Ahoy, squirts! Quint here with an early, early look at the upcoming remake of the Michael Caine classic ALFIE, starring Jude Law in the titular role. The below reviewer is a fan of the original and has more than a few bones to pick with this flick and he does it in a spoiler-heavy, long and incredibly detailed way, so those with aspoilerphobia (fear of spoilers) might want to steer clear. For the rest of you, here's Moonshine!
Hey guys,
Moonshine, checking in again. I took in a private
screening of ALFIE on the Paramount lot a couple weeks
ago (with Jude Law, director Charles Shyer, and
Paramount diva Sherry Lansing on hand to see the
audience's reactions), and I thought I'd chip in a
review. Well, actually, let's not call it a review,
let's call it a comparison to the original because I'm
huge fan of the original, and if you're going to
chance a remake then comparisons are inevitable. So
I'm going whole hog. If you don't like spoilers, look
away now.
First off, a few words about the original. Straggling
in at the tail end of the kitchen-sink realism trend
in British filmmaking, the original ALFIE is a
near-perfect snapshot of a specific time and place.
It's more colorful than just about any of its other
kitchen-sink contemporaries, but that's perfectly
appropriate. The movie's generally classed as a bawdy
comedy about a swinging sixties playboy, but in
reality it's a grim portrait of a self-absorbed
womanizer who happens to be witty. That Alfie is
still often described as a loveable guy is a testament
to the brilliance of Michael Caine's performance. I
mean, Alfie's a total turd. The way he treats women,
his friends, and just about everyone in his life is
abhorrent. Nevermind his oft-quoted tendency to refer
to women as "birds," just try to count how many times
Alfie refers to a woman as "it" and you'll see what a
cad he is. Still, even with his boorish behavior, you
can't help but hope Alfie will find some kind of happy
ending. That he doesn't is what makes the movie
near-perfect in my book.
Getting back to Caine, there's a reason he named his
autobiography "What's It All About," after Alfie's
oft-repeated final line. And there's a reason Mike
Myers tapped Caine to play Austin Powers' father. The
reason for both is Alfie. In spite of what the film
and the role are really about, there's just this
definitive image that the character of Alfie projects.
He's the randy scamp, who can't get enough of women.
He treats them all like shit and still maintains that
loveable air. Alfie's often been imitated, but seldom
equalled. So when I first heard that a remake of
Alfie was on the production slate, I thought, "WHY???"
The director of the project, Charles Shyer, certainly
didn't inspire confidence either. Not that he's a bad
filmmaker, I just associate him with crowd-pleaser
fluff. ALFIE should never be turned into
crowd-pleasing fluff.
So, anyway, given my affection for the original, why
would I even venture out for a screening of this
retread? Well, I was intrigued by the casting. Jude
Law as Alfie, Susan Sarandon taking over the role
played by Shelley Winters in the original, and Marisa
Tomei, Nia Long, Sienna Miller and Jane Krakowski as a
few of Alfie's "birds" seemed like a pretty fine cast
to me. And, at the very least, the casting of Michael
Caine is what made the original ALFIE a great film in
the first place. I mean, sure, you've got Lewis
Gilbert directing, and he'd go on to make a good Sean
Connery 007 flick and a couple really bad Roger Moore
ones, as well as Educating Rita and Shirley Valentine.
But you don't exactly think of ALFIE as a Lewis
Gilbert film. It's a Michael Caine movie. So the
cast they put together for this remake seemed to be a
fairly good start.
On to the movie itself, I'd be extremely generous if I
even said it was okay. A few choice scenes were
excellent and I'll get to those, some of it was
middling, and a lot of it was total crap.
Unlike the original, the remake has been transplanted
from swinging England to modern day New York City. I
didn't have a huge problem with this, though I wish
they would have made New York City more of a lively
character in the film. It seemed from Alfie's opening
monologue that it might be, but in the end it just
felt like a set to me.
Just like the original, Alfie talks to the audience
throughout, narrating the action and confessing his
thoughts. For the original, this was a unique
storytelling device. But by now it's a played-out
cliche, and that's how it came across for this remake.
Funny at first, but still a cliche. Michael Caine's
Alfie drew you into the picture--you were his unseen
confidante. Jude's Alfie felt more like a narrator to
me, practically telling you when and where you were
supposed to laugh, or feel appalled by his behavior,
or feel sad. And even without the narration, there's
a visual device that Shyer uses that I found
overbearing. Throughout the film, billboards are
glimpsed with single words on them, like DESIRE.
They're like insidious chapter titles, pointing you
towards the proper emotion or context you should see
the following scene in, and it grew irritating to me.
By the end of the movie, I half-expected to see a
billboard saying APPLAUSE.
The remake follows the basic structure of the original
ALFIE, but adds small flourishes to make the
situations seem slightly unique. Jane Krakowski shows
up in the opening segment as a married woman boffing
Alfie in a car, and just as in the original Alfie
promises the audience that she won't be seen again.
