Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Withnail ganders at THE 13TH WARRIOR

Hey folks, Harry here. It seems I've been covering screenings of 13TH WARRIOR / EATERS OF THE DEAD for years... and the first reviews came in February of 1998... But due to scheduling problems with Antonio Banderas and the reshooting team... plus John McTiernan's commitment to direct Pierce Brosnan's latest action film... Well, it just made it so that it was a loooong post process. The initial reviews from Joe Hallenbeck, Goldfinger and the Big Bad Wolf were mixed... going from terrible to mixed to favorable. And through the testing process the movie has improved it's reputation. And this time the word is favorable from Withnail, and I hope that perhaps we'll see a rip-roaring kickass VIKING film this August 13th. We'll keep an eye on this one...

Hey Harry!

Withnail here, over on the other side of the Atlantic in 'swinging London, baby'.

Tonight I managed to sneak into a screening of the finished version of the new John McTiernan actioner - The 13th Warrior.

I've been waiting for a long time to see if this unashamed battle flick could erase the memory of Die Hard 3 and Last Action Hero. And the answer is, yes it does, but it's not up there with Die Hard I, Predator or The Hunt for Red October. For more details, read on...

The 13th Warrior

Actions speak louder than words. Much louder, if the way that director John McTiernan handles this movie is anything to go by. This tale of Norse Action Heroes has only sparse dialogue, with the swords doing most of the talking.

Many films are eventually made into video games, but The 13th Warrior feels like a computer game that¹s been recreated shot, scene by scene on film. There¹s the opening set up where Antonio Banderas, helped by wise veteran Omar Sharif and bits of his own voiceover, is forced to join a band of Vikings who are travelling North to face a nameless enemy.

And from then on, the film breathlessly rushes from action set piece to action set piece. Each, seemingly, more bloody than the last. But like a video game, there¹s no real point to it all, apart from the need to beat the bad guys. The action sequences are broken up by odd clues that just allow you to get to the next big fight. And it doesn¹t have a begining and an end, just a first battle and a last battle.

Banderas, sadly, doesn¹t have much to do apart from wave his sword around and be struck by a regular burst of inspiration that will lead them to the scene of their next big punch up. And as he¹s nowhere near as physically imposing as any of his co stars, he¹s not particularly believable. It would have worked much better with someone like Schwarzenegger in this role.

Where it fails narratively, though, it succeeds in terms of pure action. McTiernan, almost entirely using handheld cameras, creates some of the most impressive battle scenes ever put on celluloid. Much of it is also astonishingly violent, with a fair number of severed heads and disembowellings.

Visually, it¹s also a winner. From the opening shot of a bolt of lightning revealing Banderas and co. in storm tossed boat, to the closing image of a Viking ship sailing into the mist, it constantly stuns and amazes.

Peter Menzies Jnr¹s photography is pretty fabulous too. Much of the film takes place at night, with the characters lit only by fires - and he pulls off this difficult feat with apparent ease.

It¹s a pity then that the story couldn¹t have been fleshed out more to give the whole thing more resonance. McTiernan fans, will still have much to cheer about though. It¹s a strong return to form for him, and there are a few nice references to his previous movies. At the start the Vikings are speaking in a foreign tongue, but with a slow zoom in and zoom out to one of them, they mix into speaking English - just like the Russians did in The Hunt For Red October.

He also borrows liberally from other stories. The first third is very reminiscent of the Magnificent Seven, and one section where Banderas and the Vikings discover their flesh eating enemies in a network of caves, looks eerily like an R rated version of Indiana Jones & The Temple of Doom.

A testosterone filled treat then, but one which manages to bypass the brain.

Withnail.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Click for previous story Talk Back Click for next story

User login

Reader Talkback


by SavegeFred
Jun 29th, 1999
02:18:32 AM
Well, uh...
by Alessan
Jun 29th, 1999
02:25:23 AM
crichton's book
by BalrogWings
Jun 29th, 1999
04:05:10 AM
Foreign Tounge!
by Kielland
Jun 29th, 1999
05:11:08 AM
crichton, you bastard!
by Taliesin
Jun 29th, 1999
06:00:05 AM
I don't know about this guy
by Impetus26
Jun 29th, 1999
06:16:56 AM
It's *supposed* to be Beowulf!
by Caius
Jun 29th, 1999
08:12:02 AM
anything with Omar Sharif
by -Z-
Jun 29th, 1999
08:20:56 AM
Hey Rick - Rating
by Slayer
Jun 29th, 1999
09:16:32 AM
It sounds GREAT: McTiernan is BACK
by ABking
Jun 29th, 1999
11:21:48 AM
Re: Crichton= not intelligent...
by Yossarian
Jun 29th, 1999
11:26:04 AM
Clever casting of Schwarzenegger as Arab
by Musgrave
Jun 29th, 1999
01:25:36 PM
What the hell was wrong with Die Hard 3?
by Cineman
Jun 29th, 1999
04:56:49 PM
I don't know...............
by cliffemall
Jun 29th, 1999
05:02:47 PM
Mark my words!
by morpheus
Jun 29th, 1999
07:17:57 PM
YOU LEFT OUT BONDOSAN'S REVIEW!
by Uncapie
Jun 29th, 1999
07:25:05 PM
Schwarzenegger+McTiernan should = SGT.ROCK
by ABking
Jun 29th, 1999
08:59:47 PM
Put it out, already!!! As for the rest of you--
by Rodzilla
Jun 29th, 1999
10:55:45 PM
Crichton copies himself and reinvents the wheel with other thing
by Uncapie
Jun 29th, 1999
11:44:10 PM
A subtle ax to the head...
by BDDres
Jun 29th, 1999
11:55:01 PM
Film History!
by Kielland
Jun 30th, 1999
10:34:38 AM
Film History!
by Kielland
Jun 30th, 1999
10:36:39 AM
The other 12 just couldn't cut it.
by Wolfpack
Aug 8th, 2006
08:12:07 AM

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.