Logo

Cool News

The Latest on RULES OF ATTRACTION!!!

Published at:  Dec 03, 2001 11:38:27 AM CST

Hey folks, Harry here with the latest tidbit on the most evil film in the future! And it'll be evil in all the best most deliciously wicked ways. Roger looks to have made one for the DVD shelf and for the frequent sitter club of theater goers everywhere.... aka FSCOTGE. You might have heard of it, but I'm not just a member, I'm the president. Whoo hooo Heee Haaaa Hooo Hoooo... (now imagine Daffy Duck bouncing out of existence!)





Hello Harry

I don't know if this is old news, but empireonline.co.uk has a story
about Shannyn Sossamon in which it suggests that after Avary has
finished with Bret Easton Ellis's Rule Of Attraction, he's going to film
the writer's latest (and only unfilmed) novel, Glamorama. Also there is
a really funny piece about the filming of Victor Ward's bit in RoA (he
is a marginal character, who takes centre-stage in Glam.) from The
Guardian newspaper a couple of weeks back, and can be found at
This Location!!!

Mooch



    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Dec 03, 2001 11:42:42 AM CST

    GAY

    by grimshu

    GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 03, 2001 11:48:33 AM CST

    Glamorama

    by silvio dante

    would be an ideal David Fincher film. Avary? Hope it rocks, Pardue was promising enough in Virgin Suicides and that football flick, the one with Denzel.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 03, 2001 12:07:47 PM CST

    Daunting Task

    by boston

    Does anyone else think Glamorama would be ridiculously challenging to film sticking to its orinal source? Would be interesting though, especially since Ellis himself admitted that he was unsure what the second half of the novel meant, which I think is annoying, but that's just me.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 03, 2001 12:22:00 PM CST

    whos playing patrick bateman???

    by kylekrane

    this sounds awsome. i cant wait to hear the release date. but i had heard that the charachter of patrick bateman was gong to make a cameo...is it still gong to happen??? if so...whos playing him???...and oh yeah...american psycho 2 is going to blow ass! the first is a masterpeice! its unsequelable! and why have it star william shattner???? its just...i dunno...dumb!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 03, 2001 12:33:06 PM CST

    informers

    by maxc7001

    Glamorama isn't Ellis' only unfilmed book. He wrote a book called the Informers that has yet to be put on screen.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 03, 2001 12:48:01 PM CST

    How cool...

    by superfinn

    ... was that Kip Pardue/Victor Ward thing? The more I hear about RoA the better it sounds. I'm also glad they chose to film this one before/instead of Glamorama ... I was a bit disappointed by the book. And I definitely don't think it's more of a 'filmable novel' either.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 03, 2001 1:21:59 PM CST

    less than zero?

    by moneymyk13

    was his novel Less than Zero made into a film, i loved American Psycho and i read the book less than zero so i would like to see that movie if it was made into a film

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 03, 2001 1:28:39 PM CST

    The Informers isn't a novel...

    by evilbusinessman

    its a collection of short stories. And don't bother watching the Less Than Zero movie - it is nothing like the book and just plain sucks!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 03, 2001 1:49:57 PM CST

    Reality check...

    by some dude

    As excited as I am for "RoA," the tid-bit regarding "Glamorama" has put a big smile on my face. This excellent book was ripped off as a comedy in that crap-feast "Zoolander." "Glamorama" the film will make an excellent addition to the "Is this real?" sub-genre that includes such works as "Total Recall," "The Matrix" and "Existenz."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nothin' much to add, other than that highly original subject line. But I wouldn't get your hopes up on this movie. It stars James Van Der Beek. Check out the Mighty Big TV Dawson's Creek forums for some pretty funny commentary on the making of this movie. Too lazy to find the link and post it, but it's well worth checking out.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 03, 2001 2:12:38 PM CST

    MONKEYMYK13: Less Than Zero movie

    by tensticks

    Yes, Less Than Zero was made into a film released Dec. 1987. It is not yet on DVD but should still be on VHS. However, be warned that if you approach it as an adaptation of the book and have high expectations of it from that perspective, you are likely to be disappointed. The dozens of intersecting story-strands that are never tied up in the book are discarded in favour of a linear version of ONE of those strands, primarily involving Julian (Robert Downey Jr.), Clay (Andrew McCarthy), Blair (Jami Gertz), and Rip the dealer (James Spader). Many details were changed and yes it was "Hollywoodized"....BUT: if you approach it simply as a FILM, then it's quite extraordinary, and unlike many of its bretheren of similar vintage, it still holds up. The production values and cinematography are GORGEOUS--it looks like it could have just been made--and even the 1987 styles and colours don't look cheesy (compare it to any "teen" movie of the era, and they feel SO dated in comparison). Also, while opinions vary on McCarthy and Gertz (most loathe the latter, but even her awful performance seems appropriate), Downey and ESPECIALLY Spader MAKE the film. Spader is the epitome ofHIGH CLASS SLEAZE, and with Downey as a spolied rich drug addict...hmm, I suppose it was practice. Too bad he never learned whatever moral or lesson the movie attempted to convey. Anyway, hope that helps, and if you want let me know what you think of the film when you see it! azrockyforever@yahoo.com

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 03, 2001 2:16:08 PM CST

    less than zero PS & "IS THIS REAL"

    by tensticks

    I forgot to mention that a number of folks who worked on the film version of LESS THAN ZERO went on to be major players in TWIN PEAKS, particularly Harley Peyton and/or Robert Engels. ALSO, regarding Some Dude's "IS THIS REAL" category...doesn't DARK CITY belong there also? (hell, even TRUMAN SHOW! and SHOCK TREATMENT! and...and....)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 03, 2001 2:38:54 PM CST

    Kip Pardue in Virgin Suicides?

    by jason blood

    Yeah, he was really good in The Virgin Suicides...I especially liked the lightsaber battle with Hayden Christensen...oh, wait...KIP PARDUE WASN'T IN VIRGIN SUICIDES! WHAT WAS I THINKING?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 03, 2001 2:39:43 PM CST

    LESS THAN ZERO Is A Great Anti-Drug Movie Because No Matter How

    by buzz maverik

    ...it's even worse when you're on cocaine. Oddly, it gets better after a case and a half of malt liquor.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 03, 2001 3:21:36 PM CST

    Thank God Harry saved us all that 'craving cock' stuff t

    by cash bailey

    I mean, Jesus Christ, Big Guy, what was all that about?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 03, 2001 4:06:12 PM CST

    Kip Pardue in Virgin Suicides.

    by silvio dante

    Of course he wasn't, it was Josh Hartnett. Just checkin, keeping you guys on your toes. Honestly.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 03, 2001 5:08:27 PM CST

    Thanks for the assist, Tensticks...

    by some dude

    I always thought that the vastly over-rated "Truman Show," intentionally or not, was too reminiscent of the vastly under-rated "Shock Treatment." C'mon, Richard O'Brian, why isn't that on DVD yet? Anyone else have movies that fit in this sub-genre? "Wes Craven's New Nightmare" and "John Carpenter's In the Mouth of Madness" almost fit, but I think they are in a slighty different grouping. I'll try to forget "The 13th Floor."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 03, 2001 6:43:46 PM CST

    RoA Script

    by firstaddiction

    I got a chance to read the script for Rules of Attraction and it is pretty amazing. Not what I think people are going to expect. It took two reads for it to really sink in because so much in the script is based on the visual images, but I think he can pull it off and I think the performances are going to rock. I never, ever, ever thought that I would say this, but James Van Der Beek is going to kick ass. I could almost hear him saying Sean's lines. It was weird. As for Victor in Europe. I laughed throughout that whole sequence. Just simply an awesome script.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 03, 2001 8:38:52 PM CST

    Truman, Shock Treatment, reality TV....

    by tensticks

    Some Dude....interesting that you make the Truman/Shock connection. I've been trying to get that one to fly for years and no one buys it. From my view I love SHOCK as a flawed might have been....I cared enough about it to produce a live-with-the-film production a couple years ago here in Phoenix! As a sequel to ROCKY HORROR it's very flawed, but taken totally on its own merits, it's eerily prescient in its pioneering of the "reality tv" concept, a full decade before "Cops" and "The Real World" and closer to TWO decades before "Survivor", "Big Brother" and "Truman". On the latter point, I agree it's overrated, but I still thought it was quality, and certainly a high mark for Carrey. However, I know how you feel, since I've always considered the MATRIX to be VASTLY overrated--entertaining, well made, but it didn't blow me away. Truthfully I thought that DARK CITY covered similar ground with a hell of a lot more style, substance and intellect. (And Richard O'Brien was in that one too, strange....) Oh well. As for the SHOCK DVD, it will probably come eventually, but don't hold your breath. Richard hasn't even discussed SHOCK at recent conventions, and Pat Quinn has little to say of it either. His long view of it is one of disappointment, unfortunately. And as wonderfully perfect as the ROCKY HORROR dvd was, for fans and regular audience alike, it underperformed for Fox, so I don't think they're gonna rush for that SHOCK TREATMENT special edition anytime soon, unfortunately. Oh well, at least it's on VHS, and sooner or later I'll get that Japanese laserdisc....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 03, 2001 10:32:30 PM CST

    Rules of my a**

    by robby

    that movie is gonna suck!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 04, 2001 2:11:41 AM CST

    Glamorama? awesome!

    by jacklint

    I never thought they would even attempt it. Man, im looking forward to that! I never thought there would be a character that even come close to Patrick Bateman, but then I read Glamorama and meet Victor Ward. Im trying to think of an actor that might be good...I dont know.
    Its a real shame Bale isnt doing Bateman again for RoA. They should just leave him out of it all together cause nobody alse could do him justice.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 04, 2001 7:18:26 AM CST

    fuck me, lot of cool news today...

    by erik_richmond

    rules of attraction, glamorama, oceans 11,LOTR,equilibrium, new chuck paliniuk stuff...all the sorta stuff i wana read, but im gona get fired from work if i stay online any longer. do you know what else wud b nice to hear today? what about a movie version of Iceberg Slims PIMP?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 04, 2001 7:23:50 AM CST

    Glamorama? HOW???

    by phasmatrope


    They're going to try to adapt "Glamorama"?? Well kudos to whatever screenwriter manages to successfully adapt that sucker, because there's certainly a lot there: huge cast of characters, a setting that spans half the globe, plot twists, and an ending that sure as fuck didn't make any sense to me. No offense, I liked the writing in AMERICAN PSYCHO, and the film was pretty good. But seriously, are there any Bret Easton Ellis fans out there who can kindly help explain to me how the fuck the ending and all the plot twists of "Glamorama" tie in together?? I mean, are they even supposed to? Because that shit sure left me scratching my head....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 04, 2001 9:47:01 AM CST

    don't let Avery near Glamorama

    by erik_richmond

    Glamorama has great potential as a movie, it'd it be a tough one to adapt, lot of wierd twists, loose ends etc but theres some incredible ideas, images scenes and characters in there. It screams out for a visually inventive blackly comic adaption. The most suitable directors i can think of are David fincher, darren aronofsky or Danny Boyle. The pace and attitude of the European section reminded me of Trainspotting blended with fightclub. this movie shouldn't be done on a miniscule budget by some amateur like the director of Killing Zoe. that was one of the problems with AP, good script, great lead, not enough money to create PB world though, the cinematography and production design looked cheap and boring, can't let a movie called GLAMORAMA look cheap and boring so lose Avery quickly, Zoe was one of the crappiest looking movies of the 90s. Oh, and Rules of Attraction wud make a better TV series than a movie...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 04, 2001 1:32:30 PM CST

    The Informers is not a novel, but...

    by mooch

    I think it could still make a really cool film, in a kind of Short Cuts / Magnolia type way (not that all the stories are connected, but still). On the subject of Glamorama, I don't think Arronofsky or Boyle would be any good for it. I think it would be really cool if they had all the models and beautiful people be played by really ugly and fat people, preening in front of the cameras with so much narcissism. Buscemi as Victor would be great, with the kind of ineptness-with-confidence way that he has sometimes. Fincher or Jonze could do it well perhaps. As for the ending of the book: I really liked it. I can't remember much apart from the very end (its been a few years) but that last scene was fantastic.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 04, 2001 8:05:34 PM CST

    Lynch & Unreality

    by tensticks

    Eraserhed certainly belongs there, but if you're talking about Lynch films, both LOST HIGHWAY and MULHOLLAND drive push the "what is reality" envelope....of course this is way off the original topic and probably no one else will post after this, but oh well...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 04, 2001 8:05:40 PM CST

    Lynch & Unreality

    by tensticks

    Eraserhed certainly belongs there, but if you're talking about Lynch films, both LOST HIGHWAY and MULHOLLAND drive push the "what is reality" envelope....of course this is way off the original topic and probably no one else will post after this, but oh well...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 05, 2001 10:06:48 AM CST

    Another "Is this real?" candidate...

    by vegas

    ...would have to be Amenabar's OPEN YOUR EYES. I will say no more about that.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 05, 2001 7:21:52 PM CST

    "Glamorama" ending

    by phasmatrope


    Well, for all this comparison of "Glamorama" to other reality-questioning movies, LOST HIGHWAY at least made sense to me (granted, the moebius-twist in the end threw me for a loop, but I think it did to just about everybody). No such luck with "Glamorama"; I couldn't decipher what the ending was supposed to mean in light of everything that had come before, and therefore what the overall meaning of the book you were supposed to take away was... what, was it just supposed to be another "American Psycho"-type "maybe I'm so crazy I'm really not a serial killer?"-type twist (maybe I'm so imaginative I'm really not a male model/terrorist patsy?) Who can say with Ellis...

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback