|
Published on Tuesday, July 2, 2002 - 12:05am |
|
BLADE RUNNER Anniversary Screening W/Rutger Hauer and Joe Turkel!!
Hey, everyone. "Moriarty" here with some Rumblings From The Lab.
Pretty cool. I can imagine this screening was a dream come true for fans of this film, and I still remember bitterly arguing with friends in the summer of ’82, telling them that CONAN and BLADE RUNNER and Carpenter’s THE THING would all be classics in the years to come, defending these films passionately. Now, to see that be true, it’s a constant delight, and I would imagine it must be a rush for guys like Rutger Hauer and Joe Turkel to soak up a bit of the love that exists for the film out there.
Hi Harry,
Omac reporting here from NYC where Saturday night I attended what was billed as a 20th anniversary screening of Blade Runner, this in conjunction with a sci-fi/ comics show that was taking place at Madison Square Garden over the weekend. The film was shown at the Clearview Cinema on East 59st and was attended by both Rutger Hauer and Joe Turkel, who appeared both before and after the screening.
Turkel was fit and limber, he boasted that he was 75 and he really looked as if he could be 10-15 years younger. The guy joined the army, in his mid-teens, to fight for us in WW2, and Saturday night appeared as if he was ready to do it again. Hauer looked heavier but relatively fit. He rambled a bit but never seemed less than honest and charming.
After the show both actors engaged in a spirited, detailed, tag team Q & A. Here are some highlights:
Harrison Ford on the set: Both actors noted that they found the superstar a totally professional, intense, self-absorbed and brooding sort. Turkel noted: “He always looked me in the eyes”. Hauer commented that he thought the Ford
performance brought a great “heaviness” to the tone of the film and he seemed to indicate he felt this the appropriate approach.
Hauer said that he viewed Blade Runner as the pinnacle of his career but then sort of noted “We are here to talk about Blade Runner, so what else do you think I would say?” Whatever the case, Hauer seems to have deep affections and strong feelings about the film and the Replicant, Roy Batty. He gave his overall take on the film’s storyline as “a bumbling detective decides he wants to get blowjobs from a fuckdoll”.
Hauer talked at length about Batty’s death scene on the roof. He said that Batty’s death speech was originally written to be more than a full page of dialogue but that he thought most of it sucked and talked Ridley Scott into letting him cut it down. He kind of hinted that he had created some of the lines that were still there -- which he seems to dearly love. He also mentioned that he had suggested the dove, which was supposed to have come from Sebastian’s apartmet. Hauer talked about how they could never get the dove to take off when it was released (he did a hilarious improve of the dove stepping from his hand, walking down his leg and dropping to the ground) so they ended up shooting the insert of it taking off over the roof -- just so we would know it flew away to where it’s still flying around in some John Woo flick :)
Hauer seemed said he always worried if the final shot of the dove was just a bit to much. Also, he feels that the films final scene (Deckard leaving with the girl) is “too Hollywood,” but he didn’t elaborate on what he would have preferred instead. He seemed to feel that this was the movie’s one great flaw.
Hauer said he understood the incredible effect BR had cast over every futuristic movie made since and he noted that he almost felt sorry for the creatives “who had to struggle to do something different. Blade Runner has had its time at the head of the film psyche, and now, I think, just in the last few years, it’s finally dying away”.
Turkel talked about giving advice to an aspiring filmmaker who had recently completed his first film, then revealed that the fellow was in the audience and he was only 7 years old (the kid got some cheers). He noted that when he had worked with Wise, Scott and Kubrick (X3) he had always noted a common, relentless perfectionist instinct for detail. He quoted Kubrick as saying, “Always keep your camera or your actors moving”. Turkel said he loved Kubrick (with whom he worked over 30 years) but was deeply disappointed with EYES WIDE SHUT. He referred to Kubrick’s last film as seeming to him “like an old prize fighter who answers the bell one time too often.” He pointed out how some of the blocking in EYE WIDE SHURT was repetitious of scenes from PATHS OF GLORY: “Stanley was just repeating himself”.
Hauer chimed in here: “Hey, hey, lets show some mercy for the old prize fighters... there’s glory in just answering the bell”. Turkel said he found Ridley Scott to be (predictably) reverential of Kubrick to the point where (during the filming of BR) he would ask Turkel how he thought Stanley would do this or that. Turkel said that Scott had seen Kubrick at parties but had been hesitant to
ever approach him. Turkel told Scott: “Next time you see him, just walk up and say ‘Joe says hello’”.
Turkel talked about a missing BR scene (unfilmed?) where, after Batty kills Tyrell, the dead Tyrell would be revealed as a robot, the real Tyrell would be seen in suspended animation at the top of the building/temple. Someone then asked if there was ever talk of a sequel and Turkel said, with a wink and a smile, that “of course it would have to be all about the real Tyrell”.
Toward the end Turkel went back to discussing the great directors he’d worked with and the perfectionist ethic: “This is what all the great ones have”. As an illustration of this he recounted an incident on the set of The Shining where Kubrick had halted shooting when Stan realized an ashtray on the bar was not vintage. Hauer, a recent veteran of many quickly shot B flicks, took a bit of an exception to his friends remarks and added: “Young directors must have the vision, but you must also keep it moving! Don’t think for a second that there isn’t someone standing ten feet away eager to replace you. Don’t overstep your bounds in some obsession to be number one! Brilliance is unique to individuals and shows itself with time. If you’ve got power, use it... don’t abuse it”.
It was a small crowd and by evening's end things had become so pleasant that Turkel stood in the aisle and personally said goodbye to everyone as we left.
-OMAC
Kick-ass, OMAC. Can’t wait for the special edition DVD that Warner Bros. is currently working on with the four different cuts of the movie. Should be exhaustive, and the perfect companion to Paul Sammon’s wonderful FUTURE NOIR, the book that details the development of the film.

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reader Talkback
shite... there are no posts...
does that mean I'm....
FIRST? by TheGinger Twit | Jul 2nd, 2002 12:18:25 AM | rutger hauer by Lord Vetinari | Jul 2nd, 2002 12:19:56 AM | I'm pretty sure that they
were all robots... by Fred4sure | Jul 2nd, 2002 12:38:40 AM | I have great respect for
Rutger Hauer by Darth Buttafuoco | Jul 2nd, 2002 12:54:17 AM | Nice Piece. Quentin Should
Have Hired Rutger For Kill
Bill by Son Of Batboy | Jul 2nd, 2002 01:07:52 AM | JOE TURKEL IS THE MAN! by Uncapie | Jul 2nd, 2002 01:08:13 AM | Harry knew they would be
classics! Woo woo! by eraser_x | Jul 2nd, 2002 01:22:39 AM | The novel was the best version
of Blade Runner by Moriarity Report | Jul 2nd, 2002 01:31:07 AM | Narrative version by BlackBeltJones | Jul 2nd, 2002 02:06:30 AM | I've seen things you
people wouldn't believe. by Christopher3 | Jul 2nd, 2002 02:42:40 AM | Rutger in Confessions of a
dangerous mind by MaxCalifornia. | Jul 2nd, 2002 03:04:23 AM | Fucking overratted, Ginger.
It's F - U - C - K - I - N
- G by nazismasher | Jul 2nd, 2002 03:21:59 AM | Hey, EraserX....? by EricAlan69 | Jul 2nd, 2002 03:23:04 AM | Incorrect...there is ANOTHER
actor who was in THREE Kubrick
film by Nagual | Jul 2nd, 2002 04:47:37 AM | version by DH | Jul 2nd, 2002 05:00:40 AM | "Sushi - that's what my
ex-wife called me..." - if
anyone ac by Charlie & Tex | Jul 2nd, 2002 05:36:56 AM | Shit! EricAllan is right! It
was Moriarty. by eraser_x | Jul 2nd, 2002 06:50:57 AM | I knew CONDORMAN would be a
classic on opening night by durhay | Jul 2nd, 2002 08:09:33 AM | For more (and current) BR Info by BruceL | Jul 2nd, 2002 08:33:24 AM | Hey OMAC! by RenoNevada2000 | Jul 2nd, 2002 09:24:06 AM | Your walking through the
desert when you see a tortoise
lying be by skydive | Jul 2nd, 2002 09:45:49 AM | Hauer Appreciation by FrankCobretti | Jul 2nd, 2002 11:16:14 AM | just saw all of BLADE RUNNER
for the 1st time by brewsky | Jul 2nd, 2002 11:23:16 AM | by Mush Mouth | Jul 2nd, 2002 11:57:16 AM | whatever MUSH MOUTH... by brewsky | Jul 2nd, 2002 12:10:54 PM | challenging? by brewsky | Jul 2nd, 2002 12:19:33 PM | I liked the voice-over version
better... by JAGUART | Jul 2nd, 2002 12:42:50 PM | Brewsky... Tsk stk. by Hexus | Jul 2nd, 2002 01:44:56 PM | Hexus by Hexus | Jul 2nd, 2002 01:45:31 PM | Brewsky... by PriestYoungblood | Jul 2nd, 2002 01:49:03 PM | dirty sanchez? by BruceL | Jul 2nd, 2002 02:14:14 PM | Channel 4 documentary by Roosterbooster | Jul 2nd, 2002 02:52:06 PM | bravo on a great persona by hecubus | Jul 2nd, 2002 02:59:59 PM | darn enter key jumping in the
way by hecubus | Jul 2nd, 2002 03:01:16 PM | Ebert gave Blade Runner a big
thumbs down by Hawq | Jul 2nd, 2002 03:11:12 PM | Bladebummer was over rated by Wee Willie | Jul 2nd, 2002 03:29:00 PM | Philip Stone & Joe Turkel by Carson Dyle | Jul 2nd, 2002 03:31:43 PM | "Blade Runner" is the real
deal by Carson Dyle | Jul 2nd, 2002 03:48:12 PM | Phillip K Dick by Jango Matt | Jul 2nd, 2002 03:53:37 PM | Colin Farrel by Jango Matt | Jul 2nd, 2002 04:03:00 PM | hey Hexus by brewsky | Jul 2nd, 2002 04:29:09 PM | Brewsky - by PriestYoungblood | Jul 2nd, 2002 04:36:07 PM | priestyoungblood by brewsky | Jul 2nd, 2002 04:36:34 PM | Robots?! Androids?!
REPLICANTS!! by ZaphodBB | Jul 2nd, 2002 05:05:21 PM | BR-ING by TomVee | Jul 2nd, 2002 05:19:13 PM | TomVee by brewsky | Jul 2nd, 2002 05:27:16 PM | by brewsky | Jul 2nd, 2002 05:29:22 PM | Brewsky by PriestYoungblood | Jul 2nd, 2002 05:36:11 PM | Mr. brewsky, what exactly are
you trying to accomplish? by Aquafresh | Jul 2nd, 2002 06:01:03 PM | Yeah, BR is slow. by Christopher3 | Jul 2nd, 2002 06:16:23 PM | fluffygreycat (btw...which is
a great name) by brewsky | Jul 2nd, 2002 06:27:17 PM | brewsky by Hexus | Jul 2nd, 2002 06:48:08 PM | Backing off. by Hexus | Jul 2nd, 2002 07:21:48 PM | Agree with Carson Dyle,
Roosterbooster, and TomVee by Old Guy | Jul 2nd, 2002 08:21:58 PM | Saw 'Blade Runner'
when I was ten... by Billy Talent | Jul 2nd, 2002 08:42:19 PM | DRONE by TomVee | Jul 2nd, 2002 09:16:50 PM | Wrong la sith, plus "Who is
John Galt?" and "Howard Roark"
rules by Uncapie | Jul 2nd, 2002 09:24:45 PM | Re: TomVee and "Drone" by Old Guy | Jul 2nd, 2002 10:42:57 PM | Blade Runner = lucky
masterpiece by Carson Dyle | Jul 2nd, 2002 10:56:40 PM | Deckard is a ... by FrankCobretti | Jul 2nd, 2002 11:14:50 PM | Re: Lucky Masterpiece by Old Guy | Jul 2nd, 2002 11:51:32 PM | I can't dig this flick. I
just can't by Tall_Boy | Jul 2nd, 2002 11:54:53 PM | fantasic film, BUT... it's
not for everyone, i admit. by Nexus-6 | Jul 3rd, 2002 12:34:31 AM | Clarification by BigTed | Jul 3rd, 2002 06:53:28 AM | An argument for limited VO by Damitol | Jul 3rd, 2002 11:43:15 AM | I just couldn't stay away
from this talkback.... by Zubalove | Jul 3rd, 2002 11:45:20 AM | IS THIS A JOKE?: by ScreamingPenis | Jul 3rd, 2002 04:12:54 PM | Soldier of Orange 2 by Boondock Saints | Jul 3rd, 2002 06:35:18 PM | I hope Ridley makes a new
version with all the best
elements by Hawq | Jul 3rd, 2002 07:04:05 PM | NO BLADE OF GRASS by TomVee | Jul 3rd, 2002 08:29:17 PM | Ive often wondered how cool a
sequel to blade runner made
with m by TheMatarife | Jul 3rd, 2002 11:51:45 PM | The replicants were human
clones by TheMatarife | Jul 5th, 2002 01:53:12 AM | PKD by Norrin Radd | Jul 5th, 2002 05:11:03 PM | Rutger Hauer by Mandolorian | Jul 6th, 2002 11:44:43 AM | brewsky/ayn rand by frank cotton | Jul 6th, 2002 04:47:41 PM |
|
|