|
Published on Wednesday, December 7, 2005 - 11:46pm |
|
How Did THIS FILM IS NOT YET RATED Get An NC-17?!
Hi, everyone. "Moriarty" here with some Rumblings From The Lab...
This sounds awesome. Kirby Dick is one of the most consistently engaging and interesting documentarians working right now, as anyone who saw TWIST OF FAITH this year can attest. Today, I got the following in my inbox:
NEW YORK, NY, December 7, 2005 – IFC, the first and largest network dedicated to independent film, announced today that the IFC Original Documentary, “This Film Is Not Yet Rated,” from Academy Award-nominated director Kirby Dick and producer Eddie Schmidt, will premiere at the 2006 Sundance Film Festival and air on IFC in Fall 2006. The documentary, a breakthrough investigation into the MPAA film ratings system and its profound effect on American culture, is executive produced by IFC’s Alison Palmer Bourke and Evan Shapiro.
On November 30, the ratings board, an anonymous group whose mandate is to classify films for the MPAA from the perspective of “the average American parent,” screened this documentary and gave it an NC-17 rating for “some graphic sexual content.” An NC-17 rating generally limits a film’s avenues of exhibition: many theater chains will not show it, media outlets will not run its advertisements and video store chains will not stock it.
IFC, however, will present the film uncensored and uninterrupted. Alison Palmer Bourke, IFC’s VP of Documentaries and Features states: “Kirby’s film is a natural for IFC. Our 'tv, uncut.' mandate is to give filmmakers a platform for free expression, and we let our viewers decide for themselves what is appropriate and of interest to them."
Kirby Dick agrees, “It is important that this film be seen by as many people as possible, as it deals with an insidious form of censorship resulting from a ratings process that has been kept secret for more than 30 years.”
The documentary asks whether Hollywood movies and independent films are rated equally for comparable content; whether sexual content in gay-themed movies is given harsher ratings penalties than their heterosexual counterparts; whether it makes sense that extreme violence is given an R rating while sexuality is banished to the cutting room floor; whether Hollywood studios receive detailed directions as to how to change an NC-17 film into an R, while independent film producers are left guessing; and finally, whether keeping the raters and the rating process secret leaves the MPAA entirely unaccountable for its decisions.
The MPAA has established itself as the lobbying arm of the American motion picture, home video and television industries in the US since its inception in 1922. On its board of directors are the Chairmen and Presidents of the seven major producers and distributors of motion picture and television programs in the United States - Sony, WB, Paramount, MGM, Fox, Disney and Universal. When Jack Valenti became president of the MPAA in 1966, he created a rating system to replace the old Hays code, first adopted in 1930. Valenti’s voluntary rating system, modified only slightly over the years, has become an icon in American culture, with its letter ratings of G, PG, PG-13, R, and NC-17 (formerly X) used to classify films according to age-based appropriateness.
Until today’s announcement, the subject matter of “This Film Is Not Yet Rated” was kept under wraps by the filmmakers during more than a year of research into the MPAA’s rating practices. Director Kirby Dick (“Twist of Faith,” “Derrida”) interviews filmmakers, critics, attorneys, authors and educators. Ultimately, Dick tries to uncover Hollywood's best kept secret -- the identities of the ratings board members themselves.
Filmmakers who speak candidly in “This Film Is Not Yet Rated” include John Waters (“A Dirty Shame”), Kevin Smith (“Clerks”), Matt Stone (“South Park”), Kimberly Peirce (“Boys Don’t Cry”), Atom Egoyan (“Where the Truth Lies”), Darren Aronofsky (“Requiem for a Dream”), Mary Harron (“American Psycho”), actress Maria Bello (“The Cooler”) and distributor Bingham Ray (co-founder, October Films and former President, United Artists).
When Jack Valenti stepped down in September 2004, Dan Glickman succeeded him as president and CEO. However, Valenti continued to supervise the ratings process until September 2005, when the MPAA announced that it would be splitting its leadership duties between Los Angeles-based president and COO, Bob Pisano, and Glickman, who has been appointed the Washington DC-based CEO and chairman and now oversees the ratings system.
One of the things I’ve noticed is that the ratings board is one of the most reviled and misunderstood things about Hollywood, and the idea of this filmmaker taking on this subject is exciting. I’m not going to be at Sundance this year, but for anyone who is, pleasepleaseplease send us a report about this one. Thanks.

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reader Talkback
The MPAA sucks by Langfhir | Dec 7th, 2005 10:49:53 PM | first? by Led Gopher | Dec 7th, 2005 10:50:44 PM | last by D'Jesus | Dec 7th, 2005 10:51:01 PM | Ahhh...how ironic...or
appropriate...or bad
luck...whatever the by Lenny Nero | Dec 7th, 2005 10:57:18 PM | THIS FILM IS NOT RATED should
be banned immediately by seppukudkurosawa | Dec 7th, 2005 10:58:42 PM | THANK GOD FOR THIS MOVIE by scrivener | Dec 7th, 2005 11:00:10 PM | Slightly off topic, but this
is what I call news!!! by Vim Fuego | Dec 7th, 2005 11:02:06 PM | Saw Jack Valenti on the Daily
Show this week. by ironburl | Dec 7th, 2005 11:14:36 PM | The name is Dick...KIRBY
Dick... by themikejonas | Dec 7th, 2005 11:21:31 PM | Kids under 14 are filthy
mouthed monsters no matter
what you do. by Lenny Nero | Dec 7th, 2005 11:22:06 PM | Maybe Because... by FNORDcinco1 | Dec 7th, 2005 11:24:54 PM | censorship? by HillaryLovesMe | Dec 7th, 2005 11:26:05 PM | In Australia, we have a real
man's "R" rating. by Shan | Dec 7th, 2005 11:54:53 PM | Jesus Mother Fuckin'
CHRIST, This Movie Will ROCK
MY BALLS R by buster00 | Dec 7th, 2005 11:56:24 PM | The worst thing about the
ratings system is that the art
suffers by jrbarker | Dec 7th, 2005 11:59:14 PM | What's this got to do with
man on man oral sex? by rivercb | Dec 8th, 2005 12:23:58 AM | My beef... by BendersShinyAss | Dec 8th, 2005 12:35:51 AM | If nip/tuck can show Christian
doing a fat chick from behind
wit by PVIII | Dec 8th, 2005 12:43:21 AM | "Pirates Of the Carribean 2"
will be rated "ARRRRGGGHHHH!" by Uncapie | Dec 8th, 2005 12:58:55 AM | I don't know about others,
but I'm sure as hell not
goin by Lenny Nero | Dec 8th, 2005 01:17:52 AM | HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! FUCK THE MPAA
UP THIER STUPID ASSES!!! by DOGSOUP | Dec 8th, 2005 01:39:06 AM | ironburl by Poacher | Dec 8th, 2005 02:07:16 AM | I no longer bother with
so-called arthouse movies by Thirteen 13 | Dec 8th, 2005 02:48:18 AM | Thirteen 13, that's
exactly why I like art house
movies. by Lenny Nero | Dec 8th, 2005 03:48:17 AM | Uh, Shan... by Monkey Butler | Dec 8th, 2005 05:58:58 AM | Does that mean that you
actually pay attention to
those "age rat by SalvatoreGravano | Dec 8th, 2005 06:09:04 AM | Theres this group that was on
Showbiz Tonight tuesday, and
they by Shermdawg | Dec 8th, 2005 06:26:06 AM | So Mass Murder,
State-Sanctioned Torture,
Endless War, and Rampa by ZombieSolutions | Dec 8th, 2005 06:34:32 AM | Ratings by kuryakin | Dec 8th, 2005 06:40:16 AM | Incidentally -what does NC
stand for? by kuryakin | Dec 8th, 2005 06:42:36 AM | Lenny Nero.... why the hell
not? by BendersShinyAss | Dec 8th, 2005 06:43:52 AM | I was with you,
BendersShinyAss.... by Citizen Arcane | Dec 8th, 2005 06:59:09 AM | I blame Paul Keating Monkey
Butler. by Shan | Dec 8th, 2005 07:15:57 AM | Theatres are supposed to
enforce both R and NC17
(nobody under 1 by minderbinder | Dec 8th, 2005 08:00:17 AM | NC-17 stands for... by Slim_Goodbody | Dec 8th, 2005 08:12:12 AM | up in the nort we're a lil
more lenient... by havocSchultz | Dec 8th, 2005 08:29:08 AM | NC-17 really means... by delsol | Dec 8th, 2005 08:41:47 AM | The only thing wrong with the
rating system by godoffireinhell | Dec 8th, 2005 08:55:50 AM | I wish there were more higher
rated movies by Mr_Sleep001 | Dec 8th, 2005 09:01:15 AM | The American rating system... by dr_buggerlugs | Dec 8th, 2005 09:15:59 AM | The funny thing about NC-17
rated movies... by fiester | Dec 8th, 2005 09:19:03 AM | Actually let me correct myself
there... by dr_buggerlugs | Dec 8th, 2005 09:22:12 AM | The reason why they accept
violence but not sexual
content by performingmonkey | Dec 8th, 2005 09:29:33 AM | WHINER: THE MOVIE! I wonder if
they cover the fact that the
X-ra by Negative Man | Dec 8th, 2005 09:31:55 AM | Recent article in UK Guardian
wanted *stricter* ratings... by tucson | Dec 8th, 2005 09:33:50 AM | The dilemma with censorship by tile_mcgillus | Dec 8th, 2005 09:47:06 AM | I thought Eyes Wide Shut got
an 'R'?? by dr_buggerlugs | Dec 8th, 2005 09:47:53 AM | dr_buggerlugs, Eyes had an
NC17 rating at the AMC I saw
it at in by Negative Man | Dec 8th, 2005 09:51:52 AM | "the ratings board is one of
the most reviled and
misunderstood by ComputerGuy68 | Dec 8th, 2005 10:06:43 AM | funny story about a PG film... by ComputerGuy68 | Dec 8th, 2005 10:16:55 AM | ComputerGuy68, I too have a
hatred of movie theaters by JAGUART | Dec 8th, 2005 10:29:03 AM | RE: The dilemma with
censorship + Requiem for a
Penguin by Negative Man | Dec 8th, 2005 10:31:19 AM | An example... The Merchant of
Venice... R by scrivener | Dec 8th, 2005 10:33:19 AM | The system is primitive and
archaic.... by Engelhast | Dec 8th, 2005 10:40:51 AM | The MPAA is so
hypo"christ"ical it's
pathetic. It's no by R.C. the "Wise" | Dec 8th, 2005 10:47:57 AM | JAGUART, ushers, oh I remember
them... by ComputerGuy68 | Dec 8th, 2005 10:56:34 AM | Stupid parents... by Engelhast | Dec 8th, 2005 11:01:44 AM | Butt rapeing Vs. Slimey Aliens by BendersShinyAss | Dec 8th, 2005 11:11:51 AM | how about this for nc-17? by Darth Pestilence | Dec 8th, 2005 11:16:07 AM | Fan-Boy, it's called
CYA... by ComputerGuy68 | Dec 8th, 2005 11:31:11 AM | He said ride UP to the
internet by jackinitraw | Dec 8th, 2005 11:33:02 AM | The MPAA is a very good
thing... by Blacket-Man | Dec 8th, 2005 11:41:46 AM | So It's Okay For Teenagers
To Watch Men Brutally Butcher
Eac by ZombieSolutions | Dec 8th, 2005 11:52:21 AM | Phoney__Bone by scrivener | Dec 8th, 2005 11:58:35 AM | Three more examples of rating
injustice... by scrivener | Dec 8th, 2005 12:18:13 PM | I still wonder why the Matrix
films were rated R... by ComputerGuy68 | Dec 8th, 2005 12:27:47 PM | Sexuality vs. Violence by bralli | Dec 8th, 2005 12:32:12 PM | ZombieSolutions by Sir Loin | Dec 8th, 2005 12:36:39 PM | "it is important that as many
people see this movie as
possible" by devil0509 | Dec 8th, 2005 12:43:12 PM | At Least It Beats The Hayes
Code by skoobyx | Dec 8th, 2005 12:54:49 PM | Just a quick question to dwell
on: How sexually repressed are
Ch by Negative Man | Dec 8th, 2005 01:07:38 PM | Christian "control" of media by bralli | Dec 8th, 2005 02:10:08 PM | The rule is.. by UES | Dec 8th, 2005 02:13:07 PM | if you want to piss off the
mpaa and proud-crowd zealots by ectocriminal | Dec 8th, 2005 02:47:40 PM | Anything he would never do
himself (bloody violence by TonyWilson | Dec 8th, 2005 03:15:46 PM | Meatbiscuit by Engelhast | Dec 8th, 2005 03:32:18 PM | So what exactly is wrong with
the ratings board? What huh? by Johnno | Dec 8th, 2005 03:47:37 PM | Is it true by Engelhast | Dec 8th, 2005 03:56:59 PM | Great marketing ploy by the
producers and IFC by Diskatopia | Dec 8th, 2005 04:07:45 PM | What the fuck is that Rambo
doll? by Groggy | Dec 8th, 2005 05:21:22 PM | meatbiscuit by ectocriminal | Dec 8th, 2005 05:40:18 PM | Had a chance to meet Kirby
Dick.... by Doom II | Dec 8th, 2005 05:55:09 PM | I like the NC-17 rating, but
who uses it? by Doom II | Dec 8th, 2005 06:07:06 PM | Ectocriminal by Zauriel | Dec 8th, 2005 07:05:00 PM | The ratings system is nonsense by MondoGundark | Dec 8th, 2005 08:46:07 PM | zauriel by ectocriminal | Dec 8th, 2005 08:46:15 PM | whoa by rabban | Dec 8th, 2005 10:20:05 PM | I Don't Think MPAA
Censorship Is A "Christian"
Thing... by buster00 | Dec 8th, 2005 10:58:17 PM | buster00 by seppukudkurosawa | Dec 8th, 2005 11:09:24 PM | "Conspiracy Theory" and why
6-year-olds should not watch
"Pulp F by MrCere | Dec 9th, 2005 12:42:44 AM | Pulp Fiction by kuryakin | Dec 9th, 2005 05:32:00 AM | "I'm amazed by how little
Americans know about their own
mov by minderbinder | Dec 9th, 2005 07:02:44 AM | Minderbinder by Papa Lazaru | Dec 9th, 2005 07:59:17 AM | Speaking of Passion of Christ by FlickChick | Dec 9th, 2005 08:30:04 AM | On Passion of the Christ... by scrivener | Dec 9th, 2005 12:21:11 PM | Actually, NC-17 *isn't*
"formerly X." by darthferris | Dec 9th, 2005 01:18:50 PM | scrivener by ectocriminal | Dec 9th, 2005 01:20:00 PM | ectocriminal by scrivener | Dec 9th, 2005 02:51:31 PM | Engelhast by Stubb-a-dubb | Dec 9th, 2005 04:22:58 PM | scriv, i have no personal
agenda here... by ectocriminal | Dec 9th, 2005 04:27:31 PM | In Australia we now have HUGE
UGLY Ratings signs printed
into ev by Lutz | Dec 9th, 2005 06:21:01 PM | Also in Australia Art House
movie crowd is urban
professional... by Lutz | Dec 9th, 2005 06:31:37 PM | There IS a difference between
sexual content and violent
content by Daredevil | Dec 9th, 2005 08:47:04 PM | And all you railing about how
these are "Christians" running
the by Daredevil | Dec 9th, 2005 09:55:16 PM | MrCere by BendersShinyAss | Dec 10th, 2005 12:42:55 AM | Daredevil by BendersShinyAss | Dec 10th, 2005 12:44:22 AM | BendersShinyAss by Daredevil | Dec 10th, 2005 07:08:50 PM | Daredevil by scrivener | Dec 10th, 2005 09:22:19 PM | How Did THIS FILM IS NOT YET
RATED Get An NC-17?! The same
way. by empyreal0 | Dec 11th, 2005 01:17:23 AM | Violence Vs. Sex ratings
disparities. by Hexus | Dec 11th, 2005 11:32:55 AM | Oh! One more thing... by Hexus | Dec 11th, 2005 11:36:05 AM | How about if we put actors in
fake naked body suits and THEN
hav by Lenny Nero | Dec 12th, 2005 02:41:41 AM |
|
|