Unlike the original film, this time the promise proves
to be true, and in my opinion that was a huge mistake
on the part of the filmmakers. In the original, Alfie
treats this character (named Siddie) as the most
disposable "bird" we'll see in the film. He tells us
we won't see her again, but indeed she does turn up
near the end, at Alfie's lowest moment, and she
rejects him. Her rejection is the final humiliation
that leads him into his closing soliloquy. I suppose
one could argue that Alfie suffers plenty of other
humiliations, so why just heap on another, but in the
original this character served as a perfect bookend.
Those who won't have seen the original won't miss that
closing bookend, but those who have seen it probably
will. I certainly did. There are way too many
changes/tweaks like this throughout the film.
The most significant relationship in the original
Alfie's life was Julia Foster's Gilda, a shy girl so
in love with Alfie that she tries to overlook his
callousness towards her. She bears Alfie a son, but
soon realizes that Alfie will never change and decides
to marry a sweet male friend named Humphrey, who's
just as in love with her as she is with Alfie. In
this new Alfie, Marisa Tomei plays the Gilda
equivalent, but true to the times she's a much
stronger woman. Instead of getting pregnant by Alfie,
she's already got a son who Alfie likes even more than
her. And almost immediately, she dismisses Alfie from
her romantic life after she busts him cheating on her.
In the earliest scenes, Marisa has an equivalent
lovesick Humphrey-type circling around her to pluck
her away from Alfie, but after the early scenes this
guy just vanishes, and Marisa turns up near the end
with some other strange guy we've never met. And it's
just wrong! In the original, Julia settled on
Humphrey, and ended up finding a simple happiness that
Alfie ended up admiring from afar. In this new one,
Marisa moves on to Stud #2. Did she settle? Will she
be happy with him? Who knows? All we know is that
Alfie didn't get her, which left me wanting to shout
at the screen, "So, what?" Alfie didn't the girl.
Who cares? Alfie doesn't get lots of girls. But this
one was important, and in this new version, she
doesn't feel as important as she should.
Next up, we're introduced to Alfie's best friend, Omar
Epps, who works with Alfie as a chauffeur, and who's
working with him to put together a business plan to
buy the business from their boss, Gedde Wattanabe
(playing Mr. Wing, a fuming, frantic, middle-aged
version of Long Duk Dong). All of this stuff is new,
and it's absolutely unnecessary. Wattanabe's
character is pointless, except to add some humor in
the form of a virtually incomprehensible foreigner
(think "Father of the Bride's" character Franck,
played by Martin Short). In a stupid subplot, Mr.
Wing treats his wife like shit and she ultimately
leaves him. Since this is the "nice" remake of Alfie,
Alfie encourages Mr. Wing to write poetry to woo Mrs.
Wing back, but this is the last we see or hear of Mr.
Wing, let alone whether or not he wins her back.
Back to Omar's character. He's a complete rewrite of
a character from the original. In that film, Alfie
gets a health scare, which turns out to be spots on
his lung. Alfie has a health scare in this one too (a
lump on his cock, I'm not kidding!), but it's a
completely unrelated plot and is quickly abandoned.
Anyway, while in the hospital for treatment of his
lung ailment, the original Alfie befriends Harry
Clamacraft, the man in the bed next to him. To the
camera, Alfie makes fun of the pathetically
co-dependent life Harry shares with his wife, Lily.
Even after Alfie is released from the hospital, he
continues to visit Harry, and Harry eventually
convinces Alfie to take Lily out on an afternoon
excursion to boost her spirits. And naturally Alfie
ends up fucking her. The big punctuation mark to this
storyline is that Alfie gets her pregnant, and the
abortion segment that follows is utterly horrific and
depressing, and easily the most outstanding dramatic
material in the original film. Denholm Elliott has
only about 5 minutes onscreen, but his presence and
his performance are absolutely chilling.
In Alfie 2004, Omar's bartender girlfriend, Nia Long,
has just broken up with him. Alfie hangs out with her
one late night, ostensibly to talk up Omar and boost
his chances for a reunion, but instead he and Nia end
up fucking on a pool table (in an admittedly hot
scene). The next morning, Omar's happy because Nia
wants him back. Soon after, Nia tells Alfie that
she's pregnant, and she asks Alfie to take her to an
abortion clinic, but makes him wait outside.
Afterwards, she and Omar move to upstate New York,
leaving only a letter of explanation behind for Alfie.
So much for the business plan, eh? Yet another plot
thread that's introduced and promptly forgotten.
Since I've spoiled everything else, might as well tell
you that we later find out that Nia kept the baby
because she thought there was a possibility it might
be Omar's. But it was Alfie's, and Omar ends up with
the high morals points because he's willing to stick
with his girl and a kid that isn't his own. And in an
uncomfortable meeting with Alfie, Omar basically tells
Alfie how much he hurts everyone, even though he
doesn't intend to hurt anybody. Awww! Cue the sappy
music.
What's wrong about this entire storyline is that
Omar's character is now Alfie's best friend. In the
original film, Alfie was only a casual friend of the
character of Harry, and the impact of his betrayal is
seen only from what it does to Alfie and Lily. The
detachment Alfie shows towards Harry is exactly the
same kind of detachment he exhibits in all aspects of
his life. He has no emotional investment in anyone,
and that's what's heartbreaking about his character.
But in Alfie 2004, Alfie's just a sweetheart who can't
help himself from hurting those around him.
The original film's Alfie picks up a girl named Annie
(played by Jane Asher) simply for the sport of
stealing her from another male acquaintance. When
Annie gets a little too clingy and cozy living with
Alfie, he kicks her out. End of Annie. In this
version, Annie's equivalent is played by Sienna
Miller. Alfie picks her up because it's Christmas
Eve, which he calls the loneliest night of the year.
Though not the same circumstances, I was pleased that
Alfie picked up Sienna just for the challenge of
trying to score. Sienna's section of the film is
easily some of the best material this remake has to
offer. She's a wild, apparently bipolar drunk, and at
first she and Alfie get along fine, having fun being
the party-mad youngsters they want to pretend they
are. But Sienna quickly goes off her meds, and starts
getting creepily domestic, starting to paint a wall in
Alfie's apartment and cooking him dinner when he
doesn't want it. As in the original, when the
clinginess kicks in, Alfie gives her the boot. And
for once, this film finally stays true in spirit to a
segment from the original.
The last prominent "bird" from the original was
Shelley Winters' Ruby, a lusty older woman who is
Alfie's female equal. Alfie boldly flirts with her in
public while she's with a wealthier, older man, who
Alfie initially mistakes for her husband. We soon
find that Ruby is just like Alfie, a woman who moves
from man to man either for the fun of it or for his
money, or both. In probably this film's most perfect
casting work, Susan Sarandon takes on this role and
she's sensational. The circumstances are somewhat
changed. Whereas Shelley's character wasn't much more
than a kept woman who liked to fuck around, Susan's
character is an independently wealthy businesswoman
who likes to fuck around. She's this Alfie's equal
and quite a lot more. In fact, despite Alfie's
obliviousness to it, she's very much his superior. In
a nod to one of the abandoned plot threads, she plays
advisor to Alfie on his quest to buy the limousine
business by offering to read his business plan. In
their one seduction scene, Susan cooks up a batch of
contraband absinthe (which she snuck into the U.S. in
Listerine bottles), and it's a trippy, sexy scene.
I'm as gay as they come, guys, and I wanted to fuck
Susan more than I did Jude, so that oughta tell you
something. Anyway, the only thing that goes wrong
with this portion of the film is how the final moments
between Susan and Alfie are played. In the original,
Alfie, having gone into a spiral of self doubt after
witnessing Lila's horrific abortion, kicking poor
Annie out into the rain, and stumbling across the
wedding of Gilda and Humphrey and seeing Humphrey
happily playing daddy to Alfie's son, Alfie runs to
Ruby, the only woman like him, the only woman who
understands his life. And what does he find? Ruby
fucking another stud. And when he belligerently
pushes Ruby to explain what this new buck has that he
doesn't have, Ruby tells Alfie bluntly, "He's younger
than you." It's the perfect comeuppance, and when
Alfie realizes what's just happened to him, you
finally hope that maybe he's figured it out and can
move on to being a better human being. In the new
version, pretty much the set-up is the same. Guilted
into feeling bad by Omar, flashing back to Marisa and
her new boyfriend, feeling bad about kicking Sienna
out at her lowest, Alfie runs to Susan and finds the
same situation as with Ruby. Only with Susan, when
Alfie forces her to admit that her new stud is
younger, Susan clearly feels bad telling Alfie as
much. And it screws up the ending, as far as I'm
concerned.
The cruel way Ruby treats Alfie sends him fleeing. In
not so many words, she basically tells him that he's
pathetic and disposable, and he flees only to
encounter Siddie, the girl we saw at the beginning.
The girl he promised us we wouldn't see again. He
tries to pick her up and she rejects him. The
disposable "bird" disposes of Alfie, and then he
finally takes stock of his life and gives us his
famous line, "What's it all about?"
In this new version, Susan practically apologizes with
Alfie in telling him that her other stud is younger.
Alfie flees, takes stock of his life, and trots out
the "What's it all about?" line. Only, what's
changed? Nothing. He feels bad about stuff, but so
what? He needs to feel humiliated and thrown out.
This Alfie doesn't. And his closing "What's it all
about?" question made me want to shout, "It's about 90
minutes of my life that I just wasted."
Extra trivia fact: there were no closing credits or
closing song. I heard one Paramount exec saying that
another early screening had the original Alfie theme
song sung by Cher on the closing credits and the
audience laughed. So they cut it out. They're
apparently trying to get Norah Jones to do this
version's theme. We'll see if they do.
|