Cool News
A Couple Of Looks At CYPHER, From The Director of CUBE!!
Hi, everyone. "Moriarty" here with some Rumblings From The Lab...
There’s a ton of stuff I’m going to try to post this morning, and I’m going to start right here with two reviews of a film that I’m very eager to see. Vincenzo Natali’s CUBE is a fun SF piece, and a great little mood exercise. I’m curious to see what else he’s got up his sleeve. We need more original voices in SF filmmaking today, and it sounds like both of our reviewers today are quite taken with what he’s been up to.
This first guy is an occasional contributor from Germany, and he’s written a great piece for us:
Hi Harry,
It's been a while. Honestly - I wasn't too keen on having my stuff on your site anymore. The talkbacks just get in my tits. In addition, I felt treated quite unfairly (by you too, big man!), when I sent my reviews of both Jason X and Jeepers Creepers two years ago. Everybody pissed on me for having the gall to tell it ilike it is – that Jason X is a fun romp, and JC breaks apart after a brillant half hour. It's not so much that people disagree - it's that they disagree WITHOUT having seen the films. AICN must have the most psychic readers of all the movie news websites.
Today, however, I have decided to write once more, and if you want to publish this review, go ahead. Please call me "Mild Mannered Reporter".
It's rare that I feel compelled to share my thoughts on a flick with the whole world. Rare because usually nobody gives a shit, and because I watch mostly "classics" nowadays (everybody - watch "Holy Mountain", "At Midnight I'll Take your Soul", and "Harrison Bergeron"!).
Today, I have seen "Cypher". For most people, the fact that it was directed by Vincenzo Natali ("Cube"), should be enough to see it.
Do.
I won't try to be funny (even though I adore reviews like "Out for a kill"), and I'll try not to waste your time.
"Cypher" is, quite frankly, brillant film making in every respect. Imagine (I know you won't be able to, but try anyway) the themes from "Total Recall", the intelligence of "Cube", the visual awareness of "Matrix" - on half the budget of the first DUNE miniseries.
Coming out of the theatre, I felt like my mind had just been cleansed from the memory of hundreds of crap flicks I was forced to watch over the last six months. It's this epiphany that makes you think: I've just been in the presence of greatness. Like the day I watched two unknown flicks months before their release - "Reservoir Dogs" and "Man bites dog" (the dog thing was just a coincidence, really).
Yeah, I wouldn't believe it either.
Unfortunately, I can't tell you the plot, because the movie IS the plot. It's an incredibly complex and smart story, with numerous twists and turns. And two wondrous, almost forgotten traits of moviemaking: all the twists and turns make sense, the viewer is not inevitably going "oh man, you just lost me" at one point (the movie works even in retrospect!), and the ending is beautiful, uplifting - and while it is surprising, it actually WORKS (Cube, Ninth Gate, Event Horizon anyone?!)
Lemme just tell you the setup, though: in the near future, only two big software companies have survived - DigiCorp and Sunways Systems. Martin Sullivan is hired by DigiCorp as a corporate spy, to infiltrate Sunways Systems. He gets a LOT more than he bargained for...
It sounds overly simple, and that's just the point - one of the many reasons why this movie is called "Cypher". This refers to characters, the story, the whole world this movie is set it. The title may sound generic, but it is a lot smarter than you would think.
And thumbs up for not making this one of these ridiculously boring "high tech thrillers", that are all "people staring at screens, typing in passwords, mumbling 'damn, I'm in' now and then". For a movie centering on identity in a digital world, "Cypher" uses refreshingly few of the cliches we've come to expect.
Acting is flawless - Jeremy Northam again proves to be incredibly versatile, switching between charaters with amazing ease. Lucy Liu is - well, Lucy Liu really. I have never seen her play anything else than that, to be honest. But she's good at it. David Hewlett shines in a VERY disturbing cameo. And kudos once again to the hardest working actor in Canadian Showbiz, Nigel Bennett.
Apart from the story and the acting, "Cypher" really shines in the production department. For a 10 million dollar movie, it looks (excuse my French) FUCKING AWESOME. Okay, it doesn't have big action set pieces or endless chases. Not even a fight scene. But it moves at breakneck pace, and it "feels" very action packed. Every scene is lit to perfection, with ingenious use of filters and odd camera angles (looks like different film stock was also employed). The movie looks incredibly glossy and accomplished, with the production value never straining under the actual budget. In terms of CGI, we get to major pieces: a gigantic vault (wait till you see it, it's hard to explain), a snazzy high tech helicopter. The rest is done with excellent sets and flashy, but never irritating editing.
The rest of the tech credits are flawless, too.
At the end of the day, after gasping at the sheer awfulness that was "Matrix Reloaded", it's movies like "Cypher" that give me back my faith in science fiction. As long as movies like this are being made, all is not lost.
That's why I implore you - go see it, support the people who have made it. That goes for you too, Wachowski brothers!
Don't let anyone tell you "Matrix Reloaded" or "Terminator 3" is good science fiction. Apart from not being good, I'd be hesitant to even call them science fiction.
"Cypher" is the real deal.
Prepare to be stunned.Excellent work. This next guy echoes many of the same sentiments. I’d love to hear from anyone else who’s seen it to see if there’s a consensus building on it.
Hi there,
I don't know, I just don't get it. In 1997 or 98 one movie has been all over this place: Vincenzo Natali's ingenious feature debut CUBE. Now we have 2002 and no word has yet been written on this site (or anywhere else on the web it seems -- at least not in english) about his 2002 effort called CYPHER (the IMDb says he's also just completed work on his next one, NOTHING... I'd love to hear something about that one!).
The film has been shown on several festivals all over Europe (including Sitges...) and already enjoyed a theatrical run in France. The French DVD is on its way as well as the German one. How come no one's written a review yet? Guess somebody has to spread the word:
CYPHER is a masterpiece. Maybe not as fresh and original as CUBE, but what is? CYPHER features the talents of Jeremy Northam, Lucy Liu and David Hewlett of CUBE fame as well as Vincenzo Natali's now trademark simplistic stylishness. I don't want to give away too much of the plot -- not only because it's getting pretty complicating and even confusing at times (don't worry, it all ties up neatly at the end), but also because there are lots and lots and lots of twists in there which you don't wanna know about. All you need to know is CYPHER is set in the future and Jeremy Northam plays a regular guy named Morgan Sullivan who gets himself a job as a technology spy for some company. What starts out as an exciting departure from boring normal life becomes a more and more threatening experience as extremely weird things happen and questions about Morgan's own identity arise.
In CYPHER, Vincenzo Natali deals with similar themes as he did in CUBE: the main character gets stuck in events he cannot explain. His only way out seems to just play along and deal with situations when they occur. He's a total victim of circumstance in a claustrophic world where nobody can be trusted including his own mind. Jeremy Northam, who hasn't made much of an impression on me in the past, plays this average joe character just perfectly. Lucy Liu does a decent job as well, but one of the greatest scenes in the movie is the one with David Hewlett. He's a creepy and interesting character and absolutely steals the scene away from Northam.
Another major role in CYPHER is being played by the look and feel of the film: the production design and the use uf CG is top notch, producing a similar minimalistic impression as the one in CUBE. However, this time, Natali has created a world of much grander scope, with many different locations and lots of stunning visuals (captured by Derek Rogers great cinematography), which still feels claustrophic and intimate. Michael Andrew, who did the fantastic DONNIE DARKO score, doesn't fail to deliver the goods here either.
To cut this one short, CYPHER is a perfect film, deserving to be seen by a wider audience than the handfull of people who saw it on festivals and theatrically in France. It's a damn shame that gems like this oftentimes can't seem to get a theatrical distributor (which is the case here in Germany and probably will be the case almost everywhere else, including the US) and dreck like the un-films produced by über-hacks like Paul Anderson and Rob Cohen, get full media attention. This film is from 2002 and almost nobody has noticed it yet! Believe me, it's great and Vincenzo Natali is, right next to Lucky McKee and Richard Kelly, one of the most interesting young directors working today. I'm sure, CYPHER would draw lots of (even non-geek) movie-goers to the theaters if only someone would give it a chance. Check it out if you can (next chance: Fantasy Filmfest Germany...).
Best regards,
Deine MudderTwo great reviews, and a bit of a clue. If you know something about NOTHING... or anything about NOTHING... then drop us a line and let us know what Natali’s up to. In the meantime, thanks to both of these reviewers for their great work.
"Moriarty" out.
-
+ Expand All
-
like some people have seen a completely different version of Matrix Reloaded than me. "Sheer awfulness"? What the fuck? Cypher seems cool, though, and there is no risk I'll be able to see it in the theater. Seems too narrow.
-
like some people have seen a completely different version of Matrix Reloaded than me. "Sheer awfulness"? What the fuck? Cypher seems cool, though, and there is no risk I'll be able to see it in the theater. Seems too narrow.
-
Liam Neeson as Seb Shaw, Charlize Theron as Emma Frost, Brendan Gleeson as Harry Leland & Cole Hauser as Donald Pierce, thats what i need.
-
I love the Matrix, but me like many others though Reloaded was a major bummer.
Matrix 2(the good bits)=Trinity falling, Restaurant scene(Monica rules), most of the Burly Brawl, the Oracle, the Twins(we are getting aggravated, V cool), Morpheus & the Katana.
Matrix 2(the bad bits)=Baaad Cgi in the burly brawl & chase scene, the annoying "Kid", the keymaker, the architect, Neo's boring fight scenes near the end, the whole Zion/Fraggle Rock part.
Lets hope Revolutions delivers. -
...and what would you call it anyway? Period Drama? Although I do agree with him on Jeepers Creepers, bearing in mind some of his other comments it's looks like he's part of the 'It's too successful to be good' crowd, (as opposed to the 'Why didn't they make the film that was in MY head' mob.) I'd be interested to see this film, should I ever get the chance. Northram is pretty impressive in Enigma as well by the way.
-
Criterion might be releasing Henson's Cube soon along with other early work like Time Piece.
-
Jul 14, 2003 5:43:38 PM CDT
this films looks like a rip-off of William Gibson (no, not the a
by beamish13
and I e-mailed Criterion about Henson's CUBE a few months ago. Someone up there must really like me...
-
why'd you read the talkback anyways, knowre are assholes here in the first place, i'll tell you why, cuz you wanted to bust a nut having a whole bunch of people agree with you and stroke your ego. but it backfired. sure i thought jason x was shit, sure i agree with you jeepers fell apart after the 1/2 hour mark, but who gives a shit what anyone else says. do you listen to the same music as these people. do you dress the same way? no then fuck it.
btw: the guy who did the first cube is the shit, cube 2: hypercube was a waste of time if no for some visual coolness.
- 81666 -
all that build up for a "profound" lecture about cause and effect. Most people figure out cause and effect before they enter grade school. Congrats to the W bros for finally figuring it out. And it did horrible when compared to even conservative financial expectations. One week at number one then toppled by Bruce Almighty of all things! Cause = a bad movie. Effect = word of mouth got out on the turkey and people refused to see it.
-
"Cypher" has been in the can for about 2 years. In fact, it used to have the title
"Company Man" until some other crappy movie caused the studio to change it. "Cypher" was supposed to have come out last year, but for some reason Miramax didn't want to release it. It was pushed back till this summer, but who knows really when it will come out.
"Nothing" is another sci-fi flick, this time with only about $3-4 million for a budget. As far as I know I think it is a two or three-hander. But considering Natali's track record that's his specialty.
If you like "Cube" and "Cypher", you have to check out his short film "Elevated" which he made at the Canadian Film Centre. Shot in 16mm the whole film takes place in an elevator. It's simply the best short film I've ever seen, and I've seen a lot. If you want to buy it, go to www.buzztaxi.com.
Over and out from T.O. -
I saw that trailer online last week, there's a link here, just scroll down.....http://www.themoviebox.net/trailerspage.htm
-
Cypher was released in Japan a few months ago, (actually it was theatrically released even before France). The Japanese release title is "Company Man". The DVD (zone 2, NTSC, English language) has been available for a few weeks, see for instance
http://www.amazon.co.jp/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00009AV0O/qid=1058239882/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_2_1/250-2799261-4166653
For those of you who can not wait for this masterpiece to be released in theaters...
-
Just to clarify, I'm not saying that everybody have to love Matrix Reloaded or that it didn't have some problems. It's just that I loved it, and have a hard time relating to the offhanded way in which it is often dismissed as crap. Seems like most reviewers acknowledged that it wasn't perfect, but pretty good none the less.
-
Honestly, it's not. I saw this about 6 months ago and was pretty disappointed. In a strange way the movie felt just as small and confined as Cube, it has a terrible finaly, and the whole movie ultimately feels like much ado about nothing. Yes the film looks good, and Northam gives a great performance, but it's a movie that is seriously left wanting. Still worth to check out though.
Readers Talkback
User Login
Top Talkbacks
- SPACE 2099!! -- 98 total posts 98 posts
- OK. So Harrison Ford Isn't In Talks For The New BLADE RUNNER. But... -- 138 total posts 94 posts
- Check out Colin Farrell in these new pics from SEVEN PSYCHOPATHS -- 91 total posts 91 posts
- Nice And Splattery MACHETE KILLS Promo Art!! -- 87 total posts 85 posts
- Thursday Is Sweeps Day Eight!! Yack Here About OFFICE, ROCK, UP, WIPEOUT, PERSON, FINDER, MENTALIST, IDOL, BANG, ROB, ANATOMY, JERSEY & More!! -- 113 total posts 81 posts
- Kurtzman And Boborci Producing An Adaptation Of Anne Rice's Lestat Novel TALE OF THE BODY THIEF?? -- 338 total posts 74 posts
- In That New 300 Movie Spin-Off Thingy, Xerxes And Artemisia Will Be Played By... -- 77 total posts 66 posts
- Quint travels to Barsoom and visits the John Carter set!!! -- 65 total posts 65 posts
- WETTER HOTTER AMERICAN SUMMER? -- 61 total posts 59 posts
- Crom! Grant The Behind the Scenes Pics of the Day revenge! And if you do not listen, den to Hell witchu! -- 55 total posts 55 posts