Logo

Cool News

The First Really Good Picture of the T-X from T3!!!

Published at:  Dec 17, 2002 3:51:10 AM CST

Hey folks, Harry here - The problem with this picture being associated with TERMINATOR 3, and the whole concept of a TERMINATOR 3 with a female Terminator is that here's this beautiful goddess personified by Kristanna Loken - and she's in a PG-13 Terminator film - which means a halfassed sequence of her time traveling naked. No chest shot here, like we have had of Arnie's Man Breasts... and that's just fucking sexist. I mean what the fuck... Arnie has firm well developed man breasts and we have to see them every fucking Terminator film. EQUAL TREATMENT!!!!! I say all of us men protest to have Arnie's nude chest shots removed on grounds of sexism. We'll burn Arnie brand Man Bras in the street! Right my brothers?





Hi Harry,


in case you didn't get it so far, just wanted to send you the latest image
from T3. It's Kristanna Loken as the T-X - the by far best developed killer
machine ever build by Skynet. And of course, this is the villain in T3.


Picture attached...


Best,

The Movie Brat











    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 3:54:19 AM CST

    I fear for this movie

    by qwerty uiop

    it can go so wrong in so many ways

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 3:55:18 AM CST

    yawn

    by dragonlord

    boooring...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 3:57:37 AM CST

    To paraphrase Morgan Freeman...

    by vroom socko

    Qwerty, for the first time, you and I are in total agreement.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 3:58:14 AM CST

    Dull

    by weintraub

    Red leather...not seen that before...yawn

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 4:01:02 AM CST

    take it off!

    by chewy-chop

    Nuttin wrong with a blonde in red leather. But still not convinced with a chick Terminator. Should've left it at #2. Anyone seen the Sperminator? Any good plot points to steal from that porno?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 4:04:30 AM CST

    no subject

    by joeypogi

    a female terminator?

    bwahahahahaha

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 4:05:37 AM CST

    its gonna be one of those "remake" sequels

    by jacklint

    come to think of it, T2 was also. But it had enough of a twist to make it seem new. Something a female terminator IS NOT going to do.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 4:10:40 AM CST

    "Lady, we gotta get you back to the Andromeda set..."

    by dlhstar

    "Seriously. We have reports that Lexa Doig's been running around naked ever since you stole her robotic precision and red leather outfit... Wait! Lexa Doig's running around NAKED?! F-OFF, LADY, _I'VE_ gotta get back to the Andromeda set!"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 4:14:03 AM CST

    She's obviously talented

    by qwerty uiop

    Look at her eyes, those are some evil robot eyes. I bet shes a hundred times better than that other female android movie. Really, I do.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 4:15:52 AM CST

    PG-13 T3?

    by roguescribner

    What's the point? I see TERMINATOR films for hardcore action and cool plot developments, not for long shots of people getting killed! I am so not looking forward to this film. There is no way it can be w/o Cameron's involvement. It's all an excuse to try to revitalize Arnold's career and make some green. Sad. L8r

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 4:23:40 AM CST

    Wow, I'm really not excited

    by theginger twit

    So Harry likes fake breasts huh?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 4:34:01 AM CST

    Uhh,,doesn't everome realize they dont make rated R movies anymo

    by monkeybrains

    That time has long since past, friends. There are fewer and fewer R rated movies..Just checkout the marquee the next time your at the cineplex and count how many you see. Even crap movies like xXx and Reign of Fire, that would have been R 5 years ago are PG13. You can thank the groups that pressured Hollywood with boycotts for that. Your not going to get anything with any type of edge anymore. If you want "adult" fare, might as well just watch HBO, because thats about all we have left. But look on the bright side. All the Kids are now safe. They dont have to be afraid to go out in the streets anymore. The movies have been cleaned up!!! Hip Hip HOORAYYYYYY. The world has been saved. Peace at last, Peace at last.

    Reply to Talkback

  • http://www.thearnoldfans.com/movies/t3/videos/etvideo.htm

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 4:38:36 AM CST

    I think Skynet's computer has somehow hacked into Harry's server

    by regis travolta

    Here's what I got when I clicked Back to the AICN main page if somebody can translate the following I hope it doesn't turn out to be a recipe on how to serve man! 

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 4:42:51 AM CST

    

    by regis travolta

    Well at least Harry's book is still on sale in the future where Terminators destroy us puny humans for fun!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 4:46:36 AM CST

    Oh god...

    by zone zero

    T2 was supposed to be it... But those f**kers just HAD to go for a third one! Those out of continuity bastards!
    F1r$+ p0$+3r$ ph33r z0n3 z3r0

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 4:54:29 AM CST

    PG-13?

    by clancywiggum

    Are they really gonna do that? I hadn't heard. I would have given it a chance before, but COME ON! I'm not gonna pay to see some lame-ass version of Terminator.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 4:59:45 AM CST

    gaawwwwddddd!!!

    by redtom

    this is going to suck massively...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 5:06:56 AM CST

    Final nail...

    by jayf

    Man i was suspicious of them making this film without Cameron, but now its PG13??? thats the final nail, terminator was always about great plot, great suspense and escapism...that and a prettty big body count... but now its just gonna be some stupid P.C cartoon, i dont intend on seeing it anymore and neither do any of my friends!
    Bring back Cameron, blood/guts, boobs, graphic violance..all the things that made the first Terminator great!

    Reply to Talkback

  • POT: "Hey Kettle! Hey, over here you b1tch! Man, are you ever black!"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 5:26:00 AM CST

    Were there boobs in the other Terminators?

    by qwerty uiop

    I don't recall any in one and I know Two had none.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 5:42:38 AM CST

    'Eve of Destruction' anyone?

    by trevor goodchild

    T3 following sequence of lamest films.
    Like 'Look who's talking'.
    Ok how can we make this film again.I know let's have the dogs talking in this one.
    What possible use would a killer robot that only resembles a woman have over the T1000.
    This film is the dying twitches of Arnold's career. Desperate.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 5:57:04 AM CST

    Oh dear.

    by millie

    That picture looks like a scene from a cheesy, generic sci-fi TV series. And what's with the colorful interior there? I thought this was a Terminator movie, not SeaQuest: The Motion Picture.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 6:05:59 AM CST

    She's hot but this movie looks SO LAME.

    by idfuckavril

    PG-13?? WTF? And where HAVE all the women's breasts gone in movies nowadays? It seems like the MPAA has become way too conservative in recent years.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 6:36:43 AM CST

    This will compliment Robocop 3 nicely

    by zombiepresley

    The thing that pisses me off is that if part 3 sucks donkey balls, which is looking more and more likely as each bit of info comes to light, that it will hurt the brilliant first two.. Because it will now see collectively seen as a trilogy, when of course, there was never any need for a trilogy. The three film will lower the overall standard on average... We geeks may know the difference but others who don't know who James Cameron is wont know the difference, they'll just say: "terminator series? Yeah not bad, third one sucked"
    There is just no need for this film to be made... fucking leeches.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 7:05:26 AM CST

    If you guys think this one will be bad.....

    by one9deuce

    wait until the fourth one! The third movie in a series is almost without fail where they start to go wrong. This will be no exception, but since it will be PG-13, it will make plenty of money. A fourth will be made (as planned) and Claire Daines character will be the lead, and it will be a POS.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 7:09:48 AM CST

    I prefer a hard-core R rated T3 than a pansy PG13 movie

    by fd resurrected

    Given the fact that T3 without James 'King of the World' Cameron will probably suck Ahnuld's shrinking balls but we gotta keep our skepticism healthy until the movie comes out come July - ya never know whether Jonathan Mostow will pull it off really as well as Breakdown and U-571. That said, I hope they don't turn this movie into another Pg-13 B-movie parody like Robocop 3. Bring on Robocop versus The Terminator movie!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 7:25:17 AM CST

    Harry hates T3, and he hasnt even seen it!

    by si@yippiekiyay

    Ok this is it! Why is T3 getting all this fucking shit on this site? That picture has been out for a while now, And how in Gods name is T3 a pg-13???? if You can give me some facts then thats fine. but this is BULLSHIT..... AGAIN! (Dont forget Vin Disel being the bad terminator)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 7:35:33 AM CST

    Let's wait and see... maybe it will be worth it.

    by beatrice_kidd

    Oh wait, fuck that. PG-13? Fuck Ah-nuld, fuck everyone involved in ruining another good franchise. God bless Hollywood where they manage to kill good and bad ideas in exactly the same fashion EVERY FUCKING TIME.

    Now, just give me the damn Kill Bill teaser, dammit!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 7:38:09 AM CST

    Well....

    by si@yippiekiyay

    I love this site Harry... but i just want 2 know where you got your facts from?
    The T3 site says it hasnt been rated yet, Thearnoldfans got news from inside that its rated R! And you just decide to say T3 is pg13 to piss people off. So they can talk how shit T3 is gonna be!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 7:38:38 AM CST

    Harry, you so cra-zay...

    by kong33

    funny though. Cool pic.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 7:41:24 AM CST

    vaya mierda

    by cuervojones

  • Dec 17, 2002 7:47:32 AM CST

    Has anyone seen...

    by kid ab

    the Entertainment Tonight feature at all. It had Claire Danes (The only reason i'm going to see this film) threatening Arnie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 7:54:09 AM CST

    TERMINATOR - PG-13

    by kong33

    so little kids can watch, too! Not too many deaths or language now! lol. Anyway, I hate the black steel interior, it's terrible, but X2 will show everyone how it should be done. I think Arnold will turn into Stallone unless he does something different and it really pays off.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 8:12:57 AM CST

    I fear for this film.

    by noriko takaya

    T-2 ended things perfectly; a sequel is so unnecessary. Why did they have to make this thing? Oh yeah, I forgot--*CHA-CHING!!* How silly of me. Toppu o Nerae!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 8:26:58 AM CST

    What does she do, fuck them to death?

    by jaguart

    I wondered what DareDevil looked like without the mask. Now we have the Terminator Model T-Xenia Onatopp. I wonder if they made her smell good down there to fool the dogs.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 8:34:40 AM CST

    The Attorminator Model T-X

    by jaguart

    She time travels to the past circa 2004 and slaps John Conner with sexual harassment suit at Cyberdyne Systems ruining his career prospects and emasculating him.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 8:41:34 AM CST

    Qwerty, you don't remember Sarah Connor's boob shot in T1???

    by blanket-man

    During her love scene with Michael Biehn, Linda Hamilton most definitely showed some boobage in the original Terminator. I wore out that scene in my VCR back in the 80s -- Hamilton's a friend of my aunt's, so seeing her in person than seeing her naked on TV was mind-blowing during my adolescence.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 8:44:51 AM CST

    Terminator HooHa's

    by zer0cool2k2

    Yes, there were definitely Breasts in the first Terminator film. Linda Hamilton's exposed breast made an excellent cameo appearance in the love sene with Reece. As far as I can remember, the closest we get in T2, is what's left of Linda's breasts (after all the working out), poking through that white wifebeater she wore early in the film.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 8:48:58 AM CST

    T3 HAS NOT BEEN RATED!

    by si@yippiekiyay

    Doh Harry. Im still waiting where u got your fake facts from for T3 being a Pg-13. You cant just say shit things about a movie which ive been waiting for 11 years. yes..I want this movie to be good (which alot dont *coughHarrycough*) Its kinda funny though, cause whatever shit u say thousands believe you. Oh well When T3 is rated R we can look back on this with a smile.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 8:51:36 AM CST

    Why does TX look so sleepy?

    by burlivesleftnut

    Destroying mankind's future must be boring work.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 9:10:11 AM CST

    Please tell me this is a joke?

    by jaguart

    "I vant your keys, yor necklahce, your hearrings and yor Bloomie's Card."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 9:25:59 AM CST

    terminated

    by mikeinmoncton

    Terminator 3 - James Cameron = total shitball. This movie may entertain on a minor, forgettable level. Ahnuld's gotta go back to Cameron to get his career jump started back to life again.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 9:29:15 AM CST

    If you like boobs....

    by rev_skarekroe

    ...might I recommend the 1985 classic "Sperminator"? sk

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 9:50:05 AM CST

    Harry (and people built like harry) need a man-bra, manzer, what

    by bannthisucommies

    Lets face it many of the puds on this TB are looking at their fat man-breasts and thinking ewwwwww.... less bon-bons and more pushups ladies.....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 9:52:52 AM CST

    It's NOT PG-13, Harry!

    by dark howler

    According to TheArnoldFans, T3 will be R rated! This comes straight from the director, Jonathan Mostow, himself!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Is it Faith Hill or Shania Twain that's really a cyborg from the future? Damn, I keep forgetting. I mean, what human would want to perform that music? But nevertheless, I was watching VH1 (a victim of innocent channel-surfing) and I happened to get sucked into watching endless soundbytes about 1980 and '81. The "Empire" and "Raiders" bits were especially depressing. But it all made me wonder (along with this picture and "Back to the Future" out on DVD and VHS...own it TODAY!): Has the standard for mainstream sci-fi really dropped that much in the past fifteen-twenty years? Has the post-Jurassic Park CGI era really sapped the need for creativity and decent characters out of films? I mean, "Minority Report" (also out on DVD...own it TODAY!)is the exception, and even THAT film didn't get the attention and across-the-board love that I'd hoped for. Outside of "The Matrix", what sci-fi franchise has grabbed our collective imagination over the last ten years? Don't...don't say it. And between the impending sense of dread surrounding this film and the calculated manipulation of "Star Trek: Nemesis" (ech!), I just haven't seen the old school stuff brought back faithfully yet. However...I still want to see a remake of "Flash Gordon", with Queen's score rerecorded with the Foo Fighters, and Brian May laying down that wicked guitar tone which is the sound of victory, no matter what. I want to see the teaser be the Ming and henchman (Klytus?) voiceover, recreated to a "T". Culminating with the pulsing low "A" note and the project release season. Do this, Industry! "Klytus, I'm borrrred..."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 10:03:20 AM CST

    Topless in Toronto? Finally ONE reason to go to Canada.

    by bannthisucommies

    Except won't the nipples freeze off? Its like 10 below in the Summer. This place is NORTH of Buffalo for crissakes!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 10:03:44 AM CST

    T3 HASN'T BEEN FUCKING RATED!

    by dukethebastard

    You idiots. Where the fuck does it say T3 will be PG-13? Fukcing nowhere because the movie has NOT BEEN submitted to the ratings board. Get your fucking facts straight.

    Go ahead, all you knobends, but remember this, T3 will FUCKING BE FILM OF THE YEAR 2003, so your fucked.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 10:12:57 AM CST

    toplessness in toronto

    by jarek

    I'm not sure where the first post came from, and why it's in this article, but I want to respond to it. I live in Toronto, and it is indeed legal for women to walk around topless. Do they, even though they have the right? No. Not that I've seen yet. A few women on the beaches. But for the most part, nada.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 10:18:46 AM CST

    You Have To Give Up. You Have To Realize That Someday A Franchi

    by jollydwarf

    You are not your DVD collection. You are not your ISP. You are not--all right, I'll stop. But "iTyler" (how many Durdens are running around on this site?), the reason why most of us are skeptical on this one is because...we bitch about everything. But the reason I'M jaded is because this SEQUEL took eleven years, Arnold's desperate for a hit (witness the semi-annual "True Lies 2" rumor mill), a female Terminator seems to be a red flag for no real ingenuity, Cameron and Furlong are M.I.A., and we've seen what happens when you try to revisit '80s glory in films (lookin' at you, G-Lu). Oh, and I think G'n'R coming back has something to do with it, at least on a cosmic level. Expect the same "exciting" results.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 10:19:32 AM CST

    Terminator 3 rated...

    by k|lldozer

    PG-13???
    What the hell...that's major suckage if that's the case. That may show that the studio doesn't have exactly the faith in Ahhhnold that they used to.
    This is how you also get watered down pieces of crap like the Scorpion King so all the mullets can get in without the supervision of their parents, and still bring THEIR kids too.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 10:25:38 AM CST

    It's Seven of Nine!

    by empyreal0

    This movie's looking as bad as I feared. Sexy Terminatrix in tight leather outfit. Ooooh. It's sad that I'm still going to see this movie only for this yummy woman, and not for the story, when it's a fucking TERMINATOR MOVIE. *sigh* I'll go pop T2 in my DVD player now and cry.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 10:33:29 AM CST

    Thanks for the photo...

    by schnorbitz

    but it would have been nice to have seen her leather-clad legs. Oooh.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 10:34:11 AM CST

    Retards from Toronto

    by mookieblaylock

    Toronto boys: the incident that resulted in the topless law being changed happened in Guelph, in 1991. The woman's name was Gwen Jacob. So, if by a couple of years ago in Toronto you mean 12 years ago in Guelph, then you're correct, you mullethead Toronto pukes. This is why the rest of the country hates you ignorant losers.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 10:37:03 AM CST

    You can leave after the first 10 minutes, because...

    by empyreal0

    ...after that point, she's already been sent back and found clothes. That's right, kiddies, the only good stuff is the naked woman being transported back in time. As for the controlling machines thing, stupid. I am not threatened by a toaster. Writers need to be thinking in terms of tactical advantage here, which is why the T-1000 was so fucking cool (apart from the fact that we'd never seen anything like it before). Remote control? Yawn. Seen it. How's about we end the series on a down note? Skynet sends back a fuckload of advanced terminators, John Conner is killed in the battle for mankind, the machines win, and this is why Skynet was never destroyed. Done, and done.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 10:48:24 AM CST

    Lady Terminator

    by wolvie6

    I swear once back in the early ninties there was a trailer on some tape I don't remember for a movie called "Lady Terminator" that may or may not have ever been released due to copyright laws. Was this flick renamed or am I thinking of "Eve of Destruction?" I swear I saw that trailer and never saw squat of it ever again since then. Anyone else remember this trailer or am I nuts?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 11:05:20 AM CST

    What if John Connor was killed?

    by dorfer

    And then some other human rose up to lead the humans to victory. The assumptions that only this one man can save us are beginning to wear on me. Or, what if he just died and there was no one single leader after that? Many leaders fare better as martyrs. Look at Jesus. Much better ratings after death. 3 movies based around the protection of this one man is 1 too many. It's gonna take an interesting storyline to convince me that this flick is necessary. --d

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 11:17:19 AM CST

    if someone hasn't said it already...

    by lelon

    this looks like a scene directly out of andromeda. is she shooting kevin sorbo?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 11:31:23 AM CST

    LOL

    by dartofharkness

    can some one please tell me what "lol" is chatroom shorthand for?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 11:34:30 AM CST

    dartofharkness, "lol" means

    by dorfer

    "overused chatroom shorthand." Or "laugh(ing) out loud." --d

    Reply to Talkback

  • I'm completely isolated: the only person who thought T2 was a piece of shit. I can't understand how anyone can give a crap about the next Terminator film, or any of these non-violent mainstream "action" pictures. I look forward to this the way I looked forward to The Next Karate Kid, and at least that had a decent cast. I will say that the sexist comments about the female terminator are just ridiculous. What does it matter what sex the thing is? It's a machine. It's not like they put hormones in the damn thing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 12:03:29 PM CST

    I agree, FatPaul.

    by dorfer

    I don't think it matters what sex the Terminator is. Of course, the T-1000 could be any sex it wanted, so maybe the question becomes "why resort to having a Terminator with a set appearance anyway?" Then it begs, "why is it a gorgeous female?" Let's see, the original Terminators were large hulking men. They stand out and look menacing even without the guns and silly talk. The T-1000 could fit in anywhere. Now there's a terribly beautiful female terminator... again, surely will stand out. I'll say it again, it's gonna take a neato storyline for me to give a crap about this new one. --d

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 12:14:40 PM CST

    ugh

    by direktor

    I dunno... I'm trying to give this thing a chance, but I've seen photos and some of the ET footage... and, well it don't look too stellar. They seem to be going for the self parody route. Whether it's rated "R" or "PG-13" wont matter, no one can re-create Cameron's instinctive ultra-cool action/violence fettish. The man was born to film action. Mostow is like a kindergarden version of Cameron... he needs to go through a few more grades to even approach Cameron's level.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Why didn't they cast Natasha Henstridge as the T-X in this movie? That would have drawn the fanboy crowd! Oh, wait a minute. She's stuck in that silly syndication, She Spies. Like that's gonna last more than a season.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 12:18:42 PM CST

    THIS SITE HAS NO CONSISTENCY OR STANDARDS, AND, THUS, HARRY'S A

    by turdfergeson

    Under another screen name on another talkback about six months ago, I got banned for some reason. I have no idea why. The post that did it was one where I was jokingly encouraging the creation of the stupid catch-phrases that seem to come and go on this site. That got me banned. However, on a Two Towers talkback, at this very moment, there's some guy that's posted twice all about "niggers this, and niggers that." AND HE'S NOT BEEN BANNED OR DELETED. What are we supposed to take from this Harry, you gas-bag? Joking is bad, but racism is good?? You're policy on banning (or lack of a policy more like it) makes you look extremely stupid for anyone who's been around here long enough to see you work. So, go ahead and ban me for being critical. I guess the only way this post would stay here is if I was a racist bigot. You seem to enjoy and tolerate those kinds of posts.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 12:21:56 PM CST

    if I'm gonna see Ahnuld's ass...

    by devil0509

    I want to see this chicks ass and rack. Period.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 12:32:39 PM CST

    Do You Know Who Would Make A Good Terminator Adversary?

    by battle-poster

    Me. (Accessing Seinfeld Soundbyte Files...Accessing AICNStaff Files) Hello, Drewwwwman...(Accessing 2002 Films>Fantasy>TwoTowers>Quotes...loading Paraphraser 2.1) "I come back to you now, at the turn of the flame."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 12:43:17 PM CST

    PG "Fucking" 13? You've got to be kidding me.

    by nickfoley

    I thought they changed it back to an "R" rating.

    No wonder I dont care about this movie. A PG-13 rating for a Terminator movie? Fuck that.

    Bring on The Matrix Reloaded & Matrix Revolutions.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 12:47:22 PM CST

    How can this movie not suck!??

    by manaqua

    There is now way. Its a foregone conclusion. If there is any plot at all about sending ANOTHER terminator back in time to then they fucced up out the gate and dropped teh ball. The only way to do it, the only story worth telling, is all in the future. Lameness...........M

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 1:33:27 PM CST

    Cheese, glorious cheese!

    by no. 41

    This movie could somehow wind up being halfway could, or it could blow the back wall out of the theater with its god-awfulness. Either way, it's a story that didn't need to be told, since the first two films covered just about all of the ground the concept allows. So Mostow and co. better be ready to show us something very, very cool. I have a little faith in Mostow, both "Breakdown" and "U-571" were solid albeit forgettable pieces of entertainment. The jury is out.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Bloody hell...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 2:04:08 PM CST

    Breakdown Was A Great Movie

    by nickfoley

  • Dec 17, 2002 2:11:31 PM CST

    Can't we all just get along?

    by fujison

    I'm going to try to address everything that has been said.
    Toronto did have the same law changed recently (in the past 8 years) as did Guelph.
    Toronto has extreme weather, really cold in the winter, really hot in the summer.
    The T3 is not rated pg-13 or rated R. The director has said he will aim for a R rating. But it has yet to be rated. I hope Harry will do the right thing and retract the PG13 line in his post. Because a lot of people go to AICN for movie info.
    Last but not least, we all don't know whether this T3 will suck or not. It's a bit earlier for everyone to start bashing this film. I suggest everyone to watch Access Hollywood tonight for the full T3 trailer, and decide on what you think.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 2:40:55 PM CST

    i nO tHiS wiLL sOuNd rEduNdAnT.....

    by louis p.

    but PG-13. FUCK THAT SHIT!!! Well, all my hopes are shot for this flick.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 2:51:33 PM CST

    no subject

    by spacesheik

    "Oh, and you can change your password. Forgot how to do it offhand but it's possible. I changed mine to the pet name for my penis, Colonel Klink".

    HAHAAHAHAAAA

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 3:10:53 PM CST

    PG T&A

    by steve the k

    1984's "Sheena" (yes, I'm the one who saw it) had a nice lingering waterfall shower scene showing Tanya Roberts breasts and ass, and it was rated a plain PG.

    Nudity can get past if it is non-sexual in nature.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 3:12:56 PM CST

    SEQUELS

    by dinoguy

    This movie is gonna rock! Part "3s" always rule. Think about it: Godfather 3, Lethal Weapon 3, Jaws 3-D, Batman Forever, Jurassic Park 3, Return of the Jedi... the list goes on. The third installment is always the best. I suspect this movie will even unseat Citizen Kane from its top spot at the list of best films ever made.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 3:25:37 PM CST

    Where's Claire Danes?

    by 07919

    Wasn't Claire Danes going to be the terminatrix? Please someone set me straight?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 3:29:27 PM CST

    Cool Chick

    by oompacabra

    I was lucky enough to meet this girl a few years back and she's downright cool. It will be interesting to watch her in this role because she's one of the most laid back chicks I've met in this silly town. Anyway, cheers to her, she looks friggin' hot here.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 3:39:00 PM CST

    07919...

    by dorfer

    I believe Claire Danes is one of John Connor's human companions. That's what I could derive from the pics at Darkhorizons.com. Check them out. you'll see her there. Yeah, she's one of the reasons I'll see this movie. Gotta love her. --d

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 3:52:01 PM CST

    Cameron not directing? Female TX? This will suk harder than "Gl

    by darth phallus

    'nuff said

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 3:54:33 PM CST

    I thnk I'm alone.

    by dorfer

    Am I the only one who is slightly intrigued by a female Terminator? Guess so. I think it does fit the recent trend of badass leading ladies in the vein of Lara Croft, Buffy, Birds of Prey, Dark Angel... and I love the trend, despite the fact that Buffy seems to be the only success of that crew. --d

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 3:56:13 PM CST

    I'll only see this one

    by rampagingtroll

    If the Sherminator gets nekkid. C'mon, a female evil robot that hot has to use her feminine qualities for something. Mmmm... hot woman boobies... ones that aren't in my life (though the ones that *are* happen to be pretty hot too). What is the hangup we have on unattainable titties anyways? Always wondered that, but then shook it off and reopened my Hustler.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Ridiculous concept.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 4:11:05 PM CST

    Lol

    by spacesheik

    "Think about it: Godfather 3, Lethal Weapon 3, Jaws 3-D, Batman Forever, Jurassic Park 3, Return of the Jedi... the list goes on. The third installment is always the best. I suspect this movie will even unseat Citizen Kane from its top spot at the list of best films ever made".

    Sarcasm, dont ya love it? Hehehe.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 4:16:58 PM CST

    Lisa Ryder should`ve been the TX!!

    by elgyn6655321

    Anyone seen "Jason X"?
    Also, I seriously wouldn`t be surprised if "T3" really DID turn out to be rated PG-13. Studios are turning to PG-13 more and more lately. Seagul`s latest is PG-13. Even horror flicks like "They" and "Darkness Falls" are getting PG-13 now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 4:25:20 PM CST

    Harry is High

    by smoothmomma

    There is no way Harry knows the rating. The fricking picture isn't even done yet. The director doesn't even know the rating yet.

    If harry wants to see breasts he should take off his own shirt and look in the mirror.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 4:27:39 PM CST

    Exclusive not so exclusive

    by smoothmomma

    That picture has been on http://www.terminator3.com since Friday!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 4:44:21 PM CST

    horrible

    by the tuxedo

    this picture personifies everything i feared T3 would be. bland. bland as hell. the very notion of a 'female terminator' is so unoriginal. if they ever make a T4 they'll have a 'black terminator' then a 'homosexual' terminator, each film trying to outdo the original by giving us the same thing, but with a 'wild' twist. in T2 we got a groundbreaking special effect for a villian. fair enough, as it was something I'd never seen before. but 'manipulating metal?' that's so boring and unoriginal! i wish i didn't want to see this crap.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 4:45:37 PM CST

    I just saw the trailer on Access...

    by fimbulwinter

    ...and all I could do was shake my head. Arnie's makeup is even subpar and there are all these stupid, swooshy-whooshy camera moves around recycled set pieces and bits. I feel bad for Arnie because he could have been a good one instead of this clutching grasping attempt to cash in on the good will of the existing films. My advice to everyone is to go to Universal Studios and see T2 Battle Across Time instead. Not figuring out how to do this (or more appropriate A 3rd T movie) with Cameron is just wrong in so many ways it's not even worth the amount of words I've already typed. Sad.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 4:56:39 PM CST

    Terminator Series

    by jamboreech

    Wait wait what's this crap about not making R-rated movies? They're R movies out all the time, where are you at?

    There can't be a rating on this thing yet ITS NOT OUT YET. And hell if I was Arnold I would want to go out with a T-3, like make it the last movie I do or something. But in all reality I think it will fail. Seriously the Terminator series wasn't about deep insight or storytelling, just a BADASS million dollar horror movie with the equivelent of a sci-fi 'Jason'. And how do they expect to top a villian like T-1000, probably one of the coolest in science fiction history? With a female Cyborg? Hurrah you guys Hurrah.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 5:03:06 PM CST

    "Hasta La Vista......Bitch!"

    by moriarity report

    Ten bucks says Arnie says that line. Well, unless it's PG-13. Then Arnie will very intimidatingly call the evil robot killing machine a "witch". Oh my.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 5:42:27 PM CST

    yeah

    by poliman4

    Ya know harry, there's a great new revised X2 trailer in glorious quicktime online right now, and yet you waste our time with a really dumb picture from a movie that'll probably be all wrong, and for what? cause it makes you horny and you're complaining cause you want more? I guess nothing gets coverage unless it gets you horny and has the possibility of getting you more horny. Seriously though, when you come back from that TTT screening put up a story about that X2 trailer so we can discuss something worth it!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 5:54:40 PM CST

    FAT GINGER HEADED HARRY IS ANTI T3

    by ihateharry666

    HARRY YOU ARE ANTI T3 FOR SOME STUPID REASON. T3 WILL BE RATED R NOT PG-13. YOU DO NOT EVEN KNOW THE PLOT FOR T3 BUT YOU CRITICISE A MOVIE THAT HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED.

    YOUR WEBSITE IS RUBBISH AND YOUR NOTHING BUT A FAT GINGER HEADED IDIOT. COME JULY 2 2003 T3 WILL SHUT UP CRITICS LIKE YOU.

    T3 WILL ROCK FAT BOY.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 5:58:38 PM CST

    You can have nudity in a PG13, look at Titanic.

    by minderbinder

    And they didn't even have to resort to crappy lighting, awkward camera angles, or strategically placed stuff (OK, they did for the bush). So they could still show the T-X's 34C's and get the PG13 they want. And YES, it hasn't been rated, but I'd be shocked if they release it R. And no, it's not about fucking Tipper, it's about the fact that teenagers are the biggest movie audience so R's just don't make as much money.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 6:26:10 PM CST

    Harry's smokin da crack if he can SEE INTO THE FUTURE!

    by tall_boy

    first his Nemesis review & now saying T3 has a PG-13. Good lord, man. I think you need an intervention.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 6:28:30 PM CST

    somebody throw her a cheeseburger or two...

    by neckbone

    i don't understand all the fuss over the potential for T(3)&A. according to her bio she's 5'10" and 115lbs. that's not T&A, sounds more like your typical 8th grade boy. there's certainly not any A, and the only T came from her plastic surgeon. doesn't that make it S&A? hell, she makes linda hamilton look voluptous... where's sir mix-a-lot when you need him?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 6:57:07 PM CST

    I'm sick and tired of Beatrice-Kidd

    by movieview

    I'm tired of Beatrice_Kidd and her fucking username. She's ruining it for all the kill bill fans revealing that Uma's name is going to be Beatrix Kiddo and kept a secret until the end. Get another fucking username asshole.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 7:32:21 PM CST

    does she have a bomb in her metallic ribcage?

    by junior d-girl

    Oy stick a fork in me boys I'm done. :-)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 7:40:39 PM CST

    We're livin' in a post-MATRIX world folks, T3 is SO dated, like

    by truthseekr1488

  • Dec 17, 2002 8:00:12 PM CST

    Looks like Andromeda

    by uberzip

    Did she steal Lexa Doigs outfit from andromeda??? Heck, they should have just finished the job and got lexa Doig to do the part!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 9:13:05 PM CST

    I'm an asshole!

    by beatrice_kidd

    Wow, never heard THAT one before! I'll be sure to use that one at the company Christmas party! Keep up the good work... Christ, you're about as clever as a bathtub.

    And I think I'll keep the user name, thank you!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 9:22:13 PM CST

    what amazes me about the future is...

    by elguapo

    ...that despite being able to make liquid metal cyborgs and the like, leather is still the coolest material in existence.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 9:30:54 PM CST

    Bad Boys II Trailer Kicks My Ass

    by nickfoley

    Around The World.

    Their back:

    http://www.apple.com/trailers/columbia/badboys2/large.html

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 9:41:37 PM CST

    Just Saw The New T3 Trailer

    by nickfoley

    The movie looks and feels like one of those cheesy directed to cable SCI-FI movies.

    She'll Be Back? Give me a break.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 9:54:16 PM CST

    The TX thinks she's Trinity?

    by nickfoley

    Another reason why the movie will fail.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 10:31:15 PM CST

    Trailer is online

    by gandalft.white

    www.terminator3.com

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 11:02:27 PM CST

    Machines & makeup

    by dogsmack

    Wow a machine that uses Lipstick & Makeup. Does she wear tampons as well?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 11:22:35 PM CST

    Are You Kidding Me!?!?!?!?

    by oatmeal2348

    Did anyone see that trailer on the Apple site?
    I kept waiting for the punchline ... the setup looked like some movie parody skit from MadTV or SNL.
    Wait a moment .. there was a punchline 'She'll be back.' I couldn't help but stifle a giggle. Should I have been scared?
    Dear God in Heaven! Help me know if I am losing my mind. I write a positive review of a Rob Schneider film and then we get this!?!?!

    Still, I'll go see it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 11:42:18 PM CST

    Not a money making scam

    by bastard_guy180

    I mean, they waited 11 years and besides aside from the cliche of hearing arnold as the Terminator it looks great... I mean, it could very well suck, but it would be a crying shame, one of the few honorable franchises left, by that I mean has not been soiled by a bad sequel, rather bettered... My only two concerns are this, one sequels that take a while to come out (10-11 years after the original) after there original tend to suck... And two aside from a different enemy this isnt an entirely new concept like the second one was... Arnold as the protagonist was a great move... well just have to see how this one holds up.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 11:42:58 PM CST

    hey, looky...

    by k|lldozer

    The new T3 trailer is online, and it looks to kick MUCH serious ass.


    http://www.apple.com/trailers/wb/t3/large.html

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 17, 2002 11:48:22 PM CST

    Ladies and Gentlemen: The President of the United States

    by george w bush

    In the spirit of peace and bipartisan unity, I'll refrain from pointing out that this "terminatrix" is an obvious attempt meant to epitomize latent femenist agression against the opposite sex (excluding Peter MacNicol).--------Monkey Brains: Thank you for pointing out that my faith-based policy has had an impact indeed--getting rid of all the violence, strong language, and moral decay makes me happier than a priest in daycare. As for Mr. Scorsezee, me and my "associates" hope nothing bad happens to Mr. Scoresaysee tennis elbow-------- And no Regis Travolta, Harry was inconsiderate enough not to send our dog Spot a banana biscotti. Sorry Harry but (small) accidents do happen...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 18, 2002 12:46:09 AM CST

    T3 TRAILER

    by samblackchvrch21

    http://www.apple.com/trailers/wb/t3/large.html

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 18, 2002 12:47:14 AM CST

    Fuck pictures

    by originalskoobx

    JoBlo.com has a link to the trailer in glorious full screen quicktime. Enjoy.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 18, 2002 12:48:44 AM CST

    I was "pro T3"

    by jsp2000

    until I saw that trailer. I don't know. I hate it when people complain in this talkbacks, but I gotta tell you, that trailer was pretty underwhelming. I don't know what exactly I was expecting, but the "TX" doesn't look like it could hold a candle to the T-1000.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 18, 2002 12:49:30 AM CST

    T3 Trailer

    by mooeth

    Yup its out on apple.com

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 18, 2002 1:23:09 AM CST

    The rating

    by spacesheik

    I think Harry may be right actually about the rating. This is Warner fucking Brothers here guys. If T3 is rated Pg-13 it will be the ROBOCOP III of the trilogy.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 18, 2002 1:29:14 AM CST

    T3: D.A.N. (dumb as nuts)

    by scrat-a-tat-tat

    Come on!! We've seen this movie once before, but with better actors!!

    They should have stopped with T2. What will this movie be with no Eddie Furlong, no James Cameron, and no Guns N Roses wailin' in the background?!? Craptacular, that's what!! The new terminator is like a bad Seven of Nine rip off!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 18, 2002 2:58:18 AM CST

    Quick! Back into the Stargate!

    by hellasboy

    What? Is she some Go'ould (sp?) warlord type person now?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 18, 2002 3:17:34 AM CST

    Been there done that

    by zerlochman

    Just saw the trailor thats over on apple.com Things arent looking good. Sure the female term looks the business but big explosions and cheesy rehashed one liners are not going to save this film.

    As others have said, they needed to set this in the future..do something new.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 18, 2002 4:12:09 AM CST

    Large Trailer download ;)

    by jazza2

    http://a772.g.akamai.net/5/772/51/059edd72c725b5/1a1a1aaa2198c627970773d80669d84574a8d80d3cb12453c02589f25382f668c9329e0375e8178ef01f93c6f569db3ca51176e8/t3_tlr_m480.mov

    Large version

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 18, 2002 5:27:31 AM CST

    the teaser is SO UGLY

    by cuervojones

    it looks like a straight to video thing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 18, 2002 7:08:56 AM CST

    Hey TurdFergeson what was the catchphrase you came up with?

    by regicidal_maniac

    Better post something here. Oh yeah... "Everything sucks, no movie made these days can be any good, so I hate everything in advance."

    There, that's most of you idiots in a nutshell.

    No wait, this is: "Help get us out of this nutshell! How'd we even get in this nutshell anyway?"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 18, 2002 7:10:57 AM CST

    Full Screen Trailer download

    by jazza2

    http://a816.g.akamai.net/5/816/51/e2e3841e981dc9/1a1a1aaa2198c627970773d80669d84574a8d80d3cb12453c02589f25382f668c9329e0375e8178ef01f93c6f569db3ca51176e8177df0/t3_fs1.mov

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 18, 2002 7:45:29 AM CST

    Why the cliche?

    by soonersean

    All I have a problem with (aside from the lack of Cameron) is the cliches... if you have a movie villain (or even hero for that matter) why do they always have to be decked out in leather?

    And with retro fashion coming back... she's got 70's pants on... check out those ankles!

    Why not outfit her in combat gear... she obviously isn't here to fit in.

    Or why not make it like that sci-fi vampire movie from the 80's (Lifeforce) and have her spend half the movie naked.

    Terminators (per the movie) were designed to inflitrate and then kill you. These show up and immediately begin destroying everythin in site - so why even look human to begin with?

    This would have only worked (female terminator) if she'd been absolutely drop-dead gorgeous and a big rack so that fanboys would fall in love and see it over and over again. A skinny little wannabe in red leather with bell-bottoms ain't gonna get it done.

    And finally... why is John Connor a little geeky looking guy? We saw him as an adult in T2 and he was a kick-ass, scar faced, soldier. When does he make that transition (by the way... where was Edward Furlong - or however you spell it)???

    Reply to Talkback

  • Examples: JPIII (5-6 yrs after JPII, which sucked massively in its own right), Alien^3 (7 yrs after Aliens), Alien4 (5 years after ^3). T3 will be 12 yrs after T2. If there was something interesting to say left in this franchise, they woulda said it by now. Exceptions to the rule: Aliens was 7 yrs after Alien, but that had Jimmy Cameron going for it, whose storytelling skills make Herc's beloved Joss Whedon look like a kid using his own shit to paint on the bathroom walls. This one don't.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 18, 2002 2:44:43 PM CST

    woman of silicone vs. MAN OF IRON

    by deepenetration

    Hmmm, Wonder Who's Gonna Win In The End? Me Thinks That Arny's Gonna Use The Hydraulic Dong On The (120lbs Soaking Wet) Silicone Bad Chick And Go For Deep Penetration Before He Finishes Her Off, With A Motor Oil Facial!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 18, 2002 5:41:15 PM CST

    T3: Windows XPms and Tampons?

    by deepenetration

    Yeah, She's Going To Be TOUGH!
    She Runs On The Windows XPms Operating System Sent To Our Time To Destroy Microsoft Before They Manufactor Anymore Lame Ass Operating Systems, But Arnold Will Save The Day Of Course, Or She Will Crash Cause Of Some Typical Windows Bug. Somone Wrote An Artical About Her Using Tampons, Hell No She Doesn't Use Tampons, She's A Robot. She Uses Oil Plugs, A Fembots Only Form Of Pertection From Nasty Vaginal Leaking. Of Course They Are Not 100% Effective. She'll Have Those Days Where Some Will Drain Through And Saturate Her Thong Panties In The Crotch Area And Some Unsuspecting Guy Will Find Out And She Will Have To Crush His Head Like A Melon Because He Knows She Is Not Human.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 18, 2002 8:09:37 PM CST

    shot for shot

    by quills

    quid pro quo for johnny falcon

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 18, 2002 8:10:14 PM CST

    shot for shot

    by quills

    quid pro quo for johnny falcon

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 18, 2002 9:49:15 PM CST

    this film will suck ...PERIOD

    by woodystiffer

    the franchise has outlived its welcome. obviously it has sunk to the level of a b-frickin movie and should go straight to video. I'm skippin' this one come theater time - no james cameron, no $10-$15 of my money in the theater. QUALITY CONTROL PEOPLE!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 18, 2002 9:56:06 PM CST

    ThisMovieWillSuck

    by stimpson j cat

    flash and blast that's the name of the game today I see cheese ball although way through this piece of shit.it's no wonder Cameron didn't want to get to involved with this.this has alien three and four written all over it thank you for your time..

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 18, 2002 10:01:33 PM CST

    ACTUAL TERMINATOR 3 PRODUCTING MEETING EXCERPTS!!

    by woodystiffer

    "uuh, we know the franchise is dead and we're a bunch of hacks right?"
    "RIGHT!"
    "umm, so Jim's not with us anymore, so why don't we copy the set pieces that Jim used in T1 & 2 and use a female terminator so that desperate young men will come see the movie in the hopes that they'll see some tits, then maybe someone will spend some money on this piece of shit. What do you think?"
    "FUCKIN' GREAT IDEA, WE GOT A MONEY MAKER ON OUR HANDS!"
    >This was an actual excerpt from a T3 production meeting!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 19, 2002 5:15:51 AM CST

    Visually unimpressive, here's why

    by spacesheik

    The opening of the trailer was fabulous, when you could see all those skulls underwater with the light skimming through the surface. The end of the trailer with the shots of the skynet robots in the future looked great too. Anything else in between, shot in modern DAY L.A. look tired, altho the action looked alright. If you look at Cameron's T2 most of the film was hot in a blue hue, there was a visual majesty even to the action scenes. But there are several aspects hurting this T3: 1. Potential PG13 rating 2. The female Terminatrix (after the T1000 this is a MAJOR letdown) and the 3. Routine, mundane way the film is shot and the locations (cemetary, etc). When will Hollwood learn that less IS more when it comes to trailers. And that shot of Swarzenneger going 'She'll be back" will elicit groans from audiences all over. This film could go either way, good or bad, but it prolly won't be a classic, just a guilty pleasure.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 19, 2002 5:21:36 AM CST

    The trailer is so lame and disappointing

    by vel

    I have been waiting for this movie forever and after seeing the trailer I'm pretty disappointed.

    The trailer was just so overdone it made me want to kick my monitor. That stupid guy's voice doing the narration, those lame one liners, and that shitty glaring evil turnaround that the chick does with the sparkling eye...OOh I'm so damn scared, how friggin original.

    PUKE! Gag me. Seriously.

    Then to top it off, the chick terminator has to act all Robert Patrick with that constant stone face (tilted slightly downward). That was Patrick's thing, why they're having her do it again is lame. Howabout some variety. I don't want another friggin Robert Patrick wannabe giving the world the evil eye it's entire existance.

    Poo.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 19, 2002 3:59:03 PM CST

    Uhhh, no...

    by buck_turgidson

    ...that just looks like some broad in a leather jumpsuit holding a flashlight. You can really see that the budget right up there on the screen

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 19, 2002 5:01:43 PM CST

    Might have some good action...

    by mynamedoesn'tfit

    But if the trailer's any indication--wow--you're lookin' pretty saggy there, Arnold. Probably not a good move.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 20, 2002 2:44:18 AM CST

    oh dear god...

    by mithril

    my hopes have not been up about this movie at all, but the awful trailer and this "Andromeda" pic aren't helping. Okay, let's see: no Cameron, no Hamilton, no Furlong (both Hamilton and Furlong saying that the script sucks balls so they don't want to do it), getting older and crappier Arnie, no original ideas (oh look, Arnie's hanging on to an out of control truck - sheesh, wasn't that in T2?), and getting in a female terminator for just two reasons: they can't think of a new terminator angle and this is the best they can come up with, and they've realised that the film can't stand on its own feet without trying to attract people with T&A. Well, as the philosopher Krishnamurti says, "in lieu of creativity, you can expect an emphasis on sexuality". T3 seems like a prime example. ***I guess my main problem is, though, that there is absolutely no need for this movie plot- or theme-wise. T2 could be expected, since the fate of the crushed terminator parts had to be explained, and both good Arnie and the T-1000 were good spins on the original. But after T2, there's nothing to explain, not to mention the fact that the movie will take away from the open ending of T2. You know, "the future stretches in front of me like a highway at night" or whatever it was. The only thing the movies could do is do something in the future, but even with that, I think I'll be satisfied with the Terminator ride at Universal Studios or wherever the damn thing was.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 20, 2002 4:53:53 PM CST

    She's X-TREEEME DUDE!

    by edsel

    Oh good, I was nervous that she wouldn't be extreme. When shit ain't extreme, the kids won't wanna watch it. Boy, this whole movie looks extreme. Really, really extreme.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2002 7:51:55 PM CST

    1/it has to be pg13

    by zykkon

    why well look at the budget of the movie $180 million add a couple of mill for adver. the studio has to make that back
    and the easyist way of doing this is to make it pg13 its an action movie and there's a higher percent of men/boys/nerds who like action movies so why not put a hot women in lether in it and hope people think she gets naked. arnie has not had a decent movie in years and is going nowhere he's hopeing T3 might save his carear it wont
    its been to long since T2 and fans which made T2 a big hit have moved on to things like the matrix and that will blow T3 stright to video

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 10, 2003 12:42:48 AM CST

    Not a terminator movie

    by abeman

    OK This is very unfortunate for the first two movies which were ground breaking in both special effects but also in movie quality. Here comes a guy who liked T1 and T2 when they came out 12+ years ago so much that he decided that he would make one so he can "be a part of the terminator dynasty" or whatever you wanna call it. Yet i will give this movie a chance, it can be GREAT if this movie has more than 5 minutes of the future with all the t's hopping out of HK's wasting people. I figure a good 30 min of futuristic battles would give this movie the edge it needs. They should treat it like Back to the Future where things happen in the past and then they goto a future scene and you see different things happening. Unless that happens i think they should call it robo-cop 4 w/ Arnold and not include it in the terminator series. Thank You

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback