Logo

Cool News

The Return of the Magical Swirling Ass! CHARLIE'S ANGELS 2: HALO -- Hot Soap Bubble Popping Pics!!!

Published at:  Aug 02, 2002 1:49:14 AM CDT

Harry here... There is nothing that fills my britches faster than the return of the magical swirling ass film! I can't wait to see this soap bubble scene. I think this could very well be the pinnacle of cinema! God Bless McG! Now - don't fuck up SUPERMAN!















The UK tabloid The Sun published pics today of the gals washing a car. I was never an ass man myself, but I believe Ms. Diaz is changing all that.













-Dorky St Clair














    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 1:51:51 AM CDT

    "About Halo, what about Howard Stern and Baba Boo----NEXT CALLER

    by notchjohnson

    Halo pics are good, but what I really miss are those good old "phoney phone calls" when Larry King would take serious callers that started off like "What about the UN Treaty on Global Warning....and HOWARD STERN AND BABA BOOEY..." before being cut off by Larry. Notch out.

    Reply to Talkback

  • What's the dang deal?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 2:04:34 AM CDT

    Nothing wrong with these pics

    by iamcaine2

    These pics are just fine. I`m more concerned that it took Harry more than 5 hours to post them after I sent them to him. Oh yeah, I suppose there is a little time lag between Tokyo and Texas.

    Reply to Talkback

  • See, the point of PG-13 T&A films is to give something for all the horny little junior highers to watch and make out to: "It was gross, he like swallowed my face, mom."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 2:17:29 AM CDT

    Cammy is so damn proud of that ass.

    by heywood jablomie

    Not that it's a bad ass. A little bony. But the rest of her....mmm....DELICIOUS!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 2:19:56 AM CDT

    That hood ornament's got a huge ass!

    by zardoz

    Oh, wait a sec, that's Drew Barrymore...my bad!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 2:36:58 AM CDT

    Swirl away baby!

    by elicash

    Ahhh that's the ticket.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 2:39:48 AM CDT

    "God Bless McG" ?!?

    by niaiserie

    Really? God bless McG? Why? Cause he can make a crap movie that gets 3 hot chicks ALMOST naked? Hey, they already have crappy movies with skin, it's called porn. When it's rated PG-13 it offers nothing to praise as far as skin is concerned, and if it manages to drown out even Bill Murray's comic timing then it's seriously a big huge steaming pile of plain ole crap, we shouldn't be encouraging or praising people who have the "ability" to make t&a for 12 year olds.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 2:45:08 AM CDT

    I think Diaz got unhealthily thin...

    by dlhstar

    It's hard to think of her in a sexual way, because almost everytime I see her bony face I think the Red Skull is wearing make-up and got a boob job.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 3:23:23 AM CDT

    What ass? Cameron Diaz hasn't had an ass since THE MASK.

    by cash bailey

    Honestly, look how utterly lickable she was in THE MASK then look at her now. The difference is truly alarming. Same with Jennifer Connolly.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 3:26:04 AM CDT

    Hey ICQPIMP...

    by buynothing

    Umm, dude, I realize you're trolling and all- I guess I've decided to give you a bite. Seriously, dude, take a pill, chill out, relax. Maybe you should give your computer a break for a few days. You know, spend some time apart, examine the relationship, make sure the two of you are compatible. Because none of your talkback comments indicate that you are person that should have access to a keyboard right now. Vehemence and incoherence, while commonly paired, don't mix well together. You are living proof of this. Perhaps you should look into an English class at your local learning annex. Or maybe I'm wrong, and in fact you are extremely literate and are experimenting with an avante garde grammer system a la James Joyce. In which case I applaud you sir.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 3:35:38 AM CDT

    Harry not an Ass-Man?

    by monkeybrains

    Could of fooled me, especially the way you've been forcing us to see yours' these past few weeks. First with you and Moriarty doing Lord-knows what up in the corner, and now having to watch you pee? Harry, you are in need of some desperate help.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 3:52:01 AM CDT

    first of all, cameron diaz needs to HAVE an ass

    by bearison ford

    wheres the beef? oh, it's on drew. lookin good.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 4:12:08 AM CDT

    I wish this movie was about...

    by fxninja1

    I wish this movie was about Charlie's Angels taking on the main character from the video game HALO. I would love to see those three girls get the tar kicked out of their anorexic candy-asses. How 'bout it Sony?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 4:35:48 AM CDT

    Pussy

    by utellemstevedave

    We shouldn't be afraid to say it. CHARLIE'S ANGELS is about pussy. God Bless America!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 4:37:24 AM CDT

    You're all crazy!! Diaz has an awesome ass and--

    by eugene o

    --my PENIS is never wrong!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 4:42:13 AM CDT

    Darth Hom, what? what?

    by miami'scanadian

    What are you talking about Micheal Bay bad? Of all the directors who would touch a Superman script what do u think Bay would do? Make it a sappy romantic, make it a seriously art character driven piece or a major comic book film? Superman is a comic book, a fantasy, and Bay is the best at making big popcorn film come to life. Can u imagine a Superman Doomsday fight that resembles the Pearl Harbor attack sequence, a race with Supes and Flash like The Rock chase, and so on. In Bay's film he wont be a pussy who doesn't take so long to get violent, he'll be what we all want him to be, an ass kicking one liner comic book character come to life like Stanley Goodspeed and Harry Stamper. Dont hate the man for making commercial films.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 4:58:32 AM CDT

    wake up

    by talbuckin

    who cares about diaz when liu is in sight.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 5:08:56 AM CDT

    oh drew!

    by hank quinlan

    You suck. No really. Except for getting Donnie Darko made. Evry chick I know LOVED the Angels movie. And I hate you for that. It's so awful. But it's just vapid enough with just the right amount of go girl to make chicks adore it. And that spells dollars and that spells more crappy movies. McG I hate you. Your videos suck too. And I have to agree with all the TBers who say if you want the real thing just watch porn. That way they can give the money to REAL movie makers who might make something worth watching. Think if To the White Sea (finest unproduced screenplay I have ever read)was given that money. Then we would have 100 minutes of silent cinematic genius instead of loud stupid TV remakes. Im all for the latter if it's something fun. Not this crap. I know. I know. Its a business. So is porn. And that is gonna my money.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 5:29:23 AM CDT

    God bless McG???????

    by vincentspain

  • Aug 02, 2002 5:58:25 AM CDT

    Micheal Bay = Legend

    by westiebestie

    That's all I got to say about that! Love them pics Harry! Any chance you'd put them up in place of you pissing/doing nasty things with Moriarty? While I respect your views on film etc., it must be said that Cameron Diaz has a MUCH nicer ass than you.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 6:04:34 AM CDT

    Are any of those 3 Sexy?

    by mst3kpimp

    I mean sure attractive might be a word used to describe them but I feel no lust for any of these dingbats and no I a'int gay. I thought Diaz was hot as hell in the Mask but now she is a disturbingly vapid little ditz. It's pretty strange watching Charlies Angels with no sex appeal but it really makes you see just how shitty it really is.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 7:40:24 AM CDT

    Halo? - Hello!

    by chilli kramer

    Cameron's ass is there, and it's got my 'Chilli Pepper' pointing north. There's sure to be a good few almost nude shots here, because it worked the first time, and the girls might earning a fortune on the gross of this film. So they'll give us what worked first. I dunno what they need the obscene amounts of cash for, but it sure ain't food....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 8:12:47 AM CDT

    Harry, please try to join an adult site...

    by lord_soth

    I bet you've never seen a single real woman ass.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 8:20:08 AM CDT

    cameron Diaz

    by minega

    Diaz might not have those latino curves...but she is fucking gorgeous...nuff said.She's the sweetest thing in movies today and she's a damn excellent actress..

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 8:40:56 AM CDT

    can't wait

    by frank black

    I loved the first movie, I love Cameron and her ass, and it doesn't matter what people think of this movie. It will surely have one important thing in common with the first one... FUN!!!

    pssttt, check out my new site www.echopraxia.org In the next few days. We just launched yesterday and we will be covering hard to find DVDs and where you can find them, and many film and pop culture related items.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 8:55:51 AM CDT

    wake me when "Gangs of New York" comes out

    by rev_skarekroe

    It's the only Cameron Diaz movie I'm interested in seeing. As for asses, I'll take Barrymore's over Diaz's any day. She doesn't look like she's Atkins dieted herself into curve oblivion. sk

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 8:57:13 AM CDT

    McG is a stupid name.

    by rainjacket

    Can't blame him for not using his real name on his worthless projects. With the absolute garbage he's churned out, I'd be bloody embarrassed to use my real name, too. I mean... c'mon!! Charlie's Angels!!! I don't care what they say about it being, "A tongue-in-cheek look at pop-culture or whatever." Until Rollerball was forced upon me, that had to be the worst theatrical movie I had ever seen. I aggresively despised it. Every minute of it. So what do they do? They made a damn sequel. Naturally. If this thing becomes a massive box-office hit, I'm going to have to start thinking about stamp collecting as a new hobby. And a I hate stamp collecting.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 9:03:07 AM CDT

    Dream a couple of perky round dreams

    by zer0cool2k2

    The chick from "Dream A Little Dream" (one God-Awful flick), was Meredith Salenger, and yes she was Extremely HOT! She was also in "The Kiss" (not too bad a horror flick). and way back before she got curvy, she starred in Disney's "The Journey of Natty Gann" (much as Connelly in Labrynth, you just knew they were gonna' grow up to be hotties). Last time I saw her was in an ep of BUFFY, around season 2 I think, when she played a Ghostly teacher in a love triangle with a student or something like that. Of course, if she makes another comeback, I'm sure she'll drop down to 85 pounds and look like a little boy. Sure, Diaz is an attractive woman, but the chicks on the BowFlex commercials have much better bodies. Now Liu is a hottie, and with Berrymore, well she's like a box of chocolates. I'll always remember someone saying about her a few years ago: "Even in a silk dress, you just know she's wearing dirty underwear".

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 9:17:24 AM CDT

    I hate when this happens

    by itsover

    When my hormones pull rank on my brain. I know intellectually I'll hate the movie but damned if they don't already have my nine bucks. **** Right now (it wavers) i'm saying Diaz is the most beautiful woman in Hollywood but yes, I'd like to see her add a few pounds.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 9:22:22 AM CDT

    You may enjoy Cameron's swirling ass, Harry, but give me Luc

    by terry_1978

    gorgeous as hell everything in general, man. As long she's in the sequel. I'm sold. Yeah, not exactly a prime reason to wanna check this out, but I've had a slight boyhood crush on the chick since the ally mcbeal days...what can I tell ya?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 9:24:53 AM CDT

    Sexual Frustrations a-poppin'!!!

    by weedymcsmokey

    This is a fun talkback - a little pathetic in parts, but fun. So I will join - Since this actors insist on putting themselves in roles that amount to "ass and tits on display" - or "grrrl power" (for those who think that using/denying sex is a genuine and worthwhile projection of power) in the Spice Girls sense - I wouldn't kick any of them out of bed for eating Crackers - even if Crackers was the dog.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 9:44:59 AM CDT

    Diaz wore "figure enhancement" for "The Mask."

    by christopher3

    She's always been skinny. They just padded her up to J. Rabbit proportions for the Carrey flick.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 9:47:26 AM CDT

    What a f$#^ing joke

    by ewem

    Wow, that's some real hard hitting movie material there.
    Nothing like forgetting the rest of what was promoted in that link either... Where's the Halo stuff?

    Moronic, although the gals look hot. Cameron Diaz needs to learn how to eat again. I see she's another one of those that have bought into the "looking like a Holcaust victim is sexy" BS.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 9:48:04 AM CDT

    PS

    by ewem

    Just kidding about the HAlo stuff! ;-)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 10:01:19 AM CDT

    Barrymore's ass in pic 3!!!!

    by iontyre

    Now we're talking! Let's see that one a-swirlin'!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 10:22:45 AM CDT

    Man oh man...

    by zarles

    ...does Harry ever need to get laid. I say that everyone who visits this site has to throw in a buck so we can get The Big Man a decently-priced hooker. There's gotta be a few thousand of us on here, right? We should be able to get something halfway decent for that much. Even in Texas...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 10:23:14 AM CDT

    no delivery....

    by symon

    movies like charlie's angels and singers like britney spears, besides being incredibly boring, are works of genius. they sell you the illusion of sex and nudity without ever getting to the actual sex and nudity, and 90% of you guys lap it up anyway. what are you really buying? you're buying a strip tease edited for television. not worth it. i'm with anybody blasting harry over this one (no offense big man, but come on, this is a little pathetic...) if you want tits and ass, watch tits and ass (virtually any jennifer connelly movie of the mid-1990s) you'll be much more .... er, fulfilled...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 10:32:31 AM CDT

    Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon didn't have to force Michelle

    by osmosis jones

    ...and it actually OUTGROSSED the godawful Charlie's Angels. Take a hint, Hollywood. I prefer Lucy Liu's ass to Cameron Diaz's, anyways (which was nice during her Mask days, but is pretty dang bony now).

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 10:37:42 AM CDT

    charlies angels movies

    by fun guy

    great photos i really appreciate them and am looking forward to the charlies angels two movie. i hope they have a motley crue song in this one like they did in the first one. that was fucken awesome. my wife even liked the first one. she usually hates stupid movies.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 10:56:40 AM CDT

    If you guys are this feverish over a couple of pics...

    by yossarian

    And I agree with the first poster. Retarded, really fucking retarded. You should do like me and engage in much higher-minded activities; like come hang out at my campus, which incidentally, is in Texas. You'd go apeshit just walking from one end of the quad to the other. They are DEFINATELY putting something in the water here... Either that, or SWT has an admittance policy that only allows beautiful girls to get a higher ed.
    Now that I think about it. MTV shot footage here a little while back, so we musthave passed their T&A bar-de-excellence.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 11:25:28 AM CDT

    Morons... Harry didn't say it

    by coop

    See the different fonts and colors? see the little signature that says Dorky St. Clair? Harry didn't say he wasn't an ass man. I may sound like a raving lunatic but I have a major peeve with people thinking Harry says everything on this site. Be a little more observant would you? Here's a clue, Harry writes in that giant bold light purple colored font, letters from people are in Times New Roman black bold, Herc writes in red I think and the others always say something like "Mori here". Now go and look a little closer when you are visiting this site and my blood pressure can go back down.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 11:44:28 AM CDT

    Nah

    by buck teeth soh

    saddest talback ever was that Natalie Portman looky-like/stunt double, that was really disgusting. This one's quite funny. Anyway what the hell, I was watching Drew's derriere in Angels' Charlies.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 11:46:01 AM CDT

    Mc-G + Superman = Shit

    by movieteacher

    When Batman vs Superman comes out and shatters all the old records they are going to jump at making the new superman movie, all I know is that if this fag Mc-G is the one making it, as I heard he was in talks, it will suck serious SHIT!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 11:58:00 AM CDT

    We know what you mean, assblaster

    by buck teeth soh

    That was a Freudian slip. You dream of ploughing the sweaty furrow between Harry's mighty trembling cheeks. Just think, your own personal earthquake. If he clenched, you might just get sucked in!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 12:24:29 PM CDT

    this talk back

    by fun guy

    this talk back has to be the best one since the star wars/lord of the rings troll wars. great entertainment guys. keep it going! let's have some discussions about rear ends in other movie talk backs. we need more debate about butts in general.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 12:32:08 PM CDT

    It's a shame

    by andel crodo

    It's a shame to see such talented actors involved with such a horrid waste of celluloid. Worse yet that some are also involved in production. Camp is fine as long as it doesn't take itself seriously. Flims like this attempt to burn the candle at both ends and it just doesn't work.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 12:56:20 PM CDT

    "God Bless McG! Now don't fuck up Superman!"!?! You endles

    by hammer2fall

    Granted, I liked Charlie's Angels, and am looking forward to the sequel, but McG directing of all things SUPERMAN!? No fucking way.

    Reply to Talkback

  • And in the 3rd I want some lube and give her a great big suprise in ye ole' poopshute.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 1:20:18 PM CDT

    this is news?

    by jerkass

    where's the money shot??

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 2:00:06 PM CDT

    Look at the size of Drew's ass. I mean, how the hell would y

    by weedymcsmokey

    (rim shot).

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 2:18:43 PM CDT

    Drew has angle looks...

    by declan_swartz

    Drew is one of these women that looks good at certain angles. In her case the Popeye chin can mess up your perception of her looks. Britney Spears and Alyssa Milano have the same problem in that they have nice curves, but they have that ruler body type with smaller shoulders and thick necks.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 2:31:27 PM CDT

    PTA talks about Alien vs. Predator

    by declan_swartz

    http://www.joblo.com/arrow/interview62.htm

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 2:34:18 PM CDT

    Declan Swartz - what are you, a photographer?

    by weedymcsmokey

    That's pretty critical. "Her problem is...... people who overly analyze her frikkin' bone structure. I sure hope I never get that kind of shallow treatment. Yeah, there's a dream.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 2:40:24 PM CDT

    no subject

    by declan_swartz

    No, but I do draw different types of people for my work, so I have studied people's faces. I also know I would be lucky enough if any of those actresses even asked me for the time.

    The PTA thing was a joke in my second post.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 3:02:23 PM CDT

    Charlie's Angles was so retarted and looks the like the sequ

    by nuke mayhem

    CA1 was nothing but sex jokes, bad jokes, stupid looking fighting, and Bill Murray and I can tell just from those pics that CA2 will most likely be the same kind of movie(or maybe worst).

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 3:17:05 PM CDT

    Crispin Glover!

    by movieteacher

    McG is a ass, charlies angles sucked. But there were two things i enjoyed, one of coarse is BIll Murry... fuck i sat through Hamlet to see him! And second is Cripsin Glover, that mother fucker is AWESOME! I have been a huge fan since Back to the Future.And now he has been cast as the lead in the remake of WILLARD! Its about time hollywood recongize this tallent!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 3:27:20 PM CDT

    Peluca!

    by declan_swartz

    I apologize for posting so much, but I have nothing to do this afternoon. Hollywood there is a great Argentian commercial directing team by the name of Peluca that could do wonders with say a Charlie Kaufman script. Their Chris "Christmas" Rodriguez campaign had me laughing for days. "For the 2000 festive season, London agency Mother teamed with Argentine directing combo Peluca to create the Chris Christmas Rodriguez viral campaign and drop-kick familiar holiday icons and morals in the head...." Chris ads: http://formen.ign.com/news/32016.html Peluca's reels: www.cielofilms.tv/directors/peluca.htm

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 4:33:41 PM CDT

    Charlie's Angles was so retarted and looks the like the sequ

    by wee willie

    Who's retarded?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Which means that today, she's spent the afternoon reading how several hundred Talkbackers want to fuck her up the ass. That's fucking hilarious.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 5:16:12 PM CDT

    Goddammit!

    by mascan

    You just had to put up those pics, didn't you Harry? Now my keyboard will be all sticky for days!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 5:50:45 PM CDT

    Lucy Liu love

    by terry_1978

    ha ha...yeah, truth be told, Lucy is the finest of the three angels in my opinion. Got nothing against white chicks(I'm black, as everyone on here already knew, I'm sure), but she just looks the best to me, personally. Cameron and Drew are definitely cuties, though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 6:18:15 PM CDT

    I think I speak for everyone when I say Kevin Smith should do Su

    by ranting_dude

    I for sure as hell hate McG. I got this thing against music video directors turned Hollywood directors. EEEEEEEEWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!! Just look at Michal Bays awful films. Pearl Harbor was just another Titanic knock off peace of crap. But McG really failed badly in Charlies Angles. It was the gay-est crap I have ever seen. Trying to copy Brian DePalma's classic Mission:Impossible scene where it was like impossible to go inside that computer room, but Tom Cruise was able to get a copy on the disk. The three "angels" well, one is skinny as a twig, another is chubby like a pig and the chinese one is ok I guess. I'm pretty sure it'll make money and then we will be back on the talkbacks ragging on Charlies Angels 3. (Shudders)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 6:40:30 PM CDT

    The problem with Drew Barrymore

    by chiknfriedelfsac

    Well first off she needs to like..exercise or something. She's just...squishy. She's not fat, she just looks...mushy or something. While I admire her for not taking the superthin route, sometimes you can go too far the other way. Don't have to see the rippled six-pack, but do a few crunches now and again and lay off the Ben & Jerry's. I mean, when you're a movie star, part of your job is to look good. Just like staying in top shape is for a professional athlete. Maybe the problem is she is prematurely aging. She's the youngest of the three, but doesn't look it. In a Hollywood where 30-year-olds play high school kids, sometimes even somewhat convincingly, Drew looks her age and then some. The cause for this, quite probably, is that she was drinking long island iced teas by the gallon and snorting coke when she was a prepubescent. Let this be a lesson to you: being a drunken drug addict when you're 8 may not bode well for looking young and fit as you get older. Remember her in her Poison Ivy and Bad Girls days? I mean she was so hot it hurt. Clean livin baby, thats the life for me!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 6:52:58 PM CDT

    Lucy Liu's ass is better

    by hawq

    Cameron's is a liitle small for my taste, but it sure looks good in that top picture. and there's nothing wrong with showing some good ass on your website or in a movie. Get off your damn high PC horse.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 8:17:58 PM CDT

    McG & K.Smith co-directing

    by jdanielp

    Hey, ... don't knock the MUSIC VIDEO directors who turn MOVIE directors. Sure, I didn't care for David Fincher's debute with "Alien 3", ... but his movie "Seven" is a masterpiece of filmmaking. (And "Seven" just so happens to be written by the same man who's writing "Batman vs. Superman".)

    There is in fact an art to music video. Movies based on superheroes demand artistic vision, ... as much focus on artistry as there is on story.


    As for the "Superman" movie, ... I wouldn't mind seeing both Kevin Smith AND McG co-direct. Smith could focus more on story interpretation and work closely with the actors, while McG could focus more on the visual artistry of the film itself.

    And hey, ... while I'm on the subject of co-directing, ... as for "Batman vs. Superman", ... why not have David Fincher direct Batman/Gotham City and Wolfgang direct Superman/Metropolis. After all, such a movie craves CONTRAST of the two characters as much as the two cities.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 8:20:15 PM CDT

    If Barrymore does check out this site, I wanna thank her for Don

    by basic alias

    It's funny. She's mostly known for producing safe, female-oriented mainstream flicks like Never Been Kissed and Riding in Cars with Boys. So how the hell did a movie like Donnie Darko fall into her lap? I don't know, but here's hoping she takes more risks like this one. Seriously, you guys should check it out, it's cool as hell and you'll never look at Patrick Swayze, Tears for Fears or people in bunny costumes the same way again.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 8:42:49 PM CDT

    Kevin Smith?!?!? God help us all. . .

    by jumpstart

    Please, no. For the love of all that's holy. Kevin Smith. . .what can I say that won't get me flamed like a pig at a luau? Oh hell, never mind. Kevin Smith is not great. He's not that good. He's a guy who has pretty consistently written for the 20-something slacker set and nothing really on the outside. He's good at that, no doubt. I will concede defeat on that. The problem with that is that Superman is close to universal. Not absolutely, but what is, other than need for food and air? It deserves someone who understands a wider range of people better and the director of the first two (this trivia escapes me at the moment) understood that. It was given all the colors, all the sounds, all the humanistic details it deserved with all the graphic stylings of a kid's comic-book world. (If I wanted my kid to read a comic book, even the Death of Superman beats the hell out of the stuff I DO like to read) Having it set in a kid's comic-book world does not a qualification for Kevin Smith make. Now, if I know McG from what I've seen of him (several Smash Mouth videos and those god awful commercials for that god awful looking show "Fastlane") McG has all the makings of someone to remake the Batman series of the 1960's. Not Superman. Dear God, not MY Supe. Not my true-blue, all American boyscout of a Clark Kent. Not my conservative, balls-tough Lois Lane. Not on MY Daily Planet. Thank you for listening to the rant. . .

    And one more thing. . .I need to put in my 2 cents for Lucy Liu. Uhhhhh-huh. . .that's what I like.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 10:48:17 PM CDT

    I am so crunk homey, yo, yo, yo.

    by icuchump

    You've got to be fucking joking, right? You know, I see your stupid ass ALL CAP miisspellled contrived mis-quoted ignorant G'd out diarrhea of the keyboard smeared all OVER this site, and sometimes your seemingly complete lack of any kind of actual knowledge pertaining to the subject you're discussing is - literally - entertaining. But you don't throw some shit like that out there and then go... 'oh, no offense though, yo yo yo... YO.' If Lucy's a 'slanted eyed bitch', then you're an 'illiterate keyboard-jockey wigger', biiiiaaatch. And you know this.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 11:26:47 PM CDT

    Uh, Harry..."Don't **** up Superman, McG"?

    by kingkrypton

    Who do you think you're kidding? McG + Jon Peters = a bad Superman movie. This isn't exactly rocket science, given what we know about the project and the filmmakers. (The planned Tim Burton/Jon Peters Superman movie would have sucked, too, albeit at the opposite end of the spectrum.) As for CHARLIE'S ANGELS 2...no thanks. I saw the first film on cable and thought it was stupid (and not in a funny way, either). And am I the only one who thinks Lucy Liu is the only good-looking member of the group?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2002 11:38:42 PM CDT

    HOLY FUCKING GOD!!

    by sith lord sauron

    BITCH YOU MAKE A NIGGA WANNA BUST A NUT THAT HITS THE MOON AND BOUNCES OFF INTO THE SUN UH BITCH UH BITCH UHHHHHHHH *SPPPUUUUURRRRRRRRRTT!!* Lookin at Drew's be-hind is da bomb!! Who wouldn't wanna fill that?!?!?!?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 03, 2002 2:16:03 AM CDT

    Not picky

    by darth_testine

    I'd fuck all three up the ass, myself. The other two can take turns tossing my salad while I do the third.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 03, 2002 8:28:18 AM CDT

    Eh, ass fetish...

    by fd resurrected

    For the record, I despise McG and Michael Bay with the fibre of my being. Tehy're the reason Hollywood is in current state of decline. Nah, that's been going on for quite a long time. As for which Charlie's Angel ass I'd choose Lucy Liu - Asian asses have the best ass-skin texture and ass-favor even for Rocco Siffredi, Peter "Max Hardcore" Little and Ron Jeremy. This talkback is one of the most pathetically entertaining I've read on AICN since the analytical probing of Natalie Portman/stuntwoman's ass.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Well, here we go again. It seems like it was about a month or so ago that we all had this heavy venom spewing hate-a-thon directed at a little film called "Charlie's Angels". Now that Harry has acquired the first known photos of the upcoming sequel, all the flamers and overly hostile fanboys have taken to their computers to curse, swear, make lewd comments about female asses, and shriek about how the world is coming to an end because Charlie's Angels 2: Halo is on the way, (so to speak...)

    Well, I will say again what I said in the last verbal brawl:
    Since I have just as much right to voice MY opinions just as all of you have the right to voice yours, and obviously you all have, loudly and at length, here's my two cents:


    Firstly, what is this preoccupation with inserting things up one's rear? I grant you, Harry did open this can of worms with the phots he's posted, yet I'm not sure that those pics automatically relate to anal insertions and sodomy (which is the technical term for sexually penetrating someone via the anus).
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but the name of this site is www.aint-it-cool-news.com, not www.up-your-ass.com, is it not?

    Secondly, in the holy name of God, what in the world has caused so much ill will and calamity over this trifle of a film? If you feel the need to become so violently and aggressively verbose about something, why not direct your energies towards something substantial, such as the Catholic Church's penchant to molest young boys and then lie about it, or the sad epidemic of young girls being abducted and murdered, or multi-billion dollar companies bilking investors out of their life savings? But to bitch, piss, whine and moan about Charlies Angels 2? Exactly what are some of you people smoking?
    I grant you, Charlie's Angels is not everybody's "beverage of choice" as they say, and that's fine. In fact, if you have criticisms about the film, you have every right to air them, as that's what these talkbacks are really here for (and not for the juvenile "FIRST" posts...). But remember, there's a difference between making a personal criticism and just bitching to hear yourself bitch.

    That being said, I find it mindboggling that so many of you were simply IN LOVE this summer with cinematic junk food such as AUSTIN POWERS 3, EIGHT LEGGED FREAKS, and SCOOBY DOO, (and don't lie, many of the posters IN THIS VERY TALKBACK were gushing all over those flicks in other Talkbacks, or else there's a mob running around using your User ID's)yet, for Charlies Angels 2, you're going to get all high and mighty????
    HELLO?????? CAN YOU SAY "INCONSISTENCY"????? Are you going to SERIOUSLY sit there and tell me what a steaming pile of doggie doo doo Charlies Angels 2 will be, while at the same time championing something like AUSTIN POWERS as some jolly good film fun? PUHHHHHHH-LEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEZE!!!!!!!!
    The point is: You can't have it both ways. Cinematic junk food is cinematic junk food. Pick and choose what you like if you must, but for chrissakes, don't slam one and elevate the other to AMC status based soley on your own tastes! That's hypocrisy, and it blows to hell whatever credibility you bring to this forum. Make no mistake here: Charlie's Angels is cinematic junk food, a cerebral fizzy drink, but guess what,it's never aspired to be anything but, and the same goes for Charlie's Angels 2. It's a ride, an exercise in goofy, silly fun, and anyone who came to this film with that proviso in mind (as I did, and based on the tons of money it made, so did countless others), will enjoy it for that.
    So don't start reading into a film like Charlie's Angels 1 or 2 for anything more than a happy bit of wackiness that it is. To put it another way, if you sit down to a dish of ice cream, you'd better not be thiking you're getting filet mignon, or else you're going to be sorely disappointed.

    I notice I've spent much of this Talkback just setting the record straight, so let me wind this up with some comments that are ACTUALLY ABOUT THE MOVIE.
    For anyone who cares, the script this time around will reportedly deal with the Angels being assigned to protect the son of an FBI agent or witness who is marked for death. SOMETING OF NOTE TO ALL YOU CRISPIN GLOVER FANS: IF THE STORIES ARE TO BE BELIEVED, CRISPIN WILL BE REPRISING HIS ROLE AS THE UBERCOOL "CREEPY THIN MAN"!
    Without a doubt, Crispin's fight scene with the 3 Angels was one of the coolest fight scenes ever shot in the last few years. And before you all start bithing about "Oh, it's just a Matrix" rip off" keep in mind that the fight scenes in the Matrix itself were a homage to the old Kung Fu Theater flicks of the 70's, not the the least of which were those made by THE MAN HIMSELF, BRUCE LEE!
    To sum up:
    Lighten up, people, enjoy silly movies for what they are, and try not to be so angry, ok?

    Have a nice day!

    Cinematt

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 04, 2002 11:22:01 AM CDT

    To my dear friend, al80...

    by cinematt

    Bravo! Without realizing it, you have proven my point to absolute perfection; that is, some people come to these Talkbacks to bitch only for the purpose of hearing themselves bitch! You do a lot of whining in your attempted retort to my post, but you don't say a damned thing? Do you even understand what a debate is? Apparently not. You didn't provide a single viable argument to any of the points I made. Obviously, the only thing you know how to do is to call someone fuck-o and for the most part make an ass of yourself. Well, congratualtions, al80, now everyone on this Talback understands what a horse's ass you must be. And I spoil the party? What party is that? The United Brotherhood of Sticking Things Up One's Ass party? If I did spoil that particular party...GOOD! SOME PARTIES NEED TO BE SPOILED! I don't fit in?
    Why in the blue hell would I want to fit in with individuals like yourself, persons who live to flame others simply because you do not LIKE my opinion?

    al80, let me give you some friendly advice here...give it up, because you have no credibility, nothing to say, and nothing to argue.

    Have a nice day!

    Cinematt

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 05, 2002 4:39:30 AM CDT

    well, it's been... hmm...

    by mithril

    All I can say after reading the butt-numbingly long, butt-reference infested TB is... I'm surprised that all you guys talking about chicks who used to look hot in movies have forgotten about one quintessential babe. I won't give you her name, cause thinking of it will give you all something to occupy your minds for a while (and you need it at least until your keyboards get cleaned up again). I'll just say this: Fast Times at Ridgemont High. Pool. Bright red bikini. A moment seared into the retinas of a generation of XY-chromosomed Homo Sapiens. End of story.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback