|
Published on Tuesday, March 16, 1999 - 1:52am |
|
A look at EATERS OF THE DEAD
Here is a film that should have been a walk in the park. We had a great script, John McTiernan, Antonio Banderas (perfectly casted in his role) and Omar Shariff amongst a bunch of bad ass vikings... The film should have been a film to inspire legends of greatness... but instead... sort of the overwhelming word from up on high is.. That the movie still (despite reshoots and a director change) is nowhere near as good as it should have been. Personally I'm hoping that he doesn't know what he's talking about... But we'll see won't we. Till thin... here's another view...
"THIRTEENTH WARRIOR" aka 'EATERS OF THE DEAD" REVIEW BY BONDOSAN
Well, kids, I saw it and you know, I really enjoyed the book, but boy did this
movie blow goats! First of all, the beautiful people at Touchstone were
stringent about any outsiders seeing the film. It was at a foreign buyers
screening and this was their private showing of the movie to the people that
bought the overseas rights. "Gee, can I see the movie to find out if its any
good before I buy it?", "NO, YOU MUST BUY IT FIRST, SIGHT UNSEEN! THEN YOU
"WILL" SEE AND ENJOY IT OR ELSE!" "Mousechwitz" indeed!
Anyway, my buyer friend had a pass and invited me to the 9:00 am screening.
Yes, that's right; A.M. as in morning. They let him in with no problem, but
scrutinized me. Basically, it was ..."YOUR PASS, PLEASE! SOME QUESTIONS,
PLEASE! YOU "WILL" ENJOY THE SHOW!" Uh, right, pal!.
The movie begins with a great CGI shot of Antonio Bandaras and a group of
Vikings that looked like they just went through a hell of a battle, on a tiny
boat with HUGE fifity foot waves crashing around them in the open sea as
thunder and lightning crack in the skies. Impressive opening shot as the
camera pulls back to the credits. Later on this scene is reused and loses its
effect.
Recap of Bandaras as a Arab emissary who gets banished to a northern post for
making goo-goo eyes at another diplomats future bride. He and his aide,
portrayed by Omar Shariff in a very minor, wasted role for his talents, meet
up with some Vikings which he wishes to make friends with. Another ship
arrives with the son of a Viking chief that tells the tale of woe of evil
beasts eating people and destroying their villages. A Viking witch forsees
tweleve good men and one who isn't, sent to destroy this malevolent force.
Guess who goes?
Half an hour into the film, the morning wake-up sequence is pretty gross. A
bowl filled with water is passed around with the Vikings washing up, drinking
and spitting back into it as its passed around. The best part is when one
Viking blows his nose into the bowl. Sauted snot. Yummy. I thought I was going
to blow chunks on the floor. No one ate their popcorn after that scene. Nice
move on the theater concession sales, Touchstone!
The Vikings arrive and the first battle with the "creatures" is pretty cool.
You never get to see what they look like and they're mean as hell. They also
carry off their dead which makes it more mysterious. If they would have kept
that theme all through the film, it would have been great. You finally see
them and they look like actors portraying cannibals. You never really find
out what these guys are. Cannibals, of course but, are they neaderthal's?
American Indians? Their history is never explained except that they worship
bears and live in a cave with their mountainous amount of bones and skulls
from their canibalized enemies. The glow worm fire sequence coming down the
hill is creepy and it has a nice build up for the second fight. Bandaras and
the other actors portraying Vikings are good, but I feel as though I've seen
all this before. Plus, you never really have time to care for any of the
characters.
John McTiernen does a so-so job with directing. Pretty much, by-the-book, he
could have phoned this one in. The script has swiss chese holes in the story.
This movie has been on the shelf for a year and several editors tried to fix
it. Rumor has is that this is going straight to cable. Another was based for
an August '99 release. "Eaters of the Dead" was a much better title. They
should have stayed with it. Save your dough, read the book.
BONDOSAN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reader Talkback
I saw this last year. Man it
was mediocre! by John McLame | Mar 16th, 1999 01:30:14 AM | Michael Crichton by Harris | Mar 16th, 1999 07:19:43 AM | Oh nonononono *whimpering
softly* by DaniTo BuRRito | Mar 16th, 1999 08:39:13 AM | Has anyone been having
problems with... by ABking | Mar 16th, 1999 08:46:29 AM | eaters of the dead by blacksilence | Mar 16th, 1999 11:14:55 AM | ravenous by red7ine | Mar 16th, 1999 12:01:09 PM | Michael's new book by Khan | Mar 16th, 1999 01:10:27 PM | I know what they are!!! by mckracken | Mar 16th, 1999 02:05:55 PM | Hey Harry! How about.... by magusreno | Mar 16th, 1999 02:48:16 PM | Touchstone by DaveDe | Mar 16th, 1999 03:17:13 PM | Yeah, Eaters of the Dead-
great title. 12th Warrior-
dumb title! by Uncapie | Mar 16th, 1999 06:04:22 PM | What could have been.. by John Spade | Mar 16th, 1999 06:54:38 PM | My Thoughts on John
McTiernan...Please READ!!! by BNITT | Mar 16th, 1999 09:02:46 PM | Hey Uncapie by Ghost of Versace | Mar 16th, 1999 10:07:55 PM | I agree. And Michael Bay too! by John McLame | Mar 17th, 1999 12:45:37 AM | Ravenous by Joe Buck | Mar 17th, 1999 12:47:59 PM | I guess Jerry Garcia has a lot
of protein in him. by Wolfpack | Jul 13th, 2006 08:18:06 AM |
|
|