ADDED DETAILS AFTER THE ORIGINAL STORY!!!!
Hey folks, Harry here... Well, here is a fella that is luckier than you or me (unless you happen to be working on LOTR or are an exec at New Line), because he's seen 20 minutes of footage from LORD OF THE RINGS that we really really really want to see. Now there is a problem with the below description by Wide Mouthed Frog... First... he doesn't really know the story for LORD OF THE RINGS, sort of like those folks that kinda know STAR WARS.... They know the names of Darth Vader and Yoda... but refer to Harrison Ford as Harrison Ford and Alec Guinness as that. Now on the up side, he isn't chained by the emotional baggage of having the books in his head while looking at the footage.... yet he still loves what he saw! This is very important towards the success of these films. Will non-LOTR fans GET it? From this report... ummmm... yeah, I think they will. ALSO, he has an oh so slight nitpick with the English accents on Sam and Frodo, but says it is acceptable.... It should be noted that anything other than an american accent would, at first, see slightly odd coming out of Elijah or Astin's mouths... but it is something we get used to over the course of the film... As even this guy accepted it. Alright, now sit back and enjoy this report... You are about to get real excited...
Hey Harry
Today in Sydney, Executive Mark Ordesky (from New Line) presented 20
minutes of raw footage of THE LORD OF THE RINGS to potential licencees.
All of the footage had temp soundtracks, but all dialogue seemed complete,
and several scenes, whilst not really heavy on SFX, looked very much
finalised.
I managed to hypnotise the usher with my voodoo Krusty Doll, and heard/saw
the following from the aisle.
ORDESKY'S SPEECH
He spoke very generally about the spirit that had developed over the making
of the films. He seemed genuine when he said that this project was the one
that he felt would be New Line's legacy, and was the most exciting thing
that they had ever worked on. That there was a spirit of PASSION amongst
everyone who was working on the films - essentially that there would be
easier ways for a lot of the people involved to be making more money, but
that everyone was aware that they were part of history in the making.
(Aside: I have heard similar speeches from Hollywood execs about their
upcoming films that they were 'so excited' about before... YAWN.... but for
once this guy was actually convincing. I was thinking about using the Krusty
doll to get him to take me back to NZ with him, but it's too cold down
there).
He said that apparently one of the first things that happened in the making
of all the props was that they built an actual armoury factory to make
master copies of all the weapons in (?)steel in the way that they would have
been made a thousand years ago... so that when the props people made
duplications in the thousands, every single prop would look and feel like it
was genuine, not a cheap rip off. When Viggo Mortensen was given his sword,
he literally carried it around with him for three months, so it would feel
like it was part of him.
THE SCENES
There were (I think) nine or ten scenes, some ranging from a minute, some
for 4 or 5. They were shown in sequential, but not consecutive, order.. I
think that all were from the first film, with the exception of the last
scene which was from the end of the 2nd. I will tell you as much as I can
remember from each of the scenes.
IMPORTANT NOTE - I DON'T KNOW THE BOOKS VERY WELL - I have a vague
recollection of the story from when I read Fellowship 15 years ago, but I am
not going to pretend to say the names of the key characters, even though I'm
sure many readers will immediately know who I should be referring to. I
apologise if some of the assumptions about the story I have made are
wrong... just tryin to do my best.
THE SET-UP
From what I can remember, the 'Ring' in question, created by an evil lord
with the power to enslave the world, has fallen (by accident?) into the
hands of a hobbit clan, and is currently held by descendent Frodo (Elijah
Wood). Gandalf has arrived to help tell him what to do with it.
FIRST SCENE SHOWN
Gandalf arriving at Bag End.
First note: the Hobbit getup on Wood looks superb. The big feet and ears
don't look fake, and the movement is completely natural.
Second note: Wood speaks with an English accent. (Actually, they all do..)
Hasn't mastered it completely, but within seconds I felt that the casting of
this kid was very smart. He has a very compelling mix of intelligence and
wide-eyed wonder... Clearly he will be carrying the films, and he's GREAT.
McKellen as Gandalf is also great casting - he's got a majesty and dignity
but also a weariness.. he's obviously seen a lot in his time. Looks like a
real wizard, not a guy in a cape with a funny hat.
The scene essentially consists of Frodo on a mossy ledge on the LHS of the
screen, with Gandalf approaching the frame on the RHS on a horsedrawn
carriage. There's some repartee that makes you initially think there's some
antagonism or they aren't familiar with each other, but it's just a playful
joke - they're both obviously thrilled to see each other (again?)
SECOND SCENE SHOWN
Gandalf and Frodo in a cabin (Frodo's home?) Painted portraits of Hobbit
cousins/family in that English countryside fashion above the fireplace.
Cute.
It appears Frodo has thrown the ring, encased in a letter, onto the fire. As
the pages are scorched, the simple gold ring is revealed. Gandalf tells
Frodo to pick it up, and examine it. "It won't be hot" he says. "What is on
the ring?" - it seems Gandalf isn't sure that the ring is the one he fears.
Frodo holds it up to the light - the outside of the ring is unmarked
...and then it seems it isn't. As Frodo turns the ring in the light, writing
(unintelligible) scorches itself across the width of the band, and the light
is reflected in red across Frodo's face and the fireplace. Gandalf is
clearly freaked, Frodo asks what the writing means.
Gandalf says (the lines that end the first teaser trailer) "One ring to rule
them all... one ring to find them... one ring to bring them all... and in
the darkness bind them".. except his face shows that this is some pretty
serious shit. He says words to the effect that, as a wizard, he's wasted his
life on stupid and silly magic.. here now was something completely of
another level.
THIRD SCENE SHOWN
Frodo and three other Hobbits on the road... I presume they have set off to
dispose of the ring. Sean Astin is one of them, and again speaks with an
English accent that isn't entirely 100%, but isn't too distracting.
The four hobbits have fallen off the side of the road and are tumbling down
a hill, and stop to admire some mushrooms (for what properties I have no
idea...) Frodo senses that something is stirring on the path ahead... the
others don't seem to concerned, but as a strange blue mist comes ahead of
them he screams for all of them to jump over to the RHS and under a
ledge...as a SERIOUS SCARY DUDE ON A BIG BLACK MOTHERFUCKIN HORSE IN A CAPE
bounds by.
Clearly this guy is on the case of Frodo and the ring. In one of those
slightly annoying scenes, the hunter comes about 10 cm from the ledge where
Frodo is (scared as shit), but misses him. The hunter rides off and the
hobbits bolt further into a town.
(NOTE: the hunter is clearly not human, mostly because it makes the sound of
DEATH - sort of a cross between a banshee wail and the sound of a rat being
tortured. Yeeeesh. Not good. V. creepy in fact.) As he rides off, it's clear
he's not on his own - two others ride in from other directions and they all
take off together back down the path.
FOURTH SCENE SHOWN
The Hobbits arriving into a town and taking shelter in a pub (the PRANCING
PONY), where they are supposed to be meeting Gandalf. (Aside: I swear that
one of the faces of the villagers that they pass looked a lot like Peter
Jackson. He looks right into frame... seemed a bit obvious for a
Hitchcock-type cameo, and I could be very wrong, but I thought it was him).
A conversation occurs between the publican and Frodo about whether Gandalf
is there or not (he's not). Cool shot of the barman looking down at the
Hobbits - they're so short they rest underneath the ledge of the bar.
Proportions look pretty cool, actually.
Scene ends, from memory, with the introduction of Viggo Mortensen as an
enigmatic warrior type.
FIFTH SCENE
Frodo, Mortensen and the other three hobbits are fast asleep in one of the
rooms of the hotel. Suddenly the team of
banshee-death-sword-carrying-mutherfuckers-in-capes enter the room, and all
raise their swords in the air, and massacre the shapes in the beds beneath
them!
...except in one of those Silence Of The
Lambs-climax-tricky-they're-in-the-wrong-room edits we realise that it's not
the room whether the hobbits are sleeping. Mortensen has clearly realised
they're being followed, and have taken them all to a room across the street.
They can see the 'attack' from the window. Frodo asks who they are.
Mortensen says words to the effect of that they were once great warriors,
heroes even, who were offered eternal life by the evil lord who owned the
ring. Now they had become enslaved to him, to do his bidding.
SIXTH SCENE
I must confess I didn't really understand this one. It was of a different
wizard, all in white, in a cave. Could it have been Christopher Lee? I'm not
sure. Maybe. He seemed to have conjured, created or trained some sort of
ghoul, that looked a little like a demon from Buffy, crossed with one of
those bounding monsters from Ghostbusters 2, except taller, and had had a
bucket of blue paint thrown over him. I am probably appearing disrespectful
to the monster crew, but these are simple descriptive impressions.
Essentially the wizard seemed to have some sort of gripe, and was gearing
this bastard of a thing to do his bidding. He didn't look very happy, nor
very nice. Lots of teeth gnashing and unpleasantness.
SEVENTH SCENE
Mortensen and the Hobbits on a snowcovered mountain - looking they were
seriously high up in the NZ alps.
Sean Bean was also part of the team at this point - I couldn't work out who
his character was (a compatriot of Mortensen?)
Interesting scene here: as Bean talked to Frodo, and came closer to the
ring, he seemed to be slightly disoriented, and perhaps manevolent. Snapped
out of it quickly, but something strange was going on, and Frodo could sense
it.
EIGHTH SCENE
One of conflict between Mortensen and Frodo near the peak of this mountain..
as the two are face to face, Mortensen seems overcome with rage and
conflict, and it looks like he's about to attack his (friend?). Mortensen
pulls away, out of a daze, and whispers "RUN" to Frodo - it's as though he's
aware he can't control his behaviour for much longer.
Opinion - clearly the ring, despite being an inanimate object, wields a type
of intense force that disorients and changes behaviour. I couldn't quite
work out whether/how Frodo was being affected at this point.
At the end of this scene it seemed Frodo did the bolt while Mortensen stayed
to field a huge battalion of creatures just around the corner. Gulp.
NINTH SCENE
A very quick sequence of the gorgeous Liv Tyler on horseback, being chased
through a forest by a team of hunters. Frodo was on the back of her horse in
a cape, looking seriously ill & blue to the face.
TENTH SCENE
The beginnings of what seemed to be a large group of good warriors held up
in a big fortress, attempting to fend off an attack of a thousand serious
angry demons or bad guys with swords and your usual fortress-raiding
equipment. Not overly bloody per. Gladiator or Braveheart, but still very
intense nonetheless. The scene meant nothing in context - it was just a
serious battle.
I think this was the scene that was from the end of the second of the films.
FINAL REACTION
Clearly, we were shown no footage of any of the characters other than those
mentioned. Not a word out of Liv, no sign of Cate Blanchett, Hugo Weaving,
etc. etc.
There was also not a single special effect, apart from the mist in the
fourth scene. Bummer.
What was really cool was the film seemed REAL - the landscape felt genuine
and naturalistic, even in a medieval -type context. The real thing that
stood out for me was how well Elijah Wood seemed to TAKE the screen so
confidently. He didn't seem like a kid. He had a sense of dignity and awe
that made me feel like "Yup, I want to see this guy through this story."
I really can't comment on any of the other performances, apart from McKellen
carrying all the grace and gravity that you would expect.
Most of all, it was simply amazing to realise YES, THESE MOVIES ARE COMING
SOON (albeit a year or so). I felt thrilled they they were coming from a
slightly left of centre studio, one that had the sense to stand back and let
Peter Jackson do his thing.
Life was not so bad today.
Till next time
THE WIDE-MOUTHED FROG.
THE NEW STUFF.....
Hey folks, Harry here again.... And after reading some rather frantic-y e-mails... I was all set to write a new intro to the above because I saw quite a bit of paranoid over-reaction going on.... FOLKS... CHILL PILL PLEASE! Wide-Mouthed Frog is NOT a studio plant.... LORD OF THE RINGS doesn't need one.... DRIVEN does... This doesn't. Alright... Here's what you should know. WHEN studios do licensing presentations they take a reel of footage that is A)In no way... a complete A to B type thing.... it is a sampling... sort of a Appetizer Mixed Plate.... Giving the potential financial partner an idea of the many varied opportunities and characters and locales... It is also supposed to give you a sense of TONE and FEEL for the story and level of competency. B) WIDE - MOUTHED FROG in many cases made assumptions and leaps of logics and was at a loss for words to describe what he was seeing because... There were no frames of reference for him.... He isn't very familiar at all with the source material... BUT HE DID LIKE WHAT HE SAW QUITE A BIT. And lastly C) I know there have not been many reports about footage that has been screened... though they have been screening stuff in a few places... Like during CANNES this year to foreign distributors (and from what I heard it was the same 20 minutes) BUT you folks have got to understand that this fella didn't really grok to the fact that everytime he saw Frodo and Gandalf together... THAT WAS A SPECIAL EFFECT.... now the mere fact he didn't mention that sort of thing... you should take GREAT courage and hope from.... That means the effects were INVISIBLE.... Now.... Wide Mouthed Frog has written in to clarify on some of the issues and cries for clarification that some of you have made.... Here ya go....
Harry
I've been reading some of the talkback messages about my report, and thought
I would clarify some of the points/questions.
1. I am not a fucking studio plant.
2. I wrote the report at one a.m in the morning. I didn't realise that every
word I wrote would be picked over to death (D'OH! How could I be so
naive...) and could be reinterpreted in a hundred different ways.
EIGHT HOURS LATER... EXTRA THINGS THAT NEED TO BE SAID:
I don't think I made it clear enough that the scenes didn't necessarily
follow each other. They were shown in the order they would appear in the
film, BUT NOT IN DIRECT SEQUENCE - It could well be the case that there was
a gap of years between scenes, including the first and second. One of the
talkbackers suggested that Gandalf was arriving at the beginning to attend a
party.. apparently in the book when Gandalf and Frodo examine the ring, it's
several years later? ...this well could have been the case.
SCENE TWO
It probably was Gandalf that threw the ring into the fire. I presumed it was
Frodo, but was probably wrong. The scene actually started with the ring in
the fire.
I don't think the exact words "It won't be hot" and "What does it say" were
used; that was just the essence of the dialogue. I think it could have been
Frodo that asked what the words were, but Gandalf definitely asked him to
read it, and told him the ring would not be hot to touch.
SCENE THREE
I didn't realise that the dude in the cape with screech had bad eyesight -
this would make sense as to why he didn't see Frodo.
Also, perhaps too much was made of the mist - it wasn't dramatic or thick or
fast or swirly (the mist in PRINCE OF EGYPT that went through the village
this was NOT). It was more like dust that had a faint blueish tinge to it.
Maybe it was sort of like a 'scout'... and it did also seem to be the case
that only Frodo saw it.... but then again that could have been because all
the other hobbits were getting stuck into looking for the mushrooms.
Also, this was the only time the mist was seen - it didn't appear in any of
the other shots of the badasses on horses.
SCENE FOUR
I may have been wrong about whether Mortensen was with Frodo and Sean Bean
in this scene on the mountain... I thought he was, but then again I may have
made this assumption because he was in the scene before (which could have
been a lot earlier in the film). Sean Bean's character seemed to have a lot
of attitude.
SCENE FIVE
I shouldn't have said the words 'peaks of the mountain' here - in fact it
wasn't icy at all, they just seemed to be high up somewhere, in some sort of
old castle or ruins or something.. like a little circular amphitheatre
without the seats.. I think it was circular anyway. It was definitely Frodo
and Mortensen though. Mortensen told him to RUN.
ONE MORE THING -
I AM NOT A FUCKING STUDIO PLANT. Forgive me if I was supposed to know the
book back to front. I didn't go with the intention of sending this report
but as soon as it started I realised I was seeing something pretty special
and you guys might be keen to hear about. The footage was only run once -
sorry if I have caused confusion, but I'm pretty sure that what I've said is
accurate. One more thing - I felt that the film was going to be amazing,
because something that Ordesky said rang true. I didn't feel like I was
watching a 'movie'... I lost sense of myself in another world. I wanna go
back for more something shocking. The year's wait is gonna kill me.
THE WIDE MOUTHED FROG
| 
