenefits.com. It's a pretty entertaining little flick, so feel free to check that out after reading some of my reviews! The address is http://fwb.proboards18.com, and my stuff is under "The Doctor's..." If you don't have time, don't worry about it. Just trying to spread the word. I have faith in you, fellow film geeks. Thanks! Dr.Scott

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 4:13:53 AM CST

    wait a second...

    by bcfreeb

    But isnt this the same trailer that premiered a couple of months ago on the web? Yes. Yes it is.
    www.unseenfilms.com

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 4:20:06 AM CST

    NEvermind

    by bcfreeb

    I am an idiot. A big idiot, downloading the wrong trailer and posting before I figure out my idiocy. Please, geeks of the world, forgive me. I must go cry now.
    But the trailer looks great.
    www.unseenfilms.com

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 4:38:01 AM CST

    What a piece of shit

    by flipster

    What was that? a TV movie of the week. Fuck off. And die.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 4:38:32 AM CST

    I'm with Harry

    by dannyocean01

    slow zombies are scarier, in fact not scarier, more unsettling. It was the fact that they could fill up an entire Mall or army base with ease. And just when you think you're safe the lift doors open up and POW. It was the fact that you should be able to get away easily but most still got whacked that made them so creepy.

    Down with 28 Days Later style hooligan zombies.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 4:46:11 AM CST

    bitches please

    by blue7

    Just downloaded the trailer. Whatever you loads who think this looks great are smoking, I want some. The first scene is a little creepy when the girl jumps up and down or whatever. The shot of lots and lots of zombies outside the mall is almost decent. As far as the rest of it goes, shut the fuck up already. If the movie ends up actually being good, I'll admit it. You fucking heathens who dare criticize Romero's zombie movies, though, are way out of line. I know this remake will not have one tenth the blood and guts of any of Romero's Dead movies. It will feature loud noises and jump cuts in place of creepiness and plodding, inescapable, inevitable zombie death. Even if this movie doesn't entirely suck (oh boy!), the Big Red Tub is right when he says the fact that this is made when Romero himself can't get shit for funding for Dead Reckoning is a truly horrible injustice. The TCM remake was shit. This, too, will be shit. Zombie babies or not, shit it will surely be. Don't kid yourselves, and you fuckwads who dare apeak ill of Romero and the hallowed zombie trilogy, wash your shit-stinking mouths out with soap.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 5:06:47 AM CST

    WTF?

    by neoaddix

    The only original or interesting thing about that whole trailer was the bit at the end with the spraycan. The rest of it was a steaming pile of shite.

    Fact: This film will suck harder than a two-bit Louisiana whore in the middle of mardis gras.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 5:22:58 AM CST

    Holy Fuck - This Rocks !!!

    by lcd

    My God, I sit here in my office and freak out and get scared as shit - over a trailer in brought daylight!!! Can not wait to see this in the dark! Who is that chick? She

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 6:02:03 AM CST

    zombies fast??? oxy---moron

    by unclefishbits

    This is written for somewhat of a dramatic effect:

    It is decidely tragic that one could haphazardly and foolishly attempt to move the realistic world of zombies (living dead walking around due to radiation, nuclear/toxic waste, genetic experiments, a comet) and move it into the realm of utter nonsense.

    FAST?? QUICK? If you want to be smart like Boyle, where his "zombies" were still alive and just really really fucked up..... and running like zombies out of hell.. that might be acceptable.

    BUT, the one flaw is... the thing that made zombies so bloody scary is that they WERE slow.... they were a perfect antithesis to the human condition, but still echoed its sentiments in the hollow, and existentially damning way that they walked, lumbered.... the empty carcass, broken down jalopy of man (or woman for pc-interested...)

    Zombies in DAWN of the DEAD were filmed and shot like the security camera footage of true consumers shopping at the mall. They lumbered around, aimless, and vacuous. Romero said he hadn't any idea of how to film it, and when he saw the mall's footage, he said it was obvious... because the commentary of the consumerism was already inherent to the production.

    Whatever the case, the lack of dimension of a zombie is what created the sheer terror and fear, of what a human truly was at the deepest levels.. and the basest.

    Giving them abilities to move fast, and perform tasks, gives them too much functioning ability, therefore negating the idea of them being zombies.

    I guess, this jibber-jabber, aimless ramble can end with a non sequitir, as all things are considered.

    I am a real fan of the social, political and economic commentary that horror and especially zombie films have echoed for the sentiment of their time. I enjoy the films for entertainment even more.

    I will love this film, but unless the savvy and genius manuever that Boyle pulled in 28 days later to create the PLAUSABILITY of a fast zombie like human is explained, it will end up...

    just... another.... zombie.... movie.

    "It is remarkable how you can do without life's necessities, provided that you have some of life's finer luxuries."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 6:09:19 AM CST

    hm

    by llephen

    That actually looked pretty damn scary. But i just don't know about the running zombies. that's a real problem. But the neighborhood stuff looks creepy as hell, i love it. EVer since i was a little kid i have always imagined what it would look like to see the street that i lived on in a romero zombie world. i'd take stock of the windows to decide which ones i would board up and how, and i'd picture myself running outside to escape zombies in my home, only to find a lot more in each direction on the street. that's weird that i thought this stuff as a little kid.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 6:22:04 AM CST

    new dawn zombie's are alive

    by unclefishbits

    on the site, the snyopsis states that the world has been taken over by some "viral epidemic", and that people are finding that the "dead aren't dying"

    So it is to say, that they aren't necessarily dead... they get really sick, pass out dead, and wake up after a nice nap that turns them into "groovy cats whom like to saunter"

    Just info to add to the story..

    Hey... anyone near Fort Ord, Monterey CA needs to come here and see the acres and acres of abandoned housing and buildings on an old army base. I am working out a very good script.. anyhoo...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 6:39:32 AM CST

    Doesnt have anything on the original

    by hiperaktiv

    The original was eerie as hell, a true masterpiece. This just looks like a typical hollywood stylish movie with the typical fancy trailer techniques of a couple cliched scares and maybe one or two of the only good shots in the movie used to impress people. Wont have fucking anything on the original, even at its best it will never be 1/100th the horror classic Dawn of the Dead was.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 6:50:27 AM CST

    HEY KIDS, A MIXED RACE ZOMBIE FETUS--!

    by hostile organism

    Is that a liberal or conservative issue? Is it really abortion if it's an unborn zombie? Add to that a single couple being stalked by the zombie neighbor child. Whoever wrote this picture has a Jungian fear of procreation. Discuss amongst yourselves.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 7:24:28 AM CST

    Fast Zombies...ad nauseum.

    by bigpoppi

    I'll chime in and say that I don't really like the idea of fast moving zombies simply because my fat ass would be lunch in about five minutes.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Still a good trailer. The music is "It's a Wonderful Life" by Sparklehorse.

    If everything in the script is true, then this could be the movie that 28 Days Later could've been.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 9:02:48 AM CST

    DAY OF THE DEAD rawks!!

    by garko

    "I'm running this monkey farm now, Frankenstein! Now, I want to know WHAT THE FUCK YOU'VE BEEN DOING WITH MY TIME?!" - Capt. Rhodes.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 9:13:40 AM CST

    Fuck you, Yahoo Movies, fuck you right up the ass.

    by fluffyunbound

    If anyone knows of a different source for the trailer than that link to Yahoo Movies at the official site, I would appreciate. NO, YAHOO, I DON'T FUCKING WANT THE LATEST VERSION OF REALPLAYER ON MY FUCKING MACHINE. FUCK YOU AND JUST FUCKING GIVE ME THE FUCKING QUICKTIME AND/OR WINDOWS MEDIA TRAILER. Why in the fucking god damn flying fuck does that piece of fucking shit fucking site want me to have ALL FUCKING THREE before it will let me download a FUCKING WINDOWS FILE? If I could find the fuckers who designed this fucking Media Helper piece of fucking shit, I would fucking rip out their eyes and brain-fuck them!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 9:17:34 AM CST

    SHAUN OF THE DEAD!

    by coatsy uk

    Seriously folks. If none of you have seen Spaced (a british sitcom) you don't know what your missing. Anyway, one of Spaced's writers and the series Director are shooting a Zombie movie and it will kick the fucking shit out of this "remake". Apparantly it's a Zombie movie/Romantic comedy so they're labelling it a "Zom-Rom-Com" or something like that (which is funny in itself). All hail Simon Pegg! All hail Edgar Wright! All hail Shaun of the Dead! A film that will appeal to the TRUE fan of the zombie genre...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 9:35:41 AM CST

    I have to admit: Nice trailer...

    by coatsy uk

    I fucking love that shot of the lady looking around at her neighbourhood, and the camera mounted on the back of the car (nothing new, but nice). It's scary, suddenly this doesn't look so bad after all...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 9:48:15 AM CST

    Already an error in the trailer

    by acefan1971

    If this thing is set in Washington, why does the car tag visible when Sarah Polley's character is fleeing read Wisconsin? I downloaded the trailer off a joblo.com link and watched that part frame by frame to make sure I was right.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 9:58:21 AM CST

    Hey, hey, hey. What's in your head

    by rev_skarekroe

    In your head, Zombie, zombie, zombie? sk

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 9:59:32 AM CST

    The end there reminds me of Gremlins 2 ...

    by glen quagmire

    HEY! Maybe Hulk Hogan will pop out of nowehere in the movie and start kicking ass and administering Leg Drops to the living dead! or not ... but hey, that trailer is mighty good. That whole scene with the dead little girl *shudder* Creepy!! Yeah, I agree with most people who say that it makes sense that the zombies would move fast in the beginning (being freshly dead) and begin to slow down as their bodies rotted. It only bothers me in that ... I've always been scared shitless by zombie movies but was thankfull that I could probably outrun them if attacked! But HELL! I'm nowhere NEAR the fastest runner ... so yeah, I'd be screwed. AND! is that zombie baby going to be some sort of zombie-human hybrid or something who brings peace to Zombies and Human kind? I'm guessing either the mother got bitten or the baby died in the womb somehow ... either way, that's kind of a neat (yet also creepy) concept. & of course ... Sarah Polley. So yeah, I'll be watchin' this for sure.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 10:13:57 AM CST

    There's no 'error' in the trailer ACEFAN...

    by skyway moaters

    ... It says quite clearly in the synopsis (the link is on the same page that you presumably went through to get to the trailer) that it is set in Wisconsin...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 10:17:13 AM CST

    Wup, my bad ACE...

    by skyway moaters

    ... you said in your post that you got the trailer from joblo.com. If you want to read the synopsis I referred to follow the link Harry provided and you'll see it...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 10:29:21 AM CST

    Hey My Glock

    by fluffyunbound

    I don't think the concept of "zombie" has ever been fully defined by science, but here's my take: The subject must experience TOTAL death, brain, heart, and respiratory, if only for a brief period of time. Then the brain must reanimate. If zombies respirate, they must do it in a way that isn't human [i.e. no beating heart, no breathing] because if they have brain activity, beating heart, and are breathing, they aren't zombies, because they are living people then.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 10:29:22 AM CST

    my thoughts

    by crazy_8

    1)So when a zombie bites you in this movie, the change is a couple of seconds? That's how it came across to me in the beginning sequence there.

    2)If these zombies can run and jump, what exactly stops them from breaking glass, seems to me these zombies are pretty strong, so getting in that mall wouldn't be too difficult, especially with about a thousand of them outside.

    Me likes this movie so far, can't wait for the final product.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 10:35:59 AM CST

    brilliant ending

    by topcad

    Yes it was similar to the Gremlins bit with the film breaking up but I still thought it was brilliant and the scenes in the neighborhood were f'ing creepy.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 10:37:49 AM CST

    Romero

    by m.d. douche

    hasn't done a good movie in years. Who wants to see him pull a Carpenter on a dead film anyways?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 10:40:26 AM CST

    ZOMBIES 101 (sorry so long)

    by profgriffin



    In the classic horror film, Night of the Living Dead that rather unusual situation was presented in a VERY realistic and effective manner. In Romero

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 11:13:03 AM CST

    The last word (hopefully) on fast vs. slow zombies

    by garbageman33

    Here's the problem I always had with slow zombies - If they're so damn slow, why did people always go to cramped places like farmhouses and shopping malls to escape? Isn't that playing right into their outstretched hands? Why not just to a wide-open field and run your ass off every time they got close? Then, you take a nice breather, wait for them to saunter their pasty-white zombie asses closer and run like hell again. It's like playing tag with really slow kids. Except the slow kids wanna eat your guts. I loved the zombies (well, they weren't technically zombies, but whatever) in 28 Days Later. That scene in the tunnel was probably the coolest thing in any movie last year. Well, except for the gay love scene betwen Merry and Pippin in ROTK. I'll admit that slow-footed zombies are creepier, but I never understood why the dumb ass "heroes" didn't just run.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 11:19:41 AM CST

    "Good Morning, daddy. ROAAAR!"

    by malex

    But really, this looks pretty cool. The neighborhood shot is creepy as hell. At first, I did not want to see this, and now...I guess I'm there opening weekend. But why, why Mekhi Phifer? WHY? With him in it, we are lucky the trailer soundtrack didn't go like this: "Let the bodies hit the floor let the bodies hit the floor let the bodies hit the floor..."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 11:26:07 AM CST

    remake

    by cuervojones

  • Jan 09, 2004 12:08:01 PM CST

    Call me nust, but this is looking better and better.

    by gigaloff

  • Jan 09, 2004 12:21:55 PM CST

    THERE ARE 2 TRAILERS, PEOPLE!

    by phildogger

    No, You didnt see this last week. This one is new. Fast Zombies suck. That is all.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 12:32:31 PM CST

    9 days into 2004 and The Shit is coming

    by montypigeon

    Why cant you leave the f**k alone? You are raping the original for all its worth.***The makers of this film should be hung, drawn and quartered. Anyone who loves the original and accepts this suckfest, is pissing on the original from a great height.WHY MESS WITH THE F*****G GREATEST ZOMBIE FILM OF ALL TIME?*********28 DAYS LATER showed that Horror can be done right but after seeing that trailer - F**K YOU! You are making a joke out of the "DEAD" Trilogy, You are screwing with Horror at its best. You are killing these films.****Anybody here who loves the Original and accepts this, has to ask themselves - "Do you really like the original or are you a fuckwad?"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 12:35:32 PM CST

    Well, as long as we've overthinking the fast vs. slow zombies th

    by fluffyunbound

    Any of you Green Bay folks want to look outside right now, and then tell me the technical issue this brings up? Wisconsin is fucking COLD. Once the power goes out and the oil tanks in people's houses burn dry, there isn't a single place in Wisconsin where a zombie would be anything but a big frozen roast beef for six months of the year. You only have to hold out in your mall fortress until winter. Then you wouldn't even need guns to kill the zombie ice sculptures - a chain saw would do nicely. "Good morning, Mr. Zombie. Time for a haircut." This would be made immensely cooler by the fact that the zombies would still be zombie-conscious and trying like hell to get you, they would just be unable to move as you chain saw their damn heads off. A few teams of 10 guys each could probably clear most of the state before the spring.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 12:49:44 PM CST

    DOTD Trailer

    by griffin02

    Well, i guess it's official that the horror genre is cannibalizing itself with all the remakes and all. That said, this trailer kicks ass, and I will attend with an open mind, as I try to with all movies. The TCM remake was hardly a classic, but entertaining enough, and I am salivating to see TNT's Salem's Lot remake. Just remember kids, a great horror movie trailer does not mean a great horror movie (case in point: I Still Know What You Did Last Summer had a terrific trailer and ended up being a steaming pile of horse shit)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 12:52:15 PM CST

    The scary thing about the slow zombie is it never gives up

    by sexybeast


    When chased by the traditional zombie your initial thought is "these things will never catch me" but humans have to sleep, meanwhile those zombies are shuffling closer no matter how far you run. Horror should be something that is different than the normal dangers of life. In real life it isn't uncommon for a human to be chased down by something, other humans or animals. It is uncommon to be chased to the ends of the unearth by a slow unholy killing machine.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 1:25:33 PM CST

    The end gimmick

    by agador

    I love the end gimmick with the film burning and the zombies coming through the screen. Pure Castle-esque showmanship.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 2:17:22 PM CST

    when there's no more ideas in hollywood...

    by duanejones

    ...james gunn will cannibalize the cannibals (i know "strictly speaking, these are not cannibals..."). as much sympathy as i have for the "romero ain't done jack since _dotd_/4th dead flick would surely suck", i STRONGLY disagree he's an overrated hack -- apply this to wes craven/john carpenter/dario argento, thank you. romero is not a felicitous writer but is a great director whose lame scripts aren't greenlighted but occasionally (better _the ill_ than _dusk of the dead_). as for the supernal ms. sarah polley...girlfriend, the wedding is off. i'm marrying judith o'dea, instead..

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 2:35:45 PM CST

    This makes me nust

    by gypsytrobot

    Sound card - not - functioning. Can't - watch - trailer! oh yeah and Return of the Living Dead is a movie I don't ever want to watch again, even though it's a good movie. That zombie freaks me out too much. You know the one I mean, the skinny shambly slippery fella.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 3:38:32 PM CST

    Best Zombie Movie ever is.....

    by angels-egg

    Return of the Living Dead....Period!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 4:04:13 PM CST

    well, after being against this from the get go....

    by slade justice

    that looked pretty fucking sweet

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 4:09:44 PM CST

    and at least they are making no secret of that it is a remake

    by slade justice

    unlike 28 days later which decided to be a remake of day of the dead half way through...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 4:10:44 PM CST

    Looked pretty bad to me

    by ivan_mtl

    I have no idea what the rest of you saw in this trailer, but this film looks pretty lame and uninspired to me. This will go the way of "New Coke" and only make the original look even better by comparison.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 4:26:08 PM CST

    JESUS is still my favorite zombie

    by gwynsheadinabox

    I just wish there was more cannibalism in the New Testament...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 4:56:42 PM CST

    Are Dracula's vamp bitches "zombies"? If so I want to be eaten [

    by myglockyourmouth

    And I would prefer the slow versus fast version on said occasion.

    Many thanks to the erudite postings below and above as to the nature and necessary tactical response to the zombie. If you recall, the SWAT team in the original DOTD was ill-prepared for zombie combat and got decimated. I'm still uncertain whether a "head shot" is still necessary to stop a zombie or would a complete shredding by weaponry such as Jesse Ventura's shoulder mounted 7.62 mm mini-gun from PREDATOR suffice? Inquiring minds want to know! I detect the presence of zombies and this feeling of mine grows stronger with the passage of each and every day. I need to start honing my combact skills and preparedness. The day of the Zombie is upon us!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 5:44:42 PM CST

    Change the title and it could be cool..

    by manwiththedogs

    ..just leave DOTD the f**k alone.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 7:02:30 PM CST

    LordOfTheDumbass

    by fluffyunbound

    You know what? I want James Cameron to produce a Martin Scorcese-directed $150 million zombie film starring Russell Crowe and Cate Blanchett, featuring ACTUAL ZOMBIES developed by a $20 billion "black bag" DoD project. Oh wait - THAT ISN'T GOING TO FUCKING HAPPEN. And you know what? Your demand for an A list production here isn't going to be satisfied, either. The budget for this film is about what I would expect. Do you know what the budget for NOTLD was? Given your encyclopedic knowledge, I bet you do. How much more developed do the special effects really have to be? Do you want CGI zombies? Extras, my lad. Extras are the only real cost multiplier here. Perhaps they should have shot this in New Zealand and made their army show up to get dressed as zombies for free. But it's too late for that now. I think we have what we are going to have. The wide angle shots in the trailer are what they are. If there is any more of that in the film, it's worth 10 bucks. Boycotting this film will just make it that much harder to get genre films made.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 7:07:17 PM CST

    And by the way, Lord

    by fluffyunbound

    I can't think of anything crappier than doing the zombies in a DOTD remake the way they did Pirates of the Caribbean. Yeah, those special effects were SCARY. Ooooooooooo. Maybe they can use leftover Army of the Dead effects work from ROTK, too. That would work real well in a horror film, don't you think? You're better off grabbing the first ten people you see on the street and putting ketchup on their faces and saying "Groan a lot and walk this way" than you are using ANYTHING that was on the screen in POTC.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 7:12:44 PM CST

    SOMEONE

    by bourne greyelf

    please tell me this movie is gonna be rated R. PLEASE!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 8:45:36 PM CST

    Not enough

    by momardi

    There are sadly no enough good zombie movies in the world i can only name 3 (Night of, zombi and 28 days latter) I have not seen the original dawn of the dead, it's hard to get here, but day of the dead sucked big time. I hope this will be the 4th good one, PLEASE MAKE MORE END OF THE FUCKING WORLD, APOCALYPTIC AND ZOMBIE MOVIES if it combines all 3 subjects the better

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 8:52:47 PM CST

    says....

    by removed_user

    Annemarie,..............Annemarie,.........Annemarie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 10:16:10 PM CST

    Oh yeah Acefan1971? You watched it frame by frame just to make

    by boris the blade

    You know what this is? This is an "L". It stands for loser. That's you. I know a 32 year old that needs to get more of a life....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 09, 2004 10:47:35 PM CST

    One Thing that I never understood in Zombie movies... Why they d

    by judge doom

    I mean, they came from the graveyard and most of then are rotting, rigth, nothing but rot meat. So why nobody ever say something like "damn, them dead smell like s***!". A mouse died inside my house once and it took one week to remove the smell. maibe the reanimated bodies use channel n

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 10, 2004 12:01:38 AM CST

    Hey, thelastgreyelf, Call me nust but

    by judge doom

    This movie WILL be rated R. happy now?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 10, 2004 12:48:08 AM CST

    That was awesome...

    by dru

    Okay, the whole mall thing made me think of '8-Legged Freaks,' but still! The music was perfect. I don't care if this will be a good movie or not. Bottom line: that trailer rocked! Out.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 10, 2004 4:34:57 AM CST

    why dawn of the dead

    by cromley

    i really really really want to hate this movie...dawn of the dead is a timeless classic and here they gotta go and fuck it up..why not make romero's origional screenplay for day of the dead..the one that was going to end the whole series.. or even better give funding to romero to make his new dead screenplay... unfortunately i am prolly going to see this the day it comes out.. its a zombie movie and im a sucker for zombie movies... im goin in without high expectations but what really bugs me is the title when this is totaly a diffrent movie it seems.. anyway thats my 2 cents

    Reply to Talkback

  • MUST....EAT...BRAINS....BROtHER!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 10, 2004 2:36:12 PM CST

    My point exactly, Phant...- I mean Lord

    by fluffyunbound

    NOTLD was the least expensive. And the zombies in NOTLD are the best. I don't know how much "The Last Man on Earth" cost, but if you toss in the plague victims of the Vincent Price classic as honorary living dead, those are probably the 2nd cheapest, and they happen to be the 2nd best. The zombies in Resident Evil had a much higher budget, and they aren't as good. The undead in POTC and ROTK had the highest budget of all, and they are the worst. [This is not a POTC or ROTK criticism, because they are not supposed to be "horror" zombies per se. But I would say that they could not be MADE to be scary even if that effect was desired]. So we seem to have an inverse relationship where the more money that is spent on zombies, the less effective they are. This is ultimately, I believe, because the BEST zombie is a PLAIN OLD HUMAN BEING, with $2.50 worth of makeup, and that the key to making films featuring zombies effective is not how much you spend on them but how the script and the director frame the situation. Day of the Dead has the "best" gore and makeup work of the three Romero films, but it is the least of the three in terms of its horror and its memorability. I think that this Dawn remake has a chance to be good because, judging from the two trailers [which is dicey I know, but it's what we're talking about and it's what trailers are for] the filmmakers have remembered that the world is supposed to be ending, so there should be wide shots of lots of stuff getting fucked up, and lots of zombies moving at shit in human waves. And on that basis I am trying to get over being "against" this movie on principle. If it does in fact turn out to be more like "Alien", where people in dark rooms open doors and it's either a cat or a zombie, and the score makes a loud noise either way, then I will in fact be a little disappointed, not because there's anything wrong with "Alien" but because that's not what this should be. If it's more like NOTLD or DOTD where the danger is the omnipresent threat just a barricaded door away, then the film has a chance to be good. JMHO.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 11, 2004 12:32:30 AM CST

    lol

    by philosylphairi

    OMG i SO agree with you about real player! its so annoying. yahoo SUCKS for letting real player do that to people. lol. well said my friend! keep up the good work!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 11, 2004 10:12:47 AM CST

    Spoiler Alert: Zombies are actually dead people

    by dickhead

  • Jan 11, 2004 5:42:30 PM CST

    Location

    by sabernaut

    Why would they remake it up on that frozen tundra, when the original was right here in westmorland county pennsylavania?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 12, 2004 4:11:09 PM CST

    wouldn't zombies crave burgers instead of human flesh?

    by gernblanston67

    Why human flesh? Why would someone come back from the dead with a craving for something they probably have never tasted? If they're hungry, wouldn't they crave what they ate most of in life?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 12, 2004 4:46:38 PM CST

    This movie is going to rock!!!

    by jeditemple

    I love Zombie flicks and this is going to be among the best. The actors/actresses will make this an instant classic for me. Ving Rhames rules! I'm also a Romero fan and I did like his first two outings. "Day of the Dead" sucked bad though...

    Reply to Talkback

  • The new one has more scenes and the film keeps freezing up. Then something cool happens in the end. I can't wait to see this trailer in the theater to see how the ending of the trailer looks on the big screen. I am now excited to see this film.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback